Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 6
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 12:04:15 AM EDT
[#1]
Bang,banging,banging more, badabang

cool for more

Bang,banging,banging more, badabang

Link Posted: 6/4/2023 12:05:40 AM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Fission is separation.

Fusion is combination.
View Quote


Like when kids ask for more money but can't lend me cash if my wife has the bank card.

Gotcha
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 12:05:55 AM EDT
[#3]
They want to deliver vast amounts of information over the Internet. And again, the Internet is not something that you just dump something on. It's not a big truck. It's a series of tubes. And if you don't understand, those tubes can be filled and if they are filled, when you put your message in, it gets in line and it's going to be delayed by anyone that puts into that tube enormous amounts of material, enormous amounts of material.

Link Posted: 6/4/2023 12:08:41 AM EDT
[#4]
I mean i watch justin huhn on youtube. But mr higgs can probably break it down better than anyone on this site
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 12:12:34 AM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
In a understandable way?
View Quote


take a hundred mousetraps place a ping pong ball on each one.

toss a pingpong ball into the mousetraps - suddenly there are pingpong balls flying everywhere.

change the pingpong ball to a neutron, the mouse traps into uranium atoms, and you get the general idea.

get enough material (mouse traps) close enough together, shoot a neutron (ping pong ball) into it and you get a chain reaction of atoms splitting part, causing other atoms to split apart, releasing energy in the process.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 12:13:55 AM EDT
[#6]
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 12:56:26 AM EDT
[#7]
The story of nuclear fission is the story of a free neutron interacting with a heavy element.

Heavy elements are those with automatic masses (the sum of its protons and neutrons) greater than 200.

The most common heavy elements we think of are usually Uranium and Plutonium as they are two that work the best in reactors and bombs; Which are typically what we use fission for.

When a free neutron travels at just the right speed and distance from a heavy elemental atom of let’s say Uranium 235 (92 Protons with 143 Neutrons in its nucleus), the free neutron can be absorbed into the nucleus and immediately cause it to become unstable and split into two smaller “daughter” nuclei.  These can be a number of different smaller elements, but usually two and sometimes three.  

One possible product of a U235 fission is 1 Beryllium 145 atom and 1 Krypton 92 atom.  In addition to these two new daughter nuclei, the reaction also produced thermal light energy and 3- free neutrons.

These free neutrons produced by the fission reaction have the potential to cause more fissions.  In fact this is why nuclear physics was so heavily studied in the early to mid 20th century, the possibility of these free neutrons causing a chain reaction, releasing exponentially more energy than a chemical reaction.

If you have enough fissionable material, such as U235, in a small enough space, a series of fissions by the released neutrons from the first fission event can become a sustainable chain reaction.  The term for this is when the reaction becomes “critical”.  

The daughter elements produced by each fission are always unstable and highly radioactive, releasing alpha particles, which is two protons and two neutrons (a helium nucleus) or beta particles (a high speed electron) which changes these 1st generation daughter atoms into smaller, more stable atoms.

It is important to note that all elements heavier than Iron release more energy from their fission than it takes to produce the reaction.  All elements smaller than Iron requires more energy to produce a fission reaction than what is released from the reaction.

All atoms can be split or fissioned, but you only get a net positive energy release from the heavy ones.

Link Posted: 6/4/2023 1:11:50 AM EDT
[#8]
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 1:18:04 AM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
When a mommy neutron and a daddy neutron love each other very much...
View Quote

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 1:22:14 AM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Then steam happens and

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/439317/ElhEeX3WoAIMUYk_jpg-2839496.JPG

Hope that explains it for you op.
View Quote
good to seen an old Arfcom original meme still in circulation
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 1:25:01 AM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Fissile material, such as uranium 235.  Fissile, meaning, radioactive.  Radioactive meaning alpha decay, in the form of neutrons and protons.

If you put enough U235 in the same place, those decay neutrons will hit the neucleii of other nearby U235 atoms and fission, meaning cause them to split.  Which, creates heat (and other radioactive by products), but most importantly, more neutrons, that then hit other uranium atoms, in a chain.

There is some other stuff about fast vs slow neutrons, moderators, etc.

So you can have a controlled "slow burn" type reaction, such as in a nuclear reactor, or you can have a critical mass type reaction, such as in a fission bomb.  Comes down the purity, density and volume of the uranium.
View Quote

Fissile doesn't mean radioactive, it means that it can undergo fission with a thermal (AKA slow) neutron. U235, Pu239, etc. These are reactor fuels, and U235 is the only naturally occurring fissile material. U238, on the other hand, is "fissionable." It can fission, most likely won't, generally needs a higher energy neutron to have a decent probability to do it.

That said, yes, those materials are also radioactive. U235 does experience alpha decay and down the chain there's beta decays as well. Neutrons aren't given off during the decay, they come from the fact that U235 can also spontaneously fission. In fact, in a reactor of low enough enrichment, a neutron source is often employed to start the chain reaction. (They are no longer used in US commercial reactors). Alpha decay is when a helium atom is given off taking away 2 protons and 2 neutrons from the parent nucleus. These aren't neutrons free to cause fission, however.

The other stuff about fast vs slow neutrons, etc, is important to understand controlled nuclear fission and what I mention above about which materials fission with which neutrons can be explained by this neutron energy graph.



Link Posted: 6/4/2023 1:28:13 AM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
A free neutron can be captured by an atom, making that atom heavier.

Atoms can become highly unstable at all but a few specific weights.

Large atoms are heavier than the sum of their parts! The extra mass is potential energy.

By increasing the weight of a heavy atom by exposing it to neutrons, it can cause it to absorb a neutron and go from stable to unstable.

When an unstable atom breaks apart, it will release it's parts, as well as the additional weight above the sum of its parts as energy, according to E=MC^2 where M is the mass difference between the atom and it's parts.

This can release more neutrons , which if sufficient to cause a growing chain reaction is called prompt critical. BOOM!

Or the parts of the parent molecule may itself be unstable, and when they decay seconds, minutes, or hours later, may release delayed neutrons, which can keep the nuclear reaction sustained on time scales that allow it to be controlled.
View Quote

There's some good bits in there but to simplify it for commercial nuclear reactors, there are prompt neutrons (neutrons born directly from fission) and there are delayed neutrons (neutrons born from the decay of fission product daughters). Something like 99.5% of all neutrons are born prompt, but it's that .5% that are born delayed that allow humans to control the reactor. The absence of delayed neutrons is called "prompt critical" and we cannot control it.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 1:28:35 AM EDT
[#13]
While we have some experts here what exactly about radioactive material makes it carry so much energy?  Why can't you ram a particle into a chunk of aluminum and release the energy bonding those atoms for example?  Are they just impossible to split or somehow just carrying exponentially less energy to hold them together than uranium or something?
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 1:29:28 AM EDT
[#14]
Nuclear fission is when the center of an atom, called the nucleus, splits into two smaller parts. When this happens, a lot of energy is released. It's like breaking a big piece of Lego into two smaller pieces and getting a big "POP!" sound and some energy.

Scientists use this energy to do useful things, like making electricity in special power plants called nuclear reactors. They control the process very carefully to make sure it's safe. The energy that comes from nuclear fission can be very strong, so it's important to be cautious and use it responsibly.

In simpler words, nuclear fission is when the inside of an atom splits and makes a big boom, and people use that big boom to make electricity.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 1:31:27 AM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The story of nuclear fission is the story of a free neutron interacting with a heavy element.

Heavy elements are those with automatic masses (the sum of its protons and neutrons) greater than 200.

The most common heavy elements we think of are usually Uranium and Plutonium as they are two that work the best in reactors and bombs; Which are typically what we use fission for.

When a free neutron travels at just the right speed and distance from a heavy elemental atom of let's say Uranium 235 (92 Protons with 143 Neutrons in its nucleus), the free neutron can be absorbed into the nucleus and immediately cause it to become unstable and split into to smaller "daughter" nuclei.  These can be a number of different smaller elements, but usually two and sometimes three.  

One possible product of a U235 fission is 1 Beryllium 145 atom and 1 Krypton 92 atom.  In addition to these two new daughter nuclei, the reaction also produced thermal light energy and 3- free neutrons.

These free neutrons produced by the fission reaction have the potential to cause more fissions.  In fact this is why nuclear physics was so heavily studied in the early to mid 20th century, the possibility of these free neutrons causing a chain reaction, releasing exponentially more energy than a chemical reaction.

If you have enough fissionable material, such as U235, in a small enough space, a series of fissions by the released neutrons from the first fission event can become a sustainable chain reaction.  The term for this is when the reaction becomes "critical".  

The daughter elements produced by each fission are always unstable and highly radioactive, releasing alpha particles, which is two protons and two neutrons (a helium nucleus) or beta particles (a high speed electron) which changes these 1st generation daughter atoms into smaller, more stable atoms.

It is important to note that all elements heavier than Iron release more energy from their fission than it takes to produce the reaction.  All elements smaller than Iron requires more energy to produce a fission reaction than what is released from the reaction.

All atoms can be split or fissioned, but you only get a net positive energy release from the heavy ones.

View Quote

Summed up by a graph,


Link Posted: 6/4/2023 1:36:17 AM EDT
[#16]
As nucleuses get larger and larger, they reach a point where the forces pushing them apart are barely restrained by the forces holding them together. There's a reason why those are the largest/heaviest elements in nature, larger ones are too unstable. There are weird eccentricities about odd and even atomic weights but that's the gist of it.

Add a destabilizing particle and energy to one of those nuclei of the heaviest and least stable isotopes, and the forces pushing it apart become greater than the forces holding it together, so it breaks apart into smaller pieces. Fission.

Some of the energy that was holding the nucleus together is released, as the combined smaller fragments do not need as much of that energy.

The amount of energy released from a single atom is vastly larger than even the most energetic chemical reactions. If I remember the comparison correctly, the highest energy chemical reaction is about 5eV per molecule in the reaction. Each fissioning atom releases about 200 million eV of energy.

The heaviest of the natural elements, Uranium, and the heavier synthetic elements like Plutonium are so unstable that instead of radioactive decay, they will occasionally undergo fission spontaneously.

As an aside, "As nucleuses get larger and larger, they reach a point where the forces pushing them apart are barely restrained by the forces holding them together." Smaller atoms are of course the opposite... the forces holding them together are much stronger than the forces pushing them apart. Which is why it's possible with a few of the lightest elements to get them to combine, or fuse, together.

(caveat: I'm not a theoretical physicist, the above does not describe or conform to the standard model or any other mathematical model of physics, it's just an attempt at a simplified explanation for lay persons)
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 1:38:47 AM EDT
[#17]
It’s not hard.

Especially since it’s all theory anyway. Who can argue with you?
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 1:39:54 AM EDT
[#18]
Quoted:
In a understandable way?
View Quote


Spicy rock goes boom.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 1:40:06 AM EDT
[#19]
Quoted:
While we have some experts here what exactly about radioactive material makes it carry so much energy?  Why can't you ram a particle into a chunk of aluminum and release the energy bonding those atoms for example?  Are they just impossible to split or somehow just carrying exponentially less energy to hold them together than uranium or something?
View Quote


See above graph and JHMC79's explanation. I know the graph doesn't mean much to the laymen, but what it means is that the binding energy per nucleon for a given atomic mass becomes significant and you would end up putting much more energy into the process than you would ever get out.., if you could generate such energy in the first place. U235 is barely holding itself together as it is and just needs a tickle from a low energy neutron to get its game on. Hell, it'll do it itself sometimes too. It takes us little energy to split such atoms.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 1:41:03 AM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It's not hard.

Especially since it's all theory anyway. Who can argue with you?
View Quote

Haha one of my favorite lines, "That's why we call it reactor theory, not reactor fact."
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 1:42:07 AM EDT
[#21]
Right...

So,
There are these things called atoms.  They have Protons and Neutrons at their center.  The number of Protons in the nucleolus, as the center is called, determines what Element it is.

Protons are Positively charged and Neutrons have no charge.  Like magnets... opposites attract and like charges repel each other.  So how can a nucleolus that's made of neutral and positively charged things stay together?  There is a force that's stronger than the repulsion.  It sticks them together but it only acts over a very short distance so you have to get them really close to get them to stick.

As more and more protons and neutrons are stuck together you get the heavier elements... and these elements become more and more unstable.  They're prone to breaking apart and becoming 2 lighter elements...  That's Fission... Division of the element.

When it breaks... It's messy.  The two elements don't have the same mass as they did when they were one element.  E=MC^2  Some of the mass was converted to energy.  Also some Neutrons tend to escape... until they collide with other atoms.

That collision can trigger other atoms to also split.  Which causes more to split... and more and more.  If this is allowed to happen then it does so in a fraction of a second and you get a Big explosion.

If you instead limit the amount of unstable material and place near it materials which absorb the escaping neutrons then you can limit the speed of the reaction so you only get an amount of heat you can manage.

Power plants use that heat to boil water and run the steam through a steam turbine to create electricity.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 2:02:03 AM EDT
[#22]
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 2:07:42 AM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
While we have some experts here what exactly about radioactive material makes it carry so much energy?  Why can't you ram a particle into a chunk of aluminum and release the energy bonding those atoms for example?  Are they just impossible to split or somehow just carrying exponentially less energy to hold them together than uranium or something?
View Quote



Don’t think of it so much as all radioactive materials having great potential to release energy via fission, but rather the atoms with the highest potential energy releases by fission all tend to be radioactive.

For instance Tritium, which they put in night sights, is radioactive.  It is merely a Hydrogen atom, or 1 Proton, but also with two Neutrons.  So Hydrogen-3.  These two neutrons in its nucleus makes it unstable and it is releasing energy in order to get to its most stable form, which is Hydrogen-1 or just Hydrogen.  Even though it is radioactive it has virtually zero potential to release energy by causing it to fission.

Also the daughter products of a U235 fission are incredibly dangerous with their level of radioactivity.  Cesium-137 and Strontium- 90 are killers but as they are about half the atomic mass of their parent, they also are not good for fissioning for energy release.

You mentioned aluminum.  Yes, it can be fissioned but the energy required to split the atom is exponentially higher than what is released as it’s atomic mass is less than Iron’s.

Yes, the higher the atomic mass, the more trapped energy there is to exploit via fission.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 2:25:20 AM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
While we have some experts here what exactly about radioactive material makes it carry so much energy?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
While we have some experts here what exactly about radioactive material makes it carry so much energy?

First, radioactive does not equal fissionable or fission.

The mechanism is somewhat similar though.

Nuclei are composed of positive protons, and neutral neutrons. As elements get larger (more protons) they need more neutrons to keep the forces in balance. When the numbers of neutrons are off though, the forces are out of balance, and eventually that nucleus will expel energy and maybe particle to get to a more stable configuration. The expelled energy/particle is "nuclear radiation".

The energies that are there within every nucleus are enormous for such a small amount of matter. It is literally the energy of eons of stars bundled up into tiny bundles.

Why can't you ram a particle into a chunk of aluminum and release the energy bonding those atoms for example?

The balance of forces that hold nuclei together versus push them apart make that a lot more difficult.

When people think of nuclear fission they probably are thinking of a fission chain reaction, not just the fission process itself. Yes it's possible to fission an aluminum atom, but only Uranium (or the synthetic element Plutonium) can create a self-sustaining fission chain reaction. A fission chain reaction is a neutron expelled from a fissioning atom going on to hit another nucleus and create another fission, and so on and so on. If that happens at least once for every fission, you have a self-sustaining chain reaction. You need a sufficient quantity of those atoms of fissile material, arranged into a suitable geometry to get a self-sustaining chain reaction, known as a critical mass.

Are they just impossible to split or somehow just carrying exponentially less energy to hold them together than uranium or something?

They have more energy holding them together versus pushing them apart.  As elements get larger, the balance changes progressively toward the forces pushing apart, so that at Uranium you have an element that is barely stable. There is a quirk/eccentricity in the forces such that nuclei with an odd number of particles are less stable than those with an even number. The discovery of fission was the discovery of a mechanism to push some Uranium atoms (the odd size ones) beyond the point of stability, so that they break apart. Some serendipity was involved in discovering how to make it happen.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 2:35:04 AM EDT
[#25]
Tiny twists of matter bump and make big boom. Big boom is useful.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 2:42:57 AM EDT
[#26]
TELL ME HOW A NUCLEAR REACTOR WORKS OR ILL HAVE YOU THROWN FROM THIS HELICOPTER
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 2:45:03 AM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

...In fact, in a reactor of low enough enrichment, a neutron source is often employed to start the chain reaction. (They are no longer used in US commercial reactors)...

View Quote


I believe Vogtle 3 & 4 use a Californium source for first core startup.  Are you referring to secondary sources?
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 2:46:50 AM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
TELL ME HOW A NUCLEAR REACTOR WORKS OR ILL HAVE YOU THROWN FROM THIS HELICOPTER
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
TELL ME HOW A NUCLEAR REACTOR WORKS OR ILL HAVE YOU THROWN FROM THIS HELICOPTER

Quoted:
Spicy rock goes boom.

It's a reactor, so spicy rock gets hot, put spicy rock in water and make hot water.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 3:46:50 AM EDT
[#29]
Good info. Just mansplained all of that to the wife against her will.  She didn't seem to think knowing all that was as important as I did lol.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 3:56:28 AM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Good info. Just mansplained all of that to the wife against her will.  She didn't seem to think knowing all that was as important as I did lol.
View Quote

I think this goes above mansplaining, and falls into the deeper territory of nerdsplaining.

Link Posted: 6/4/2023 4:20:39 AM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
A side effect of fission many of us can relate to... Radon is a byproduct of uranium fission.  That's why radon is such a problem for homes in the East, all the uranium deposits generate radon, which percolates up from the ground into your home.
View Quote
Radon in the ground is from radioactive decay of Uranium which eventually produces radium which decays to radon.

Fission would mean the Uranium is split and is a different process than decay.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 4:25:30 AM EDT
[#32]
A boy radioactive atom and a girl radioactive atom fall in love...
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 4:39:11 AM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It's not hard.

Especially since it's all theory anyway. Who can argue with you?
View Quote
Nuclear fission is not theory. It happens and we use it every day in nuclear power plants all over the world and have even used it as a weapon of war twice. The first weapon used fissioned U235 and the second weapon fissioned Pu239.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 4:40:23 AM EDT
[#34]
Yes
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 5:13:03 AM EDT
[#35]
The forces required to create or destroy an element are enormous for example the elements in the periodic table up to and including iron can form in a conventional star like our sun, the remaining elements require forces more typical of collapsing stars and black holes.  There are other interesting oddities such as the Oddo-Harkin effect where elements with even atomic numbers are more abundant than those with odd atomic numbers - thought possibly due to proton - pairing producing a more stable configuration.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 6:06:56 AM EDT
[#36]
Tiny pieces of rock atoms pop off and knock tiny pieces of atoms off others nearby unless something catches or slows them down. The process get really hot and if you get near it it will kill you.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 6:10:14 AM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
"Demon Core"

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/13/Partially-reflected-plutonium-sphere.jpeg

Harry Daghlian

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0e/Daghlian-hand.jpg


During an experiment on August 21, 1945, Daghlian was attempting to build a neutron reflector manually by stacking a set of 4.4-kilogram (9.7 lb) tungsten carbide bricks in an incremental fashion around a plutonium core. The purpose of the neutron reflector was to reduce the mass required for the plutonium core to attain criticality. He was moving the final brick over the assembly, but neutron counters alerted Daghlian to the fact that the addition of that brick would render the system supercritical. As he withdrew his hand, he inadvertently dropped the brick onto the center of the assembly. Since the assembly was nearly in the critical state, the accidental addition of that brick caused the reaction to go immediately into the prompt critical region of neutronic behavior. This resulted in a criticality accident.

Daghlian reacted immediately after dropping the brick and attempted to knock the brick off the assembly without success. He was forced to disassemble part of the tungsten-carbide pile in order to halt the reaction.

Daghlian was estimated to have received a dose of 510 rem (5.1 Sv) of neutron radiation, from a yield of 1016 fissions. Despite intensive medical care, he developed symptoms of severe radiation poisoning, and his sister and widowed mother were flown out to care for him. He fell into a coma and died 25 days after the accident. He was the first known fatality caused by a criticality accident. His body was returned to New London, where he was buried at Cedar Grove Cemetery.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/db/Tickling_the_Dragons_Tail.jpg


View Quote


Serious question here:

How was he not exposed to all sorts of radiation anyway just handling a plutonium ball in close proximity?
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 6:45:35 AM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Serious question here:

How was he not exposed to all sorts of radiation anyway just handling a plutonium ball in close proximity?
View Quote

Alpha emitters are boring unless ingested
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 6:49:50 AM EDT
[#39]
Understandable way....well, take beans and mix it in your chili. Once it's inside your body it changes the molecular structure and when you run to the bathroom -

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 6:54:23 AM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I can speak intelligently on many things.

Splitting the atom, and theoretical physics are two that I cannot.
View Quote

Lucky for you it's theoretical.

So it's all just made up anyway
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 7:11:13 AM EDT
[#41]
A portion of US Navy Surface Warfare qualifications is knowing the fission process in some detail.

Rocks make steam, steam spins turbines, turbines spin reduction gears that make the propellers go round-n-round.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 7:17:24 AM EDT
[#42]
Bottom photo is likely Slotin, who was warned his carelessness with criticality demonstrations would get him killed.

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
"Demon Core"

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/13/Partially-reflected-plutonium-sphere.jpeg

Harry Daghlian

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0e/Daghlian-hand.jpg


During an experiment on August 21, 1945, Daghlian was attempting to build a neutron reflector manually by stacking a set of 4.4-kilogram (9.7 lb) tungsten carbide bricks in an incremental fashion around a plutonium core. The purpose of the neutron reflector was to reduce the mass required for the plutonium core to attain criticality. He was moving the final brick over the assembly, but neutron counters alerted Daghlian to the fact that the addition of that brick would render the system supercritical. As he withdrew his hand, he inadvertently dropped the brick onto the center of the assembly. Since the assembly was nearly in the critical state, the accidental addition of that brick caused the reaction to go immediately into the prompt critical region of neutronic behavior. This resulted in a criticality accident.

Daghlian reacted immediately after dropping the brick and attempted to knock the brick off the assembly without success. He was forced to disassemble part of the tungsten-carbide pile in order to halt the reaction.

Daghlian was estimated to have received a dose of 510 rem (5.1 Sv) of neutron radiation, from a yield of 1016 fissions. Despite intensive medical care, he developed symptoms of severe radiation poisoning, and his sister and widowed mother were flown out to care for him. He fell into a coma and died 25 days after the accident. He was the first known fatality caused by a criticality accident. His body was returned to New London, where he was buried at Cedar Grove Cemetery.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/db/Tickling_the_Dragons_Tail.jpg


View Quote

Link Posted: 6/4/2023 7:45:40 AM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
When a mommy U-238 and a daddy U-238 love each other very much, they get excited and vibrate against each other, and  then a neutron is born. And den…canned sunshine!
View Quote



This is pretty good.  It is technically incorrect.  Plus you need to explain in a way GD would understand.

When you go to a Chilli cook off and you decide to eat two bowls.  8 hours later there is a release of radioactive energy.  Generally enough to lift you off the toilet seat.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 8:04:36 AM EDT
[#44]
One atom enters, two atoms leave.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 8:07:49 AM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History


My favorite thing about those photos is the coke bottle.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 8:16:47 AM EDT
[#46]
Fusion Power Explained – Future or Failure
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 8:19:15 AM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Fissile material, such as uranium 235.  Fissile, meaning, radioactive.  Radioactive meaning alpha decay, in the form of neutrons and protons.

If you put enough U235 in the same place, those decay neutrons will hit the neucleii of other nearby U235 atoms and fission, meaning cause them to split.  Which, creates heat (and other radioactive by products), but most importantly, more neutrons, that then hit other uranium atoms, in a chain.

There is some other stuff about fast vs slow neutrons, moderators, etc.

So you can have a controlled "slow burn" type reaction, such as in a nuclear reactor, or you can have a critical mass type reaction, such as in a fission bomb.  Comes down the purity, density and volume of the uranium.
View Quote



Not quite right.  Decay neutrons do not have enough energy to cause fission.

Reactor Operator / RO instructor here.
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 8:25:00 AM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

U235, U238...whatever it takes.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
When a mommy U-238 and a daddy U-238 love each other very much, they get excited and vibrate against each other, and  then a neutron is born. And den canned sunshine!
U235

U235, U238...whatever it takes.


But my grilled cheese is hardly melted!
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 8:38:47 AM EDT
[#49]
Yes.

Kharn
Link Posted: 6/4/2023 8:46:03 AM EDT
[#50]
I’ve watched HBOs Chernobyl 5 times so I’m pretty much a SME

Yes
Page / 6
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top