Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
4/17/2012 11:24:26 AM EDT
How good are the pvs-14 and can it safely be mounted on a 7.62 NATO besides doing a rhino mount?  Also would it work well behind a elcan dr 1x4 scope or not?
4/17/2012 11:32:26 AM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
How good are the pvs-14

Is "freakin' awesome" a viable descriptor? Because it ought to be.

and can it safely be mounted on a 7.62 NATO besides doing a rhino mount?

It can using a Larue or other well stabilized mount.

Also would it work well behind a elcan dr 1x4 scope or not?


I have never put one behind an Elcan, but they work behind other scopes, so I don't see why not. There are mounts that let you mate a PVS-14 to a standard day scope, and the results are pretty impressive. I have  done that exact thing and was pretty shocked that it worked so well.

Shameless plug:  www.ar15.com/forums/t_7_163/970939_WTS__AN_PVS_14_3rd_Gen.html
4/17/2012 11:32:37 AM EDT
[#2]
Can I get my hands on a fusion thermal unit for non mil?
4/17/2012 11:34:18 AM EDT
[#3]
If you have scads of money, sure.
4/17/2012 11:34:22 AM EDT
[#4]
Well I don't want to drop two ga on a DR scope and not have it work.  I'm open to other nvg as well
4/17/2012 11:34:55 AM EDT
[#5]
What unit and where. Price isn't a concern.
4/17/2012 11:35:40 AM EDT
[#6]
Google it bro. Lots of them out there.
4/17/2012 11:42:06 AM EDT
[#7]
I know there are retailers here hence why I posted.  Take my money
4/17/2012 11:59:31 AM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:
How good are the pvs-14 and can it safely be mounted on a 7.62 NATO besides doing a rhino mount?  Also would it work well behind a elcan dr 1x4 scope or not?


Hi Sniper_B, give us a call.  We've assisted a great many here,  Kyle, Chip or I will be glad to assist you.

Vic
4/17/2012 12:14:02 PM EDT
[#9]
What options do you suggest. Primary weapon will be a hk 91 but it doesn't have to be weapons mounted if I go ir laser I guess.
4/17/2012 3:18:30 PM EDT
[#10]
Bad juju mounting a PVS-14 on a .308 rifle. While it's "mountable" the tubes can be hit or miss when it comes to the ability to take the recoil, but the bodies are not designed to take weapons recoil. There has been thread after thread discussing this over and over and over.

Here, because I'm a nice guy
The most recent thread
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_6_18/368820_Gun_mounted_PVS_14__how_much_recoil_is_too_much_.html

As for the SpectreDR, here's a PDF that's on the TNVC webpage.
http://www.tnvc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ELCAN_DR_article.pdf

For thermal fusion units your looking at 10s of thousands of dollars. And to be honest, having tested units for one of the big time units, they're still in an infancy stage. If you have that kind of cash to throw around, I'd go with a PVS-14, DBAL-D2, SpectreDR, and a clip-on unit to go in front of the SpectreDR. All that crap would still be cheaper than a single PSQ-20.
4/17/2012 4:10:20 PM EDT
[#11]
Is there a unit that is universal like the 14 that can handle the recoil of a 12 lb hk91
4/17/2012 4:13:21 PM EDT
[#12]
Not that I've ever heard of.
4/17/2012 5:08:34 PM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
Quoted:
How good are the pvs-14

Is "freakin' awesome" a viable descriptor? Because it ought to be.

and can it safely be mounted on a 7.62 NATO besides doing a rhino mount?

It can using a Larue or other well stabilized mount.

Also would it work well behind a elcan dr 1x4 scope or not?


I have never put one behind an Elcan, but they work behind other scopes, so I don't see why not. There are mounts that let you mate a PVS-14 to a standard day scope, and the results are pretty impressive. I have  done that exact thing and was pretty shocked that it worked so well.

Shameless plug:  www.ar15.com/forums/t_7_163/970939_WTS__AN_PVS_14_3rd_Gen.html


The mount has essentially fuck all to due with the ability of the device to tolerate recoil.  <Personal attack removed.  ––tbk1>

All the best, J

ETA: The mount has the possibility of addressing the consideration of ripping the helicoil out of the plastic housing, but not so much a ring mount on the objective lens assembly type as suggested.  The problem of recoil induced tube failure yet remains under almost all 7.62x51 and PVS-14 combinations.
Armory Sponsor