Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
1/5/2008 10:12:58 PM EDT
It's late and I'm up with a horrible cough so I'm waiting for the cold medicine to kick in.....

So while I was laying in bed waiting I thought of this:

A sub sonic round will generally not cycle a bolt on an AR.  What if I used a buffer that had all the weights removed (a hollow tube with the rubber bumper).  Would that be light enough to cycle the action?  Or maybe perhaps I'd be better off with a shorter buffer spring?  Or maybe a 'shaved' bolt carrier.

Anyone ever tried this?  I guess I could go little by little removing weight from the buffer to see if this would work.

By the way, for those that shoot suppressed and sub sonic what loads do you use?  Factory of do you "roll you own".  

1/5/2008 10:41:13 PM EDT
[#1]
"Subsonic" and .223/5.56 generally don't go well together in automatic firearms.

In the AR-15, the buffer and BCG are too heavy and the spring has too much compression force. I've never tried tuning all these parts together. I'd imagine it could be done with alot of tinkering.

Rolling your own subsonic rounds that will cycle the AR usually includes using a very heavy bullet ( > 75 grain) and a slow burning powder like Trail Boss. There was a company that sold a subsonic .223 that they claimed would cycle semi-autos. IIRC, it was longer, much heavier, and the tips were blunt profiled. Commercial subsonic .223 is very pricey - at least the decent, reliable stuff is.

The ballistic problem with subsonic .223 is that you basically end up with a long .22, albeit with a bit more smack. Slowing down the .223 to just under 1050 and less has some pretty bad effects on drop and energy. I played with this for several months when I first got my can.

They are nice for wowing folks on the range, but that's about it. Removing too much weight from the buffer could result in feeding and chambering problems. IMOH, it just isn't worth it. If you want subsonic, just find some TTI and recharge it manually, or get yourself a Ceiner kit and shoot Remington Subsonic .22LR. Very very fun through a can
1/5/2008 11:29:10 PM EDT
[#2]
On a velocity based cartridge, it is a pointless idea to make 5.56mm subsonic. However with .22lr and 9mm conversion kits, subsonics there are very good with suppressors.
1/6/2008 7:55:51 AM EDT
[#3]
Yes, I realize this would strictly be a "for fun" issue.

Tinkering with guns is sometimes more fun than shooting them.
1/6/2008 4:32:05 PM EDT
[#4]
Why not just shoot cycling subsonic ammo in your regular rifle?
1/6/2008 5:18:36 PM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:
Why not just shoot cycling subsonic ammo in your regular rifle?


Huh?  


Not sure I get that.  Is there a brand of subsonic that cycles the AR?  
1/8/2008 8:09:18 AM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Why not just shoot cycling subsonic ammo in your regular rifle?


Huh?  


Not sure I get that.  Is there a brand of subsonic that cycles the AR?  


Extreme Shock .223 HP/Frangible 100 grain - 975 FPS

It exists, but it is way too expensive for my tastes.
1/8/2008 10:01:21 AM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Why not just shoot cycling subsonic ammo in your regular rifle?


Huh?  


Not sure I get that.  Is there a brand of subsonic that cycles the AR?  


Extreme Shock .223 HP/Frangible 100 grain - 975 FPS

It exists, but it is way too expensive for my tastes.


It may be too expensive but any subsonic ammo is expensive.  An altralight buffer makes the rifle only able to shoot that one ammo... it wont shoot full powered rounds. A Ceiner conversion would be a faster and easier swap than to mess with some proprietary buffer.  If you dont want to us a Ceiner than whtever you do will be expensive.
AR Sponsor