AR Sponsor
Posted: 9/12/2012 6:05:35 PM EDT
|
My cousin bought an upper vise block and it didn't come with an insert to fill the BCG area. Is this right?
I have owned the same block for a long time from Brownells so I figured I would ask. Thank you. |
|
He bought it on eBay....
Mine came with an insert. Here's the model that I own: http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/pid=22385/Product/AR-15-M16-UPPER-RECEIVER-ACTION-BLOCK |
| The clam-shell block will work pretty well to hold the upper without significant risk of damage to the upper beyond what any upper blocks pose. I say that because these tools are still going to put any torque from barrel installation or muzzle device installation on the upper, and this can be a problem. A barrel vise is both simpler and more secure. It may leave smears of aluminum on your barrel, but they come off with a good bronze brush and some solvent, and ALL of the torque is applied to the barrel (the toughest and most resilient part of the system). It is especially important to use a barrel vise when installing or removing muzzle devices because the barrel is supposed to be kind of springy, and it will turn into a torsion bar when you crank on that flash hider - and transmit ALL of your torque somewhere else. You NEED a solidly held barrel when installing the muzzle device or your torque (and maybe timing) will be way off. |
|
Quoted:
The clam-shell block will work pretty well to hold the upper without significant risk of damage to the upper beyond what any upper blocks pose. I say that because these tools are still going to put any torque from barrel installation or muzzle device installation on the upper, and this can be a problem. A barrel vise is both simpler and more secure. It may leave smears of aluminum on your barrel, but they come off with a good bronze brush and some solvent, and ALL of the torque is applied to the barrel (the toughest and most resilient part of the system). It is especially important to use a barrel vise when installing or removing muzzle devices because the barrel is supposed to be kind of springy, and it will turn into a torsion bar when you crank on that flash hider - and transmit ALL of your torque somewhere else. You NEED a solidly held barrel when installing the muzzle device or your torque (and maybe timing) will be way off. Then why did the Colt instructor from the armorers school tell us that the clamshell is the best thing to rebarrel one of these things because it reduces the torque on the locator pin and groove in the upper? Now a muzzle device still needs a barrel vice. |
|
Then why did the Colt instructor from the armorers school tell us that the clamshell is the best thing to rebarrel one of these things because it reduces the torque on the locator pin and groove in the upper? Now a muzzle device still needs a barrel vice.
I can't find the link, but I think it was here that I read about using the barrel clamp to tighten the barrel nut reduces stress on the upper receiver. I was not taught that way in armorer courses either, but apparently that is the best method. I really would like to know the definitive answer, but I know those are hard to come by. So right now, I use the upper vise block and the barrel block together. I have the table to hold both so I just do it that way. Can someone find a link that refers to that information please? |
|
Quoted:
I am not an armorer, but I understand the mechanics of this assembly task. Compared to a bottom mount upper receiver block, a clamshell reduces the torque applied to the index pin and upper index slot. But if you are using a barrel vise, there is almost no torque applied to the pin and slot. This is because by the time you are putting any real torque on the barrel nut, the barrel is already locked up on the upper enough to STOP any movement of the index pin in the slot. This happens at something like ten foot pounds, long before the pin could do annoying to the upper. Not to say anything bad about the armorer instructor, but you don't have to be an engineer to teach a course about mechanics. Having been a technical instructor, and having critiqued a fair number of other instructors (including military weapons training instructors), it doesn't take much to add good information to a course but to do it ineffectively and make things confusing or inaccurate.
Then why did the Colt instructor from the armorers school tell us that the clamshell is the best thing to rebarrel one of these things because it reduces the torque on the locator pin and groove in the upper? Now a muzzle device still needs a barrel vice. Go ahead and use a clamshell, but it is still not superior to a barrel vise for holding the barrel and upper for installing, and especially removing, the barrel nut. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I am not an armorer, but I understand the mechanics of this assembly task. Compared to a bottom mount upper receiver block, a clamshell reduces the torque applied to the index pin and upper index slot. But if you are using a barrel vise, there is almost no torque applied to the pin and slot. This is because by the time you are putting any real torque on the barrel nut, the barrel is already locked up on the upper enough to STOP any movement of the index pin in the slot. This happens at something like ten foot pounds, long before the pin could do annoying to the upper. Not to say anything bad about the armorer instructor, but you don't have to be an engineer to teach a course about mechanics. Having been a technical instructor, and having critiqued a fair number of other instructors (including military weapons training instructors), it doesn't take much to add good information to a course but to do it ineffectively and make things confusing or inaccurate.
Then why did the Colt instructor from the armorers school tell us that the clamshell is the best thing to rebarrel one of these things because it reduces the torque on the locator pin and groove in the upper? Now a muzzle device still needs a barrel vice. Go ahead and use a clamshell, but it is still not superior to a barrel vise for holding the barrel and upper for installing, and especially removing, the barrel nut. This the stance from the Colt instructor. "More locator pins have been damaged due to using barrel vices than can be recorded" I have changed literally thousands of barrels personally on this platform as well as watched other in the unit change thousands more and seen many many barrels screwed up and having to use maximum windage to zero when using the barrel vice but have never seen one utilizing a clamshell. Coincidence? maybe but since it goes in line with what we were taught by Colt, I'll will always stick with this opinion. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I am not an armorer, but I understand the mechanics of this assembly task. Compared to a bottom mount upper receiver block, a clamshell reduces the torque applied to the index pin and upper index slot. But if you are using a barrel vise, there is almost no torque applied to the pin and slot. This is because by the time you are putting any real torque on the barrel nut, the barrel is already locked up on the upper enough to STOP any movement of the index pin in the slot. This happens at something like ten foot pounds, long before the pin could do annoying to the upper. Not to say anything bad about the armorer instructor, but you don't have to be an engineer to teach a course about mechanics. Having been a technical instructor, and having critiqued a fair number of other instructors (including military weapons training instructors), it doesn't take much to add good information to a course but to do it ineffectively and make things confusing or inaccurate.
Then why did the Colt instructor from the armorers school tell us that the clamshell is the best thing to rebarrel one of these things because it reduces the torque on the locator pin and groove in the upper? Now a muzzle device still needs a barrel vice. Go ahead and use a clamshell, but it is still not superior to a barrel vise for holding the barrel and upper for installing, and especially removing, the barrel nut. This the stance from the Colt instructor. "More locator pins have been damaged due to using barrel vices than can be recorded" I have changed literally thousands of barrels personally on this platform as well as watched other in the unit change thousands more and seen many many barrels screwed up and having to use maximum windage to zero when using the barrel vice but have never seen one utilizing a clamshell. Coincidence? maybe but since it goes in line with what we were taught by Colt, I'll will always stick with this opinion. So these are no good for barrel installation on an upper? http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/sid=41189/pid=17094/Product/AR-15-AR-STYLE-308-UPPER-RECEIVER-BLOCK http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/sid=52635/pid=27411/Product/AR-15-M16-UPPER-RECEIVER-VISE-BLOCK# I'm asking cause im looking to build my 1st upper. |
|
Quoted:
My cousin bought an upper vise block and it didn't come with an insert to fill the BCG area. Is this right? I have owned the same block for a long time from Brownells so I figured I would ask. Thank you. If your a mechanic and have various sockets around just find the two with the same outside diameter as the ID of the upper receiver. Place two of them in to help distribute the torque on the upper. I've used this before and makes for a perfect fit. |
AR Sponsor