When Lawrence Summers withdrew from consideration as the next head of the Federal Reserve, he performed a great service for the Democratic Party’s two most important figures -- Barack Obama, and his presumed (by Democrats) successor, Hillary Clinton.

The president was spared an embarrassing Senate confirmation fight, with likely defections from his own party. And Clinton avoided an episode that might have forced her to confront a question that she has, so far, happily avoided: If she runs for president, will she dare to do so as a Clinton Democrat?

Summers’ undoing was largely the work of the ascendant left wing of the Democratic Party, an increasingly assertive faction that saw in Summers a remnant of a political approach it roundly rejects – the “New Democrat” politics of former President Bill Clinton.

One pillar of Clintonism was a reorientation of the party toward Wall Street, where Clinton, in 1992, found his chief economic adviser, Robert Rubin, the co-chairman of Goldman Sachs (and a trove of new money for Democratic coffers). Rubin and his protégé, Summers, both served Clinton as Treasury secretary, and both advocated for de-regulation of the financial sector – a policy that much of the left blames for the 2008 financial meltdown.

From the moment in July that Obama mentioned that current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke was leaving the post, two things became clear: Obama was determined that Summers would become the next Fed chairman, and liberal Democrats were just as determined that he wouldn’t.

The fact that the Summers push collapsed before Obama even made the nomination shows that the real energy in the Democratic Party is in the progressive populist base, whose ideology more closely resembles that of the Occupy movement than the centrism of Bill Clinton. For all the notice of current Republican disunity, the divide on the left is just as real, and will be especially tricky for Hillary Clinton to navigate as she positions herself for a presumed 2016 presidential run.

Can't stand the bitch, but the article makes some good points.....

A fascist vs. communist divide inside the dim party?  Is it wrong to hope it gets real bloody?

what I always find funny is that people still try to push the centrist bill Clinton image.  he is a lefty ideologue like the rest of them and was forced to the center by a republican controlled congress.  trust me if he had a democrat controlled congress  during his 8 years we would be much farther down the hole than we are now.

While I agree with your statement about Clinton being a leftie, it is heartening to see cracks forming in their own delusions of their past plus the realization by some that they've gotten into bed with some really nasty people. (No pun intended)

Clinton was much more of a pragmatist than Obama is. He was used to working with a Republican statehouse and he did cuddle up to corporations to get donations and appeal to a broader base. Obama pretends to be a OWS type while taking corporate money behind his back.