Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 3
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 7:28:13 AM EST
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

That’s why they needed to be bailed out I guess.

Too big to fail means they have too much juice to fail. Too many people in their pockets.
View Quote
Actually, they didn't need a bailout at all. If you go back and read up on the subject you'll find that at the time the government was so concerned that there would be a domino effect of bank failures that when they designed their bailout plan they forced even healthy banks to take the money with the idea that if all banks took it then the bailouts wouldn't be a signal to investors/account holders that a specific bank was "in trouble", thus artificially creating a panic. Wells, and several other heathy banks, begrudgingly took the $ and promptly sat on it, and then they paid it back, with interest, when the gov plan allowed for it. Wells didn't need a bailout at all, in fact they were in "buying mode" looking for good deals amongst failing banks...which is where the Wachovia acquisition came from.

There were other elements of the various bailouts that were full on hand outs to businesses that shouldn't have got one, but the healthy big banks bailouts actually worked out just fine for the government...it's one of the very few things gov has done in recent decades that actually had a positive return.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 7:31:47 AM EST
[#2]
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 7:34:29 AM EST
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
FAOC.
View Quote
Dern tootin'!
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 7:35:27 AM EST
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

This.

He got a lesson in zealotry.
View Quote
It won’t have any effect.

Rich socialists are usually intelligent but they have no common sense with which to see the obvious.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 7:37:13 AM EST
[#5]
Her job, her only job, is to repeat propaganda.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 7:38:16 AM EST
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I want ringside when that happens.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
She is gonna piss of the wrong person any day now.
I want ringside when that happens.
Hopefully she has info that could lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 7:40:06 AM EST
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Actually, they didn't need a bailout at all. If you go back and read up on the subject you'll find that at the time the government was so concerned that there would be a domino effect of bank failures that when they designed their bailout plan they forced even healthy banks to take the money with the idea that if all banks took it then the bailouts wouldn't be a signal to investors/account holders that a specific bank was "in trouble", thus artificially creating a panic. Wells, and several other heathy banks, begrudgingly took the $ and promptly sat on it, and then they paid it back, with interest, when the gov plan allowed for it. Wells didn't need a bailout at all, in fact they were in "buying mode" looking for good deals amongst failing banks...which is where the Wachovia acquisition came from.

There were other elements of the various bailouts that were full on hand outs to businesses that shouldn't have got one, but the healthy big banks bailouts actually worked out just fine for the government...it's one of the very few things gov has done in recent decades that actually had a positive return.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

That's why they needed to be bailed out I guess.

Too big to fail means they have too much juice to fail. Too many people in their pockets.
Actually, they didn't need a bailout at all. If you go back and read up on the subject you'll find that at the time the government was so concerned that there would be a domino effect of bank failures that when they designed their bailout plan they forced even healthy banks to take the money with the idea that if all banks took it then the bailouts wouldn't be a signal to investors/account holders that a specific bank was "in trouble", thus artificially creating a panic. Wells, and several other heathy banks, begrudgingly took the $ and promptly sat on it, and then they paid it back, with interest, when the gov plan allowed for it. Wells didn't need a bailout at all, in fact they were in "buying mode" looking for good deals amongst failing banks...which is where the Wachovia acquisition came from.

There were other elements of the various bailouts that were full on hand outs to businesses that shouldn't have got one, but the healthy big banks bailouts actually worked out just fine for the government...it's one of the very few things gov has done in recent decades that actually had a positive return.
Be careful with too many facts, it will give the OWS types diabetes.  
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 7:40:48 AM EST
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
HRC , Pelosi,  Feinstein have no control anymore.  The inmates are running the asylum now.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Do the Vegas bookmakers have an over/under on AOC being Arkancided yet?  Because that's something that depends entirely on the forbearance of her Democrat overseers.  Nearly impossible to predict.  I'll give it a shot, though.
HRC , Pelosi,  Feinstein have no control anymore.  The inmates are running the asylum now.
This.

If the old guard were still in charge, the new commies would’ve already been made to sit down and shut up.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 7:49:34 AM EST
[#9]
They should cancel all her credit cards, call in her student loans, ruin her credit, no loans for her.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 7:53:31 AM EST
[#10]
This is all by design.

Her handlers (justice Democrats) are looking to overthrow establishment Democrats or the moderate Democrats.

They don't give one shit whether she pisses off Pelosi or Feinstein. They want those seats in congress.

She's there to get the far left ideals out in the open.

She was found in a casting call if that tells you anything.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 8:35:25 AM EST
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You can bet your ass there were scores of liberals sitting around watching that on CSPAN whooping it up and high fiving each other baecause she was straight up kicking ass in their opinions.

Aviator
View Quote
Yep.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 8:37:32 AM EST
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They should cancel all her credit cards, call in her student loans, ruin her credit, no loans for her.
View Quote
doesn't she have like a 400 credit score?
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 8:46:26 AM EST
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
This is all by design.

Her handlers (justice Democrats) are looking to overthrow establishment Democrats or the moderate Democrats.

They don't give one shit whether she pisses off Pelosi or Feinstein. They want those seats in congress.

She's there to get the far left ideals out in the open.

She was found in a casting call if that tells you anything.
View Quote
Please.  there are no handlers.  do you even know why she was elected by her constituents in NY?  There was a 10% turnout.  The regular democrat didn't even campaign since he though he was a shoe in.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 8:56:23 AM EST
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If you repeat this conspiratorial left wing nonsense enough the public will begin to buy it.

The true Dem left has determined to push their agenda in spite of party leadership.

They are using s Bolshevik model to subvert the left.
View Quote
Worse, they are beginning to make progress this time around. Within a generation we will look back at this and say how much we miss these days.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 8:58:14 AM EST
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
These fucking morons and their idiot drone base of voters will drive off businesses from the US. I hope these companies are starting to see the light..
View Quote
Like other socialist nations, they will make laws forbidding this from happening.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 9:04:29 AM EST
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Since all of the major corporations are liberal and donate heavily to the Democrats it’s going to happen. She’s attacking all of them and painting a picture that they’re the boogeyman and that the government is the only thing that can save the people. The meltdown will be epic!
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
She is gonna piss of the wrong person any day now.
Since all of the major corporations are liberal and donate heavily to the Democrats it’s going to happen. She’s attacking all of them and painting a picture that they’re the boogeyman and that the government is the only thing that can save the people. The meltdown will be epic!
If you think they will stop donating to the Democrats, you are wrong. They will as that is their best chance at keeping the government off their backs. Give it support so that they don't go after them full force.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 9:15:57 AM EST
[#17]
I don't know why people bother to answer her questions.  She's a petulant child whose ignorance seems to know no limits yet she proudly wears that ignorance on her sleeve.  I swear I'd have called her out and asked if there was an adult in the house.  The fact that her constituents are dumber than her says tons, all of it bad.  
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 9:26:43 AM EST
[#18]
Based on the memo we got yesterday, I believe he will eventually capitulate to such ridiculous demands out of the sake of appeasement; as if that will reduce their appetite for blood.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 9:46:04 AM EST
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Commies love extortion.
View Quote
It's been going on for a long time, she is just dumb enough to be talking about it out in the open.  Remember, Obama used the DOJ to shakedown corporations to fund liberal non-profits.  Pepperidge Farm remembers.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gop-wants-to-eliminate-shadowy-doj-slush-fund-bankrolling-leftist-groups
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 10:02:29 AM EST
[#20]
Waren Buffett is their largest shareholder, huge democrat.  At this point I wouldn’t care if the socialized the big banks, would serve them right.  Then the insurance companies, that would put a little dent into his net worth.  He’d probably still vote dem.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 10:22:18 AM EST
[#21]
Doesn't matter how often she's corrected with facts and logic, she won't pay any attention at all. She's focused on her bullshit and ignores everything else. That's why occasionally she'll delete a tweet but won't admit how stupid she is. No facts matter, only her agenda. You aren't going to embarrass her or change her mind. And shes barely smarter than her "constituents".
And personally I hope the dems really push for the wealth tax on billionaires, we should join them on this one for laughs. It isn't like the billionaires are defenseless or can't afford to buy enough congress critters, lawyers, accountants etc to get past the noise from the dems on the tax.
But what it would hopefully do is slow down their attacks on conservatives for a bit. It would be nice to see bloomturd have to spend a ton of time fighting against the wealth tax instead of funding gun control.
And if the dems pissed the billionaires off enough maybe they'd fund a third party to contend against the dems. That would be a hoot to watch the money siphon off away from the dems to go somewhere useless.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 11:50:37 AM EST
[#22]
I heard another little gem from the YouTube:  She listed WF as holding Puerto Rico’s bonds as the reason they can’t extricate themselves from constraining debt.

I know she’s stupid and that this is mostly a rhetorical question, but what is a bank SUPPOSED to do with worthless bonds?  Except not have held them in the first place.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 11:58:14 AM EST
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Actually, they didn't need a bailout at all. If you go back and read up on the subject you'll find that at the time the government was so concerned that there would be a domino effect of bank failures that when they designed their bailout plan they forced even healthy banks to take the money with the idea that if all banks took it then the bailouts wouldn't be a signal to investors/account holders that a specific bank was "in trouble", thus artificially creating a panic. Wells, and several other heathy banks, begrudgingly took the $ and promptly sat on it, and then they paid it back, with interest, when the gov plan allowed for it. Wells didn't need a bailout at all, in fact they were in "buying mode" looking for good deals amongst failing banks...which is where the Wachovia acquisition came from.

There were other elements of the various bailouts that were full on hand outs to businesses that shouldn't have got one, but the healthy big banks bailouts actually worked out just fine for the government...it's one of the very few things gov has done in recent decades that actually had a positive return.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

That’s why they needed to be bailed out I guess.

Too big to fail means they have too much juice to fail. Too many people in their pockets.
Actually, they didn't need a bailout at all. If you go back and read up on the subject you'll find that at the time the government was so concerned that there would be a domino effect of bank failures that when they designed their bailout plan they forced even healthy banks to take the money with the idea that if all banks took it then the bailouts wouldn't be a signal to investors/account holders that a specific bank was "in trouble", thus artificially creating a panic. Wells, and several other heathy banks, begrudgingly took the $ and promptly sat on it, and then they paid it back, with interest, when the gov plan allowed for it. Wells didn't need a bailout at all, in fact they were in "buying mode" looking for good deals amongst failing banks...which is where the Wachovia acquisition came from.

There were other elements of the various bailouts that were full on hand outs to businesses that shouldn't have got one, but the healthy big banks bailouts actually worked out just fine for the government...it's one of the very few things gov has done in recent decades that actually had a positive return.
Right, and the purpose of the federal reserve is to stabilize the economy and not to siphon off as much of Americas wealth as possible to the people who control it.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 12:00:39 PM EST
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You know what, I just got it. She is literally too stupid to insult. This is going to be the next wave in the leftist assault on us - complete and utter morons.
View Quote
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/03/meet_alexandria_ocasiocortezs_rasputin.html

The larger plot was and remains to recruit attractive people to run for Congress. The longer-term strategy seems to be to gain control of the Democrat Party, Congress and ultimately the United States government itself. Their stated goal “was to run hundreds of Democratic candidates” who do "not take corporate money and serve the voters rather than the donors," as well as "capture a significant amount of Congress with strong progressives" and "overpower the corporate Democrats."

In the 2018 elections, 26 of the 79 candidates endorsed by Justice Democrats won their respective primary elections. Along with AOC, six other of these progressive minority candidates won in the general election: Raúl Grijalva, Ro Khanna, Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Pramila Jayapal. The districts where they won were all solidly Democrat. This suggests why the far left wing newbies were not only given key committee assignments and but quickly found senior Democrats fawning over them. When Rep. Ilhan Omar was accused of anti-Semitic remarks, Democrats could not find the will to directly condemn her. Instead they passed a watered down meaningless resolution against hate.  Pelosi and other establishment Democrats are understandably afraid of who will be targeted by the Justice Democrats in 2020 and they don’t want to antagonize them.

In her primary, Ocasio-Cortez received 57.13% of the vote (15,897) to Joe Crowley's 42.5% (11,761) to defeat the 10-term incumbent. Ocasio-Cortez won the general election with 78% of the vote (110,318) to Pappas's 14% (17,762). The Democrats all got the message.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 12:01:05 PM EST
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Be careful with too many facts, it will give the OWS types diabetes.  
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

That's why they needed to be bailed out I guess.

Too big to fail means they have too much juice to fail. Too many people in their pockets.
Actually, they didn't need a bailout at all. If you go back and read up on the subject you'll find that at the time the government was so concerned that there would be a domino effect of bank failures that when they designed their bailout plan they forced even healthy banks to take the money with the idea that if all banks took it then the bailouts wouldn't be a signal to investors/account holders that a specific bank was "in trouble", thus artificially creating a panic. Wells, and several other heathy banks, begrudgingly took the $ and promptly sat on it, and then they paid it back, with interest, when the gov plan allowed for it. Wells didn't need a bailout at all, in fact they were in "buying mode" looking for good deals amongst failing banks...which is where the Wachovia acquisition came from.

There were other elements of the various bailouts that were full on hand outs to businesses that shouldn't have got one, but the healthy big banks bailouts actually worked out just fine for the government...it's one of the very few things gov has done in recent decades that actually had a positive return.
Be careful with too many facts, it will give the OWS types diabetes.  
Lol.

Some of you people are schizophrenic with what you choose to believe or not believe from the government.

One minute they’re lying their ass off and fucking us over, the next they’re acting in your best interests, because they’re that magnanimous.

Here’s a newsflash, they’re always lying their asses off and fucking you over. You just find some excuses more palatable than others.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 12:01:50 PM EST
[#26]
Keep attacking you crazy woman. Pretty soon you will have alienated all your potential corporate donors. It will be glorious.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 1:26:44 PM EST
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Right, and the purpose of the federal reserve is to stabilize the economy and not to siphon off as much of Americas wealth as possible to the people who control it.
View Quote
My dad is a full-on FRB conspiracy theorist, so I've heard it all before. The fact remains, you do NOT want politicians in charge of the money supply and almost everything the FRB does that people don't like is the direct result of the elected officials in DC doing stupid crap (primarily spending more than they take in with taxes). Without that deficit/debt spending, what is the FRB doing that is objectionable? Serious question.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 2:14:21 PM EST
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Please.  there are no handlers.  do you even know why she was elected by her constituents in NY?  There was a 10% turnout.  The regular democrat didn't even campaign since he though he was a shoe in.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
This is all by design.

Her handlers (justice Democrats) are looking to overthrow establishment Democrats or the moderate Democrats.

They don't give one shit whether she pisses off Pelosi or Feinstein. They want those seats in congress.

She's there to get the far left ideals out in the open.

She was found in a casting call if that tells you anything.
Please.  there are no handlers.  do you even know why she was elected by her constituents in NY?  There was a 10% turnout.  The regular democrat didn't even campaign since he though he was a shoe in.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=share&v=1h5iv6sECGU
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 2:40:29 PM EST
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
My dad is a full-on FRB conspiracy theorist, so I've heard it all before. The fact remains, you do NOT want politicians in charge of the money supply and almost everything the FRB does that people don't like is the direct result of the elected officials in DC doing stupid crap (primarily spending more than they take in with taxes). Without that deficit/debt spending, what is the FRB doing that is objectionable? Serious question.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Right, and the purpose of the federal reserve is to stabilize the economy and not to siphon off as much of Americas wealth as possible to the people who control it.
My dad is a full-on FRB conspiracy theorist, so I've heard it all before. The fact remains, you do NOT want politicians in charge of the money supply and almost everything the FRB does that people don't like is the direct result of the elected officials in DC doing stupid crap (primarily spending more than they take in with taxes). Without that deficit/debt spending, what is the FRB doing that is objectionable? Serious question.
By taking control of the money supply away from the government and giving it to private banks you create the conditions where by the powers that be can hide their malfeasance much more easily.

The politicians like this arrangement because they can plead ignorance or powerlessness while pointing to the Fed but at the same time the Fed is entirely unaccountable and shielded behind layers of obfuscation which makes it all but impossible to pin blame for economic negligence on any one person or group of persons. The way the Fed is structured is essential to allowing unaccountable massive deficit spending to occur in the first place.

I don’t pretend to understand all of the inner workings, the entire system is deliberately designed to be a confusing morass of regulations and practices. I do understand that giving control of such an essential function of government to such a tiny sliver of the population is a bad idea. Many of the stockholders of the various banks who make up the Fed system aren’t even American, so how can they be trusted to act in America’s interest?
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 3:23:46 PM EST
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
By taking control of the money supply away from the government and giving it to private banks you create the conditions where by the powers that be can hide their malfeasance much more easily.

The politicians like this arrangement because they can plead ignorance or powerlessness while pointing to the Fed but at the same time the Fed is entirely unaccountable and shielded behind layers of obfuscation which makes it all but impossible to pin blame for economic negligence on any one person or group of persons. The way the Fed is structured is essential to allowing unaccountable massive deficit spending to occur in the first place.

I don't pretend to understand all of the inner workings, the entire system is deliberately designed to be a confusing morass of regulations and practices. I do understand that giving control of such an essential function of government to such a tiny sliver of the population is a bad idea. Many of the stockholders of the various banks who make up the Fed system aren't even American, so how can they be trusted to act in America's interest?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Right, and the purpose of the federal reserve is to stabilize the economy and not to siphon off as much of Americas wealth as possible to the people who control it.
My dad is a full-on FRB conspiracy theorist, so I've heard it all before. The fact remains, you do NOT want politicians in charge of the money supply and almost everything the FRB does that people don't like is the direct result of the elected officials in DC doing stupid crap (primarily spending more than they take in with taxes). Without that deficit/debt spending, what is the FRB doing that is objectionable? Serious question.
By taking control of the money supply away from the government and giving it to private banks you create the conditions where by the powers that be can hide their malfeasance much more easily.

The politicians like this arrangement because they can plead ignorance or powerlessness while pointing to the Fed but at the same time the Fed is entirely unaccountable and shielded behind layers of obfuscation which makes it all but impossible to pin blame for economic negligence on any one person or group of persons. The way the Fed is structured is essential to allowing unaccountable massive deficit spending to occur in the first place.

I don't pretend to understand all of the inner workings, the entire system is deliberately designed to be a confusing morass of regulations and practices. I do understand that giving control of such an essential function of government to such a tiny sliver of the population is a bad idea. Many of the stockholders of the various banks who make up the Fed system aren't even American, so how can they be trusted to act in America's interest?
Maduro concurs, gov't should control the currency and the economy.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 3:32:17 PM EST
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Maduro concurs, gov't should control the currency and the economy.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Right, and the purpose of the federal reserve is to stabilize the economy and not to siphon off as much of Americas wealth as possible to the people who control it.
My dad is a full-on FRB conspiracy theorist, so I've heard it all before. The fact remains, you do NOT want politicians in charge of the money supply and almost everything the FRB does that people don't like is the direct result of the elected officials in DC doing stupid crap (primarily spending more than they take in with taxes). Without that deficit/debt spending, what is the FRB doing that is objectionable? Serious question.
By taking control of the money supply away from the government and giving it to private banks you create the conditions where by the powers that be can hide their malfeasance much more easily.

The politicians like this arrangement because they can plead ignorance or powerlessness while pointing to the Fed but at the same time the Fed is entirely unaccountable and shielded behind layers of obfuscation which makes it all but impossible to pin blame for economic negligence on any one person or group of persons. The way the Fed is structured is essential to allowing unaccountable massive deficit spending to occur in the first place.

I don't pretend to understand all of the inner workings, the entire system is deliberately designed to be a confusing morass of regulations and practices. I do understand that giving control of such an essential function of government to such a tiny sliver of the population is a bad idea. Many of the stockholders of the various banks who make up the Fed system aren't even American, so how can they be trusted to act in America's interest?
Maduro concurs, gov't should control the currency and the economy.
The founding fathers concurred that private central banking was a bad idea.

This has nothing to do with controlling the day to day business of the economy, that’s fucking real retarded.

Does the name “Woodrow Wilson” mean anything to you?
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 11:37:33 PM EST
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Snip

Along with AOC, six other of these progressive minority candidates won in the general election: Raúl Grijalva, Ro Khanna, Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Pramila Jayapal
View Quote
Outside of Pressley, all solid American names there.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 11:41:50 PM EST
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Not to be spoil sport here..... But she has a point....

George Soros isn't to be absolved of his financing of any of his pet causes. Money, after all, makes the world fo round.

She won with her base and I'm sure that's all she cares about....
View Quote
That is completely retarded.

Once that door opens, society collapses.

You cant accept unlimited universal liability from the butterfly effect.
Link Posted: 3/13/2019 11:44:39 PM EST
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They’re still in business because the government doesn’t regulate the banks, the banks regulate the government.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Both of them are cunts. How Wells Fargo is still in business is beyond me.
They’re still in business because the government doesn’t regulate the banks, the banks regulate the government.
Let me put it another way, why does anyone willingly deposit money with them?
Page / 3
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top