Armory Sponsor
Posted: 5/9/2016 11:13:50 AM EDT
|
I'm no help on valuation, nor would I posture myself as an expert on restoring old flint / percussion rifles, but I can tell you that there is probably considerable goodness under all that rust and grime, and "slow, careful, and gentle" is the order of the day.
While it is not a British rifle, the folks over at the British Militaria Forum have extensive discussions on gently and correctly restoring similar-vintage rifles, as well as "modern" ones like Martini-Henrys, Sniders, etc. The principles will remain the same. I can attest to the efficacy of Kramer's, the 50/50 acetone/ATF mix, microcrystalline wax, etc. One of our members here (elcope, I think) posted a very nice in-depth tutorial on his restoration of a Martini-Henry from the Nepal cache. It's probably gone to the archives by now, but had a wealth of good info / helpful hints, etc. |
|
Quoted:
I had considered that. My main concern I think is the stock. I'd like to get it cleaned and rejuvenated without refinishing or damaging it. Quoted:
Quoted:
build an electrolysis tank I had considered that. My main concern I think is the stock. I'd like to get it cleaned and rejuvenated without refinishing or damaging it. Acetone....it will not hurt the stock, and will leech out the oils and dirt... But it has to be pure acetone, not nail polish remover stuff.... It does a great job pulling out decades worth of oil soaking....wear glove if you have sensitive skin, it can give you contact dermatitis, since it will pull the oils out of your skin...won't hurt you, but you may find it irritating. I do not, but YMMV.... And don't listen to anyone who says "that will hurt the wood"...nonsense...it evaporates quickly and completely, and will not hurt the wood...in fact you may need to find a way to keep it wet long enough to pull out the oils...possibly a soaking tub, like for wallpaper, but it can't be plastic... You can steam the dents, but they will only steam out completely if they are just dents, if the wood fibers are broken, they could be made to look better, but will not disappear.... Once cleaned, you will need to re-oil with BLO for a proper period type finish...but I bet it will come out beautiful... |
|
Can you read anything on the lock? It should be dated vertically behind the hammer with the maker horizontally behind the large screw on the lockplate.
And for goodness sake, before you start dipping and cleaning, try to find out what it is. There are several different conversions of this rifle. |
|
Quoted:
Can you read anything on the lock? It should be dated vertically behind the hammer with the maker horizontally behind the large screw on the lockplate. And for goodness sake, before you start dipping and cleaning, try to find out what it is. There are several different conversions of this rifle. Lol that's what I'm trying to do. While my interests have move away from C&R weapons, I have not forgotten the importance of keeping things original and unadulterated. |
|
Quoted:
Lol that's what I'm trying to do. While my interests have move away from C&R weapons, I have not forgotten the importance of keeping things original and unadulterated. Quoted:
Quoted:
Can you read anything on the lock? It should be dated vertically behind the hammer with the maker horizontally behind the large screw on the lockplate. And for goodness sake, before you start dipping and cleaning, try to find out what it is. There are several different conversions of this rifle. Lol that's what I'm trying to do. While my interests have move away from C&R weapons, I have not forgotten the importance of keeping things original and unadulterated. So what, if anything does the lock say? It looks to be a bolster-type conversion w/o a clean out screw, which could indicate conversion around the middle of the Civil War. Any remnants of an inspection mark on the left flat of the stock? Anything visible on the barrel at the breech or is it too crispy? Is it loaded? Is it rifled? |
|
Side pics of the bolster/breech and the top breech/tang area of the barrel?
This could be something interesting. Deringer made the most M1817s with about 13000 produced. These were not originally fitted for a bayonet. During the conversion, the muzzle was turned down to accommodate either the M1855 socket bayonet or a lug was also added for the M1855 saber bayonet. I wonder if the turn down went bad so they just chopped the barrel to salvage the rifle. The muzzle could have also been damaged. The P's are assembly marks from the initial build. This was prior to interchangeable parts so each rifle was hand fitted. The Roman Numerals are from the conversion, to keep the parts for the same rifle together. |
Armory Sponsor










