Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
3/7/2012 6:02:39 AM EDT
I recently bought a Daewoo rifle and was looking around on a Daewoo dedicated site looking for co-witnessing red-dot/mount options and found extreme hate for co-witnessing a red-dot with the irons.

Now I'll be the first to admit that the Daewoo's big front sight ring does get in the way a bit but I don't have a isue with a good sight picture at least not to the extent that would lead to such hate.

To be honest it was the first time I've ever heard of anyone calling co-witnessing retarded. Do they have a point I'm missing?
3/7/2012 6:43:05 AM EDT
[#1]
To be honest, I've tried it on multiple guns and find it a hinderence.  I think people got caught up on it when some web "pro" said it was important.  I have since un-co-witnessed the guns I've tested with (2 of them being Daewoo's and a CX-4 Storm).  It's not hate and to each his own.
3/7/2012 6:49:05 AM EDT
[#2]
Never had a problem..But then again I'm not a trend follower
3/7/2012 6:57:55 AM EDT
[#3]
Are these some of the folks that suggest cutting the top of the Woo's front sight tower off?
3/7/2012 8:05:07 AM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
Are these some of the folks that suggest cutting the top of the Woo's front sight tower off?


Can't say.  

That said If one had a extra tower (if the mod went south) it would be a intresting mod. At least you would not see that annoying "tit" at 6-o'clock when you try to scope it low enough for a decent cheek weld.

3/7/2012 8:28:39 AM EDT
[#5]
I don't see it important or valuable in any way.

3/7/2012 9:07:24 AM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
I don't see it important or valuable in any way.


I prefer it (co-witnessing) as everything is on the same level and a weapon so equipped comes-up more natural to me and I don't have to "hunt" for a sight picture.

Otherwise you end-up in a extreme head-up postion like you did with the old A1 or A2 carry handle mounts. Add-ons like cheek pieces take care of that but I never cared for them.

That said I see it as a different strokes type of thing more than anything else. Even if a sight does not co-witness if it's mounted in a QD mount it can be removed if a issue comes-up and the irons used.

3/7/2012 1:00:21 PM EDT
[#7]
Not really an option on the Woo...but on an AR I dislike fixed sights (front and rear).  To me BUIS are just that...back up's.  99.9% of the time they'll spend their life folded away on the rifle.  I don't get the lust for co-witnessing irons and a red dot.  It's just too cluttered for me, but like someone else said...it's all personal preference.

CMS
3/7/2012 2:47:13 PM EDT
[#8]
All of my carbines whether AR or XCR had absolute co-witness BUIS with my optics until I mounted TLR's one the top rail of each one of them.  Now I have to use a lower 1/3 co-witness so my BUIS and optics look "over" the top of my lights.



That's what works for me,

MadDog
3/8/2012 4:37:43 AM EDT
[#9]
I see the need for professional soldiers and LEO's.


However, I find it curious that one of the main reasons stated for doing it is to provide a rapid transition (without removing the optic) in case the red dot fails.

Then elsewhere you have people showing off their $250+ quick detachable mount for the optic that has a 10,000 hour battery life and has never failed.

3/8/2012 5:59:18 AM EDT
[#10]
Quoted:
I see the need for professional soldiers and LEO's.


However, I find it curious that one of the main reasons stated for doing it is to provide a rapid transition (without removing the optic) in case the red dot fails.

Then elsewhere you have people showing off their $250+ quick detachable mount for the optic that has a 10,000 hour battery life and has never failed.



To me the entire point of a red dot is fast target acquisition and follow up shots on a single sight plane.  Why add sights into the mix by co-witnessing...no matter if you're a Soldier, LEO, or civilian?
3/8/2012 8:28:40 AM EDT
[#11]
I hate co witnessing.

Armory Sponsor