Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
9/21/2006 10:02:55 PM EDT
Was just thinking about this. What is the difference between M4gery and Midlenght? And what is the pros and cons for each system? Thanks.
9/21/2006 10:07:20 PM EDT
[#1]
An M4gery (I hate that term) has a short carbine gas system which is "harsh" or more violent than a rifle gas system.  A midlength is exactly that, the gas system is halfway between carbine and rifle gas systems.  It is less harsh or violent than a carbine gas system while still remaining compact.


TS
9/21/2006 10:27:16 PM EDT
[#2]
Also, the mforgery has the cutout on the barrel for the 203 grenade launcher, which some have said is a weak point in the barrel for obvious reasons.  The hand guard on the midlength is longer as well giving more space on rails and what not.  The midlength has a diffrent balance than a carbine length.  I really like the mid length, but it's all personal preference.
9/21/2006 10:28:38 PM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:
An M4gery (I hate that term) has a short carbine gas system which is "harsh" or more violent than a rifle gas system.  A midlength is exactly that, the gas system is halfway between carbine and rifle gas systems.  It is less harsh or violent than a carbine gas system while still remaining compact.


TS


that about covers it; CAR vs middy system

try a search
9/22/2006 2:03:19 AM EDT
[#4]
the mid-length was reportedly created to offer a better (longer) site radius than the carbine (distance between front and rear sights)

I suppose the operational benefits listed above help too, not to mention the ability to add a bayonet to a  16" AR

9/22/2006 6:19:27 AM EDT
[#5]
Can't figure out the correct search terms to get anything to come up.

So what are the pros and cons of each system? Is the M4 better at anything? So far it seems like the middy is better at everything.
9/22/2006 6:36:11 AM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:
Can't figure out the correct search terms to get anything to come up.

So what are the pros and cons of each system? Is the M4 better at anything? So far it seems like the middy is better at everything.


In a 16 inch bbl, the carbine length gas system gets its pants beat off by the midlength.
9/22/2006 6:46:40 AM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
Can't figure out the correct search terms to get anything to come up.

So what are the pros and cons of each system? Is the M4 better at anything? So far it seems like the middy is better at everything.


The M4 is better at looking "cool" and more like the military M4 model - for the people who care about that.

But for a 16" system, I think the midlength has a number of small advatages.  I'd never take a 16" carbine/M4 over a 16" midlength, if given the choice.

However - there's nothing WRONG with a 16" carbine/M4 configuration.  It is a great rifle, and very versatile.  The midlength is just SLIGHTLY better on a few dimensions - but for practical purposes it makes little difference.



9/22/2006 7:12:44 AM EDT
[#8]
I like them both and have one of each!
9/22/2006 7:40:04 AM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
Also, the mforgery has the cutout on the barrel for the 203 grenade launcher, which some have said is a weak point in the barrel for obvious reasons.


And the same morons will go have their barrels turned down to reduce weight.

Most of the goofballs who would make that assertion are probably just worried about accidentally sitting their fat commantard asses on thier rifles.
9/22/2006 7:46:10 AM EDT
[#10]
i have both
really not much different in the way they shoot/recoil.

i have the Rock River middy, and its way too front heavy-not very balanced
probably would like it more if it had a lighter barrel.
9/22/2006 11:27:35 AM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:
i have both
really not much different in the way they shoot/recoil.

i have the Rock River middy, and its way too front heavy-not very balanced
probably would like it more if it had a lighter barrel.


You can get your barrel reprofiled to a lighter weight.
I have a SDI middy bbl with the .gov profile - lighter than a gov profile carbine bbl.
9/22/2006 3:38:33 PM EDT
[#12]
So what are the positives about the M4? None?
9/22/2006 4:25:22 PM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:

Quoted:
i have the Rock River middy, and its way too front heavy-not very balanced
probably would like it more if it had a lighter barrel.


You can get your barrel reprofiled to a lighter weight.


I know a guy that does that kind of work.
9/22/2006 4:30:03 PM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:
A midlength is exactly that, the gas system is halfway between carbine and rifle gas systems.  It is less harsh or violent than a carbine gas system while still remaining compact.


Sorry for being anal about details and correcting you, but the mid-length is NOT EXACTLY half way between carbine and rifle.
Mid-Length IS exactly 2" longer than carbine.
Rifle length is 5 3/8" longer.
Mid-length is therefore 11/16" shorter than EXACTLY half-way between them.

Yes, I know I'm a smartass.

Here are my published drawings of all the gas systems side-by-side: Gas Systems
9/22/2006 5:54:16 PM EDT
[#15]
Randall, no problem with you being a smartass, because I am a lot of the time.


TS
9/22/2006 8:18:06 PM EDT
[#16]
So... with Midlength being better then M4s in every way and there is not positive to having an M4, then why do people buy M4s? Just being tacticool doesn't seem like it convince that many people... Still lost and confused
9/22/2006 11:06:56 PM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:
So... with Midlength being better then M4s in every way and there is not positive to having an M4, then why do people buy M4s? Just being tacticool doesn't seem like it convince that many people... Still lost and confused


14.5" barrels are M4 profile, so a shorter barrel is the main advantage if that's what you want. The carbine gas system has been around for a while, so there are a lot more companies that make 16" M4s.

Personally, I have a M4 barrel because it's 14.5" long (w/ perm attached flash suppressor of course). For a 16" barrel, midlength all the way. The only problem is availability--I can't find a govt. profile midlength anywhere this isn't a lot more expensive than a M4-type.
9/23/2006 12:16:06 AM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:
Sorry for being anal about details and correcting you, but the mid-length is NOT EXACTLY half way between carbine and rifle.
Mid-Length IS exactly 2" longer than rifle carbine.
Rifle length is 5 3/8" longer.
Mid-length is therefore 11/16" shorter than EXACTLY half-way between them.



Yes, I know I'm a smartass.

I know the feeling...

MN

9/23/2006 12:18:23 AM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:
14.5" barrels are M4 profile, so a shorter barrel is the main advantage if that's what you want. The carbine gas system has been around for a while, so there are a lot more companies that make 16" M4s.

Personally, I have a M4 barrel because it's 14.5" long (w/ perm attached flash suppressor of course). For a 16" barrel, midlength all the way. The only problem is availability--I can't find a govt. profile midlength anywhere this isn't a lot more expensive than a M4-type.


In equal quality barrels and features, the profile really does not change the cost to manufacture by a significant amount.
Being able to produce a larger run of barrels will certainly lower the price.

Give a more specific example where M4 barrels are cheaper.
Are you talking about different manufacturers M4 barrel vs mid-length govt?

As an example, look at CMMG.
They offer a mid-length govt profile barrel for $250.
I have them in stock if you need one.
They also offer 14.5" M4 barrels for $250.
Where is the price discrepency here?

Are you possibly comparing DPMS M4 barrels for $200 to Sabre Mid-length govts for $300?
There certainly is a descrepency there, but that's more the DPMS/Sabre descrepency than the 14.5 M4/Mid-length govt descrepency.

The latest-greatest fad is mid-length 14.5" barrels.
I have been cutting down and permanent attaching to make these for a while now.
9/23/2006 3:35:58 AM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:

Quoted:
14.5" barrels are M4 profile, so a shorter barrel is the main advantage if that's what you want. The carbine gas system has been around for a while, so there are a lot more companies that make 16" M4s.

Personally, I have a M4 barrel because it's 14.5" long (w/ perm attached flash suppressor of course). For a 16" barrel, midlength all the way. The only problem is availability--I can't find a govt. profile midlength anywhere this isn't a lot more expensive than a M4-type.


In equal quality barrels and features, the profile really does not change the cost to manufacture by a significant amount.
Being able to produce a larger run of barrels will certainly lower the price.

Give a more specific example where M4 barrels are cheaper.
Are you talking about different manufacturers M4 barrel vs mid-length govt?

As an example, look at CMMG.
They offer a mid-length govt profile barrel for $250.
I have them in stock if you need one.
They also offer 14.5" M4 barrels for $250.
Where is the price discrepency here?

Are you possibly comparing DPMS M4 barrels for $200 to Sabre Mid-length govts for $300?
There certainly is a descrepency there, but that's more the DPMS/Sabre descrepency than the 14.5 M4/Mid-length govt descrepency.

The latest-greatest fad is mid-length 14.5" barrels.
I have been cutting down and permanent attaching to make these for a while now.


Probably so...

In the past, (from the time I heard about mid-lengths to about 3 or 4 years ago) it was significantly easier to purchase a Bushmaster M4 barrel in either length than it was to find a chrome lined mid-length barrel at any price.

Your choices back then were Armalite (who was always out at that time) and Rock River Arms, who only did very small runs of chrome lined, and then were .920 for the full length under the HG.

Now, CMMG and a small but growing number of other barrel manufacturers have begun to cater to various sub-groups of AR lovers.

I have a 14.5" CMMG mid-length, which I wouldn't trade for two M4 barrels... except maybe to sell them and buy two CMMG 14.5" mid-length barrels from Randall.

9/23/2006 3:48:37 AM EDT
[#21]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
i have the Rock River middy, and its way too front heavy-not very balanced
probably would like it more if it had a lighter barrel.


You can get your barrel reprofiled to a lighter weight.


I know a guy that does that kind of work.


I have a RRA Middy and it needs the barrel turned down under the HG.  How much would that cost me?  
9/23/2006 9:19:06 AM EDT
[#22]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
i have the Rock River middy, and its way too front heavy-not very balanced
probably would like it more if it had a lighter barrel.


You can get your barrel reprofiled to a lighter weight.


I know a guy that does that kind of work.


I have a RRA Middy and it needs the barrel turned down under the HG.  How much would that cost me?  


contact ADCO or mr Randall at ar15barrels--i think they can tune em down for ~$50+shipping
9/23/2006 3:20:49 PM EDT
[#23]
The only advantage I can see to an M4 with a 14.5" bbl is that if you already bought the correct ACOG for the M4 then the BDC would be right on, it would be slightly off with a 16" middy. Other than that the middy has it beat hands down.
9/23/2006 3:23:20 PM EDT
[#24]
14.5"  M4

16" SABRE Middy







16"SABRE Middy barrel

14.5" M4 with Phantom.

9/23/2006 9:18:20 PM EDT
[#25]

Quoted:

Quoted:
14.5" barrels are M4 profile, so a shorter barrel is the main advantage if that's what you want. The carbine gas system has been around for a while, so there are a lot more companies that make 16" M4s.

Personally, I have a M4 barrel because it's 14.5" long (w/ perm attached flash suppressor of course). For a 16" barrel, midlength all the way. The only problem is availability--I can't find a govt. profile midlength anywhere this isn't a lot more expensive than a M4-type.


In equal quality barrels and features, the profile really does not change the cost to manufacture by a significant amount.
Being able to produce a larger run of barrels will certainly lower the price.

Give a more specific example where M4 barrels are cheaper.
Are you talking about different manufacturers M4 barrel vs mid-length govt?

As an example, look at CMMG.
They offer a mid-length govt profile barrel for $250.
I have them in stock if you need one.
They also offer 14.5" M4 barrels for $250.
Where is the price discrepency here?

Are you possibly comparing DPMS M4 barrels for $200 to Sabre Mid-length govts for $300?
There certainly is a descrepency there, but that's more the DPMS/Sabre descrepency than the 14.5 M4/Mid-length govt descrepency.

The latest-greatest fad is mid-length 14.5" barrels.
I have been cutting down and permanent attaching to make these for a while now.


Yes, I was comparing $200 RRA and bushy barrels to CMMG barrels and noveske barrels.
9/23/2006 9:29:12 PM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:
Yes, I was comparing $200 RRA and bushy barrels to CMMG barrels and noveske barrels.


It's not fair to compare prices of bushmaster barrels to cmmg barrels.
The cmmg barrels have several features that the bushmaster barrels do not have.
9/23/2006 10:04:09 PM EDT
[#27]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Yes, I was comparing $200 RRA and bushy barrels to CMMG barrels and noveske barrels.


It's not fair to compare prices of bushmaster barrels to cmmg barrels.
The cmmg barrels have several features that the bushmaster barrels do not have.


I realize that. I was simply stating that a lot of the mainstream companies (BM, RRA, Colt, etc.) don't offer govt. profile middy barrels. Yes, some do, but not nearly as many that offer 16" M4 barrels.

Many of the companies that do are higher end companies, hence higher prices.
AR Sponsor
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.