Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
2/26/2015 10:28:21 PM EDT
Is there any reason to believe that this m16A2, advertised on Gunbroker as having the original upper, is not the real thing? See http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewBidHistory.aspx?Item=467660049

And here is an archived description of how to identify a real Commando:  http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=6&f=23&t=246317

Thanks.
2/26/2015 11:02:34 PM EDT
[#1]
Well, I could cut and paste what I said in the archived thread ... not much has changed.

The photos in the auction look correct. But I sure wouldn't buy something I had not personally inspected for $30k or thereabouts. Your Mileage May Vary.
2/27/2015 12:29:49 AM EDT
[#2]
Arent the commado rifles supposed to be labeled auto not burst?

2/27/2015 11:53:52 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote History
Quoted:
Arent the commado rifles supposed to be labeled auto not burst?

View Quote


+1

Also, on the form, is the model suppose be : M16a2 commando or just M16A2, what about length?
2/27/2015 8:54:46 PM EDT
[#4]
The holes on the castle nut for the spanner wrench appear slightly marred and it looks like the receiver endplate is not staked to the castle nut. Even if it is, there is not paint over the staking. These findings suggest it was not a factory carbine lower. Also, the presence of a bayonet lug and apparent lack of a slight flange at the rear of the muzzle where the threads stop make me think the barrel was potentially a cut-down. A factory Commando should not have a bayonet lug. The photos are not very high resolution, so I could be wrong on these points.
Armory Sponsor