Armory Sponsor
Posted: 7/9/2026 10:40:55 PM EDT
|
Originally Posted By backbencher: So it'll be the same length as original, but heavier, suppressed, w/ a supersonic cartridge that is going slower than originally? Yep. And I don't care. I'm not building it to shoot a mile. I'm not not building it to shoot 500 yards. I'm building it as a modern update of Jeff Cooper's Scout rifle concept. I love my 12.5" AR15 SBR; I've never missed the 300-ish FPS in any IRL measurable way. Weight: Under 6.6 pounds (unloaded) or 7.5 pounds with optics. Length: Under 1 meter (approx. 39.4 inches). Optics: A forward-mounted, low-power scope allowing the shooter to keep both eyes open for fast target acquisition, supplemented by backup iron sights. Max effective range of Cooper's Scout concept was 300-400 yards, with enough power to drop a 450lb animal. Now, my intended use for the rifle doesn't include the need to drop a 450lb animal....maybe 300 at most. So, a 5.56 is a perfect caliber for my most probable use case. If I like the 5.56 too much, I'll build the same thing in 308 for my old AAC 762SD suppressor. |
|
Originally Posted By AT-ST83: Yep. And I don't care. I'm not building it to shoot a mile. I'm not not building it to shoot 500 yards. I'm building it as a modern update of Jeff Cooper's Scout rifle concept. I love my 12.5" AR15 SBR; I've never missed the 300-ish FPS in any IRL measurable way. Weight: Under 6.6 pounds (unloaded) or 7.5 pounds with optics. Length: Under 1 meter (approx. 39.4 inches). Optics: A forward-mounted, low-power scope allowing the shooter to keep both eyes open for fast target acquisition, supplemented by backup iron sights. Max effective range of Cooper's Scout concept was 300-400 yards, with enough power to drop a 450lb animal. Now, my intended use for the rifle doesn't include the need to drop a 450lb animal....maybe 300 at most. So, a 5.56 is a perfect caliber for my most probable use case. If I like the 5.56 too much, I'll build the same thing in 308 for my old AAC 762SD suppressor. Originally Posted By AT-ST83: Originally Posted By backbencher: So it'll be the same length as original, but heavier, suppressed, w/ a supersonic cartridge that is going slower than originally? Yep. And I don't care. I'm not building it to shoot a mile. I'm not not building it to shoot 500 yards. I'm building it as a modern update of Jeff Cooper's Scout rifle concept. I love my 12.5" AR15 SBR; I've never missed the 300-ish FPS in any IRL measurable way. Weight: Under 6.6 pounds (unloaded) or 7.5 pounds with optics. Length: Under 1 meter (approx. 39.4 inches). Optics: A forward-mounted, low-power scope allowing the shooter to keep both eyes open for fast target acquisition, supplemented by backup iron sights. Max effective range of Cooper's Scout concept was 300-400 yards, with enough power to drop a 450lb animal. Now, my intended use for the rifle doesn't include the need to drop a 450lb animal....maybe 300 at most. So, a 5.56 is a perfect caliber for my most probable use case. If I like the 5.56 too much, I'll build the same thing in 308 for my old AAC 762SD suppressor. No, that's fair, and you're shifting the mass rearward, instead of hanging a pound off a 16" lever. You're also shortening the sight radius for the irons. What if you went to a featherweight pencil 14.5" or 16", and ran a less capable lightweight can? You might end up at the same weight, or less, w/ the same sound pressure at the shooter's ear - even though the can is lighter, the effective muzzle is around 20", and the supersonic crack is a few more inches away. It's easy enough to change the barrel if you don't like the result. |
| I'm starting to play with the idea of a 300 blackout build. The bolt action makes the 300 blackout much more interesting to me, since I wouldn't need to worry about feeding reliability issues (unlike an AR platform). A 1:5 twist makes stabilizing sub sonic 220gr SMK's very easy. I also have an old AAC 762SD that could use a forever home, as well. |
Armory Sponsor

