Armory Sponsor
Posted: 11/25/2016 8:22:09 AM EDT
|
Nice!
Using 223 as an example, I sometimes see velocity swings of 100fps from summer (100*+) to winter temps. It'll be interesting to see how they run six months from now. Maybe not necessary for everyone, but I think a chronograph is a great tool. It provides hard-number data, which is huge for those of us chasing that 'last little bit' |
|
For me, the most important data during load development is the group size and drop.
I do chronograph everything but it is of secondary importance for me. If I had to give up one or the other, the chrono would go. From my chrono data I calculate mean, standard deviation and extreme spread. Based on that info, I calculate coefficient of variation = standard deviation / mean value. I have always been close with rifle data. Pistol loads, if I want to match handbook data, have to be worked up. |
|
Quoted:
For me, the most important data during load development is the group size and drop. I do chronograph everything but it is of secondary importance for me. If I had to give up one or the other, the chrono would go. From my chrono data I calculate mean, standard deviation and extreme spread. Based on that info, I calculate coefficient of variation = standard deviation / mean value. I have always been close with rifle data. Pistol loads, if I want to match handbook data, have to be worked up. Definitely agree about the group size. In addition to that though since the intended destination of these bullets is ultimately flesh I feel obligated to research their expansion threshold and make sure they will operate as intended and what ranges they will be effective to. Sounds crazy to some but I'll take my 2moa 75gr OTM at 2600 over the same bullet at .2moa and 2100fps. I want it to do what I bought it to do which means MV. I just don't expect much more than 2moa from my rack grade barrels, backpack rest and my shooting ability. I think a better shooter and better barrel could shoot mine a bit better than I do. The best barrel I have is a BCM 14.5" standard CL and that's not exactly match grade. I was very pleased to see my 62 fusion load was very similar MV to 64gr Gold Dot (per Molon), my 75gr T1C OTM was extremely close to .223 TAP FPD 75gr and my 55gr SP load was practically identical to the factory version. I'm using a Lee perfect powder measure, no trickling etc so I'm happy so far. Still a lot to learn but I'm loving reloading. Getting lots of range time in these past 2 years. |
|
Quoted:
Nice! Using 223 as an example, I sometimes see velocity swings of 100fps from summer (100*+) to winter temps. It'll be interesting to see how they run six months from now. Maybe not necessary for everyone, but I think a chronograph is a great tool. It provides hard-number data, which is huge for those of us chasing that 'last little bit' Agreed. These loads were worked up in summer so I know no pressure issues but it will be very interesting what the chrono says. I'm also interested if my 16" CL FN barrel will give different velocity vs a nitride 16". I need to chrono these loads in a 14.5" while it's still cold so I can do a winter vs summer/ 14.5CL vs. 16CL and compare velocity. Either way I consider the AR a 200-300m weapon so these speeds should do very nicely at those ranges all year long. |
Armory Sponsor
