User Panel
Quoted: Quoted: Drug prohibition is unconstitutional, so this was obvious. Of course, we live in a post constitutional country. Before any of you statists call me a druggy (which would be irrelevant, but I am addicted to caffeine), I passed my test yesterday. Username checks out...... That's why I added the last sentence. Big Green is a mountain in NC. After you do some of the climbs on its faces, you will definitely want to smoke some weed to calm your nerves. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Probably not. Soon, I hope. View Quote Quoted: No, it would only fall under the court's Jurisdiction. It would take reconciliation at the supreme court, which is why it's still not a great idea to admit it, if you don't fall under that court's jurisdiction. View Quote Thanks! |
|
Fuck! They are behind supplying the latest 4473 as it is, now they have to revise it again?
|
|
|
Quoted: Fuck! They are behind supplying the latest 4473 as it is, now they have to revise it again? View Quote Might as well just forget about BGC's,they are going down with Bruen eventually......I don't recall any of the founding fathers having to pass a background check for their musket/cannon.... |
|
Goddamned reefer addicts are using their hookahs to smoke this country right down the bong hole.
|
|
"Bruen expanded gun rights..."
Fuck off it did. It limited government's authority to curtail rights which were already possessed. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Doubt that ever happens……… nor jobs with safety sensitive activities View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Now rule it's legal to use and work in a job that falls under federal guidelines. Doubt that ever happens……… nor jobs with safety sensitive activities I work with potheads daily. Construction, power tools, diesel-powered equipment and heavy machinery. ~90% of the time, it ain't the potheads that cause me headaches, just the occasional dumbass that needs to cut their dosage by 1/3 to 1/2 to be in the optimal range for work. Last 10% are the ones that don't have the brain cells to spare, not dangerous, just fucking annoying. Plenty of fuckers that could hit a joint once or twice in the morning, they'd be more useful than they are stone sober. Never belligerent like the drunks, nor paranoid like the methies and crackheads. The alkies, methheads, and goddamn pill-poppers are infinitely worse. Ever seen someone on so much fuckin' xanax they're drooling and damn near incomprehensible? I have, and he was my fucking BOSS! He honestly needed it, he was wound so damn tight, but he could take two hits of MJ and be good for the day, you wouldn't be able to tell. That xanax had him all fucked up, couldn't hardly talk if he took it without eating breakfast, I think he was taking two or three bars at a time. |
|
Quoted: Yes, because I've seen the results of being lax on hard drugs. I don't want to live in a society of fentanyl junkies. Keep it in your state. View Quote You should show up armed to my neighbor's house - he's neither picking your pocket nor breaking your leg, and tell him that you're going to shoot him if he doesn't put down that doobie instead of being cowardly by getting the state to do it for you, big guy. |
|
|
Quoted: Ditto. I think drunk drivers are a greater threat to society. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Good. And I don't even smoke the shit. Ditto. I think drunk drivers are a greater threat to society. |
|
|
Quoted: You should show up armed to my neighbor's house - he's neither picking your pocket nor breaking your leg, and tell him that you're going to shoot him if he doesn't put down that doobie instead of being cowardly by getting the state to do it for you, big guy. View Quote See you avoided the point, as the "all drugs should be legal" crowd here does every time I bring it up. I'm not talking about weed, and you know that. You also know you don't want to live in an area full of junkies, because if you did, you'd move somewhere that's already lax on drug crime, like Portland. You'll advocate for the policies that have created that kind of society, and turn tail and run the second you start to see the repercussions of that philosophy. |
|
Quoted: Will be interesting to see where this one goes. ETA; at the very least I can't wait to hear the bitching about all the stoners driving 45 in the hammer lane. View Quote i can tell you’ve never been to commierado. between the old people and the stoners, left lane is atrocious to drive in. |
|
|
Lol, nice! They should form a club called the Eugene Stoners….
|
|
Quoted: It's a Cheech & Chong fantasy if you think there won't be penalties for possession of a firearm under the influence or in possession of marijuana, even if this judges ruling should stand. Then it's up to each state to adopt it. View Quote You may beat the rap but you’ll still take the ride? Who cares? They’ve got internet in prison, don’t they? Didn’t old Sam Houston do some time in Mexico? Seems you can’t be a propper hero with being a little outlaw too. |
|
I checked my copy of the constitution, and it says you can take bong rips while shooting machine guns as long as you’re not an asshole about it.
|
|
Shit, now that I'm retired I'd probably smoke it. I smoked it overseas (it was legal) almost 30yrs ago and it was the best sleep I ever had.
|
|
We celebrate this victory falsely.
You cannot legally buy a new manufacture M2 with Raufus to protect your small yield nuke. We have a long ways to go. I want to be on like 9 drugs while a water cooled machine gun under constant operation provides denial to my mk19 emplacement which is protecting my recreational nukes. |
|
Also I'm paying very attractive women for sex while drinking beer while paying for the constant stream of water cooled fire which protects the constant stream of mk19 fire which protects the constant stream of recreational nukes.
Basically you don't want me in charge of things |
|
|
|
|
View Quote The speed makes it not funny |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: In before the moonshiners and 2-pack-a-day'ers come in to talk about how horrible this is Kcolg30 is on his way! Shit. He’s probably drunk already He hasn’t posted in almost a month. |
|
Quoted: Good. I love freedom. View Quote I'm torn. I love freedom as well. I voted yes to legalize in my former state. It may be a coincidence, but shit started going downhill fast right after that, in every single category. Idgaf if you want to torch, torch on. Same with anything else, you do you. From my house to my job, a 15 minute commute, you would smell numerous times there and again on way back. On the highway you'd see clouds of smoke. Not quite what I voted for. It's just not as simple as it seems in reality |
|
|
Quoted: See you avoided the point, as the "all drugs should be legal" crowd here does every time I bring it up. I'm not talking about weed, and you know that. You also know you don't want to live in an area full of junkies, because if you did, you'd move somewhere that's already lax on drug crime, like Portland. You'll advocate for the policies that have created that kind of society, and turn tail and run the second you start to see the repercussions of that philosophy. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You should show up armed to my neighbor's house - he's neither picking your pocket nor breaking your leg, and tell him that you're going to shoot him if he doesn't put down that doobie instead of being cowardly by getting the state to do it for you, big guy. See you avoided the point, as the "all drugs should be legal" crowd here does every time I bring it up. I'm not talking about weed, and you know that. You also know you don't want to live in an area full of junkies, because if you did, you'd move somewhere that's already lax on drug crime, like Portland. You'll advocate for the policies that have created that kind of society, and turn tail and run the second you start to see the repercussions of that philosophy. Try again. I'm for all shit being legal even though I don't condone using most drugs, to be clear. The fact is that prohibition is both wrong and unconstitutional. That's irrefutable.You're advocating for the WoD. That was my point. Problems arise from junkies because politicians don't toss the ones committing real crimes in jail. Being a shit bag is being a shit bag, regardless of what you ingest, even if what you ingest makes you more prone to being a shit bag. Whether or not it's the majority of them is irrelevant. It's no different than the revolving door of letting shitbag carjackers out of jail the same day they get arrested while calling for infringing on gun rights. ETA - TLDR, there's no justification for being a statist. |
|
Good. And I don't even partake of the devil's lettuce.
FATF and the forms they rode in on. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Try again. I'm for all shit being legal even though I don't condone using most drugs, to be clear. The fact is that prohibition is both wrong and unconstitutional. That's irrefutable.You're advocating for the WoD. That was my point. Problems arise from junkies because politicians don't toss the ones committing real crimes in jail. Being a shit bag is being a shit bag, regardless of what you ingest, even if what you ingest makes you more prone to being a shit bag. Whether or not it's the majority of them is irrelevant. It's no different than the revolving door of letting shitbag carjackers out of jail the same day they get arrested while calling for infringing on gun rights. ETA - TLDR, there's no justification for being a statist. View Quote So instead of trying to curb addiction before it starts, you'd rather the country allow the conditions for mass addiction, get the general population hooked on tar, and then incarcerate them all? |
|
Quoted: So instead of trying to curb addiction before it starts, you'd rather the country allow the conditions for mass addiction, get the general population hooked on tar, and then incarcerate them all? View Quote That's exactly what I said (again). Sure, the general population is chomping at the bit to do tar. Here are the Cliff's Notes. Prohibition is both objectively immoral and unconstitutional. There's no place for it in a free society. You should go door to door to make sure that no one is doing any type of illegal drug. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Also I'm paying very attractive women for sex while drinking beer while paying for the constant stream of water cooled fire which protects the constant stream of mk19 fire which protects the constant stream of recreational nukes. Basically you don't want me in charge of things View Quote You sound like the perfect sort to be in charge of things. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.