User Panel
Posted: 9/4/2017 1:51:57 PM EDT
5.7>9mm>.45
Velocity, range, capacity, recoil. What's not to like? No, I don't have a FiveseveN, but I shot one and loved it. I just don't have the funds. My 12" AR57 is freakin' awesome though. I like it better than my three 5.56 ARs of various lengths. 50 rounds up on top of the handguard is really sweet It's my current HD "rifle" (I have a Phase5 padded buffer tube, no brace needed). Bring the hate! |
|
No complaints here. I had a few doubts about the cartridge until I shot a few hogs with it. 20rds and less weight than a G17, I'm in.
|
|
Quoted:
5.7>9mm>.45 Velocity, range, capacity, recoil. What's not to like? No, I don't have a FiveseveN, but I shot one and loved it. I just don't have the funds. My 12" AR57 is freakin' awesome though. I like it better than my three 5.56 ARs of various lengths. 50 rounds up on top of the handguard is really sweet It's my current HD "rifle" (I have a Phase5 padded buffer tube, no brace needed). Bring the hate! View Quote No hate to bring! Hey you should post a pic of rifle pistol or something in here. I can post it for you if you message it too me. |
|
Put a S3G or B-GRF trigger in that AR57*
*Don't try this with a .22 suppressor attached, it might compress your baffle stack |
|
Big fan of the round. I traded off my FiveSeven because of a few quirks I wasn't that fond of (safety location, mag disconnect) but kept my PS90. The FiveSeven was always a favorite on the range and ran flawlessly while I had it.
|
|
Wish there were more types of ammo available in the civi market.
|
|
I've always considered getting a FiveSeven pistol..............
|
|
I think it's a solid round, you just have to be cognizant of what it is. I had a Five Seven and it was low recoil but the pistol was just too darn big so I sold it.
|
|
My PS90 is my new favorite "in case I have to shoot a 2 legged varmint at my house gun"
Damn thing is easy to handle in the house, or truck. Keep it in a tennis racket case with 6 mags. |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
My PS90 is my new favorite "in case I have to shoot a 2 legged varmint at my house gun" Damn thing is easy to handle in the house, or truck. Keep it in a tennis racket case with 6 mags. View Quote ETA Dual racket bag to add my 10" 5.56 too. Never know when a buddy may need one! |
|
View Quote |
|
|
Brooooooooooooo the horn of gondor has been blown at the fivesevenforum
I hear chants of elite ammo elite ammo elite ammo echoing in the hills |
|
Quoted:
Brooooooooooooo the horn of gondor has been blown at the fivesevenforum I hear chants of elite ammo elite ammo elite ammo echoing in the hills View Quote I can't afford that stuff! Nothing wrong with the FN choices IMO, but I would like more alternatives. Affordable alternatives. |
|
Great range toy, especially the SBR PS90.
But if it were so wonderful, why are more police, Secret Service & militaries dropping it to move to....9mm? steel core AP will do everything the 5.7 does, with greater surface area & mass. I've operated on score of people--nobody ever complained about what they were shot with, they simply bled. That said, the bigger area & weight of a 9mm or larger, well, physics, and shit....nevermind. Arguing calibers is like arguing religion or politics. Don't even pretend it's a rifle round. |
|
Quoted:
Great range toy, especially the SBR PS90. But if it were so wonderful, why are more police, Secret Service & militaries dropping it to move to....9mm? steel core AP will do everything the 5.7 does, with greater surface area & mass. I've operated on score of people--nobody ever complained about what they were shot with, they simply bled. That said, the bigger area & weight of a 9mm or larger, well, physics, and shit....nevermind. Arguing calibers is like arguing religion or politics. Don't even pretend it's a rifle round. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Great range toy, especially the SBR PS90. But if it were so wonderful, why are more police, Secret Service & militaries dropping it to move to....9mm? steel core AP will do everything the 5.7 does, with greater surface area & mass. I've operated on score of people--nobody ever complained about what they were shot with, they simply bled. That said, the bigger area & weight of a 9mm or larger, well, physics, and shit....nevermind. Arguing calibers is like arguing religion or politics. Don't even pretend it's a rifle round. View Quote Ever seen a 50 round magazine for 9mm? |
|
|
Quoted:
Great range toy, especially the SBR PS90. But if it were so wonderful, why are more police, Secret Service & militaries dropping it to move to....9mm? steel core AP will do everything the 5.7 does, with greater surface area & mass. I've operated on score of people--nobody ever complained about what they were shot with, they simply bled. That said, the bigger area & weight of a 9mm or larger, well, physics, and shit....nevermind. Arguing calibers is like arguing religion or politics. Don't even pretend it's a rifle round. View Quote 50 rds of easily concealable 5.7 > 30 rds of 9mm IMO. Plus a loadout would weigh much less. |
|
Quoted:
Here is some physics you are missing. At around 2200 fps, much of the stretch cavity becomes permanent cavity. 5.7 out of a PS90 does 2500-2600fps so yes it is doing tissue damage like a rifle round. 50 rds of easily concealable 5.7 > 30 rds of 9mm IMO. Plus a loadout would weigh much less. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Great range toy, especially the SBR PS90. But if it were so wonderful, why are more police, Secret Service & militaries dropping it to move to....9mm? steel core AP will do everything the 5.7 does, with greater surface area & mass. I've operated on score of people--nobody ever complained about what they were shot with, they simply bled. That said, the bigger area & weight of a 9mm or larger, well, physics, and shit....nevermind. Arguing calibers is like arguing religion or politics. Don't even pretend it's a rifle round. 50 rds of easily concealable 5.7 > 30 rds of 9mm IMO. Plus a loadout would weigh much less. I'd love a PS90 but my AR57 w/optic and accessories was right at $1000 |
|
I really like the AR57 upper. It's very clever, and a ton of fun to shoot. Extremely controllable.
|
|
Quoted:
I really like the AR57 upper. It's very clever, and a ton of fun to shoot. Extremely controllable. View Quote |
|
I love the PDW concept. Way easier for support people to learn how to shoot a carbine effectively. Versus a pistol.
|
|
|
The P(S)-90 is perhaps the best designed modern firearm. For its intended purpose,it's phenomenal. There isn't an easier to shoot gun in any caliber and the cartridge is plenty effective.
|
|
Quoted:
Great range toy, especially the SBR PS90. But if it were so wonderful, why are more police, Secret Service & militaries dropping it to move to....9mm? steel core AP will do everything the 5.7 does, with greater surface area & mass. I've operated on score of people--nobody ever complained about what they were shot with, they simply bled. That said, the bigger area & weight of a 9mm or larger, well, physics, and shit....nevermind. Arguing calibers is like arguing religion or politics. Don't even pretend it's a rifle round. View Quote I hate using this example, but it is documented and not some "Well I heard from the guy at the local gun shop that it won't stop small mice" Keep in mind, neither load used by the dirt bag was in anyway one of the better loads for the 5.7x28.... FORT HOOD SHOOTING... Using SS192 and SS197SR ammunition (common commercial 5.7x28 ammo), several 20-30 round magazines and an FN 5.7 (shooter also had a .357 revolver but did not use it), Hassan killed 13 and wounded 32 people. Many armchair ballistics expert criticized this result as proof that the FN 5.7 platform is not lethal enough because of the proportion of the fatalities to the wounded. Others have proposed that had Hassan used another type of pistol, 9mm or .45, there would have been more fatalities. 1. 11 people were shot center-of-mass (COM), one was shot in the stomach and one was shot in the head. All 13 died. All 11 victims who were shot COM did not survive. 2. 3 of the 13 people who died, tried to charge Hassan, but he stopped them with COM shots. 3. The 32 people who were wounded were hit in the arms, legs, hips and shoulders. None of the wounded survivors were shot COM. The following conclusions can be drawn: 1. The FN 5.7 is a very lethal round CQB because all 11 victims who were shot COM died. No survivors for those hit COM. 2. The FN 5.7 is a real stopper, because 3 tried to charge Hassan at close range and were stopped by COM shots. 3. One of the fatalities was shot in the stomach, and died. The fragmentation of the SS197R round can create a hail of metal shards that can cause serious internal organ damage and bleeding in the stomach. 4. None of the 32 people who were hit in the extremities, hips and shoulders were able to muster a counter-attack because the FN 5.7 must have shattered or broken bones. The high rate of wounded vicitms to fatalities was the direct result of the shooting ability of Hassan (or lack thereof), and not because the 5.7x28 round is not lethal. 5. Sgt. Kimberly Munley (base civilian police), one of the first responders, was immediately disabled with 5.7x28 bullet shrapnels to her wrist and a second 5.7x28 bullet broke her femur. The light 5.7x28 commercial ammo showed that it can shatter large bones due to its velocity. Her femur (the largest bone in the human body) was SHATTERED into 120 pieces. 6. According to medical personnel, there was so much blood in the room that it was difficult to get to the victims because the floor became very slippery. One can conclude that the commercial 5.7x28 rounds can fragment or tumble, causing immense blood loss. 7. It took five bullets (which I assume was a 9 mm) from Sgt Mark Todd to stop Hasan. And he survived his wounds (no available info on where he was hit, except that one of the bullets paralyzed Hasan). In conclusion: 1. The FN 5.7 is definitely a very lethal round. 100% fatality for COM shots. 2. The FN 5.7 is a man-stopper. Three military men tried to charge Hasan, and all three were stopped. 2. The FN 5.7 is a very incapacitating round, if extremities are hit, because it is powerful enough to break the femur (which is the largest bone in the body) 3. The fragmentation or tumbling effect of commercial ammo can cause a lot of blood loss. This is a DOCUMENTED real world shooting as compared to "I was told by my brother-in-law who heard it from a gun shop employee" story. In comparison, here is a LINK to another DOCUMENTED shooting where Officer had to place 17 ROUNDS OF .45 acp in a dirt bag to stop him. I only carry an FN FiveseveN now as I trust it more than any 9mm, .40 S&W, or .45 acp. The main issue I had was trying to locate a Duty holster and spare magazine carrier. I carry Elite Ammunition S4M which chronographs OVER 2,400 fps out of the FiveseveN pistol and WILL penetrate Level IIIA body armor. In addition it will penetrate 1 1/4" bullet proof glass. It's generally excepted that hydrostatic shock begins at 2,000 fps, some studies report it as low as 1,100 fps. I really have to believe that for the U.S. Secret Service to adopt the 5.7x28 that had pretty good documentation of round performance. 5.7x28 DevestaTOR USG 4 Level II vests |
|
View Quote ETA: nevermind, its 50 |
|
Another boutique round.
But yeah I wouldn't mind having an AR57 upper. |
|
Bullpups are ghey looking to me. Except the PS90. I want one.
|
|
Quoted:
9mm Steel Core WILL NOT penetrate like 5.7x28. Now that Elite Ammunition is offering DevestaTOR to "Joe Public", the penetration is MUCH better than FN SS190 A.P. I hate using this example, but it is documented and not some "Well I heard from the guy at the local gun shop that it won't stop small mice" Keep in mind, neither load used by the dirt bag was in anyway one of the better loads for the 5.7x28.... FORT HOOD SHOOTING... Using SS192 and SS197SR ammunition (common commercial 5.7x28 ammo), several 20-30 round magazines and an FN 5.7 (shooter also had a .357 revolver but did not use it), Hassan killed 13 and wounded 32 people. Many armchair ballistics expert criticized this result as proof that the FN 5.7 platform is not lethal enough because of the proportion of the fatalities to the wounded. Others have proposed that had Hassan used another type of pistol, 9mm or .45, there would have been more fatalities. 1. 11 people were shot center-of-mass (COM), one was shot in the stomach and one was shot in the head. All 13 died. All 11 victims who were shot COM did not survive. 2. 3 of the 13 people who died, tried to charge Hassan, but he stopped them with COM shots. 3. The 32 people who were wounded were hit in the arms, legs, hips and shoulders. None of the wounded survivors were shot COM. The following conclusions can be drawn: 1. The FN 5.7 is a very lethal round CQB because all 11 victims who were shot COM died. No survivors for those hit COM. 2. The FN 5.7 is a real stopper, because 3 tried to charge Hassan at close range and were stopped by COM shots. 3. One of the fatalities was shot in the stomach, and died. The fragmentation of the SS197R round can create a hail of metal shards that can cause serious internal organ damage and bleeding in the stomach. 4. None of the 32 people who were hit in the extremities, hips and shoulders were able to muster a counter-attack because the FN 5.7 must have shattered or broken bones. The high rate of wounded vicitms to fatalities was the direct result of the shooting ability of Hassan (or lack thereof), and not because the 5.7x28 round is not lethal. 5. Sgt. Kimberly Munley (base civilian police), one of the first responders, was immediately disabled with 5.7x28 bullet shrapnels to her wrist and a second 5.7x28 bullet broke her femur. The light 5.7x28 commercial ammo showed that it can shatter large bones due to its velocity. Her femur (the largest bone in the human body) was SHATTERED into 120 pieces. 6. According to medical personnel, there was so much blood in the room that it was difficult to get to the victims because the floor became very slippery. One can conclude that the commercial 5.7x28 rounds can fragment or tumble, causing immense blood loss. 7. It took five bullets (which I assume was a 9 mm) from Sgt Mark Todd to stop Hasan. And he survived his wounds (no available info on where he was hit, except that one of the bullets paralyzed Hasan). In conclusion: 1. The FN 5.7 is definitely a very lethal round. 100% fatality for COM shots. 2. The FN 5.7 is a man-stopper. Three military men tried to charge Hasan, and all three were stopped. 2. The FN 5.7 is a very incapacitating round, if extremities are hit, because it is powerful enough to break the femur (which is the largest bone in the body) 3. The fragmentation or tumbling effect of commercial ammo can cause a lot of blood loss. This is a DOCUMENTED real world shooting as compared to "I was told by my brother-in-law who heard it from a gun shop employee" story. In comparison, here is a LINK to another DOCUMENTED shooting where Officer had to place 17 ROUNDS OF .45 acp in a dirt bag to stop him. I only carry an FN FiveseveN now as I trust it more than any 9mm, .40 S&W, or .45 acp. The main issue I had was trying to locate a Duty holster and spare magazine carrier. I carry Elite Ammunition S4M which chronographs OVER 2,400 fps out of the FiveseveN pistol and WILL penetrate Level IIIA body armor. In addition it will penetrate 1 1/4" bullet proof glass. It's generally excepted that hydrostatic shock begins at 2,000 fps, some studies report it as low as 1,100 fps. I really have to believe that for the U.S. Secret Service to adopt the 5.7x28 that had pretty good documentation of round performance. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AL-kv6bVkk View Quote |
|
10mm is almost twice as good.
Seriously though, my cousin's got a FiveseveN Mk2 and I've shot it lots of times and it's made me want one of my own. Recoil impulse is hardly anything; feels like firing 115gr 9mm range ammo out of my M9. EXTREMELY easy to hold on target even when just flat out mag dumping. Nice accuracy, fun to shoot. I really love the unconventional index finger safety location too. Very simple to manipulate; I don't understand the derp, ah cayn't figger out this safety it's in the wrong location crap from people. |
|
Quoted:
10mm is almost twice as good. Seriously though, my cousin's got a FiveseveN Mk2 and I've shot it lots of times and it's made me want one of my own. Recoil impulse is hardly anything; feels like firing 115gr 9mm range ammo out of my M9. EXTREMELY easy to hold on target even when just flat out mag dumping. Nice accuracy, fun to shoot. I really love the unconventional index finger safety location too. Very simple to manipulate; I don't understand the derp, ah cayn't figger out this safety it's in the wrong location crap from people. View Quote I did a 50 round mag dump at 50 yards a couple weeks ago. Basically made a big hole the size of my hand. |
|
Quoted:
Don't even pretend it's a rifle round. View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Damn, man! I was just looking for a lighthearted 5.7 discussion but you went all out! I appreciate your info and analysis. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
9mm Steel Core WILL NOT penetrate like 5.7x28. Now that Elite Ammunition is offering DevestaTOR to "Joe Public", the penetration is MUCH better than FN SS190 A.P. I hate using this example, but it is documented and not some "Well I heard from the guy at the local gun shop that it won't stop small mice" Keep in mind, neither load used by the dirt bag was in anyway one of the better loads for the 5.7x28.... FORT HOOD SHOOTING... Using SS192 and SS197SR ammunition (common commercial 5.7x28 ammo), several 20-30 round magazines and an FN 5.7 (shooter also had a .357 revolver but did not use it), Hassan killed 13 and wounded 32 people. Many armchair ballistics expert criticized this result as proof that the FN 5.7 platform is not lethal enough because of the proportion of the fatalities to the wounded. Others have proposed that had Hassan used another type of pistol, 9mm or .45, there would have been more fatalities. 1. 11 people were shot center-of-mass (COM), one was shot in the stomach and one was shot in the head. All 13 died. All 11 victims who were shot COM did not survive. 2. 3 of the 13 people who died, tried to charge Hassan, but he stopped them with COM shots. 3. The 32 people who were wounded were hit in the arms, legs, hips and shoulders. None of the wounded survivors were shot COM. The following conclusions can be drawn: 1. The FN 5.7 is a very lethal round CQB because all 11 victims who were shot COM died. No survivors for those hit COM. 2. The FN 5.7 is a real stopper, because 3 tried to charge Hassan at close range and were stopped by COM shots. 3. One of the fatalities was shot in the stomach, and died. The fragmentation of the SS197R round can create a hail of metal shards that can cause serious internal organ damage and bleeding in the stomach. 4. None of the 32 people who were hit in the extremities, hips and shoulders were able to muster a counter-attack because the FN 5.7 must have shattered or broken bones. The high rate of wounded vicitms to fatalities was the direct result of the shooting ability of Hassan (or lack thereof), and not because the 5.7x28 round is not lethal. 5. Sgt. Kimberly Munley (base civilian police), one of the first responders, was immediately disabled with 5.7x28 bullet shrapnels to her wrist and a second 5.7x28 bullet broke her femur. The light 5.7x28 commercial ammo showed that it can shatter large bones due to its velocity. Her femur (the largest bone in the human body) was SHATTERED into 120 pieces. 6. According to medical personnel, there was so much blood in the room that it was difficult to get to the victims because the floor became very slippery. One can conclude that the commercial 5.7x28 rounds can fragment or tumble, causing immense blood loss. 7. It took five bullets (which I assume was a 9 mm) from Sgt Mark Todd to stop Hasan. And he survived his wounds (no available info on where he was hit, except that one of the bullets paralyzed Hasan). In conclusion: 1. The FN 5.7 is definitely a very lethal round. 100% fatality for COM shots. 2. The FN 5.7 is a man-stopper. Three military men tried to charge Hasan, and all three were stopped. 2. The FN 5.7 is a very incapacitating round, if extremities are hit, because it is powerful enough to break the femur (which is the largest bone in the body) 3. The fragmentation or tumbling effect of commercial ammo can cause a lot of blood loss. This is a DOCUMENTED real world shooting as compared to "I was told by my brother-in-law who heard it from a gun shop employee" story. In comparison, here is a LINK to another DOCUMENTED shooting where Officer had to place 17 ROUNDS OF .45 acp in a dirt bag to stop him. I only carry an FN FiveseveN now as I trust it more than any 9mm, .40 S&W, or .45 acp. The main issue I had was trying to locate a Duty holster and spare magazine carrier. I carry Elite Ammunition S4M which chronographs OVER 2,400 fps out of the FiveseveN pistol and WILL penetrate Level IIIA body armor. In addition it will penetrate 1 1/4" bullet proof glass. It's generally excepted that hydrostatic shock begins at 2,000 fps, some studies report it as low as 1,100 fps. I really have to believe that for the U.S. Secret Service to adopt the 5.7x28 that had pretty good documentation of round performance. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AL-kv6bVkk ETA: I think it says something that 5.7 proponents basically only point to the Fort Hood murders and Elite Ammo, who approached DocGKR contacted to test some of their ammunition under the FBI terminal ballistics protocols....and who never provided any ammunition to test. So one can safely conclude that they perhaps had reasons for not wanting their products tested in a standardized, systematic fashion against calibrated ballistic media. |
|
Quoted:
Yeah, because a dirtbag executing unsuspecting people with the element of surprise is totally comparable to performance against a hostile. ETA: I think it says something that 5.7 proponents basically only point to the Fort Hood murders and Elite Ammo, who approached DocGKR contacted to test some of their ammunition under the FBI terminal ballistics protocols....and who never provided any ammunition to test. So one can safely conclude that they perhaps had reasons for not wanting their products tested in a standardized, systematic fashion against calibrated ballistic media. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
9mm Steel Core WILL NOT penetrate like 5.7x28. Now that Elite Ammunition is offering DevestaTOR to "Joe Public", the penetration is MUCH better than FN SS190 A.P. I hate using this example, but it is documented and not some "Well I heard from the guy at the local gun shop that it won't stop small mice" Keep in mind, neither load used by the dirt bag was in anyway one of the better loads for the 5.7x28.... FORT HOOD SHOOTING... Using SS192 and SS197SR ammunition (common commercial 5.7x28 ammo), several 20-30 round magazines and an FN 5.7 (shooter also had a .357 revolver but did not use it), Hassan killed 13 and wounded 32 people. Many armchair ballistics expert criticized this result as proof that the FN 5.7 platform is not lethal enough because of the proportion of the fatalities to the wounded. Others have proposed that had Hassan used another type of pistol, 9mm or .45, there would have been more fatalities. 1. 11 people were shot center-of-mass (COM), one was shot in the stomach and one was shot in the head. All 13 died. All 11 victims who were shot COM did not survive. 2. 3 of the 13 people who died, tried to charge Hassan, but he stopped them with COM shots. 3. The 32 people who were wounded were hit in the arms, legs, hips and shoulders. None of the wounded survivors were shot COM. The following conclusions can be drawn: 1. The FN 5.7 is a very lethal round CQB because all 11 victims who were shot COM died. No survivors for those hit COM. 2. The FN 5.7 is a real stopper, because 3 tried to charge Hassan at close range and were stopped by COM shots. 3. One of the fatalities was shot in the stomach, and died. The fragmentation of the SS197R round can create a hail of metal shards that can cause serious internal organ damage and bleeding in the stomach. 4. None of the 32 people who were hit in the extremities, hips and shoulders were able to muster a counter-attack because the FN 5.7 must have shattered or broken bones. The high rate of wounded vicitms to fatalities was the direct result of the shooting ability of Hassan (or lack thereof), and not because the 5.7x28 round is not lethal. 5. Sgt. Kimberly Munley (base civilian police), one of the first responders, was immediately disabled with 5.7x28 bullet shrapnels to her wrist and a second 5.7x28 bullet broke her femur. The light 5.7x28 commercial ammo showed that it can shatter large bones due to its velocity. Her femur (the largest bone in the human body) was SHATTERED into 120 pieces. 6. According to medical personnel, there was so much blood in the room that it was difficult to get to the victims because the floor became very slippery. One can conclude that the commercial 5.7x28 rounds can fragment or tumble, causing immense blood loss. 7. It took five bullets (which I assume was a 9 mm) from Sgt Mark Todd to stop Hasan. And he survived his wounds (no available info on where he was hit, except that one of the bullets paralyzed Hasan). In conclusion: 1. The FN 5.7 is definitely a very lethal round. 100% fatality for COM shots. 2. The FN 5.7 is a man-stopper. Three military men tried to charge Hasan, and all three were stopped. 2. The FN 5.7 is a very incapacitating round, if extremities are hit, because it is powerful enough to break the femur (which is the largest bone in the body) 3. The fragmentation or tumbling effect of commercial ammo can cause a lot of blood loss. This is a DOCUMENTED real world shooting as compared to "I was told by my brother-in-law who heard it from a gun shop employee" story. In comparison, here is a LINK to another DOCUMENTED shooting where Officer had to place 17 ROUNDS OF .45 acp in a dirt bag to stop him. I only carry an FN FiveseveN now as I trust it more than any 9mm, .40 S&W, or .45 acp. The main issue I had was trying to locate a Duty holster and spare magazine carrier. I carry Elite Ammunition S4M which chronographs OVER 2,400 fps out of the FiveseveN pistol and WILL penetrate Level IIIA body armor. In addition it will penetrate 1 1/4" bullet proof glass. It's generally excepted that hydrostatic shock begins at 2,000 fps, some studies report it as low as 1,100 fps. I really have to believe that for the U.S. Secret Service to adopt the 5.7x28 that had pretty good documentation of round performance. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AL-kv6bVkk ETA: I think it says something that 5.7 proponents basically only point to the Fort Hood murders and Elite Ammo, who approached DocGKR contacted to test some of their ammunition under the FBI terminal ballistics protocols....and who never provided any ammunition to test. So one can safely conclude that they perhaps had reasons for not wanting their products tested in a standardized, systematic fashion against calibrated ballistic media. Seems like you may have some preconceived conclusions. Why don't you like 5.7? |
|
Quoted:
9mm Steel Core WILL NOT penetrate like 5.7x28. Now that Elite Ammunition is offering DevestaTOR to "Joe Public", the penetration is MUCH better than FN SS190 A.P. I hate using this example, but it is documented and not some "Well I heard from the guy at the local gun shop that it won't stop small mice" Keep in mind, neither load used by the dirt bag was in anyway one of the better loads for the 5.7x28.... FORT HOOD SHOOTING... Using SS192 and SS197SR ammunition (common commercial 5.7x28 ammo), several 20-30 round magazines and an FN 5.7 (shooter also had a .357 revolver but did not use it), Hassan killed 13 and wounded 32 people. Many armchair ballistics expert criticized this result as proof that the FN 5.7 platform is not lethal enough because of the proportion of the fatalities to the wounded. Others have proposed that had Hassan used another type of pistol, 9mm or .45, there would have been more fatalities. 1. 11 people were shot center-of-mass (COM), one was shot in the stomach and one was shot in the head. All 13 died. All 11 victims who were shot COM did not survive. 2. 3 of the 13 people who died, tried to charge Hassan, but he stopped them with COM shots. 3. The 32 people who were wounded were hit in the arms, legs, hips and shoulders. None of the wounded survivors were shot COM. The following conclusions can be drawn: 1. The FN 5.7 is a very lethal round CQB because all 11 victims who were shot COM died. No survivors for those hit COM. 2. The FN 5.7 is a real stopper, because 3 tried to charge Hassan at close range and were stopped by COM shots. 3. One of the fatalities was shot in the stomach, and died. The fragmentation of the SS197R round can create a hail of metal shards that can cause serious internal organ damage and bleeding in the stomach. 4. None of the 32 people who were hit in the extremities, hips and shoulders were able to muster a counter-attack because the FN 5.7 must have shattered or broken bones. The high rate of wounded vicitms to fatalities was the direct result of the shooting ability of Hassan (or lack thereof), and not because the 5.7x28 round is not lethal. 5. Sgt. Kimberly Munley (base civilian police), one of the first responders, was immediately disabled with 5.7x28 bullet shrapnels to her wrist and a second 5.7x28 bullet broke her femur. The light 5.7x28 commercial ammo showed that it can shatter large bones due to its velocity. Her femur (the largest bone in the human body) was SHATTERED into 120 pieces. 6. According to medical personnel, there was so much blood in the room that it was difficult to get to the victims because the floor became very slippery. One can conclude that the commercial 5.7x28 rounds can fragment or tumble, causing immense blood loss. 7. It took five bullets (which I assume was a 9 mm) from Sgt Mark Todd to stop Hasan. And he survived his wounds (no available info on where he was hit, except that one of the bullets paralyzed Hasan). In conclusion: 1. The FN 5.7 is definitely a very lethal round. 100% fatality for COM shots. 2. The FN 5.7 is a man-stopper. Three military men tried to charge Hasan, and all three were stopped. 2. The FN 5.7 is a very incapacitating round, if extremities are hit, because it is powerful enough to break the femur (which is the largest bone in the body) 3. The fragmentation or tumbling effect of commercial ammo can cause a lot of blood loss. This is a DOCUMENTED real world shooting as compared to "I was told by my brother-in-law who heard it from a gun shop employee" story. In comparison, here is a LINK to another DOCUMENTED shooting where Officer had to place 17 ROUNDS OF .45 acp in a dirt bag to stop him. I only carry an FN FiveseveN now as I trust it more than any 9mm, .40 S&W, or .45 acp. The main issue I had was trying to locate a Duty holster and spare magazine carrier. I carry Elite Ammunition S4M which chronographs OVER 2,400 fps out of the FiveseveN pistol and WILL penetrate Level IIIA body armor. In addition it will penetrate 1 1/4" bullet proof glass. It's generally excepted that hydrostatic shock begins at 2,000 fps, some studies report it as low as 1,100 fps. I really have to believe that for the U.S. Secret Service to adopt the 5.7x28 that had pretty good documentation of round performance. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AL-kv6bVkk View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Great range toy, especially the SBR PS90. But if it were so wonderful, why are more police, Secret Service & militaries dropping it to move to....9mm? steel core AP will do everything the 5.7 does, with greater surface area & mass. I've operated on score of people--nobody ever complained about what they were shot with, they simply bled. That said, the bigger area & weight of a 9mm or larger, well, physics, and shit....nevermind. Arguing calibers is like arguing religion or politics. Don't even pretend it's a rifle round. I hate using this example, but it is documented and not some "Well I heard from the guy at the local gun shop that it won't stop small mice" Keep in mind, neither load used by the dirt bag was in anyway one of the better loads for the 5.7x28.... FORT HOOD SHOOTING... Using SS192 and SS197SR ammunition (common commercial 5.7x28 ammo), several 20-30 round magazines and an FN 5.7 (shooter also had a .357 revolver but did not use it), Hassan killed 13 and wounded 32 people. Many armchair ballistics expert criticized this result as proof that the FN 5.7 platform is not lethal enough because of the proportion of the fatalities to the wounded. Others have proposed that had Hassan used another type of pistol, 9mm or .45, there would have been more fatalities. 1. 11 people were shot center-of-mass (COM), one was shot in the stomach and one was shot in the head. All 13 died. All 11 victims who were shot COM did not survive. 2. 3 of the 13 people who died, tried to charge Hassan, but he stopped them with COM shots. 3. The 32 people who were wounded were hit in the arms, legs, hips and shoulders. None of the wounded survivors were shot COM. The following conclusions can be drawn: 1. The FN 5.7 is a very lethal round CQB because all 11 victims who were shot COM died. No survivors for those hit COM. 2. The FN 5.7 is a real stopper, because 3 tried to charge Hassan at close range and were stopped by COM shots. 3. One of the fatalities was shot in the stomach, and died. The fragmentation of the SS197R round can create a hail of metal shards that can cause serious internal organ damage and bleeding in the stomach. 4. None of the 32 people who were hit in the extremities, hips and shoulders were able to muster a counter-attack because the FN 5.7 must have shattered or broken bones. The high rate of wounded vicitms to fatalities was the direct result of the shooting ability of Hassan (or lack thereof), and not because the 5.7x28 round is not lethal. 5. Sgt. Kimberly Munley (base civilian police), one of the first responders, was immediately disabled with 5.7x28 bullet shrapnels to her wrist and a second 5.7x28 bullet broke her femur. The light 5.7x28 commercial ammo showed that it can shatter large bones due to its velocity. Her femur (the largest bone in the human body) was SHATTERED into 120 pieces. 6. According to medical personnel, there was so much blood in the room that it was difficult to get to the victims because the floor became very slippery. One can conclude that the commercial 5.7x28 rounds can fragment or tumble, causing immense blood loss. 7. It took five bullets (which I assume was a 9 mm) from Sgt Mark Todd to stop Hasan. And he survived his wounds (no available info on where he was hit, except that one of the bullets paralyzed Hasan). In conclusion: 1. The FN 5.7 is definitely a very lethal round. 100% fatality for COM shots. 2. The FN 5.7 is a man-stopper. Three military men tried to charge Hasan, and all three were stopped. 2. The FN 5.7 is a very incapacitating round, if extremities are hit, because it is powerful enough to break the femur (which is the largest bone in the body) 3. The fragmentation or tumbling effect of commercial ammo can cause a lot of blood loss. This is a DOCUMENTED real world shooting as compared to "I was told by my brother-in-law who heard it from a gun shop employee" story. In comparison, here is a LINK to another DOCUMENTED shooting where Officer had to place 17 ROUNDS OF .45 acp in a dirt bag to stop him. I only carry an FN FiveseveN now as I trust it more than any 9mm, .40 S&W, or .45 acp. The main issue I had was trying to locate a Duty holster and spare magazine carrier. I carry Elite Ammunition S4M which chronographs OVER 2,400 fps out of the FiveseveN pistol and WILL penetrate Level IIIA body armor. In addition it will penetrate 1 1/4" bullet proof glass. It's generally excepted that hydrostatic shock begins at 2,000 fps, some studies report it as low as 1,100 fps. I really have to believe that for the U.S. Secret Service to adopt the 5.7x28 that had pretty good documentation of round performance. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AL-kv6bVkk From what I recall, almost all of his deceased victims were shot multiple times, including when they were on the ground. In other words, anchor shots. Yes it broke a woman's femur, 9mm, .45, .357 etc. could have done that too. Still, it is impressive for a small bullet "4. None of the 32 people who were hit in the extremities, hips and shoulders were able to muster a counter-attack because the FN 5.7 must have shattered or broken bones." Actually, many people were only trying to run away. Others tried to hide. Very few tried to fight. None were armed. Your reasoning for why they chose not to fight back reeks of bias confirmation as do several of your other points. You really seem to be seeing what you want, but there is no crime in that. No, I am not pooping on the 5.7. I think it's a nasty little bugger with some definite advantages over larger calibers. It's just not the Grim Reaper some are making it out to be because of Ft. Hood. Would I own a 5.7 pistol? Nope. I wouldn't mind an AR57 upper tho. |
|
Quoted:
I'm not saying he's right, or you're wrong, but he did provide an analysis even if it was a bit subjective. Seems like you may have some preconceived conclusions. Why don't you like 5.7? View Quote That its proponents for SD use generally repeat notions gained from a particularly slanted reading of a terrorist mass murder and try to apply them to a defensive encounter is also off-putting. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.