|
Quoted: Story Introduced by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) on Thursday, the bill dubbed the “Preventing Private Paramilitary Activity Act” would prohibit privately organized groups from “publicly patrolling, drilling, or engaging in harmful or deadly paramilitary techniques,” “interfering with or interrupting government proceedings,” or “interfering with the exercise of someone else’s constitutional rights,” according to Mr. Markey. Their bills defines a “private paramilitary organization” as “any group of 3 or more persons associating under a command structure for the purpose of functioning in public or training to function in public as a combat, combat support, law enforcement, or security services unit.” The bill states acting with or on behalf of such a private paramilitary organization while armed with a firearm, explosive, incendiary device, or other dangerous weapon, and engaging in patrolling, training, interfering with government or constitutional rights, or assuming the functions of law enforcement without official authority. Clearly un-Constitutional on its face, but when has that ever stopped asshole Dims before?  “3 or more persons who function as a security services unit in public” Celebrities and rich/powerful are gonna love that one. No more effective private security lol. |
|
Quoted: Story Introduced by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) on Thursday, the bill dubbed the “Preventing Private Paramilitary Activity Act” would prohibit privately organized groups from “publicly patrolling, drilling, or engaging in harmful or deadly paramilitary techniques,” “interfering with or interrupting government proceedings,” or “interfering with the exercise of someone else’s constitutional rights,” according to Mr. Markey. Their bills defines a “private paramilitary organization” as “any group of 3 or more persons associating under a command structure for the purpose of functioning in public or training to function in public as a combat, combat support, law enforcement, or security services unit.” The bill states acting with or on behalf of such a private paramilitary organization while armed with a firearm, explosive, incendiary device, or other dangerous weapon, and engaging in patrolling, training, interfering with government or constitutional rights, or assuming the functions of law enforcement without official authority. Clearly un-Constitutional on its face, but when has that ever stopped asshole Dims before? "Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man gainst his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American...[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people." ---Tenche Coxe, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788. |
|
Quoted: The Marxist Democrats have one agenda. Disarm Americans, lie cheat and steal elections until total absolute power is gained. They can be stopped now with the weight of the BOR and enforcement of it and fair elections, or alternative B later. They should be stopped now. Which why when communist states pass anti gun laws Never register Never comply |
|
Quoted: So, basically Antifa? Quoted: Their bills defines a "private paramilitary organization" as "any group of 3 or more persons associating under a command structure for the purpose of functioning in public or training to function in public as a combat, combat support, law enforcement, or security services unit." The bill states acting with or on behalf of such a private paramilitary organization while armed with a firearm, explosive, incendiary device, or other dangerous weapon, and engaging in patrolling, training, interfering with government or constitutional rights, or assuming the functions of law enforcement without official authority. They're an idea, not a militia. 
|
|
Quoted: I am publicly stating right now, that if this passes I'm starting a militia. No need really. By the definitions in this proposed law, I think APC would already be classified as illegal activity. I would not be surprised if you have gotten their attention and they are specifically targeting you and APC. |
|
Quoted: Remember that old cliche. Anytime they want to take your guns away, it's because they want to do something you would shoot them for. Only in this case, it's getting organized and trained. Attached File |
|
Quoted: So if you and your circle of friends believe in the true meaning of the 2nd amendment and you all go to the range together you’re possibly committing a felony? Merrrrber....  den of thieves 2018 shooting range scene |
|
Quoted: "Or training to function in public". They will claim any training in private is meant for functioning in public. Lol, first it's "you're not sufficiently trained to have a gun!" Goes and gets training: "OH MY GOD, YOU'RE TRAINING TO HAVE YOUR OWN MILITIA!!!" |
|
Hmmmmm.... Remember this? THEN-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BARACK OBAMA: We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded. https://www.foxnews.com/story/barack-obamas-civilian-army I assume that, should the Dems pass this, any enforcement would be two-tiered. |
| A well regulated Militia, ( militias are outlawed ) being necessary to the security of a free State the right of the people ( gun rights of the people require a permit and registration, and taxes paid and forms filled out ) to keep and bear Arms ( bearing arms in public is mostly outlawed, please see approved list of where bearing arms is allowed) shall not be infringed ( does not mean it can’t be highly regulated, taxed, permit required, military arms prohibited, magazines prohibited, ammunition prohibited , what is allowed and not allowed can vary by city, county, state and federal district court and selectively enforced based on race, religion, color of skin and political party ) |
|
Quoted: between Lobby Day and the unarmed J6 crew... "what if's" are now placed in their heads Lobby Day freaked them out worse than J6 Quoted: Quoted: They are afraid. between Lobby Day and the unarmed J6 crew... "what if's" are now placed in their heads Lobby Day freaked them out worse than J6  |
|
They passed this crap in Oregon last year. It was 100% drafted by bat crap crazy, rabid anti-J 6th anti-gunners on the east coast. They had those people testifying remotely at every single hearing. Here's the text of the bill that was passed here. If it gets dropped on the federal level, expect left leaning states to push it through on their own. ETA: here's the legislative page with all the info on how it progressed in Oregon: https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2023R1/Measures/Overview/HB2572 Here's a link to the submitted comments. Ths puts church groups providing for their own safety in violation. |
|
Quoted: ..Prohibit my ass.. No one sees anything in the Glades of AO! https://i.imgur.com/PtLdgSc.png ..The Florida Alligator Militia Unit... Millions strong they are hungry and live wild. “I’m rebel ready” “Defensee cabbage act”  God I fucking love AI. Now I want a “Defensee Cabbage Act” patch
|
|
Quoted: Looks like the founding fathers new of the problem. "Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man gainst his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American...[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people." ---Tenche Coxe, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788. I suggest we contact all of our representatives and let them know this is blatantly unconstitutional and demand our reps file ethics complaints and censure resolutions when these unconstitutional actions are proposed. It probably won't do any good but then we can show we tried to resolve this within the system. Just contacting the ones that propose this is not an option for anyone outside their districts so we need to contact all of our reps. |
|
Quoted: I suggest we contact all of our representatives and let them know this is blatantly unconstitutional and demand our reps file ethics complaints and censure resolutions when these unconstitutional actions are proposed. It probably won't do any good but then we can show we tried to resolve this within the system. Just contacting the ones that propose this is not an option for anyone outside their districts so we need to contact all of our reps. Quoted: Quoted: Looks like the founding fathers new of the problem. "Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man gainst his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American...[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people." ---Tenche Coxe, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788. I suggest we contact all of our representatives and let them know this is blatantly unconstitutional and demand our reps file ethics complaints and censure resolutions when these unconstitutional actions are proposed. It probably won't do any good but then we can show we tried to resolve this within the system. Just contacting the ones that propose this is not an option for anyone outside their districts so we need to contact all of our reps. I know it is a dream but when someone incites people into illegal action it is a crime and the DOJ should get right on it.  Edit; It should not matter if said person is a congressman or the average Joe. |
|
Quoted: Ha,that's one of those bills I almost wish would pass just so I could see the glorious clusterfuck created when every corporate security group suddenly becomes an illegal private militia, Of course, like all the other inconsistencies, they'd just selectively enforce it. Seems like we don't have rule of law in this nation any more. |
|
Quoted: Story Introduced by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) on Thursday, the bill dubbed the “Preventing Private Paramilitary Activity Act” would prohibit privately organized groups from “publicly patrolling, drilling, or engaging in harmful or deadly paramilitary techniques,” “interfering with or interrupting government proceedings,” or “interfering with the exercise of someone else’s constitutional rights,” according to Mr. Markey. Their bills defines a “private paramilitary organization” as “any group of 3 or more persons associating under a command structure for the purpose of functioning in public or training to function in public as a combat, combat support, law enforcement, or security services unit.” The bill states acting with or on behalf of such a private paramilitary organization while armed with a firearm, explosive, incendiary device, or other dangerous weapon, and engaging in patrolling, training, interfering with government or constitutional rights, or assuming the functions of law enforcement without official authority. Clearly un-Constitutional on its face, but when has that ever stopped asshole Dims before? Use Alinsky's rules against them. Let it pass. Make them play by their own rules. Apply this to BLM, Extinction Rebellion, Hamas demonstrators, Antifa, etc. The make them waste millions in legal fees while their minions cool their heels in jail overturning the law before SCOTUS. |
|
Quoted: Gun clubs will be exempt as long as they have a political officer on the board. I used to shoot with a couple guys who would be positively thrilled to become commissars. The enemy within, even at ranges. One moron defended the clot shot makers not being able to be sued, because 'gun makers have the same protection'. We were at the range when this little pearl of wisdom fell from his retarded lips. |
|
Quoted: Use Alinsky's rules against them. Let it pass. Make them play by their own rules. Apply this to BLM, Extinction Rebellion, Hamas demonstrators, Antifa, etc. The make them waste millions in legal fees while their minions cool their heels in jail overturning the law before SCOTUS. Quoted: Quoted: Story Introduced by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) on Thursday, the bill dubbed the “Preventing Private Paramilitary Activity Act” would prohibit privately organized groups from “publicly patrolling, drilling, or engaging in harmful or deadly paramilitary techniques,” “interfering with or interrupting government proceedings,” or “interfering with the exercise of someone else’s constitutional rights,” according to Mr. Markey. Their bills defines a “private paramilitary organization” as “any group of 3 or more persons associating under a command structure for the purpose of functioning in public or training to function in public as a combat, combat support, law enforcement, or security services unit.” The bill states acting with or on behalf of such a private paramilitary organization while armed with a firearm, explosive, incendiary device, or other dangerous weapon, and engaging in patrolling, training, interfering with government or constitutional rights, or assuming the functions of law enforcement without official authority. Clearly un-Constitutional on its face, but when has that ever stopped asshole Dims before? Use Alinsky's rules against them. Let it pass. Make them play by their own rules. Apply this to BLM, Extinction Rebellion, Hamas demonstrators, Antifa, etc. The make them waste millions in legal fees while their minions cool their heels in jail overturning the law before SCOTUS. And I am certain that the DOJ will get right on it.
|
|
Quoted: So, basically Antifa? Quoted: Their bills defines a "private paramilitary organization" as "any group of 3 or more persons associating under a command structure for the purpose of functioning in public or training to function in public as a combat, combat support, law enforcement, or security services unit." The bill states acting with or on behalf of such a private paramilitary organization while armed with a firearm, explosive, incendiary device, or other dangerous weapon, and engaging in patrolling, training, interfering with government or constitutional rights, or assuming the functions of law enforcement without official authority. no, antifa is just an idea, no proof that their is any organization |
