Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 6:16:30 PM EST
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Not surprised. The SCOTUS previously said that the feds can't withhold funds because of a reason unrelated to the purpose of the funds.

Trump need to figure out a way to get 99% of what he wants with that limitation. He needs better quality lawyers writing up these EOs. He must have some flunky left over from Obama who knows how to write EOs that sound good to Trump but won't pass review.
View Quote
If they are DOJ law enforcement funds they are related.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 6:17:49 PM EST
[#2]
The judge was appointed to his position in 2002, and was a Republican representative in Illinois.  The law is the law, and now it needs to be changed.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 6:17:52 PM EST
[#3]
Ignore him like he ignores us
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 6:19:45 PM EST
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So will the judge force the appropriate person to sign checks?
View Quote
How does that go again?

"He's made his decision. Now let him enforce it."

Link Posted: 9/15/2017 6:22:55 PM EST
[#5]
Newt was right when he ran on curbing the power of judges. 
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 6:24:51 PM EST
[#6]
So, by the same logic, unlimited speed limits and 18 year old drinking age here we come?
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 6:28:56 PM EST
[#7]
Trump is going to have to make an example of one of these cocksuckers.

When they start losing their cushy lifetime jobs (and pensions), maybe they'll quit being fucking outlaws themselves.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 6:35:30 PM EST
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'll never understand how a district judge can rule over the entire country.
View Quote
This
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 6:39:12 PM EST
[#9]
Do our judges get to do this when they try to implement more gun control?
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 6:41:42 PM EST
[#10]
The tyranny of the black robes.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 6:47:38 PM EST
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Why do I keep reading and hearing that Obama failed to fill hundreds of positions in the court rooms, yet the few that he appointed keep shitting on President Trump.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Why do I keep reading and hearing that Obama failed to fill hundreds of positions in the court rooms, yet the few that he appointed keep shitting on President Trump.
The judge, who was appointed by former President Ronald Reagan...
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 6:49:28 PM EST
[#12]
So funds cant be denied say's the dinosaur huh?




So if they want funds just give these sanctuary citys just $87.00 each and tell them to make it last






Can the judge be fired/removed by the DOJ ?
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 6:49:59 PM EST
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


How?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Guys this is just another battle in the overall war. In this particular battle we will eventually win!


How?
Very easily. There are two appellate courts and at least one of them will rule against this dumb@$$ district judge. There's the Circuit Court of Appeals that is over this bonehead. And if they are as stupid as the 9th Circus Court of Appeals, then the Supreme Court will straighten out things.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 6:52:06 PM EST
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So why can't we get a federal judge to overrule all state level firearms laws just because he feels like it?
View Quote
Because it would be reversed by an appellate court that actually understands the law and doesn't makes it's own law.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 7:00:27 PM EST
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So, by the same logic, unlimited speed limits and 18 year old drinking age here we come?
View Quote
One could only hope. Get to your destination faster AND let Darwin run free?

Kids should have fun too
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 7:00:44 PM EST
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Not surprised. The SCOTUS previously said that the feds can't withhold funds because of a reason unrelated to the purpose of the funds.

Trump need to figure out a way to get 99% of what he wants with that limitation. He needs better quality lawyers writing up these EOs. He must have some flunky left over from Obama who knows how to write EOs that sound good to Trump but won't pass review.
View Quote
Current federal funding cannot be stopped because they already have established agreements in place governing the issuance of these funds which currently do not include immigration enforcement. However, those rules are about to expire come September 30, 2017 which is the end of this federal fiscal year. Which means that the government can write up new rules (these are the strings attached to funding and are not Executive Orders) for the issuance and acceptance by states for federal funds that will be given out to the states for next fiscal year starting 10-01-2017. Those new rules can include requiring that the states honor immigration detainers, allow their law enforcement officers, at their discretion, the freedom to contact ICE and report that they have illegal and/or out of status aliens in their custody on their criminal charges, and agree to not interfere or block ICE officers from arresting illegal/out of status aliens on state property.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 7:00:54 PM EST
[#17]
Doesn't the law allow fines for companies that hire undocumented workers? Just send audit teams all over the sanctuary cities inspecting employers' I9 forms and handing out massive fines. Raise some revenue for the deficit, drive out the illegally, make liberals scream: it's a win-win-win. Why does this not happen?
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 7:01:16 PM EST
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

How the hell can a judge control what the DOJ does with its own grant money?
View Quote
For the same reason Obama's DOE couldn't withhold funds for tranny bathroom policies.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 7:02:17 PM EST
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Because no one has ever told them to piss off, we're not paying any attention to you.
Tell him you send any federal marshalls to arrest us, our federal officers will shoot your federal officers in the face.
View Quote
HAHAHA!

Wait, are you being serious?
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 7:04:45 PM EST
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

How the hell can a judge control what the DOJ does with its own grant money?
View Quote

He can't. The issue is that the grant money comes with strings (guidelines that the state must follow) that currently don't say anything about immigration enforcement. However, come Sept. 30, 2017, that federal funding ends. The next grants start 10-01-2017 and the government agency (congress??) that issues these grants can include stipulations including cooperation with ICE as in honoring ICE immigration detainers, not interfering with ICE officers making arrests on state property, and allowing their state/local LEO's to contact ICE (if they so chose) to report the arrest by them of illegal/out of status aliens that ICE may be interested in interviewing.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 7:29:18 PM EST
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

He can't. The issue is that the grant money comes with strings (guidelines that the state must follow) that currently don't say anything about immigration enforcement. However, come Sept. 30, 2017, that federal funding ends. The next grants start 10-01-2017 and the government agency (congress??) that issues these grants can include stipulations including cooperation with ICE as in honoring ICE immigration detainers, not interfering with ICE officers making arrests on state property, and allowing their state/local LEO's to contact ICE (if they so chose) to report the arrest by them of illegal/out of status aliens that ICE may be interested in interviewing.
View Quote
If that's the case why didn't they just make the EO effective 10/1 and avoid the pissing match?
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 7:31:43 PM EST
[#22]
Enough of black robes making law!  Complete BS.  Withhold the funds anyway.  Barry broke the law all the time.  He's not in jail.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 7:46:03 PM EST
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'll never understand how a district judge can rule over the entire country.
View Quote
Too bad judges on our side didn't do this shit when obummer was in office.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 7:51:53 PM EST
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


If that's the case why didn't they just make the EO effective 10/1 and avoid the pissing match?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


If that's the case why didn't they just make the EO effective 10/1 and avoid the pissing match?
Not an EO, new DOJ policy.  

Can't find any details on the effective date.

Based on a September 5th deadline to apply for the grant, I'd say the money is for after 1 October.

The city will request a decision from the judge before the Sept. 5 deadline to apply for the Byrne grant, Siskel said.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 7:51:58 PM EST
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Not surprised. The SCOTUS previously said that the feds can't withhold funds because of a reason unrelated to the purpose of the funds.
View Quote
Illegals are not supposed to get get the cheese. Cities/counties/states that distribute the cheese for the feds are complicit with the illegals.

QED
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 7:54:00 PM EST
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'll never understand how a district judge can rule over the entire country.
View Quote
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 7:56:04 PM EST
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Why do I keep reading and hearing that Obama failed to fill hundreds of positions in the court rooms, yet the few that he appointed keep shitting on President Trump.
View Quote
It was that way until Harry Reid pulled the nuclear option and changed the Senate rules to allow confirmation of federal judge with a majority vote.  Once he did that they confirmed hundreds of judges that Obama picked.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 7:59:27 PM EST
[#28]
This will be straightened out in October when they hit the reset button.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 8:06:29 PM EST
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Too bad judges on our side didn't do this shit when obummer was in office.
View Quote
They did.  Several times.



Do you guys REALLY not remember this stuff?
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 8:10:22 PM EST
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They did.  Several times.



Do you guys REALLY not remember this stuff?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Too bad judges on our side didn't do this shit when obummer was in office.
They did.  Several times.



Do you guys REALLY not remember this stuff?
I don't really remember obummer being denied very much.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 8:14:58 PM EST
[#31]
Quoted:
Federal judge blocks Trump from denying funds to sanctuary cities

Federal judge blocks Trump from denying funds to sanctuary cities
© Getty
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration's rules requiring so-called sanctuary cities to help enforce federal immigration laws in order to receive funding.

U.S. District Judge Harry Leinenweber issued a nationwide preliminary injunction against the Department of Justice (DOJ) on Friday after Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced new rules governing DOJ law enforcement grants, The Chicago Tribune reports.

The city of Chicago sued the Trump administration last month over the DOJ’s threat to withhold those grants from "sanctuary cities," which are cities that refuse to help federal authorities enforce immigration laws.

Leinenweber said in his 41-page ruling that Chicago had shown a "likelihood of success" in its arguments that Sessions exceeded his authority in July when he announced that the DOJ would withhold public safety grants to sanctuary cities.

The judge, who was appointed by former President Ronald Reagan, explained that he halted the DOJ policy nationwide because there is "no reason to think that the legal issues present in this case are restricted to Chicago or that the statutory authority given to the Attorney General would differ in another jurisdiction."

http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/350937-federal-judge-blocks-trump-from-defunding-sanctuary-cities
View Quote


he ruled it, now let him enforce it
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 8:16:27 PM EST
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I don't really remember obummer being denied very much.
View Quote
I believe that, statistically, he was the most overturned president in the country's history.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 8:16:30 PM EST
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


People don't think the Federal judiciary be like it is.  But it do.
View Quote
Ayep.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 8:34:52 PM EST
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Too bad judges on our side didn't do this shit when obummer was in office.
View Quote
Something has to have happened to make them think twice about ruling against obama.  I'm sure that we all can imagine just what pressure was on them.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 8:36:36 PM EST
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
People don't think the Federal judiciary be like it is.  But it do.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'll never understand how a district judge can rule over the entire country.
People don't think the Federal judiciary be like it is.  But it do.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 8:57:58 PM EST
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Current federal funding cannot be stopped because they already have established agreements in place governing the issuance of these funds which currently do not include immigration enforcement. However, those rules are about to expire come September 30, 2017 which is the end of this federal fiscal year. Which means that the government can write up new rules (these are the strings attached to funding and are not Executive Orders) for the issuance and acceptance by states for federal funds that will be given out to the states for next fiscal year starting 10-01-2017. Those new rules can include requiring that the states honor immigration detainers, allow their law enforcement officers, at their discretion, the freedom to contact ICE and report that they have illegal and/or out of status aliens in their custody on their criminal charges, and agree to not interfere or block ICE officers from arresting illegal/out of status aliens on state property.
View Quote
Good.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 9:10:34 PM EST
[#37]
Judicial insurgency
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 9:18:37 PM EST
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Jesus Christ Reagan appointed him, it says so right up there, ha ha, you guys
View Quote
Reagan did have a few duds (or liars) that he appointed to the bench.  Seems he was about .500 for SCOTUS Justices.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 9:19:29 PM EST
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'll never understand how a district judge can rule over the entire country.
View Quote
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 10:30:48 PM EST
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Good.
View Quote
Damn right.
Link Posted: 9/16/2017 12:54:39 AM EST
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

How the hell can a judge control what the DOJ does with its own grant money?
View Quote
Congress, when it created and funded the grant program at issue, did not give the Attorney General the authority to impose conditions.  Congress could fix this problem by passing a law giving the Attorney General the authority to impose conditions.   Congress could impose the conditions themselves.  But that would require Congress to do something.  

BTW, the Court's decision is located here:  Linky
Link Posted: 9/16/2017 1:00:04 AM EST
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Jesus Christ Reagan appointed him, it says so right up there, ha ha, you guys
View Quote
Link Posted: 9/16/2017 1:21:33 AM EST
[#43]
Withhold the funds anyways.
Link Posted: 9/16/2017 1:28:54 AM EST
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Withhold the funds anyways.
View Quote
"The decision of the supreme court has fell still born, and they find that it cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate."
Link Posted: 9/16/2017 1:34:53 AM EST
[#45]
more tax payer money..... DOJ can't change rules??? If congress gave the president authority over the grant proceedings then rules can be changed,  guess its going to a higher court
Link Posted: 9/16/2017 1:42:32 AM EST
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Next murder by an illegal, arrest the judge for being an accessory and aiding and abetting a violent criminal.
And don't obey his orders anyways.
View Quote
They can do the same to the Mayor of Chicago as well: Judge rules in city's favor on sanctuary cities, grants nationwide injunction

From the article: "Emanuel has been declaring himself a protector of immigrants in the U.S. illegally since before Trump was sworn in, appearing with U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez within days of Trump's victory over Hillary Clinton to promise he would stand up for Chicago's "values and principles as it relates to inclusion."
Link Posted: 9/17/2017 12:33:54 PM EST
[#47]
So basically let's break the law, allow them to continue to break the law, and reward them as well? Yet we wonder what's wrong?
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top