User Panel
View Quote LOL that's rich ! It should be re-tweeted on chucky's page a million times ! |
|
|
|
Quoted: Where is Collins? AND will RedCoat Romney abstain, or vote "no?" I hate him more that I thought hate existed towards any politician. I Feel betrayed. I voted for that POS fuckwit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Chuck Grassley have all said they're "No" on confirming/voting on anyone before the inauguration. Does anyone here think that Mitt Romney is going to be a "Yes"? That piece of crap takes every opportunity he can to twist a knife in Trump's back, and if he can do it while pretending to be a "moderate" or something, all the better. This is NOT a done deal, guys. It *should be*, but it isn't. We are going to have to bring pressure like it's never been brought on those four fuckers. This is a once-in-a generation opportunity to secure our 2A rights for the forseeable future. We can't squander it, but I guarantee you that those four fucktards will try. Where is Collins? AND will RedCoat Romney abstain, or vote "no?" I hate him more that I thought hate existed towards any politician. I Feel betrayed. I voted for that POS fuckwit. |
|
Quoted: A great meltdown by a Democrat. https://twitter.com/TaraLaRosa/status/1307184885933707264 View Quote reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee...... |
|
Quoted: Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Chuck Grassley have all said they're "No" on confirming/voting on anyone before the inauguration. Does anyone here think that Mitt Romney is going to be a "Yes"? That piece of crap takes every opportunity he can to twist a knife in Trump's back, and if he can do it while pretending to be a "moderate" or something, all the better. This is NOT a done deal, guys. It *should be*, but it isn't. We are going to have to bring pressure like it's never been brought on those four fuckers. This is a once-in-a generation opportunity to secure our 2A rights for the forseeable future. We can't squander it, but I guarantee you that those four fucktards will try. View Quote Chuck Grassley must have dementia and forgot how he, his colleagues and Kavanaugh were treated during the last confirmation. Now is not a time for what he thinks is honor. |
|
Quoted: I hope Mitch strips those fucks of every committee seat and all positions. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Chuck Grassley have all said they're "No" on confirming/voting on anyone before the inauguration. I hope Mitch strips those fucks of every committee seat and all positions. Grassley can be convinced with a Yes. Collins and Murkowski ??? A lot of convincing. Romney? 1 in a million chance to no chance. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: We know what happened when Obama tried to appoint a Supreme Court justice six months before the elections. Guess we’re not having that conversation now. Within ONE HOUR of Scalia’s death, McConnell categorically refused to consider an Obama replacement nominee: “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.” View Quote IDGAF. Maybe you haven’t been paying attention? Let them fucking choke on it! |
|
Scalia was murdered..
End of story. Ruth had alien cancer and her handlers couldn't fight it. |
|
Quoted: Nope. That might seem "fair" to you in the moment, but we aren't dealing with people that play fair to begin with. Time to follow their rules. Remember the quote "elections have consequences"? View Quote Why are we supposed to be fair to these assholes??? These fuckers are burning down cities, murdering innocent people, attempting to assassinate cops... if we don't give them their way they're going to throw more tantrums... Being fair is destroying us... |
|
|
|
And her dying words, instead of heartfelt goodbyes to loved ones, was that she only be replaced by the next president. Were her and McCain secret evil siblings?
|
|
Quoted: Second term rules don't apply. Nice try share blue . View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Oh yeah..Remember this: In 2016, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refused to hold a hearing on President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee, saying it was an election year and that the American people "deserved a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice." This right here. Obama wasn't up for re election, Trump is. |
|
Quoted: Oh yeah..Remember this: In 2016, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refused to hold a hearing on President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee, saying it was an election year and that the American people "deserved a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice." View Quote Do you remember the hundreds of times the democrats made hypocritical decisions? Pepperidge Farms remembers. |
|
Quoted: https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/289413/31A10C9B-37A2-4FAA-A8D2-56B0AC1CDEA1_jpe-1598313.JPG View Quote SHADDUP. You should be in jail. |
|
|
|
Quoted: He was chosen for this moment in time: https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/108967/1EAB1719-7084-45DD-9486-541805038A14_jpe-1598338.JPG View Quote |
|
View Quote @Rugerlvr Do you have the actual tweet? This is gold. |
|
|
Quoted: We know what happened when Obama tried to appoint a Supreme Court justice six months before the elections. Guess we’re not having that conversation now. Within ONE HOUR of Scalia’s death, McConnell categorically refused to consider an Obama replacement nominee: “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.” View Quote Found one of the DU infiltrators... You do realize Repubs had the senate and Obama was a Dem... Of course the game of politics will dictate Mitch saying that. The difference is that presently Repubs are in control of both the Executive and the Senate; and whether or not Trump wins another 4 years this appointment to the SC will be a decades long "win" for the Right. |
|
It sure didn't take long for the battle cry of "Remember RGB"
I got this blind text earlier today. . Attached File Attached File Give no Quarter. |
|
Quoted: You do understand the difference between a lame duck president and one who isn't, right? And you do understand the difference between the sitting president's party having a majority in the Senate and not? View Quote Fuck Senate “rules”. Senate ignores the constitution but is all serious about their stupid procedures |
|
Quoted: Precisely; the other rules are gentleman's agreements from an era when senators still behaved like gentlemen (or at least weren't going for the throat in a bid to impose One Party Rule over the land at EVERY fucking opportunity) They have no place in today's negotiations with the DNC. Trump really did show how it's done with the mideast peace deal; identify your intransigent parties, and make a deal without them. If the DNC chooses to be intransigent, they will not get a seat at the table, and the RNC will steamroll them however it is able. If they learn some self control, curb their animals, and become civil again, we can discuss agreements that will avoid us angering each other in the course of governance if we feel it is mutually beneficial. View Quote |
|
I love all the fake stories involving kids.
“I just told my 1-year old that RBG died. It/is was literally shaking! It ran outside, sharpened a stick into a spear, raised it and claimed “the revolution light is still bright, and the darkness and fear of fascism will be destroyed. I’m so proud of it!” |
|
Quoted: <--------- Well this is going to get interesting when PDJT tries to appoint a successor...... View Quote Both sides apply rules that favor them when it comes to appointing a SC justice during an election year. You can stand around and argue who is right and argue about which side said what last time, but frankly I don't care any more. For me, the gloves came off after Kavenaugh and Russsia/impeachment. Fuck them; we're playing for keeps now. |
|
|
|
Quoted: We know what happened when Obama tried to appoint a Supreme Court justice six months before the elections. Guess we’re not having that conversation now. Within ONE HOUR of Scalia’s death, McConnell categorically refused to consider an Obama replacement nominee: “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.” View Quote I'm curious. Since thread title contains "DU", why haven't you reported it as a personal callout thread? |
|
|
It's funny to watch liberals pretend to be conservative while floundering in sheer panic and disbelief.
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Oh yeah..Remember this: In 2016, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refused to hold a hearing on President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee, saying it was an election year and that the American people "deserved a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice." View Quote |
|
Quoted: We are not waiting 4 years and 3 months for a new SCOTUS appointment. Your REEEEEEing is amusing though, and your tears will be delicious. Feel free to screen grab this and post it to your buddies on DU and Reddit. Their tears will sustain me also. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: We know what happened when Obama tried to appoint a Supreme Court justice six months before the elections. Guess we're not having that conversation now. Within ONE HOUR of Scalia's death, McConnell categorically refused to consider an Obama replacement nominee: "The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president." We are not waiting 4 years and 3 months for a new SCOTUS appointment. Your REEEEEEing is amusing though, and your tears will be delicious. Feel free to screen grab this and post it to your buddies on DU and Reddit. Their tears will sustain me also. |
|
Quoted: Agreed. I'm not a fan of rules for thee but not for me. It's gross, lacks integrity, and spineless. If the standard or precedent has been established it should be followed. Don't care about anyone's feelings or if it's convenient for their desires. Make your bed and lay in it. View Quote If you are in a fair fight, then you are already losing. I hope you never end up commanding any troops, for God's sakes. |
|
Quoted: Again, Obama was a lame duck. And also, Republicans are currently in the driver seat. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: If only a Precedent had been set for nominating judges the last end of a Presidents Term?..Hmm? Again, Obama was a lame duck. And also, Republicans are currently in the driver seat. And Harry Reid set the precedent. |
|
Quoted: https://static.euronews.com/articles/stories/04/86/09/64/1440x810_cmsv2_bf38f2dc-a805-5124-a2b9-25bfe3236285-4860964.jpghttps://s.marketwatch.com/public/resources/images/MW-EE076_soros__ZG_20160127113703.jpg We hope to join you soon Ruth!! View Quote These things come in threes they say. |
|
Quoted: You're only telling half of the story. McConnell stated that the reason why it was held up during an election years was because of the "standard" set pushed and held to by none other than Vice President Joseph Biden. No new SC Justices in an election year when the opposition party controls the Senate. This was widely discussed on EVERY news channel during the last two confirmations. The precedent was set years ago. Why has everyone seemed to have forgotten it? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: We know what happened when Obama tried to appoint a Supreme Court justice six months before the elections. Guess we’re not having that conversation now. Within ONE HOUR of Scalia’s death, McConnell categorically refused to consider an Obama replacement nominee: “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.” You're only telling half of the story. McConnell stated that the reason why it was held up during an election years was because of the "standard" set pushed and held to by none other than Vice President Joseph Biden. No new SC Justices in an election year when the opposition party controls the Senate. This was widely discussed on EVERY news channel during the last two confirmations. The precedent was set years ago. Why has everyone seemed to have forgotten it? Yes! The Boden precedent!. |
|
|
|
I hope the devil has a barbed cock and a preference for anal.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.