Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
10/22/2008 7:35:50 PM EDT
I have an older Mesa shellholder that I feel is a much improved product over the other available options. It is not, however, without its faults. The mounting screws MUST be loc-tited into the standoffs, and they must be checked periodically. If not, they can get loose, and they can break off. Been ther, done that. That little 4-40 screw in the front on an 870 cannot take much recoil if its not tight.

After settling that, the other issue I have seen is the lack of sustained shell holding ability. The santoprene tueb that provides the tension on the shells takes a set pretty quickly, and when it does, the shells like to fall out is held as they should be, base down. You can rotate the tube a few times, but thats really chasing the symptoms, not attacking the cause.

I went down to my local podunk parts tore with a mission. I tried a few varieties of tubng. I finally settled on 1/4 0.62 wall Poly-Vinyl tubing, such as used in pneumatic lines. This stuff is pretty rigid. Make sure its the off-white stuff, not the clear, soft line.


After replacing the ultra soft santoprene with the Poly-Vinyl, I went to the range. I ran a couple hundred rounds of buck and slug, and two boxes of bird shot, and the shellholder holds the shells tighter than it ever did with the santoprene. It does take a bit more effort to remove the shells than it did, but thats a good thing, in my opinion. Best part, the stuff is about fifteen cents a foot.
10/23/2008 2:37:57 PM EDT
[#1]
NICE, I'll have to look for some of that stuff.  Thanks.
10/24/2008 1:38:25 AM EDT
[#2]

Quoted:
The santoprene tueb that provides the tension on the shells takes a set pretty quickly, and when it does, the shells like to fall out is held as they should be, base down.


I ran into the same problem with mine.I cut the ends off a few plastic Q-tips and slid them into the tube.Made the tube more rigid.Problem solved.
10/24/2008 12:02:33 PM EDT
[#3]
I just did the q-tip trick.  When I pulled the tube out there were some pretty deep flat spots on it, so I also rotated it when I put it back in.  Much better now.
10/24/2008 2:20:05 PM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:

Quoted:
The santoprene tueb that provides the tension on the shells takes a set pretty quickly, and when it does, the shells like to fall out is held as they should be, base down.


I ran into the same problem with mine.I cut the ends off a few plastic Q-tips and slid them into the tube.Made the tube more rigid.Problem solved.

That's actually pretty close to my fix.  I was using hard nylon tubing inside the soft Mesa piece.
10/25/2008 1:26:02 PM EDT
[#5]
I got a tac star looks like crap though :(
10/26/2008 1:02:10 PM EDT
[#6]
Tacstars work fine at about 1/2 the cost and without modification.
10/26/2008 4:17:32 PM EDT
[#7]


Quoted:

Tacstars work fine at about 1/2 the cost and without modification.


Yup!!



Rob

10/26/2008 9:08:17 PM EDT
[#8]
TacStars do work fine for the most part. They do wear out, however. My TacStar ceased holding shells after five years, and theres not much you can do about it. I also dislike the fact they cover the serial number, which is a pretty vital thing in the Law Enforcement world.



Yes, the TacStar is a viable product, but I feel the Mesa is simply another, better option.
10/27/2008 5:07:19 PM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
TacStars do work fine for the most part. They do wear out, however. My TacStar ceased holding shells after five years, and theres not much you can do about it. I also dislike the fact they cover the serial number, which is a pretty vital thing in the Law Enforcement world.

Yes, the TacStar is a viable product, but I feel the Mesa is simply another, better option.


I agree.The TacStar I had worked fine for awhile but had to be replaced.The Mesa is better made and the rubber tube can always be replaced.
Armory Sponsor