Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
1/3/2009 6:02:27 PM EDT
Interested in the Spike's setup.

I want to keep my syandard configuration, nothing fancy.

What am i better off with, the Conversion or the whole upper.
Availabilty is big issue for me, Im not really wanting to wait a long time for delivery, so Im leaning towards the Conversion.

Any comments, pointers, advice, opinions???

Maybe something better than the Spike's? Everything I have had from thm has been A++ and the conversion looks like a very solid platform
1/3/2009 6:12:43 PM EDT
[#1]
I've got 2 Spikes uppers, 5.5" and 11.5" Lothar Walther. Both run great. The LW is extremely accurate. I will also get a conversion kit from them. I like options. I would say the dedicated .22 upper is more accurate. My LW shoots 1/2" at 50 yards. The kit gives you the option of switching back to 5.56. Depends on what you are looking for. I originally had a Ciener and that lead me to the Spikes .22 upper. I wanted to duplicate my work rifle.
1/3/2009 6:31:39 PM EDT
[#2]
While a little pricey, I'd go for the complete upper. Though the conversions are not complicated, I'd rather push/pull a couple of pins and be done with it. When things cool down, I'll be looking at the Spikes upper as well.
1/3/2009 7:00:14 PM EDT
[#3]
i have had good experience with the spikes complete upper and black dog machine mags.
-the nickel plating makes it easy to clean
-firing 350-400 rounds at a time, it does not jam.
-way more accurate than my ciener conversion
-no gas port to foul out
-does not shoot gas in your face

go with a dedicated upper, you'll be better off in the long run.
1/3/2009 7:55:16 PM EDT
[#4]
I have run several Ceiners for years.
Someday if I get ahead some I would like a spikes or a Compass Lake service rifle upper but I enjoy the flexability of the Ceiner. I can use it in all my AR stuff depending on what I feel like shooting that day . Carbine,20",Varmint,Irons,red dot,scope––Whatever.
1/3/2009 8:41:15 PM EDT
[#5]
I'm happy with my Ceiner kit. It'll shoot 1'' groups at 25 yards, which is nothing fantastic, but more than enough to practice offhand/movement/etc. at close range.

The thing I like the most is that I can just drop it into any one of my AR's. To clone an upper for a dedicated .22LR build, that means a second identical optic. For most of us, that means you're .22LR upper is now well over a grand. That's just for one upper for one gun, I use my Ceiner in three different AR's.

So if you're looking for cheap practice with your specific firearms, go with the Ceiner. If you want a .22LR AR-15 (not a clone of any specific weapon for training purposes), than go with the dedicated upper, it'll be more accurate.



1/3/2009 8:45:52 PM EDT
[#6]
The reason I wanted a .22 was the ability to practice drills and shoot more for less $$$$.  I can get 550 rounds of .22 from Wal-Mart for about $125 cheaper than I could get 500 rounds of Wolf for.  The rimfire shoots cleaner, too .  The price of XM193 right now means that 90% of the time I'm shooting .22 through my gun and saving the good stuff for 3-gun matches and more serious practice.

I want to practice with what I run.  If I put the same cash into a similarly equipped dedicated .22 upper as I have into the upper I shoot then I could afford to buy about 5,000 rounds of XM193 and just practice with that.  The roughly $200 I spent on the conversion kit allows me to practice cheaply with the same gun I use.  The kit has already paid for itself.

My POA/POI is different (about 1-2" lower at 25 yds from my 5.56 zero) with the .22, but once you figure that out then the kits are good enough for .gov work inside of 50 yards.
AR Sponsor