[ARCHIVED THREAD] - .

Posted: 8/16/2005 1:47:23 PM EDT

And is it good?? Thanks!

Posted: 8/16/2005 2:06:39 PM EDT

[#1]

Here you go

It's the ACOG.

I have the M-4 version and really like it.

Danny

Posted: 8/16/2005 2:19:00 PM EDT

[#2]

Quoted:
Here you go

It's the ACOG.

I have the M-4 version and really like it.

Danny

Posted: 8/16/2005 6:08:14 PM EDT

[#3]

Wow! you guys are efficient. Thanks!

So they took a ta31f and added a "chalk" outline of a target. . . . .

And is it true that the sniper/headshot version includes an outline of a rag????

Posted: 8/16/2005 6:10:13 PM EDT

[#4]

Quoted:
And is it true that the sniper/headshot version includes an outline of a rag????

I predict that BAC and the BDC reticle will be too complicated for you.

Posted: 8/16/2005 6:13:58 PM EDT

[#5]

Does the M4 version use a drop for a 14.5in barrel? Thanks.

Posted: 8/16/2005 6:37:10 PM EDT

[#6]

Quoted:
Wow! you guys are efficient. Thanks!

So they took a ta31f and added a "chalk" outline of a target. . . . .

And is it true that the sniper/headshot version includes an outline of a rag????

no and no...

Posted: 8/16/2005 6:41:13 PM EDT

[#7]

Sorry for the sarcasm. The questions were serious.

Posted: 8/16/2005 6:50:22 PM EDT

[#8]

Im serious too, the answers are still no, and no. The pic you must have seen of the RCO reticle probably had a outline of a target on it for refference or something, but that target is not in the reticle.

Posted: 8/16/2005 7:51:57 PM EDT

[#9]

Got it. The one I saw was from the Trijcon website, and had a blue outline of a target at what must have been close to 100yd. It looks like it could have been a rangefinding element, added to the chevron reticle. . .

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - .

AR Sponsor

Warning

Confirm Action

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - .

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - .