User Panel
Quoted:
View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
If a person knowingly votes for a POLITICAL leader that is a SOCIALIST and supports a SOCIALIST form of government. Your saying the voter is not a SOCIALIST that supports a SOCIALIST forum of government. Sorry I disagree with you 100% That not calling them names. It's basing an OPINION upon their views and the views of who they support. It's like saying I'm voting for the DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS PARTY because I support the 2ND ADMENDMENT. When they are running on a gun CONFISCATION platform or gun ban ADGENDA. The DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS PARTY are now openly admitting they support a SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS approach f GOVERNMENT. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck. It's a duck. So is anyone who votes for a canidate that supports a SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I vehemently disagree with them, but "strategic" voting (even if the strategy seems ill-considered) doesn't make you a communist. It's not that hard to politely disagree with people, without resorting to calling them socialists or communists. It's as bad as all the lefties who call people like you and me "fascists", because we're too far to the right on the political spectrum for their liking. It's tiresome, and it dilutes the meaning of the word. Your saying the voter is not a SOCIALIST that supports a SOCIALIST forum of government. Sorry I disagree with you 100% That not calling them names. It's basing an OPINION upon their views and the views of who they support. It's like saying I'm voting for the DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS PARTY because I support the 2ND ADMENDMENT. When they are running on a gun CONFISCATION platform or gun ban ADGENDA. The DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS PARTY are now openly admitting they support a SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS approach f GOVERNMENT. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck. It's a duck. So is anyone who votes for a canidate that supports a SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT. |
|
I think Trump should hold off releasing the transcript in the light of today's events.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Shouldn't he have waited until they got further along in the process, to make them look more foolish? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Releasing the call transcript tomorrow is political genius. Democrats are going to sit in their little meeting this afternoon and not know what the hell they should do. Guessing demos will get their legs cut out from under them tomorrow. |
|
|
|
|
They have to impeach him. Else the history books won't look so good for the dems with their made up pseudo events.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Shouldn't he have waited until they got further along in the process, to make them look more foolish? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Releasing the call transcript tomorrow is political genius. Democrats are going to sit in their little meeting this afternoon and not know what the hell they should do. Guessing demos will get their legs cut out from under them tomorrow. Pretty heady, I'd say. |
|
Did Pelosi announce what the crime was they allege Trump committed or isis mor ‘Orangemanbad’?
|
|
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Tuesday launched a formal impeachment inquiry into Donald Trump, which she said would now serve as an umbrella for numerous congressional investigations into the Republican president House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Tuesday launched a formal impeachment inquiry into Donald Trump, crossing a threshold she for months said she did not want to which she said would now serve as an umbrella for numerous congressional investigations into the Republican president. The Democratic leader said Trump had betrayed his Oath of Office and undermined national security. 'This week the president has admitted to asking the president of Ukraine to take actions which would benefit him politically. The actions of the Trump presidency revealed dishonorable fact [sic] of the president's betrayal of his Oath of Office, betrayal of our national security, and betrayal of the integrity of our national elections,' she stated. 'Therefore, today I'm announcing the House of Representatives is moving forward with an official impeachment inquiry. I'm directing our six committees to proceed with their investigation under that umbrella of impeachment inquiry. The president must be held accountable. No one is above the law.' More |
|
Quoted:
And a person that votes for someone pushing grabbing the guns first then due process? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I vehemently disagree with them, but "strategic" voting (even if the strategy seems ill-considered) doesn't make you a communist. It's not that hard to politely disagree with people, without resorting to calling them socialists or communists. It's as bad as all the lefties who call people like you and me "fascists", because we're too far to the right on the political spectrum for their liking. It's tiresome, and it dilutes the meaning of the word. Your saying the voter is not a SOCIALIST that supports a SOCIALIST forum of government. Sorry I disagree with you 100% That not calling them names. It's basing an OPINION upon their views and the views of who they support. It's like saying I'm voting for the DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS PARTY because I support the 2ND ADMENDMENT. When they are running on a gun CONFISCATION platform or gun ban ADGENDA. The DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS PARTY are now openly admitting they support a SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS approach f GOVERNMENT. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck. It's a duck. So is anyone who votes for a canidate that supports a SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT. |
|
Quoted:
And a person that votes for someone pushing grabbing the guns first then due process? View Quote or are you going to ignore it and pretend you were right? |
|
Quoted:
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/09/24/22/18888568-7499895-image-a-11_1569360077342.jpg House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Tuesday launched a formal impeachment inquiry into Donald Trump, which she said would now serve as an umbrella for numerous congressional investigations into the Republican president House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Tuesday launched a formal impeachment inquiry into Donald Trump, crossing a threshold she for months said she did not want to which she said would now serve as an umbrella for numerous congressional investigations into the Republican president. The Democratic leader said Trump had betrayed his Oath of Office and undermined national security. 'This week the president has admitted to asking the president of Ukraine to take actions which would benefit him politically. The actions of the Trump presidency revealed dishonorable fact [sic] of the president's betrayal of his Oath of Office, betrayal of our national security, and betrayal of the integrity of our national elections,' she stated. 'Therefore, today I'm announcing the House of Representatives is moving forward with an official impeachment inquiry. I'm directing our six committees to proceed with their investigation under that umbrella of impeachment inquiry. The president must be held accountable. No one is above the law.' More View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
If a person knowingly votes for a POLITICAL leader that is a SOCIALIST and supports a SOCIALIST form of government. Your saying the voter is not a SOCIALIST that supports a SOCIALIST forum of government. Sorry I disagree with you 100% That not calling them names. It's basing an OPINION upon their views and the views of who they support. It's like saying I'm voting for the DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS PARTY because I support the 2ND ADMENDMENT. When they are running on a gun CONFISCATION platform or gun ban ADGENDA. The DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS PARTY are now openly admitting they support a SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS approach f GOVERNMENT. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck. It's a duck. So is anyone who votes for a canidate that supports a SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I vehemently disagree with them, but "strategic" voting (even if the strategy seems ill-considered) doesn't make you a communist. It's not that hard to politely disagree with people, without resorting to calling them socialists or communists. It's as bad as all the lefties who call people like you and me "fascists", because we're too far to the right on the political spectrum for their liking. It's tiresome, and it dilutes the meaning of the word. Your saying the voter is not a SOCIALIST that supports a SOCIALIST forum of government. Sorry I disagree with you 100% That not calling them names. It's basing an OPINION upon their views and the views of who they support. It's like saying I'm voting for the DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS PARTY because I support the 2ND ADMENDMENT. When they are running on a gun CONFISCATION platform or gun ban ADGENDA. The DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS PARTY are now openly admitting they support a SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS approach f GOVERNMENT. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck. It's a duck. So is anyone who votes for a canidate that supports a SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT. I just didn't vote for the RINO pick this time. My problem with Trump is he is too far Left. I have no opinion on the impeachment talk except to say I find it hilarious that the Dems have stooped this low. |
|
Quoted:
Oh damn dude. Be careful @DstryrOfWrlds is handing out them CoC 6 reportations View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
You'd be right too. But hey even though they both would vote for the DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS PARTY. That have openingly stated they want to BAN and or CONFISCATE gun. They are both strong supporters of the 2nd ADMENDMENT and very progun. Again https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/94613/Onthefloorlaffing-152751.gif sorry can't help myself. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I'm glad you asked! I routinely write and call my local and fed representatives as well as assist with a local GOP group. What I've seen is a lack of giving a fuck from most gun owners and conservatives whenever trump does or says anything anti gun. The "meh" attitude has led me to the conclusion that, unless Trump gets shitcanned in 2020, most gun owners won't care if Trump signs an AWB or any form of gun control. However until that happens he has my vote, so if we get a AWB between now and 2020 you can say you told me so. That have openingly stated they want to BAN and or CONFISCATE gun. They are both strong supporters of the 2nd ADMENDMENT and very progun. Again https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/94613/Onthefloorlaffing-152751.gif sorry can't help myself. |
|
This is a push from the far left group of Dems to get rid of Biden. If they spend a bunch of time looking at "if" Trump pressured the Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden, eventually they'll look at "why" Trump did it. And it'll dirty up Biden and get the old, white, "moderate" Dem out of the way.
|
|
Quoted: I've gotten warned for answering that question. The stupidity of saying I'm voting for the DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS PARTY because I support gun rights, 2ND ADMENDMENT or anything AMERICA. Is mind numbing and beyond all logic and to me are LIBERAL SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS This is not an impreachment inquiry. It's a the DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS PARTY not giving up on a POLITICAL COUP of a sitting PRESIDENT. Then after that they'll go after V.P. PENCE. Then guess who get's to be PRESIDENT. To hear this bitch say that the DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS PARTY SUPPORTS the CONSTITUTION. Disgusted me to no end. This DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS PARTY has done NOTHING but violate and attack the CONSTITUTION and the BILL OF RIGHTS and AMERICANS that disagree with them and their SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS ADGENDA. View Quote I wish you would post more often. |
|
Quoted:
serve as an umbrella for numerous congressional investigations into the Republican president. View Quote Fuckin a, can it be more transparent? |
|
Quoted:
so, are you going to find proof for the other poster about someone saying bumpstocks are machineguns and need to be banned, other than a comment that nevertrumpers were calling bumpstocks machineguns and would be banned.... or are you going to ignore it and pretend you were right? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
And a person that votes for someone pushing grabbing the guns first then due process? or are you going to ignore it and pretend you were right? |
|
Aint nobody got's time for gun control now!
All aboard on the impeachment train. |
|
The Democrats just put a nail in to the coffin of their 2020 election hopes.
|
|
He deserves it... not because he's committed any crime, but because he failed to go for the jugular with regards to declass prior to the midterms...
He pussy footed around and showed them his neck...now they're gonna take a swipe. This motherfucker will likely STILL give them some measure of gun control even as they attack him on all fronts... I hope he learns AND SOON! |
|
|
Quoted:
He deserves it... not because he's committed any crime, but because he failed to go for the jugular with regards to declass prior to the midterms... He pussy footed around and showed them his neck...now they're gonna take a swipe. This motherfucker will likely STILL give them some measure of gun control even as they attack him on all fronts... I hope he learns AND SOON! View Quote |
|
|
The only thing this does is open my wallet in support of Trump.
|
|
Did I get in before someone suggested that is all part of his plan?
|
|
Quoted:
He deserves it... not because he's committed any crime, but because he failed to go for the jugular with regards to declass prior to the midterms... He pussy footed around and showed them his neck...now they're gonna take a swipe. This motherfucker will likely STILL give them some measure of gun control even as they attack him on all fronts... I hope he learns AND SOON! View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I don't think all of them are democrats, just people upset that bumpstocks were banned and no big 2nd admendment rights were expanded. I honestly expected more from President Trump as far as gun rights. I blame him and WLP. Still voting for him due to his two Supreme Court pics and immigration policy's View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
arfcom has done such a wonderful job of being inclusive that all the Democrat voters feel they can come out of the closet and shit up news threads now I honestly expected more from President Trump as far as gun rights. I blame him and WLP. Still voting for him due to his two Supreme Court pics and immigration policy's |
|
|
What's the chance that this "inquiry" can be used to release the goodies on Biden's dealings with the Ukrainian defense allocation?
If they investigate Trump's statements, they have to evaluate the facts behind what he was discussing. Seems like a great chance to put Biden in front of some Red Reps that can reciprocate the liberal's verbal lashings towards Trump appointees. |
|
They will need 20 RINO votes in the Senate to remove Trump from office.
Seems doable. Lots of nevertrumpers in the Senate, yet they vote to confirm almost all of the justices. My newly elected Dem congressman from a previous Republican district will sign his political death warrant voting for impeachment. |
|
Nobody is above the law, except HRC?
Trump needs to declassify Obama and Clinton communications. |
|
Quoted:
They will need 20 RINO votes in the Senate to remove Trump from office. Seems doable. Lots of nevertrumpers in the Senate, yet they vote to confirm almost all of the justices. My newly elected Dem congressman from a previous Republican district will sign his political death warrant voting for impeachment. View Quote |
|
click the date LOL
Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 24, 2019 |
|
Quoted:
I seem to have satisfied the other poster. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
And a person that votes for someone pushing grabbing the guns first then due process? or are you going to ignore it and pretend you were right? someone request proof that somebody has said bumpstocks were machineguns and needed to be banned, and you quote someone who said it was a nevertrumper that likely said that |
|
Trump is going to break this MF'er off in everyone's ass. Book it. These assholes never learn. I just hope the tears are as good as election night. These people have been investigating Trump for impeachable offenses since they gained the House. If Pelosi really wants to impeach, call a vote to the floor to proceed with impeachment hearings. Otherwise this is nothing more than what they've been doing for a year so far, just more grandstanding to please her base. Pelosi quoting the founding fathers and the constitution in her impeachment speech is straight up bizarro world.
|
|
U.S. Speaker Nancy Pelosi announces formal impeachment inquiry of Donald Trump | FULL |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.