User Panel
Posted: 9/25/2013 2:38:41 PM EDT
Did the AR-15 come before the M-16?
I know I'm an idiot |
|
|
Yes. People often say that the AR-15 is the civilian version of the M-16, but actually the M-16 is the military version of the AR-15. Check out the Retro section of this site, there's a lot of good info about the early AR-10 and AR-15 models and the adoption of the platform by the U.S. military.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Did the AR-15 come before the M-16? I know I'm an idiot View Quote One less awesome feature? |
|
|
|
|
AR is the prefix for models that Armalite produced in numerical order. It has nothing to do with the military designation of M16. The military is really weird in how they designate makes/models of weapons that most of the time doesn't really follow any sort of order from what I can tell.
|
|
Quoted:
AR16 is badass. Looks badass anyway. They should make a modern interpretation of it just because it looks so cool.... http://img381.imageshack.us/img381/2389/ar16kv1.jpg View Quote Look a little FALish, I like it. |
|
Quoted:
AR16 is badass. Looks badass anyway. They should make a modern interpretation of it just because it looks so cool.... http://img381.imageshack.us/img381/2389/ar16kv1.jpg View Quote It just looks like a 7.62/.308 AR-18/AR-180. |
|
AR stands for Assault Rifle and 15 is the 15th version of the rifle.
|
|
One is the numerical designation given to the design by Armalite, one is the designation given to it by the military when it was adopted. Just because the numbers are one digit off, doesn't mean they're related.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: AR is the prefix for models that Armalite produced in numerical order. It has nothing to do with the military designation of M16. The military is really weird in how they designate makes/models of weapons that most of the time doesn't really follow any sort of order from what I can tell. View Quote It makes sense to the folks in procurement, that's about it. |
|
|
Quoted:
It just looks like a 7.62/.308 AR-18/AR-180. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
AR16 is badass. Looks badass anyway. They should make a modern interpretation of it just because it looks so cool.... http://img381.imageshack.us/img381/2389/ar16kv1.jpg It just looks like a 7.62/.308 AR-18/AR-180. Which is just another way of saying "badass", no? |
|
Eugene was born in Arkansas (AR) and came up with the rifle design when he was 15. The legend is that he was standing on the toilet hanging a clock, and slipped and hit his head in the sink. When he woke up he saw the rifle.
|
|
Quoted:
AR16 is badass. Looks badass anyway. They should make a modern interpretation of it just because it looks so cool.... http://img381.imageshack.us/img381/2389/ar16kv1.jpg View Quote Is that an AR-180??? Cause that's what that looks like!! |
|
Quoted:
AR16 is badass. Looks badass anyway. They should make a modern interpretation of it just because it looks so cool.... http://img381.imageshack.us/img381/2389/ar16kv1.jpg View Quote Stoner thought it would be more successful than the scaled down version of his AR10. |
|
The AR-15 is the AR-15. Putting a longer or shorter barrel on it doesn't change that it is an AR-15. Painting it pink doesn't change that it is an AR-15. Having a switch that is safe-semi-full, or safe-semi-3, or safe-semi doesn't change it either.
The M16 is an AR-15 with one specific set of features. The M16A1 is an AR-15 with a different set of features. Same with the M16A2 through M16A6. The M4 is an AR-15 with one specific set of features. The number after the M has nothing to do with whatever the inventor chose to call his gun. The AR-15 was invented by Eugene Stoner while working for the company Armalite. Mr Stoner was not affiliated with the military, nor was Armalite. Mr Stoner and Armalite could have chosen to call the rifle the Stoner 1000, the Poop Shooter 1-0-1, or anything they wanted, and this name would have no impact on what the military decided to call it. |
|
|
Quoted:
Is that an AR-180??? Cause that's what that looks like!! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
AR16 is badass. Looks badass anyway. They should make a modern interpretation of it just because it looks so cool.... http://img381.imageshack.us/img381/2389/ar16kv1.jpg Is that an AR-180??? Cause that's what that looks like!! Pretty much, but in 7.62 instead of 5.56. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
The prototype AR15's made in Armalite's tool room were all select-fire guns as well, meant for military competition for the Small Caliber High Velocity trials. The first production guns were made by Colt, under the nomenclature Model 601, with Armalite still engraved on the receivers. http://bpullignwolnet.dotster.com/retroblackrifle/sitebuilder/images/DSC016812-653x242.jpg View Quote I've always wondered why they went from green furniture to black. |
|
Quoted:
I've always wondered why they went from green furniture to black. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The prototype AR15's made in Armalite's tool room were all select-fire guns as well, meant for military competition for the Small Caliber High Velocity trials. The first production guns were made by Colt, under the nomenclature Model 601, with Armalite still engraved on the receivers. http://bpullignwolnet.dotster.com/retroblackrifle/sitebuilder/images/DSC016812-653x242.jpg I've always wondered why they went from green furniture to black. It's actually Bakelite painted Green: |
|
Quoted:
It's actually Bakelite painted Green: http://weaponsman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Colt-AR-15-Model-601-SN-000115.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The prototype AR15's made in Armalite's tool room were all select-fire guns as well, meant for military competition for the Small Caliber High Velocity trials. The first production guns were made by Colt, under the nomenclature Model 601, with Armalite still engraved on the receivers. http://bpullignwolnet.dotster.com/retroblackrifle/sitebuilder/images/DSC016812-653x242.jpg I've always wondered why they went from green furniture to black. It's actually Bakelite painted Green: http://weaponsman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Colt-AR-15-Model-601-SN-000115.jpg Ah I see now. I thought they went from Bakelite to green plastic to black plastic. Thanks! |
|
If I am not mistaken, the rifle Gen. Curtis LeMay fired was an AR-15. After blasting some watermelons and being pleased with the over all weapon, he decided that he wanted it to replace the M-1 Carbines then carried by Air Police (later Security Police and now Security Forces) troops securing his SAC bases and missile fields.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
If I am not mistaken, the rifle Gen. Curtis LeMay fired was an AR-15. After blasting some watermelons and being pleased with the over all weapon, he decided that he wanted it to replace the M-1 Carbines then carried by Air Police (later Security Police and now Security Forces) troops securing his SAC bases and missile fields. View Quote Yes. Then SecDef MacNamara got involved. The AR15's story is one of the most strangely-conceived series of events, in the relatively unknown shadow of the AR10. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
AR16 is badass. Looks badass anyway. They should make a modern interpretation of it just because it looks so cool.... http://img381.imageshack.us/img381/2389/ar16kv1.jpg View Quote Looks like they tried to make an FAL but didn't. This reminds me of how much I want an FAL... |
|
Quoted:
The AR-15 is the AR-15. Putting a longer or shorter barrel on it doesn't change that it is an AR-15. Painting it pink doesn't change that it is an AR-15. Having a switch that is safe-semi-full, or safe-semi-3, or safe-semi doesn't change it either. The M16 is an AR-15 with one specific set of features. The M16A1 is an AR-15 with a different set of features. Same with the M16A2 through M16A6. The M4 is an AR-15 with one specific set of features. The number after the M has nothing to do with whatever the inventor chose to call his gun. The AR-15 was invented by Eugene Stoner while working for the company Armalite. Mr Stoner was not affiliated with the military, nor was Armalite. Mr Stoner and Armalite could have chosen to call the rifle the Stoner 1000, the Poop Shooter 1-0-1, or anything they wanted, and this name would have no impact on what the military decided to call it. View Quote Stoner and Armalite first had the AR 10. The AR15 was an after thought. Colt bought the rights to produce the AR15. You are over generalizing. The M4, etc are not AR15s in the pure sense. In the conceptual sense they are variations on the original design, but M4 means a very specific Mil Spec. |
|
Well, I certainly learned a few new things today.
I was always under the assumption the M-16 was developed for the military back in the late 50's by Stoner, and the AR was its offspring. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Well, I certainly learned a few new things today. I was always under the assumption the M-16 was developed for the military back in the late 50's by Stoner, and the AR was its offspring. View Quote Nope, Amalite was designing guns and trying to sell them to anyone that would buy. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.