MUNITIONS SUPPLIER, HIS COMPANY, AND OTHERS INDICTED FOR LYING TO ARMY ON GOVERNMENT MUNITIONS CONTRACT

June 20, 2008

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Sharon Woods, Director, U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Criminal Investigative Service, Anthony V. Mangione, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Office of Investigations in Miami, Brigadier General Rodney Johnson, Commanding General, U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command, and Paul Phillips, Regional Director, Defense Contract Audit Agency, announced today that AEY, Inc. (AEY), Efraim Diveroli, David Packouz, Alexander Podrizki, and Ralph Merrill were indicted by a federal grand jury in Miami on wide-ranging fraud charges in connection with their provision of ammunition to Afghanistan.

More specifically, Count 1charges all defendants with conspiracy to defraud the U.S. by making false representations to the government and by conspiring to commit procurement fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 (Count 1). Counts 2 through 36 charge defendants AEY and Efraim Diveroli with making false statements to the U.S. Army regarding the country of origin of the ammunition, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001. Lastly, all defendants are charged with procurement fraud against the United States, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1031 (Counts 37 - 71).

As alleged in the Indictment, AEY is a munitions supplier, with offices in Miami Beach, FL. Defendant Efraim Diveroli is the President of AEY, and manages and directs the business operations of AEY. Defendant David Packouz was a Director and Vice President of AEY. Defendant Alexander Podrizki was an agent of AEY, stationed in Tirana, Albania. Defendant Ralph Merrill was a business associate of Diveroli, who provided financial and managerial assistance to AEY.

According to the Indictment, on July 28, 2006, the Department of the Army (Army) issued a solicitation requesting bids on a contract to provide various types of ammunition to the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. AEY submitted a bid and represented to the Army that it could fulfill the requirements of the contract and procure the ammunition for $298,000,000. Based on that bid, the Army awarded the contract to AEY on January 26, 2007. Under the terms of the contract, AEY was required to certify that it was providing serviceable and safe ammunition. The contract also prohibited delivery of ammunition acquired, directly or indirectly, from a Communist Chinese military company.

The Indictment alleges that the defendants submitted documents to the Army falsely attesting that the ammunition they were providing was manufactured and originated in Albania, when, in fact, the ammunition came from China. To effectuate the scheme, defendants Efraim Diveroli, David Packouz, and Alexander Podrizki would direct others to assist in the packaging of ammunition to be delivered to Afghanistan, and would provide instructions to remove Chinese markings from containers in order to conceal that the ammunition was manufactured and originated in China.

With each shipment, Diveroli, on behalf of AEY, would falsely certify in a Certificate of Conformance that the ammunition being furnished conformed with the contract requirements, and that the manufacturer and point of origin of the ammunition was the Military Export and Import Company (hereinafter referred to as MEICO) in Tirana, Albania. These false statements in the Certificates of Conformance are the basis for Counts 2- 36 of the Indictment against AEY and Diveroli. Each of the 35 Certificates of Conformance accompanied a separate shipment of ammunition.

Upon delivery of each shipment of ammunition, defendant Efraim Diveroli would submit and cause others to submit to the Department of the Army, a copy of the Certificate of Conformance and an invoice for payment to AEY. Based on these false submissions, the Army paid AEY approximately $10,331,736 for 35 shipments of Chinese ammunition. These submissions and resulting payments to AEY are the basis of Counts 37- 71.

If convicted of the charges in Counts 1through 36, each defendant named faces a maximum term of imprisonment of up to five years per count. If convicted of the charges in Counts 37 through 71, each defendant named faces a maximum term of imprisonment of up to ten years per count.

United States Attorney Alex Acosta stated, "Defense contractors are responsible for the effectiveness and safety of munitions they provide to our troops and allies. When these contractors intentionally cut corners to line their own pockets, they risk the safety and lives of our men and women in uniform. Such callousness and disregard for the lives of our soldiers and our allies will not be tolerated, and will be vigorously prosecuted."

Director Sharon Woods of the Department of Defense Criminal Investigative Service, stated, "In this day, when our soldiers and our coalition partners are fighting to keep us safe, it is reprehensible that greed and disregard for human safety have resulted in such dangerous fraud. The DoD Inspector General's Defense Criminal Investigative Service is committed to pursuing and bringing to justice those who so recklessly cheat the United States."

"The indictment and arrest of these four individuals is a result of a three-year joint law enforcement agency investigation conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Counter Proliferation Investigations (CPI) Unit, DCIS and Army CID," said Anthony V. Mangione, Special Agent in Charge of the ICE Office of Investigations in Miami. "This investigation is a fine example of how effective these law enforcement partnerships can be at ensuring that the sale and distribution of defense articles is done lawfully. This case will send a message to those individuals who attempt to profit by illegally supplying improper defense articles to our allies. ICE will continue to aggressively pursue those who violate U.S. export laws."

"The mission of the Special Agents from our Major Procurement Fraud Unit is to protect the integrity of the Army's procurement process and ensure that we get the products we pay for. Today's indictment serves as notice that the Army CID and our law enforcement partners will bring violators to justice," said the Commanding General of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command, Brigadier General Rodney Johnson. "Special Agents from our Major Procurement Fraud Unit have worked tirelessly on this case and have played a critical role in today's indictment. The tenacity and dedication of our criminal investigators, who work these cases and return money and assets to the Army and the American taxpayer, is a testament to their support of our soldiers," said Johnson.

Mr. Acosta commended the investigative efforts of the various agencies involved in this case. The Southern District of Florida also thanks the Counter Espionage Section, the National Procurement Fraud Task Force, the and the Fraud Section of the Department of Justice for their assistance in this matter. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Eloisa D. Fernandez and James M. Koukios.

Link

Quoted:
I have another thread going about my V53 SBR going back to Vector for warranty repairs. I just got off the phone this morning with the lady who answers the phones who couldn't wait to get me off the phone. All she wanted to do was tell me that no one was there. No one could answer any of my questions about my rifle and that it would get back to me sooner or later. They have had my rifle for three weeks now and I can't even find out anything about it.

I asked who was in charge and she replied "no one is in charge". "Who owns the place?, Who is the supervisor? " Look at our website and you'll find the answer you want there". You mean you can't tell me who the owner is? After asking 4 times, she finally told me "Ralph Merrill is in charge". I told her that I found the way this situation was being handled was very disturbing and I wanted to talk to Mr. Merrill. She told me that Mr. Merrill doesn't take phone calls and he "might" call me back if I left a message.

Anyone that has their guns at Vector or are considering sending their guns to Vector for repair, BEWARE.

Quoted:
If it were me, I would demand to have my rifle returned and find someone else to repair it.

Quoted:
This is my second dealing with them. The first that I talked about earlier was great. Talk about going downhill.

Quoted:


I can't believe you sent your rifle back to that black hole. If you ever get it back, you should kiss the ass of your fairy godmother.

Quoted:




Going down hill? They aren't even a company!!! There is no Vector Arms doing business any longer. They have not been producing guns sense last summer. They were actively trying to find buyers for whole sections of their company. They are for sale, and can not sell things in the mean time.

Quoted:
Went to the range today. It still shoots far to the right. Sending it back for warranty repair didn't help at all. All I got out of it was a bent sling ring.