Quote History Quoted:
They have the same argumental chromosome as liberals .. it's no wonder they are usually one-in the same. They just can't stand for you to be confident in your beliefs and leave you alone in your peace. That hole that can't be filled? , feels more full when they are making fun of you.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
With the obverse side of that same brush Atheists, Marxists, Secular Humanists, Deists insist that their beliefs are not faith but facts...based upon faith they have in those that
taught but cannot prove those facts going back to their prophets Huxley and Darwin...at least Jesus' miracles were witnessed by thousands of reliable witnesses...
If those of the Christian faith needs be relegated to "the religion forum" even after GD starts a religious history topic to comment on... then atheists should certainly have their own forum to park on
of course they'd soon be lonely and venture back to GD to make with more inane comments...imo
separate but equal
They have the same argumental chromosome as liberals .. it's no wonder they are usually one-in the same. They just can't stand for you to be confident in your beliefs and leave you alone in your peace. That hole that can't be filled? , feels more full when they are making fun of you.
"cannot prove those facts"
You cannot prove anything in science. It's not how it works (we don't KNOW absolutely that smoking causes cancer, germs cause disease or that the Earth is round-ish). You can have good objective evidence though (which there is for evolution by natural selection, etc.).
"at least Jesus' miracles were witnessed by thousands of reliable witnesses..."
There were many "miracles" witnessed by many people. Whole crowds/cities saw the sun moving around erratically in the sky, etc.
You can get David Blaine to do some magic tricks today and people will literally believe he's in contact with actual spirits, it's actual magic, etc.
One has to apply critical thinking (not believing until there's good objective evidence, not saying "I don't know, so therefor it's X", etc.)