Originally Posted By 03RN:

Idk man, it costs double of what an acog is and weighs 6oz more before adding a mount.

I only bring that up because you quote someone whose talking about affordability.

Originally Posted By HunterKiller86:


Used Razors continuously go for $850ish, right around what used TA31s go for.

Originally Posted By 1saxman:
Had one. Bought a new TA-31. The only Tritium was in the center cross which appears in low light. Sold it years ago - found out I'm better/quicker with a dot sight esp. at CQB distances, and my 100 yard accuracy is good enough.
ACOG features that I didn't like:
>its heavy
>the glass is okay but you can see distortion
>its too expensive. They rip off the government, and there's a law that they can't sell to the public for less than they sell to the government, so you're just enabling them by buying the stuff.
>when sighting in or otherwise adjusting, the reticle sometimes will not change without firing or hitting the scope.

It just doesn't seem like a $1200 sight to me.

Originally Posted By Ossian:


The 1-6 razor reticle subtensions are only accurate when set to the highest magnification with it being a sfp scope.  A red dot is definitely faster than taking the scope down to 1x for short range targets.  

Originally Posted By NewWind:
I like the acss aurora ta-31 a lot, but if I had ONE thing I could ask for is to have all the same features of the acss aurora without the chevron- I'd prefer a cross hair, maybe a dot.