deleted > AR Discussions

Posted: 5/16/2007 7:01:49 PM EDT

-

Posted: 5/16/2007 7:18:08 PM EDT

[#1]

So you're saying your SF and you store your weapons dry? Or do you actually shoot them unlubed too?

Posted: 5/16/2007 7:26:27 PM EDT

[#2]

-

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:03:43 PM EDT

[#3]

-

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:06:51 PM EDT

[#4]

Quoted:
sorry if my first post didnt seem like a question but anybody got a guess how long an M4 would last bone dry?

Longer than a person?

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:10:33 PM EDT

[#5]

an unused m4 doesn't have to be lubed, but should be lubed as it is used. that said a rifle used twice a year probly should be lubed twice a year.

no need to worry 'bout defending that missle site, you'll be ash if it's attacked.

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:14:44 PM EDT

[#6]

87 rounds and then it would need cleaning. purfeshunal opinonion.

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:15:12 PM EDT

[#7]

-

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:16:59 PM EDT

[#8]

I wonder if this falls under OPSEC...

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:18:35 PM EDT

[#9]

Quoted:
I wonder if this falls under OPSEC...

Well, if it was someone tha actually had anything to do with missiles or anything else military it might...

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:20:37 PM EDT

[#10]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I wonder if this falls under OPSEC...

Well, if it was someone tha actually had anything to do with missiles or anything else military it might...

I was just thinking that it might not be a good idea to announce that our security sucks.

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:23:52 PM EDT

[#11]

-

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:25:26 PM EDT

[#12]

It would last exactly 1,028 rounds before it malfunctions.

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:33:47 PM EDT

[#13]

Maybe you should get a job at the pentagon.

That way, you can find even bigger national security gaps and publish them on the internet.

You're not even SELLING the info...your GIVING it away.

Thanks.

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:35:53 PM EDT

[#14]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I wonder if this falls under OPSEC...

Well, if it was someone tha actually had anything to do with missiles or anything else military it might...

i am AD military but any info i released is public unclassified info, but yeah i see how a vulnerability could been seen as an OPSEC issue, but im sure the weapon would function enough to function for awhile.... i hope. i dont think anybody could use this info to undermine our security.

MOS?

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:37:00 PM EDT

[#15]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I wonder if this falls under OPSEC...

Well, if it was someone tha actually had anything to do with missiles or anything else military it might...

i am AD military but any info i released is public unclassified info, but yeah i see how a vulnerability could been seen as an OPSEC issue, but im sure the weapon would function enough to function for awhile.... i hope. i dont think anybody could use this info to undermine our security.

That's a good one, you sound like the douchbag on myspace that got some guys killed by "thinking" that the info he posted wouldn't help the rags.

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:38:16 PM EDT

[#16]

There's no way to tell I suppose. Regular weapons maintenance is key. If it has to be beat into the heads of these troopers, then so be it. Piss poor maintenance is what makes rifles choke.

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:42:02 PM EDT

[#17]

MOS?

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:46:21 PM EDT

[#18]

-

Posted: 5/16/2007 8:59:25 PM EDT

[#19]

-

Posted: 5/16/2007 9:27:19 PM EDT

[#20]

Huh!?!

What happened?

Posted: 5/16/2007 9:36:14 PM EDT

[#21]

Sounds like he wanted it DELETED

Posted: 5/16/2007 9:43:18 PM EDT

[#22]

Warning

Confirm Action

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - deleted

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - deleted