Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
1/17/2013 2:43:25 PM EDT
Has any body used both? I have both and am goinig to sell one or the other. The RRA just feels better and looks better built. What do you guys think?
1/17/2013 2:44:42 PM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
Has any body used both? I have both and am goinig to sell one or the other. The RRA just feels better and looks better built. What do you guys think?


I'd stick with the RRA LPK.  There are a bunch of PSA fanboys on here however.
1/17/2013 3:13:33 PM EDT
[#2]
both are the same in my lowly opinion
1/17/2013 3:18:28 PM EDT
[#3]
If I had to chose between Stag vs PSA....I'd chose Stag EVERYTIME lol....and I have both.

If RRA is anything like Stag then I think its an easy decision.

No matter what anyone tells you, LPK's ARE different.
1/17/2013 3:28:08 PM EDT
[#4]
RRA>PSA

Here's Why:  (From my experience)

RRA uses real roll pins and not the 'pinch' pins (or whatever they are called)
RRA pins are sized properly, PSA's pins seemed to all be hard going in (beyond tight)
RRA's mill spec trigger group seemed to be quite a bit smoother compared to PSA's gritty trigger. I'm thinking it spent a bit more time on the hone.

Things I noticed in my PSA MOE lower build kit, the hammer spring seemed to be less powerful than mill spec counterparts in the RRA, which provides a lighter trigger pull and also has the side effects of possible light strikes. Which I have not seen. I am in no way discouraging using a PSA kit in the future. The kit will build a functioning lower every time, I'd just rather use a RRA.

On a side note, I have recently noticed that CMMG uses real roll pins as well. But the CMMG kit I used seemed like the pins were a tad hard going in and were slightly irregular shaped. But who knows. The rest of the kit was GTG.
AR Sponsor