Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
Yesterday 9:32:03 PM EDT
[Last Edit: USMC88-93][Edited]
I can accomplish the same thing on a large sheet of quarter inch graph paper with a black circle pasted on it correct?  Presuming 1/4 MOA is a quarter of an inch at 25 yards then the graph paper would essentially be the same 1/4 MOA per square (at 25 yards),  just harder to see from any distance. Yeah I know the target below is meters but it serves its purpose for my question.

Plays well with self, and cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
Yesterday 10:05:12 PM EDT
[#1]
Yes, you are correct.
Of course that one explains the various click adjustments of Mil optics on the bottom.
Yesterday 10:11:24 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote History
Originally Posted By TGH456E:
Yes, you are correct.
Of course that one explains the various click adjustments of Mil optics on the bottom.
View Quote
Either way I have to do the math for where I actually want to impact at 25 yards based on the zeroing range I'm looking for such as a 50 yard zero for 5.56 62gr M855 (whatever velocity it is). with 2.6 inch sight height above bore and a 14.5 inch sight radius..... high school math and all that.
Plays well with self, and cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
Today 6:51:23 AM EDT
[Last Edit: flcracker][Edited] [#3]
Originally Posted By USMC88-93:Presuming 1/4 MOA is a quarter of an inch at 25 yards then the graph paper would essentially be the same 1/4 MOA per square (at 25 yards)....
View Quote


Check your math.

1 MOA is slightly more than 1 inch at 100 yd.  1/4 MOA is slightly more than 1/4 of an inch at 100 yards.

1 MOA is slightly more than 1/4 inch at 25 yards.  1/4 MOA is slightly more than 1/16th of an inch at 25 yards (0.06545 inches).

The target that you posted in the OP is clearly marked at one MOA per square.  It is marked with 1/4 inch grid squares and is designed to be shot at 25 yards.  Your idea to use 1/4 inch graph paper will give you the same 1 MOA markings at 25 yards.
Today 8:30:36 AM EDT
[Last Edit: AeroE][Edited] [#5]
Mixing meters and minutes is one of the dumber practices in target shooting.  Especially on scopes with minute dials and mil reticles.

The problem with this target is that it is marked 25 meters with a summary table expressed in minutes; 25 meters is 82 feet, not 75 feet.

If the squares are true 1/4 inch, then it's a 25 yard target despite the title.  If the squares are (1/4)(3.28/3)=0.273 inches, then it's a 25 meter target.

Does that matter?  The answer depends on the shooters expectation of precision and the rifle. A bench rest competitor expescts better, the guy with an off the rack rifle for casual shooting and hunting probably doesn't care and doesn't know the difference, he's looking for the cluster of bullets to strike very close to the point of aim and make one large hole.

One inch at 100 yards is called "the rifleman's minute".  That's close enough for human eyes that can't resolve 0.05 inches at 100 yards. 1 minute at 100 yards is 1.05 inches.

One of the zeroing targets I make:



The color allows me to see .22 caliber bullet holes at 300 yards and has good contrast for aiming.

The layout is in PowerPoint.  The grid is not exact increments, but it's too close to care.
Keep your powder dry, and watch your back trail.
Today 11:20:17 AM EDT
[Last Edit: USMC88-93][Edited] [#6]
Quote History
Originally Posted By AeroE:
Check your math.

Originally Posted By AeroE:

Mixing meters and minutes is one of the dumber practices in target shooting.  Does that matter?  The answer depends on the shooters expectation of precision and the rifle.
View Quote
I'm using MOA , a d yards not meters for purposes of preliminary sight in before later taking it to actual distance. And am using open iron sights on a SBR carbine. So while "my math" is not accurate for purposes of multiple decimal places it gets me well within the ballpark of the accuracy potential of the rifle in this use case.  If I were using optics the decimal places would matter and the rounding up or down would matter a great deal more. Mixing meters and yards and fudging the math (with precision of decimal places precisely used or rounded to nearest) is a fact of life on a lot of fixed distance flat ranges. Target in OP was for purposes of questioning the grid related to an alternative.


I totally agree with you in relation to actual precision rifle shooting and tools capable of that precision.  I should have stated my question fell into the realm of the typical initial sight in on short range using a carbine and "rifleman's minute" or "good enough for Govt work" (where target in OP originated) was the end goal.
Plays well with self, and cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
Today 4:03:08 PM EDT
[#7]
The "mixing" comment is not directed to you, it's aimed at the marketing morons that sell shooting stuff with fucked up labels.



Keep your powder dry, and watch your back trail.
Today 4:10:10 PM EDT
[Last Edit: KYSPIKED][Edited] [#8]
Make your own here - zero for whatever - print it out, done.  Use the advanced tab for customization for velocity, optic height, etc.

Free zero targets
Today 4:24:49 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote History
Originally Posted By AeroE:The "mixing" comment is not directed to you, it's aimed at the marketing morons that sell shooting stuff with fucked up labels.
View Quote
Had not taken it that way.
Plays well with self, and cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
Today 5:46:34 PM EDT
[#10]
I bought a CD ROM from Dillon years ago that is called:  "Click and Shoot".  Has so many targets.  They can be printed on typing/card stock paper that saves money.  Except ink cartridge money.  They have ar15/M16 sight in targets, clowns, squirrels,crows, marmots, etc.  Fun targets.  Very many targets for 22 LR and air rifle.  Like 100 flies on a sheet of paper.   The CD paid for itself very soon using typing paper.
Today 6:18:47 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote History
Originally Posted By AeroE:
Mixing meters and minutes is one of the dumber practices in target shooting.  Especially on scopes with minute dials and mil reticles.

The problem with this target is that it is marked 25 meters with a summary table expressed in minutes; 25 meters is 82 feet, not 75 feet.

If the squares are true 1/4 inch, then it's a 25 yard target despite the title.  If the squares are (1/4)(3.28/3)=0.273 inches, then it's a 25 meter target.

Does that matter?  The answer depends on the shooters expectation of precision and the rifle. A bench rest competitor expescts better, the guy with an off the rack rifle for casual shooting and hunting probably doesn't care and doesn't know the difference, he's looking for the cluster of bullets to strike very close to the point of aim and make one large hole.

One inch at 100 yards is called "the rifleman's minute".  That's close enough for human eyes that can't resolve 0.05 inches at 100 yards. 1 minute at 100 yards is 1.05 inches.

One of the zeroing targets I make:

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/348/36202.JPG

The color allows me to see .22 caliber bullet holes at 300 yards and has good contrast for aiming.

The layout is in PowerPoint.  The grid is not exact increments, but it's too close to care.
View Quote
That's an M4 zeroing target right out of the Army Rifle and Carbine manual TC 3-22x9
It's 25m because that's the US Army pre-zeroing distance and the sight increments are in MOA because that's the amount of movement per click of each type of sight listed

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In

AR Sponsor