Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
8/12/2013 1:20:58 PM EDT
I've been researching a quad rail to replace the stock handguard on my M4 and I immediately (possibly wrongly so) assumed that free-float was the way to go.  I've read the reasons for free-float over non free-float and, at least at a basic level, I understand the effect of non free-float handguard and changes in tension on the barrel.

My question is:  Money considerations aside, why would anyone ever get a non free-float rail then?  They seem to look the same cosmetically, they seem to function the same, the big difference that I can tell is simply increased accuracy?

Or maybe the benefits of a free-float rail are exaggerated in what I've read and its really not as big a deal as I'm thinking?

Thanks!
8/12/2013 1:29:30 PM EDT
[#1]
Ease of installation/removal is the only thing going for non floating rails, and now even free floating rails can do the same thing. Typically they're lighter, but a little more expensive though.

This day and age there really is no good reason not to free float. Who am I to judge though?
8/13/2013 3:03:09 AM EDT
[#2]
I have gone through the same thought process. I can understand free floating any long range rifle when a person might want to get all the accuracy potential.
Then there is the rifle intended to be used at common combat distances that averages 2 MOA without any modifications.(Average for the AR)
Is there much justification for spending more money for a free float system to make that combat rifle have the potential to shoot more accurately?
I have to ask what would be the point?
8/14/2013 9:27:49 PM EDT
[#3]
I personally have seen the poi difference that can be made from exerting pressure on a non free floated handguard. With the negligible price difference between the two I see no reason why not to. Only my opinion though.
8/15/2013 10:29:09 PM EDT
[#4]
The key word is application.  What do you want to do with this rifle?  For example, a truck gun or brush gun that you'll expect to get dirty or muddy might benefit from having non-FF handguards for easy removal and cleaning.  Regardless of sights or optics, you're limited to hitting what you can see.  If you're running  run of the mil open sights or low or non-magnified optics, the added accuracy potential may not be as noticeable.  For magnified optics and open sights with finer adjustment, free float is definitely the way to go.
8/16/2013 3:23:12 AM EDT
[#5]
For accuracy I bought free float tubes for my builds (16" carbines, 20" HBAR clones and one 24" vARmint rifle).

However, I have an M4 style carbine in 5.45X39 that shoots 2 MOA (at least out to 300 yards) with the standard hand guards when I shoot with a sling from the prone position.  2 MOA is plenty good enough for the intended use.
8/16/2013 7:32:13 PM EDT
[#6]
The main advantage of 5.56 over 7.62X39 is accuracy. Many consider 5.56 to be minimally powerful for a rifle/carbine. If that is true, then shot placement on the target would be critical. Why not free float to maximize the accuracy?
8/17/2013 8:51:55 AM EDT
[#7]
Accuracy aside I just like the no POI change.
8/20/2013 7:31:16 AM EDT
[#8]
For a non-bench, non-competition gun the accuracy isn't THAT much better.  For 99% of shooters there is no difference between FF and non-FF rails.
AR Sponsor