Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 11
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 5/12/2017 1:02:21 PM EST
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Lets See.

FBI Knew before hand about the Ft. Hood Shooter

FBI Knew about the Boston Bombers

FBI Knew about the San Bardino Shooter

FBI Knew about the Texas Shooters and there was an Agent with them during the attack.

FBI Knew about the Florida Night Club Shooter

Justice Dept. stated during Hearings that there was no evidence of Russian Interference as did the FBI.

Comey has stated that he didn't recommend charges against Clinton due to the lack of "Intent" ,  that's not
his FUCKING JOB , his job was to investigate and turn over Facts.  Not Grand Stand in front of the Media.
Don't forget the allowing of Clinton Understudies to destroy their laptops with hammers.

He should have been fired after every single incident to set an example to do your job as you swore an oath to do.
View Quote
Well said
Link Posted: 5/12/2017 2:26:00 PM EST
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Either you're ignorant of history, or you are a democrat.  Republicans were slaughtered after Nixon resigned.  Democrats controlled Congress until 1994.  That's what this is about.  The Soros crowd thought that they were invincible.  Never lose an election again.  They would import so many more third world immigrants that they could do whatever they want.  America would become one giant colonial plantation.  Then they lost.  So now they're pushing the fake Russia story to try and engineer the same result.  

If they push out Trump it's not "Pence takes over."  If they push out Trump we then have a choice between tyranny and civil war.  
View Quote
Prominent Republicans of day defended and backed Nixon's actions and said it was all blown out of proportion. In fact, most Republicans came to Nixon's defense. When Nixon was finally forced to resign, it was bad because he took the whole system with him. Ronald Reagan and George HW Bush were two of those Republicans, and it didn't seem to harm their careers much.

But effectively you are arguing that Nixon should not have resigned because that would have prevented Carter from becoming President. I suspect if the party establishment had contained the catastrophe at Nixon and not dragged the whole party down that might have been the better plan.

So taking this back to today, if you really think 3+ more years of what we've got is going to prevent the next Carter... I just can't see it. It's more like locking it in compared to what Pence might be able to accomplish in that time. But if Nixon's history tells us anything, it might be that it's already a lost cause. We've already repeated the history of backing up an obviously, clearly losing position. Die-hard Nixon supporters were not the ones that determined the future, they were the ones mostly locked out (in the short run).
Link Posted: 5/12/2017 2:34:18 PM EST
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Prominent Republicans of day defended and backed Nixon's actions and said it was all blown out of proportion. In fact, most Republicans came to Nixon's defense. When Nixon was finally forced to resign, it was bad because he took the whole system with him. Ronald Reagan and George HW Bush were two of those Republicans, and it didn't seem to harm their careers much.

But effectively you are arguing that Nixon should not have resigned because that would have prevented Carter from becoming President. I suspect if the party establishment had contained the catastrophe at Nixon and not dragged the whole party down that might have been the better plan.

So taking this back to today, if you really think 3+ more years of what we've got is going to prevent the next Carter... I just can't see it. It's more like locking it in compared to what Pence might be able to accomplish in that time. But if Nixon's history tells us anything, it might be that it's already a lost cause. We've already repeated the history of backing up an obviously, clearly losing position. Die-hard Nixon supporters were not the ones that determined the future, they were the ones mostly locked out (in the short run).
View Quote
And the siren's song repeats.  "Just walk away.  Just surrender.  We will be merciful."

Link Posted: 5/12/2017 2:38:51 PM EST
[#4]
And the plot thickens.

FBI agents promised Mr. Nikulin money, American citizenship and a free apartment for taking the fall over hacking Mrs. Clinton's campaign, he alleged in a letter published Thursday by Nastoyashchoe Vremya, a Russian-language website.

“[They told me:] you will have to confess to breaking into Clinton's inbox for [President Trump] on behalf of [Russian President Vladimir Putin],” Mr. Nikulin wrote, as translated by The Moscow Times.
View Quote
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/11/yevgeny-nikulin-alleged-russian-hacker-claims-fbi-/
Link Posted: 5/12/2017 2:39:13 PM EST
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Prominent Republicans of day defended and backed Nixon's actions and said it was all blown out of proportion. In fact, most Republicans came to Nixon's defense. When Nixon was finally forced to resign, it was bad because he took the whole system with him. Ronald Reagan and George HW Bush were two of those Republicans, and it didn't seem to harm their careers much.

But effectively you are arguing that Nixon should not have resigned because that would have prevented Carter from becoming President. I suspect if the party establishment had contained the catastrophe at Nixon and not dragged the whole party down that might have been the better plan.

So taking this back to today, if you really think 3+ more years of what we've got is going to prevent the next Carter... I just can't see it. It's more like locking it in compared to what Pence might be able to accomplish in that time. But if Nixon's history tells us anything, it might be that it's already a lost cause. We've already repeated the history of backing up an obviously, clearly losing position. Die-hard Nixon supporters were not the ones that determined the future, they were the ones mostly locked out (in the short run).
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Either you're ignorant of history, or you are a democrat.  Republicans were slaughtered after Nixon resigned.  Democrats controlled Congress until 1994.  That's what this is about.  The Soros crowd thought that they were invincible.  Never lose an election again.  They would import so many more third world immigrants that they could do whatever they want.  America would become one giant colonial plantation.  Then they lost.  So now they're pushing the fake Russia story to try and engineer the same result.  

If they push out Trump it's not "Pence takes over."  If they push out Trump we then have a choice between tyranny and civil war.  
Prominent Republicans of day defended and backed Nixon's actions and said it was all blown out of proportion. In fact, most Republicans came to Nixon's defense. When Nixon was finally forced to resign, it was bad because he took the whole system with him. Ronald Reagan and George HW Bush were two of those Republicans, and it didn't seem to harm their careers much.

But effectively you are arguing that Nixon should not have resigned because that would have prevented Carter from becoming President. I suspect if the party establishment had contained the catastrophe at Nixon and not dragged the whole party down that might have been the better plan.

So taking this back to today, if you really think 3+ more years of what we've got is going to prevent the next Carter... I just can't see it. It's more like locking it in compared to what Pence might be able to accomplish in that time. But if Nixon's history tells us anything, it might be that it's already a lost cause. We've already repeated the history of backing up an obviously, clearly losing position. Die-hard Nixon supporters were not the ones that determined the future, they were the ones mostly locked out (in the short run).
Good point.  At the end of the day what is worse:  A Trump impeachment or Trump going into the 2020 election with ~30 percent approval rating?

Of course, those aren't the only two options...but they are two options whose likelihood of occurrence seems to tick upwardly slightly each day.  Or each tweet.
Link Posted: 5/12/2017 2:43:05 PM EST
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Good point.  At the end of the day what is worse:  A Trump impeachment or Trump going into the 2020 election with ~30 percent approval rating?

Of course, those aren't the only two options...but they are two options whose likelihood of occurrence seems to tick upwardly slightly each day.  Or each tweet.
View Quote
Because evil must never be tolerated.  Soros is an evil man.  The Podesta brothers are evil men.  Crooked Hillary is an evil man woman.  It must be confronted and destroyed.  Take your siren's song of surrender somewhere else.  This Republic will not fall so long as good men rise to defend her.  

Attachment Attached File
   
Link Posted: 5/12/2017 2:47:32 PM EST
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Good point.  At the end of the day what is worse:  A Trump impeachment or Trump going into the 2020 election with ~30 percent approval rating?
View Quote
LOL. Approval ratings?

Oh lawdy
Link Posted: 5/12/2017 3:02:33 PM EST
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
LOL. Approval ratings?

Oh lawdy
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good point.  At the end of the day what is worse:  A Trump impeachment or Trump going into the 2020 election with ~30 percent approval rating?
LOL. Approval ratings?

Oh lawdy
LOL 2018 Midterms?

Oh lawdy
Link Posted: 5/12/2017 3:04:10 PM EST
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I can't wait to see the justifications for McCabe's ineviatable dismissal.
View Quote
He should have been gone on day one along with Comey.
Link Posted: 5/12/2017 3:11:44 PM EST
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
LOL 2018 Midterms?

Oh lawdy
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Good point.  At the end of the day what is worse:  A Trump impeachment or Trump going into the 2020 election with ~30 percent approval rating?
LOL. Approval ratings?

Oh lawdy
LOL 2018 Midterms?

Oh lawdy
Yeah I remember how you guys said we'd lose both the house and senate in 2016 too because we nominated Trump. We gained seats then and we will in 2018, too despite your "approval ratings". You give the MSM way too much validity man.
Link Posted: 5/12/2017 3:38:42 PM EST
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
She's having one of her good days.  I thank God for that.

@TheTallest
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:


He run out on the road. Don't think he'll be back.  real retarded now, boss. Dog-tired.

@TheTallest
Me too, Derp. Me too.

@waterglass
She's having one of her good days.  I thank God for that.

@TheTallest
Sometimes she's not herself. She swears... just pops out.

@waterglass
Link Posted: 5/12/2017 3:43:39 PM EST
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Yeah I remember how you guys said we'd lose both the house and senate in 2016 too because we nominated Trump. We gained seats then and we will in 2018, too despite your "approval ratings". You give the MSM way too much validity man.
View Quote
Roger that.  Sounds like you've got the Midterms locked up tight.  Keep on keeping on...
Link Posted: 5/12/2017 4:07:47 PM EST
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
He should have been gone on day one along with Comey.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I can't wait to see the justifications for McCabe's ineviatable dismissal.
He should have been gone on day one along with Comey.
.

Known FOB. Career man  in the same mold as Comey....
Link Posted: 5/12/2017 4:26:58 PM EST
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Roger that.  Sounds like you've got the Midterms locked up tight.  Keep on keeping on...
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Yeah I remember how you guys said we'd lose both the house and senate in 2016 too because we nominated Trump. We gained seats then and we will in 2018, too despite your "approval ratings". You give the MSM way too much validity man.
Roger that.  Sounds like you've got the Midterms locked up tight.  Keep on keeping on...
Page / 11
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top