Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
4/9/2008 7:50:21 AM EDT
Have any of you guys with a Socom II noticed any rail cant when using a eotech.  That is how I noticed mine being canted and you could clearly see it from the muzzle end also like the rifle was twisted in the rail.  So I sent it in to springfield twice with no change then the thrid time they replaced the rifle and it is the exact same way I will post some pics in the morning.  I was told by SAI that they dont notice anything but I've got excellent eyes and I see it very clearly.  If you look toward the muzzle with the rifle pointed at you mine the rail is twisted to the left
http://i251.photobucket.com/albums/gg298/Steadyfinger007/SocomII374.jpg
http://i251.photobucket.com/albums/gg298/Steadyfinger007/SocomII375.jpg
http://i251.photobucket.com/albums/gg298/Steadyfinger007/SocomII393.jpg
4/9/2008 5:59:05 PM EDT
[#1]
Ok Guys The pics Are up, Thanks.
4/11/2008 6:35:11 PM EDT
[#2]
Hard to argue with a pic like that.  Got anything else you can mount up there for comparision?
4/11/2008 10:11:13 PM EDT
[#3]
WOW


no shit, that thing looks wacky
4/12/2008 12:24:44 PM EDT
[#4]
Mine did, I tried messing with the barrel interface point, the op-rod guide and with the set screws that go into the reciever.  Nothing got the rail system square with the rifle.  Now it lives in a Sage stock, so all is right in the world.

4/18/2008 6:20:26 AM EDT
[#5]
Are you certain it's not the EoTech?

I had a 552 that was canted no matter what rifle I put it on. Do you have anything else to mount up there?
4/18/2008 8:36:32 AM EDT
[#6]
Thats a well noted problem with the EoTech's "canting" to the left or right.  EoTech says its not their problem but a problem with the rail, but thats all bull honkey.  
4/22/2008 5:38:55 PM EDT
[#7]
Dude thats sucks man. I think that confirms it for me. I have been torn as to whether I should get the Socom II or 16.
4/23/2008 1:02:12 AM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
Dude thats sucks man. I think that confirms it for me. I have been torn as to whether I should get the Socom II or 16.


I thought mister batman here just clarified that it's the sight, not the gun.
4/23/2008 11:26:09 AM EDT
[#9]
Sorry guys I haven't checked this out in a while.  Ok I did put this eotech on an AR and it is fine I took another eotech off my AR and put it on the socom and its canted this is not the 1st socom II I've had this problem with the one in the photo is the one that SAI sent me to replace the one I sent them to get fixed and it is the same.  So I called SAI back and they had me put a level on the reciever and the rail and see if they match and they do not.  Called them again and they said they did the same thing on my old rifle that I sent in and it was off to.  They then told me they had found a major inconsistancy in several of rails they had around there and that they now seen where I was coming from.  I will try to get some pics up of the levels on the rifle but I can assure everyone that it is not eotechs problem as SAI stood up to the plate and is going to get the rifle fixed for good, plus they told me they would deffienently start checking this on every rifle upon inspection so that no one else woul dhave this problem.  The guy I talked to was Bret the production manager and he was an awesome guy to deal with.  Also to the naked Eye looking down the rail without an optic mounted the rail seem fine but 7 or 8 degrees is hard to see on the bare rail as it is not very wide or tall when you level the reciever and put a level on the rail it is very noticable.
4/24/2008 5:02:35 PM EDT
[#10]
It sounds like somebody at VLTOR is going to get and ass reaming.
Armory Sponsor