AR Sponsor
Posted: 3/7/2008 3:20:00 PM EDT
| on this front site there is a threaded hole in the bottom of it is that for a bipod? and if so wouldnt the legs stick out past the barrel, i wanna get a harris bipod the 9-13 in but would i or can i make the legs bend back instead of foward or is that stupid?http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc217/THE-BIG-BOSS78/pop_wm_753910.jpg |
|
Get a railed front hand guard and get the GG&G bipod. As an alternative you can get a short piece of rail, drill and tap your front hand guard and screw it on. Mount it to that. If you're hooked on a Harris you can get a sling swivel and bolt that to the front hand guard. |
and if you want real accuracy DONT USE BIPOD use sand bag wich is hard if you are hunting |
Why is that? Seems like a solid bipod would work just as well. |
Do as I say! Not as I do. I think the GG&G is a lot more rugged than this Harris. I have a sling swivel that attaches to the front rail that holds the Harris. The GG&G clamps right onto the rail. Edited to add this of course is an AR10 but the same shit should go for a 15' |
For all practical purposes, it will. |
Right.. Care to elaborate on that at all? For all practical purposes carrying a bag of sand will be better than a bipod? (Obviously not, just fishing for some reasoning..) |
Well, you actually already elaborated for me or there is some misunderstanding in communication. Either way, the rifle if free floated so stress wise the difference between a bipod and sand bag is arguably nil. Therefore the function of both should be about equal, except the bipod is much more practical. And unless you are shooting benchrest competition, of which bolt actions dominate, then practicality should reign. My $0.10 anyway. |
AR Sponsor