AR Sponsor
Posted: 8/16/2010 1:53:35 PM EDT
|
just replaced commercial buffer tube with a mil-spec buffer tube to put a new stock on one of my RRAs and tightened the shit out of the castle nut.
should I put the punch on this thing or is it good to go? |
|
There seems to be some confusion here. Mil-Spec torque for a castle nut on a carbine receiver extension is 40 INCH pounds plus or minus 2 INCH pounds, not FOOT pounds!
Read more about the correct torque values for the AR-15 here: http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=4&t=315921 |
|
Quoted:
There seems to be some confusion here. Mil-Spec torque for a castle nut on a carbine receiver extension is 40 INCH pounds plus or minus 2 INCH pounds, not FOOT pounds! Read more about the correct torque values for the AR-15 here: http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=4&t=315921 so it's 35-39 ft lbs for a rifle buffer tube but only 30 in. lbs. for a castle nut? that makes no sense. here's anotherthread on it. |
|
Confusing to say the least, here is what Armalite has on their site:
http://www.armalite.com/ItemForm.aspx?item=15207020&Category=93c41860-4ca2-43ee-8ca9-dc09b1a5bf2c |
|
Quoted:
Confusing to say the least, here is what Armalite has on their site: http://www.armalite.com/ItemForm.aspx?item=15207020&Category=93c41860-4ca2-43ee-8ca9-dc09b1a5bf2c Colt says 38-42 ft-lbs. |
|
Quoted:
Anyone have a guide as to how to to this? I never did before. Not sure if I even have the rights tools, or how exactly to go about it. I have 2 lowers that have been total fine with hard use, but I'd like to do it anyway. [Deleted, links to this site are not allowed. -L] I staked my castle nut by using a drill to dimple the receiver end plate, then I used a center punch to have a small amount of material from the receiver end plate displaced into one of the slots in the castle nut. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Confusing to say the least, here is what Armalite has on their site: http://www.armalite.com/ItemForm.aspx?item=15207020&Category=93c41860-4ca2-43ee-8ca9-dc09b1a5bf2c Colt says 38-42 ft-lbs. This I guess the whole inch pounds spec was a mistake. Colt corrected it with the Foot pounds. Inch pounds is barely hand tight, so Foot pounds makes more sense. 40 Foot pounds, + or - 2 pounds is the correct answer. |
AR Sponsor

