Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
9/4/2014 10:48:23 PM EDT
Anyone have experience with one of these?  If so, what do you think of it?
I'm not interested in the LC9s, just the LC9.
9/4/2014 11:07:38 PM EDT
[#1]
I've shot one a fair bit. It has a long trigger pull, but I like it in a pocket gun.

Any specific questions?
9/4/2014 11:23:37 PM EDT
[#2]
I had one with the laser max red dot on it. Was my personal carry for a few years but IMO I didn't feel comfortable with it anticipating the trigger pull. 1st shot wasn't always on "target". Recoil wasn't bad
9/5/2014 10:51:54 AM EDT
[#3]
I had one. Worked as advertised, nice and thin. Ended up getting a s&w shield.
9/5/2014 11:05:26 AM EDT
[#4]
LC9s has a vastly better trigger.
9/5/2014 11:25:35 AM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:


Anyone have experience with one of these?  If so, what do you think of it?

I'm not interested in the LC9s, just the LC9.
View Quote
Why?

 
9/5/2014 1:05:53 PM EDT
[#6]
I've had one for a year or so.  Several hundred rounds through it.  Only problem I had was that a second mag I bought would not always disengage the mag safety due to excessive tolerances.  That was when I pulled the mag safety out.   Once I got the mag safety out, I saw where the engagement tab could be bent to provide more contact with the magazine, but I left it out, because fuck that thing.

I pocket carry it and it works well for me.
9/5/2014 5:23:43 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote History
Quoted:
Why?  
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Anyone have experience with one of these?  If so, what do you think of it?
I'm not interested in the LC9s, just the LC9.
Why?  


Why? +1  Because

Quoted:
LC9s has a vastly better trigger.


Absolutely yes.
9/5/2014 7:51:50 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote History
Quoted:
Why?  
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Anyone have experience with one of these?  If so, what do you think of it?
I'm not interested in the LC9s, just the LC9.
Why?  


Because I want a hammer fired gun.
9/6/2014 11:12:27 AM EDT
[#9]
I've carried one for the last year or so.

It's flat, light and easy to carry.  Mine's been 100% reliable.  Accuracy is on par, or even better, than the DA revolver it replaced.

I think it boils down to the trigger on this gun.

The trigger pull is much more like a revolver.  In fact it feels much the same as my SIL's LCR.  I'm an old wheel-gun type, and the trigger pull is not any different than a DA revolver and I find the trigger pull no big deal.  Many people don't like a DA revolver-style trigger, and they probably won't like the trigger pull much.  It's a truly long pull, though smooth and not really heavy for a DA pull.  I like revolvers, this replaced a DA revolver (642) as my EDC, I have several DA-only revolvers, and the trigger pull on my LC9 is a good DA trigger.  

What it's not is a good SA trigger.  I handled an LC9s at the LGS last weekend, and the trigger pull is far more typical of a striker fired gun.  If the DA pull bothers you, or you want a better trigger, the LC9s is really something to look at.  I'll probably pick one up after they've been out for a while, so I can have one of each.  I don't think I'd consider carrying the LC9s without a holster.  It's like a Glock or Shield.  I would recommend something should be covering the trigger.  I have far less concern about the DA LC9 as long as you're not carrying anything else in your pocket.  

The DA LC9 is sorta like a flat pocket revolver that's carries more rounds and is faster to reload.  Fine for me, and I'd likely still carry the DA version if I buy a striker version.  It's an easy to live with gun.
Armory Sponsor