Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 3
Link Posted: 5/30/2009 11:20:40 PM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/1071-More-Yellow-Weeds-Chicago-PMI.html

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/05/30/National-debt-at-545668-per-household/UPI-40641243709475/

Aren't a lot of good signs out there.

Try this experiment.  IGNORE the equities markets.  Pretend that the dow jones industrial average doesn't exist.

Does any other data out there, then, support the contention that we're recovering?

If so, what?

If not, why aren't you concerned that the indexes aren't mirroring the economic indicators?

Just what the hell is going on in the markets?



Optomism that comes with a new President.  Happens every time.  Not everyone has the same perception we do.
Link Posted: 5/30/2009 11:21:04 PM EDT
[#2]
I believe a VAT tax will be installed nationally on top of all the other taxes we currently have and this will be the final push into an epic depression.
Link Posted: 5/30/2009 11:22:54 PM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What we're looking at is a big ball of nasty problems which compound each other.

First we have too much debt, public and private. The private debtors are defaulting (and deflating prices for things like houses) because they can't produce the cash flow needed to service the debt. The government has not faced economic reality, namely that it will not be siphoning off the same value from the economy for several years to come and that substantial budget cuts are needed. This insistence on staying delusional about reality on the part of our politicians is leading to the debasement (inflation) of our currency at a much higher rate than normal.

Second, the lawlessness of the Obama administration applied to the world of finance. They effectively rendered contract law null and void when they tried to undo the AIG bonus contracts and rearranged debt seniority in the Chrysler bankruptcy. There is no reason to set up contractual agreements if a political figure can barge in and rearrange the terms to suit them. Right now this means that unionized companies will have to pay more in risk premium for financing, but taken too far and we won't have financial markets at all. That means cash and carry for cars, houses, college educations...and cash may not be an acceptable form of payment per point #1.

Third, demographics. The baby boomers are starting to retire which means they want their financial assets in safer places (point #2 applies here). So capital is going to get scarce. They also want entitlements from the government to support themselves in retirement as well. If you count Social Security and Medicaid obligations as debts on the public balance sheet the government is bankrupt right now. Add in the fact that in real terms most of Gen X and Y do not and will not earn what their parents did and you can see that there's no value adding tax base to pay for the entitlements either (point #1 applies here).



Point #2 is fascinating really. I had never considered something like that happening. So, what do we use as currency?
Gold? A more stable currency?


That's what's bugging me. What if we find ourselves in an overall deflation on average simply because the prices for McMansions, jetskis, plasma TVs, precious metals, and wages fall while at the same time prices for food, medicine, and energy spike? The gov't will say that the CPI shows only a little inflation but the man in the street looking for food will know better.


The CPI is correct.  It is probably the most inspected (by various groups) staststic in the economy.

Food will go up some, because of the nature of the production and transport.  
But food isn't going to go up so much that people will starve.  However some people just might have to not have a new car, cell phone and 300 channels of cable.

Priorities.
Link Posted: 5/30/2009 11:24:00 PM EDT
[#4]
Looks like we get to experience a historic time in world history first hand. Let's make a good outcome for us all.
Link Posted: 5/30/2009 11:25:04 PM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
Looks like we get to experience a historic time in world history first hand. Let's make a good outcome for us all.


Not really.

1873

1893

and of course 1933


We are just approaching 1979 now.
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 12:19:19 AM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What we're looking at is a big ball of nasty problems which compound each other.

First we have too much debt, public and private. The private debtors are defaulting (and deflating prices for things like houses) because they can't produce the cash flow needed to service the debt. The government has not faced economic reality, namely that it will not be siphoning off the same value from the economy for several years to come and that substantial budget cuts are needed. This insistence on staying delusional about reality on the part of our politicians is leading to the debasement (inflation) of our currency at a much higher rate than normal.

Second, the lawlessness of the Obama administration applied to the world of finance. They effectively rendered contract law null and void when they tried to undo the AIG bonus contracts and rearranged debt seniority in the Chrysler bankruptcy. There is no reason to set up contractual agreements if a political figure can barge in and rearrange the terms to suit them. Right now this means that unionized companies will have to pay more in risk premium for financing, but taken too far and we won't have financial markets at all. That means cash and carry for cars, houses, college educations...and cash may not be an acceptable form of payment per point #1.

Third, demographics. The baby boomers are starting to retire which means they want their financial assets in safer places (point #2 applies here). So capital is going to get scarce. They also want entitlements from the government to support themselves in retirement as well. If you count Social Security and Medicaid obligations as debts on the public balance sheet the government is bankrupt right now. Add in the fact that in real terms most of Gen X and Y do not and will not earn what their parents did and you can see that there's no value adding tax base to pay for the entitlements either (point #1 applies here).



Point #2 is fascinating really. I had never considered something like that happening. So, what do we use as currency?
Gold? A more stable currency?


That's what's bugging me. What if we find ourselves in an overall deflation on average simply because the prices for McMansions, jetskis, plasma TVs, precious metals, and wages fall while at the same time prices for food, medicine, and energy spike? The gov't will say that the CPI shows only a little inflation but the man in the street looking for food will know better.


The CPI is correct.  It is probably the most inspected (by various groups) staststic in the economy.

Food will go up some, because of the nature of the production and transport.  
But food isn't going to go up so much that people will starve.  However some people just might have to not have a new car, cell phone and 300 channels of cable.

Priorities.


If things really go to crap the .gov is certain to monkey with the numbers like they've been doing with unemployment. Pretty much Uncle Sam says you're fully employed if you work 40 hrs per week...even if you're qualified to be an engineer but your job is mopping the floor in McDonald's for the minimum wage.

Fortunately I don't drive a new car, own a new phone, or pay for TV at all.
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 2:24:30 AM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What we're looking at is a big ball of nasty problems which compound each other.

First we have too much debt, public and private. The private debtors are defaulting (and deflating prices for things like houses) because they can't produce the cash flow needed to service the debt. The government has not faced economic reality, namely that it will not be siphoning off the same value from the economy for several years to come and that substantial budget cuts are needed. This insistence on staying delusional about reality on the part of our politicians is leading to the debasement (inflation) of our currency at a much higher rate than normal.

Second, the lawlessness of the Obama administration applied to the world of finance. They effectively rendered contract law null and void when they tried to undo the AIG bonus contracts and rearranged debt seniority in the Chrysler bankruptcy. There is no reason to set up contractual agreements if a political figure can barge in and rearrange the terms to suit them. Right now this means that unionized companies will have to pay more in risk premium for financing, but taken too far and we won't have financial markets at all. That means cash and carry for cars, houses, college educations...and cash may not be an acceptable form of payment per point #1.

Third, demographics. The baby boomers are starting to retire which means they want their financial assets in safer places (point #2 applies here). So capital is going to get scarce. They also want entitlements from the government to support themselves in retirement as well. If you count Social Security and Medicaid obligations as debts on the public balance sheet the government is bankrupt right now. Add in the fact that in real terms most of Gen X and Y do not and will not earn what their parents did and you can see that there's no value adding tax base to pay for the entitlements either (point #1 applies here).



Point #2 is fascinating really. I had never considered something like that happening. So, what do we use as currency?
Gold? A more stable currency?


That's what's bugging me. What if we find ourselves in an overall deflation on average simply because the prices for McMansions, jetskis, plasma TVs, precious metals, and wages fall while at the same time prices for food, medicine, and energy spike? The gov't will say that the CPI shows only a little inflation but the man in the street looking for food will know better.


The CPI is correct.  It is probably the most inspected (by various groups) staststic in the economy.

Food will go up some, because of the nature of the production and transport.  
But food isn't going to go up so much that people will starve.  However some people just might have to not have a new car, cell phone and 300 channels of cable.

Priorities.


If things really go to crap the .gov is certain to monkey with the numbers like they've been doing with unemployment. Pretty much Uncle Sam says you're fully employed if you work 40 hrs per week...even if you're qualified to be an engineer but your job is mopping the floor in McDonald's for the minimum wage.

Fortunately I don't drive a new car, own a new phone, or pay for TV at all.



CPI is one number they would have a hard time messing with.
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 2:55:16 AM EDT
[#8]
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 3:17:07 AM EDT
[#9]
http://www.bestmindsinc.com/documents/TheNextLandslide_LessonsFromAndrewCarnegie.pdf

Read it all the way to the end. It's not good.

Link Posted: 5/31/2009 3:18:18 AM EDT
[#10]
Tagged for the reality checks.
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 5:37:30 AM EDT
[#11]
This thread has definite potential;

FoF, checking in.

ETA: See sigline below.

Link Posted: 5/31/2009 6:36:44 AM EDT
[#12]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Another thing to consider is interest rates.  The Fed has been buying Treasury debt (Quantitative Easing) and artificially setting the interest rates low.  Low interest rates are very necessary to stimulate spending.  There is so much Treasury debt being offered, and competing with corporate, non-profit, and state/municipal issues, that there is not enough money to buy it all.  Competition breeds higher rates, so keep your eyes planted squarely on the 10 year yield.  If it goes up, then the .gov is fucked.


Rates are already starting to go up on their own.  Holding down the prime isn't working anymore.

When will the .gov learn you can't legislate the laws of physics and you can't legislate the laws of economics?


I think the main culprit is BHO's "stimulus".  It has crowded out all the rest of the capital, and made borrowing more expensive for the private sector.

Just what we need too, more good money chasing bad, but on an unprecidented scale.

Link Posted: 5/31/2009 7:49:11 AM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What we're looking at is a big ball of nasty problems which compound each other.

First we have too much debt, public and private. The private debtors are defaulting (and deflating prices for things like houses) because they can't produce the cash flow needed to service the debt. The government has not faced economic reality, namely that it will not be siphoning off the same value from the economy for several years to come and that substantial budget cuts are needed. This insistence on staying delusional about reality on the part of our politicians is leading to the debasement (inflation) of our currency at a much higher rate than normal.

Second, the lawlessness of the Obama administration applied to the world of finance. They effectively rendered contract law null and void when they tried to undo the AIG bonus contracts and rearranged debt seniority in the Chrysler bankruptcy. There is no reason to set up contractual agreements if a political figure can barge in and rearrange the terms to suit them. Right now this means that unionized companies will have to pay more in risk premium for financing, but taken too far and we won't have financial markets at all. That means cash and carry for cars, houses, college educations...and cash may not be an acceptable form of payment per point #1.

Third, demographics. The baby boomers are starting to retire which means they want their financial assets in safer places (point #2 applies here). So capital is going to get scarce. They also want entitlements from the government to support themselves in retirement as well. If you count Social Security and Medicaid obligations as debts on the public balance sheet the government is bankrupt right now. Add in the fact that in real terms most of Gen X and Y do not and will not earn what their parents did and you can see that there's no value adding tax base to pay for the entitlements either (point #1 applies here).



Point #2 is fascinating really. I had never considered something like that happening. So, what do we use as currency?
Gold? A more stable currency?


That's what's bugging me. What if we find ourselves in an overall deflation on average simply because the prices for McMansions, jetskis, plasma TVs, precious metals, and wages fall while at the same time prices for food, medicine, and energy spike? The gov't will say that the CPI shows only a little inflation but the man in the street looking for food will know better.


The CPI is correct.  It is probably the most inspected (by various groups) staststic in the economy.

Food will go up some, because of the nature of the production and transport.  
But food isn't going to go up so much that people will starve.  However some people just might have to not have a new car, cell phone and 300 channels of cable.

Priorities.


If things really go to crap the .gov is certain to monkey with the numbers like they've been doing with unemployment. Pretty much Uncle Sam says you're fully employed if you work 40 hrs per week...even if you're qualified to be an engineer but your job is mopping the floor in McDonald's for the minimum wage.

Fortunately I don't drive a new car, own a new phone, or pay for TV at all.



CPI is one number they would have a hard time messing with.


Yea sure they wouldn't.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonic_index

That $3000 computer you bought in 1994 had a certain utility.  Today if you could buy the same utility in a computer it might cost $30.  That is a 99% decline in price.  That is a factor in CPI.  Unfortunately you can't buy a $30 computer.  They aren't made, and even if you could buy one, it has no modern utility.

You can buy a useful computer for @$600, so there's been a drop, but it's more in the 80% range, not 99%.

Cars are worse.  The $15,000 car you bought in 1994 might cost $7,500 if made today, but again it's not made.  A similar car with modern "value added" features (safety, efficiency, convenience items) might cost $20,000.  Hedonic estimates would say this item has FALLEN 50% in cost, while it in the real world it has RISEN 33%.

You often see core CPI quoted, ie CPI less food and energy.  I would prefer to see a dollar value index consisting of oil, ag. commodities, and precious metals.
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 7:58:54 AM EDT
[#14]
Quoted:
Quoted:
America is fucked as long as we keep letting forigners import more than we export.

Every person needs to stop buying from China Japan and other forign nations and buy American.

We need imports taxes and to get rid of envirmental, saftey, and wokers rloights




An obvious student of history.  I think he read all about the Smoot-Hawley tarriff and liked the results.
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 8:13:02 AM EDT
[#15]
Depression - Check
Cold Hard Facts to Support a looming Depression, Obama as POTUS - Check

Have a great day.
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 8:56:35 AM EDT
[#16]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Looks like we get to experience a historic time in world history first hand. Let's make a good outcome for us all.


Not really.

1873

1893

and of course 1933


We are just approaching 1979 now.


I think John is saying that this depression might eclipse all of the ones you are listing.
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 8:59:43 AM EDT
[#17]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What we're looking at is a big ball of nasty problems which compound each other.

First we have too much debt, public and private. The private debtors are defaulting (and deflating prices for things like houses) because they can't produce the cash flow needed to service the debt. The government has not faced economic reality, namely that it will not be siphoning off the same value from the economy for several years to come and that substantial budget cuts are needed. This insistence on staying delusional about reality on the part of our politicians is leading to the debasement (inflation) of our currency at a much higher rate than normal.

Second, the lawlessness of the Obama administration applied to the world of finance. They effectively rendered contract law null and void when they tried to undo the AIG bonus contracts and rearranged debt seniority in the Chrysler bankruptcy. There is no reason to set up contractual agreements if a political figure can barge in and rearrange the terms to suit them. Right now this means that unionized companies will have to pay more in risk premium for financing, but taken too far and we won't have financial markets at all. That means cash and carry for cars, houses, college educations...and cash may not be an acceptable form of payment per point #1.

Third, demographics. The baby boomers are starting to retire which means they want their financial assets in safer places (point #2 applies here). So capital is going to get scarce. They also want entitlements from the government to support themselves in retirement as well. If you count Social Security and Medicaid obligations as debts on the public balance sheet the government is bankrupt right now. Add in the fact that in real terms most of Gen X and Y do not and will not earn what their parents did and you can see that there's no value adding tax base to pay for the entitlements either (point #1 applies here).



Point #2 is fascinating really. I had never considered something like that happening. So, what do we use as currency?
Gold? A more stable currency?


That's what's bugging me. What if we find ourselves in an overall deflation on average simply because the prices for McMansions, jetskis, plasma TVs, precious metals, and wages fall while at the same time prices for food, medicine, and energy spike? The gov't will say that the CPI shows only a little inflation but the man in the street looking for food will know better.


The CPI is correct.  It is probably the most inspected (by various groups) staststic in the economy.

Food will go up some, because of the nature of the production and transport.  
But food isn't going to go up so much that people will starve.  However some people just might have to not have a new car, cell phone and 300 channels of cable.

Priorities.


If things really go to crap the .gov is certain to monkey with the numbers like they've been doing with unemployment. Pretty much Uncle Sam says you're fully employed if you work 40 hrs per week...even if you're qualified to be an engineer but your job is mopping the floor in McDonald's for the minimum wage.
Fortunately I don't drive a new car, own a new phone, or pay for TV at all.


The .gov also does not include, children (obviously) the elderly, people in college, people who have given up looking for a job, people who are disabled (many who are not really disabled) etc, etc. The point being that all these people consume but are not counted as "unemployed". What fraction of the populace really is producing?
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 9:13:40 AM EDT
[#18]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What we're looking at is a big ball of nasty problems which compound each other.

First we have too much debt, public and private. The private debtors are defaulting (and deflating prices for things like houses) because they can't produce the cash flow needed to service the debt. The government has not faced economic reality, namely that it will not be siphoning off the same value from the economy for several years to come and that substantial budget cuts are needed. This insistence on staying delusional about reality on the part of our politicians is leading to the debasement (inflation) of our currency at a much higher rate than normal.

Second, the lawlessness of the Obama administration applied to the world of finance. They effectively rendered contract law null and void when they tried to undo the AIG bonus contracts and rearranged debt seniority in the Chrysler bankruptcy. There is no reason to set up contractual agreements if a political figure can barge in and rearrange the terms to suit them. Right now this means that unionized companies will have to pay more in risk premium for financing, but taken too far and we won't have financial markets at all. That means cash and carry for cars, houses, college educations...and cash may not be an acceptable form of payment per point #1.

Third, demographics. The baby boomers are starting to retire which means they want their financial assets in safer places (point #2 applies here). So capital is going to get scarce. They also want entitlements from the government to support themselves in retirement as well. If you count Social Security and Medicaid obligations as debts on the public balance sheet the government is bankrupt right now. Add in the fact that in real terms most of Gen X and Y do not and will not earn what their parents did and you can see that there's no value adding tax base to pay for the entitlements either (point #1 applies here).



Point #2 is fascinating really. I had never considered something like that happening. So, what do we use as currency?
Gold? A more stable currency?


That's what's bugging me. What if we find ourselves in an overall deflation on average simply because the prices for McMansions, jetskis, plasma TVs, precious metals, and wages fall while at the same time prices for food, medicine, and energy spike? The gov't will say that the CPI shows only a little inflation but the man in the street looking for food will know better.


The CPI is correct.  It is probably the most inspected (by various groups) staststic in the economy.

Food will go up some, because of the nature of the production and transport.  
But food isn't going to go up so much that people will starve.  However some people just might have to not have a new car, cell phone and 300 channels of cable.

Priorities.


If things really go to crap the .gov is certain to monkey with the numbers like they've been doing with unemployment. Pretty much Uncle Sam says you're fully employed if you work 40 hrs per week...even if you're qualified to be an engineer but your job is mopping the floor in McDonald's for the minimum wage.

Fortunately I don't drive a new car, own a new phone, or pay for TV at all.



CPI is one number they would have a hard time messing with.


Yea sure they wouldn't.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonic_index

That $3000 computer you bought in 1994 had a certain utility.  Today if you could buy the same utility in a computer it might cost $30.  That is a 99% decline in price.  That is a factor in CPI.  Unfortunately you can't buy a $30 computer.  They aren't made, and even if you could buy one, it has no modern utility.

You can buy a useful computer for @$600, so there's been a drop, but it's more in the 80% range, not 99%.

Cars are worse.  The $15,000 car you bought in 1994 might cost $7,500 if made today, but again it's not made.  A similar car with modern "value added" features (safety, efficiency, convenience items) might cost $20,000.  Hedonic estimates would say this item has FALLEN 50% in cost, while it in the real world it has RISEN 33%.

You often see core CPI quoted, ie CPI less food and energy.  I would prefer to see a dollar value index consisting of oil, ag. commodities, and precious metals.


That might work. How about a dollar linked to ...gold?
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 9:22:55 AM EDT
[#19]
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 9:23:10 AM EDT
[#20]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Israel attack on Iran sending gas to $7/gal.


Or just a modest economic recovery could send it to $7.

Bottom line, rising gas prices helped put us where we are and rising gas prices will help finish us off.


Only if we don't drill.  If we could start drilling, it would reverse the trend.  However since we have no energy policy we will revert to third world status.


Energy policy? Come on, cap & trade and Obama's 39 mpg cars will save the world . . .

No nukes, no drilling, . . . don't rape mother Gia

Link Posted: 5/31/2009 9:24:17 AM EDT
[#21]
Quoted:
Quoted:
If gas went up tommorow to $7 a gallon  ,it would be 1-3 years before we'd see much in terms of domestic oil if we started to tap everything, drilling takes time.


Yup, and if we just started 4 years ago when Bush first started talk about ANWR we wouldn't be in this mess.


I though Bush was talking about that around 2000 or 2001 . . .

Link Posted: 5/31/2009 9:25:45 AM EDT
[#22]
Quoted:
The more I think about it the more I believe that sherrick may be right in that there will be no 'collapse'

We will continue on our downward spiral until housing prices stabilize, and then we will stay there.  Stagnation - I think it's what is termed an "L shaped" recovery.  In other words, once the bleeding stops there is no transfusion of new blood.

One thing is for certain...the bottom callers right now are full of shit.  We will not recover until housing prices stop falling - and they are falling at an historic level.



Kinda like Japan . . .
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 9:27:09 AM EDT
[#23]
Quoted:
One major difference between the US today and classic cases of hyperinflation (such as the Weimar, or Zimbabwe):

We have humongous quantities of material goods.  There is no shortage of luxury items, of necessities, or of anything.  Consumers have simply aquired them on credit, and are defaulting on their payments for them.

There is a glut of material goods.  People are trying to unload things to raise cash, or just get out from under payments.

This is a classic scenario for deflation.

The .gov will of course, in its infinite wisdom, cause inflation by printing more money and "buying" its own debt (classic shell game), and may succeed to a great degree.

But out of control hyperinflation occurs when there are people who need things, and there are very few things to go around.

We have more things than we need –– a lot more.



I see what you are saying. But will we have this "glut" in the future? For example, I anticipate a "glut" of GM cars near future, farther out I'm not so sure . . .
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 9:38:04 AM EDT
[#24]
Quoted:
Quoted:
One major difference between the US today and classic cases of hyperinflation (such as the Weimar, or Zimbabwe):

We have humongous quantities of material goods.  There is no shortage of luxury items, of necessities, or of anything.  Consumers have simply aquired them on credit, and are defaulting on their payments for them.

There is a glut of material goods.  People are trying to unload things to raise cash, or just get out from under payments.

This is a classic scenario for deflation.

The .gov will of course, in its infinite wisdom, cause inflation by printing more money and "buying" its own debt (classic shell game), and may succeed to a great degree.

But out of control hyperinflation occurs when there are people who need things, and there are very few things to go around.

We have more things than we need –– a lot more.



I see what you are saying. But will we have this "glut" in the future? For example, I anticipate a "glut" of GM cars near future, farther out I'm not so sure . . .


As far as cars go, I understand the United States normally scraps about 14 million cars a year.  We are currently buying cars at a 10 million a year pace.  That mismatch and the pent up demand is going to have an effect someday.  Hopefully before the asteriod hits on 12/21/12
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 9:40:06 AM EDT
[#25]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Looks like we get to experience a historic time in world history first hand. Let's make a good outcome for us all.


Not really.

1873

1893

and of course 1933


We are just approaching 1979 now.


I think John is saying that this depression might eclipse all of the ones you are listing.



'33 was extended about 7 years due to FDR's policies, according to analysis by some UCLA economists. We still have remaining FDR and LBJ progams to deal with (Social Security and Medicare) and Obama is piling onto that with a hoast of economic stupidity. Hecne, this time could be much worse than anything seen before.
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 9:46:32 AM EDT
[#26]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Looks like we get to experience a historic time in world history first hand. Let's make a good outcome for us all.


Not really.

1873

1893

and of course 1933


We are just approaching 1979 now.


I think John is saying that this depression might eclipse all of the ones you are listing.



'33 was extended about 7 years due to FDR's policies, according to analysis by some UCLA economists. We still have remaining FDR and LBJ progams to deal with (Social Security and Medicare) and Obama is piling onto that with a hoast of economic stupidity. Hecne, this time could be much worse than anything seen before.


You forgot about George W. Bush who spent more than LBJ.
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 9:49:43 AM EDT
[#27]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If gas went up tommorow to $7 a gallon  ,it would be 1-3 years before we'd see much in terms of domestic oil if we started to tap everything, drilling takes time.


Yup, and if we just started 4 years ago when Bush first started talk about ANWR we wouldn't be in this mess.


I though Bush was talking about that around 2000 or 2001 . . .



Yeah, but as usual that was just Bubba-bait from Bush.  He never actually did anything about it, just like he couldn't even be bothered to rescind any of Clinton's most insane EOs, or his father's EOs, including the gun ones.

Bush was not a friend to the oilfield.  He was less of an enemy than Obama, but neither Bush nor Cheney bothered to address a whole bunch of issues that would have gotten us a hell of a lot farther than drilling in ANWR.
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 10:00:07 AM EDT
[#28]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If gas went up tommorow to $7 a gallon  ,it would be 1-3 years before we'd see much in terms of domestic oil if we started to tap everything, drilling takes time.


Yup, and if we just started 4 years ago when Bush first started talk about ANWR we wouldn't be in this mess.


I though Bush was talking about that around 2000 or 2001 . . .



Yeah, but as usual that was just Bubba-bait from Bush.  He never actually did anything about it, just like he couldn't even be bothered to rescind any of Clinton's most insane EOs, or his father's EOs, including the gun ones.
Bush was not a friend to the oilfield.  He was less of an enemy than Obama, but neither Bush nor Cheney bothered to address a whole bunch of issues that would have gotten us a hell of a lot farther than drilling in ANWR.


Agreed. Bush was no friend of ours. We went from bad to worse with Obama.

Someday within my lifetime, I'd really like to vote FOR someone rather than against someone.

Link Posted: 5/31/2009 10:33:41 AM EDT
[#29]
First he scooped up a trillion in cash...

...then he took over Aig and had BoA and Citi wagging thier tails on command...

...now he's handed GM and Chrysler to the unions...

...and in a very short time, he's going to seize the entire US Treasury, because he's liquidating US dollars by the truckload by printing money to buy bonds..

...and some folks here think this is all a product of stupidity, instead of design.

Lesson one, stupidity cancels itself out over time. Random distribution, it's a law of nature. When a person "screws up" and ends up with ALL the money, it usually isn't an accident.

We have exactly one ally in the fight to keep Obama from making the USD dollar worthless, squeezing out all the value and handing it to friends and allies, just like AIG, GM, Chrysler, BoA, Citibank, etc.

That's China.

If Obama devalues our treasury, he devalues their treasury as well, due to all the bonds they've bought over the years.

That's why they are selling hard dollars to buy gold, and why they ordered Obama to stop printing money last week.

That's also probably why they are slipping the leash on their pit bull, in North Korea.

They haven't started dumping US bonds, for pennies on the dollar yet, but they have stopped buying any more.

They clearly think the dollar will drop against gold, or they would be selling gold to buy dollars.

And Obama comes thru right on cue, with the solution to dilute the wealth of the US only, while giving China time to get out safely...yup...you guessed it...

Obama just TOLD us he plans to take a cut of EVERYTHING, to the tune of 5-25 percent.

I think when most peiple heard Obama said he'd re-distribute the wealth, they thought he'd tax the rich, and give a few extra bucks to the poor.

But what he really meant was that he was going to take all the US banks and give them to cronies, take all the car companies and give them to the unions, and take the entire US Treasury and give it to China, and take three quarters of every dollar you earn, instead of the half we give up to taxes now.

Obama is redistributing the wealth of EARTH, and most folks still think it's just coincidence.







Link Posted: 5/31/2009 10:35:54 AM EDT
[#30]
First he scooped up a trillion in cash...

...then he took over Aig and had BoA and Citi wagging thier tails on command...

...now he's handed GM and Chrysler to the unions...

...and in a very short time, he's going to seize the entire US Treasury, because he's liquidating US dollars by the truckload by printing money to buy bonds..

...and some folks here think this is all a product of stupidity, instead of design.

Lesson one, stupidity cancels itself out over time. Random distribution, it's a law of nature. When a person "screws up" and ends up with ALL the money, it usually isn't an accident.

We have exactly one ally in the fight to keep Obama from making the USD dollar worthless, squeezing out all the value and handing it to friends and allies, just like AIG, GM, Chrysler, BoA, Citibank, etc.

That's China.

If Obama devalues our treasury, he devalues their treasury as well, due to all the bonds they've bought over the years.

That's why they are selling hard dollars to buy gold, and why they ordered Obama to stop printing money last week.

That's also probably why they are slipping the leash on their pit bull, in North Korea.

They haven't started dumping US bonds, for pennies on the dollar yet, but they have stopped buying any more.

They clearly think the dollar will drop against gold, or they would be selling gold to buy dollars.

And Obama comes thru right on cue, with the solution to dilute the wealth of the US only, while giving China time to get out safely...yup...you guessed it...

Obama just TOLD us he plans to take a cut of EVERYTHING, to the tune of 5-25 percent.

I think when most peiple heard Obama said he'd re-distribute the wealth, they thought he'd tax the rich, and give a few extra bucks to the poor.

But what he really meant was that he was going to take all the US banks and give them to cronies, take all the car companies and give them to the unions, and take the entire US Treasury and give it to China, and take three quarters of every dollar you earn, instead of the half we give up to taxes now.

Obama is redistributing the wealth of EARTH, like a chainsaw through balsa wood, and most folks still think it's just coincidence.







Link Posted: 5/31/2009 10:41:31 AM EDT
[#31]



Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:


Quoted:

In ten years the annual interest on the national debt will be 850 billion USD per year, largely thanks to 0bamas budgets. That is clearly unsustainable. One day nobody will show up to buy our bonds.




Don't worry, we have a buyer with unlimited funds.  His name is Ben Bernanke.




Yep.  We already don't have enough buyers for our bonds, so the Treasury is printing money and buying them, about 50% IIRC.




This is news to me. You are saying that the Treasury (part of our Fed government) is borrowing money (selling bonds) to itself? This would be the equivalent of someone taking cash from a credit card to pay another one...compunded debt


No.



What is happening, is that the Federal Reserve has bought some amount of existing bonds off the open market, in an attempt to ensure that there is still demand for new ones...



 
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 11:54:31 AM EDT
[#32]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
In ten years the annual interest on the national debt will be 850 billion USD per year, largely thanks to 0bamas budgets. That is clearly unsustainable. One day nobody will show up to buy our bonds.


Don't worry, we have a buyer with unlimited funds.  His name is Ben Bernanke.


Yep.  We already don't have enough buyers for our bonds, so the Treasury is printing money and buying them, about 50% IIRC.


This is news to me. You are saying that the Treasury (part of our Fed government) is borrowing money (selling bonds) to itself? This would be the equivalent of someone taking cash from a credit card to pay another one...compunded debt

No.

What is happening, is that the Federal Reserve has bought some amount of existing bonds off the open market, in an attempt to ensure that there is still demand for new ones...
 


Ok, so the Fed is not buying bonds from itself, it is issuing bonds and them buying them back.

Whew! That's a huge difference. I feel better now.

Link Posted: 5/31/2009 5:03:24 PM EDT
[#33]
Quoted:
Quoted:
The more I think about it the more I believe that sherrick may be right in that there will be no 'collapse'

We will continue on our downward spiral until housing prices stabilize, and then we will stay there.  Stagnation - I think it's what is termed an "L shaped" recovery.  In other words, once the bleeding stops there is no transfusion of new blood.

One thing is for certain...the bottom callers right now are full of shit.  We will not recover until housing prices stop falling - and they are falling at an historic level.



Kinda like Japan . . .


I've been saying that for a while now.

Link Posted: 5/31/2009 5:04:32 PM EDT
[#34]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Looks like we get to experience a historic time in world history first hand. Let's make a good outcome for us all.


Not really.

1873

1893

and of course 1933


We are just approaching 1979 now.


I think John is saying that this depression might eclipse all of the ones you are listing.



And John will probably be wrong.  

UNLESS, we continue to elected D's in 010 and 012.  Then he very well might be right.  Our current economic problems are political related, not system related.

But we will see.
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 5:15:02 PM EDT
[#35]
In the not to distant future we will have a national language, Chinese. China will own the US of A.
If we stopped buying items made in china we'd stop most non essential buying thus halting our economy.
Welcome to the new world.
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 7:39:36 PM EDT
[#36]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Looks like we get to experience a historic time in world history first hand. Let's make a good outcome for us all.


Not really.

1873

1893

and of course 1933


We are just approaching 1979 now.


From my memory, we'd about mid-way through 1977.
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 9:06:43 PM EDT
[#37]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If gas went up tommorow to $7 a gallon  ,it would be 1-3 years before we'd see much in terms of domestic oil if we started to tap everything, drilling takes time.


Yup, and if we just started 4 years ago when Bush first started talk about ANWR we wouldn't be in this mess.


I though Bush was talking about that around 2000 or 2001 . . .



Yeah, but as usual that was just Bubba-bait from Bush.  He never actually did anything about it, just like he couldn't even be bothered to rescind any of Clinton's most insane EOs, or his father's EOs, including the gun ones.
Bush was not a friend to the oilfield.  He was less of an enemy than Obama, but neither Bush nor Cheney bothered to address a whole bunch of issues that would have gotten us a hell of a lot farther than drilling in ANWR.


Agreed. Bush was no friend of ours. We went from bad to worse with Obama.

Someday within my lifetime, I'd really like to vote FOR someone rather than against someone.



That is so friggin true...
Link Posted: 5/31/2009 9:15:46 PM EDT
[#38]
TAG
Link Posted: 6/1/2009 6:32:06 AM EDT
[#39]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If gas went up tommorow to $7 a gallon  ,it would be 1-3 years before we'd see much in terms of domestic oil if we started to tap everything, drilling takes time.


Yup, and if we just started 4 years ago when Bush first started talk about ANWR we wouldn't be in this mess.


I though Bush was talking about that around 2000 or 2001 . . .



Yeah, but as usual that was just Bubba-bait from Bush.  He never actually did anything about it, just like he couldn't even be bothered to rescind any of Clinton's most insane EOs, or his father's EOs, including the gun ones.

Bush was not a friend to the oilfield.  He was less of an enemy than Obama, but neither Bush nor Cheney bothered to address a whole bunch of issues that would have gotten us a hell of a lot farther than drilling in ANWR.


Regarding EOs, there is a tradition of not rescinding previous EOs.  Bush mostly followed this tradition.  Obama may break the tradition, but isn't (much) so far.

Why do they have this tradition?  Because it gives the President more power.  And I expect most future presidents, Dem or GOP to follow it.
Link Posted: 6/1/2009 6:44:59 AM EDT
[#40]






If theories were supported by "cold hard facts" they would not be theories.  Also, economics is a 'soft science' unlike say....physics.
5sub
Link Posted: 6/1/2009 7:41:20 AM EDT
[#41]
Quoted:
Free trade accomplished what it was suppose to do. It destroyed the working class, giving them no choice but to support Democrats. Now, our industries will be nationalized, and protectionism will be brought back.

Look for trial balloons for Mexico, the US, and Canada to have a shared currency.
Look for a VAT tax.
Look for a new Tri-North American Government within 40 years.
Look for a police state.
Look for food and energy rationing.
Look for work camps.
Look for the elimination of a meat and dairy.  
Look for the almost complete elimination of automobiles.
Look for the elimination of free speech.
Look for the elimination of single family housing units.



Is this actually viable?  I mean, is that the rational view on things right now or the survivalist fantasy view?
Link Posted: 6/1/2009 7:46:57 AM EDT
[#42]
I don't know about the job market and economy in general, but here's a great slideshow on the housing market:  http://moremortgagemeltdown.com/download/pdf/T2_Partners_presentation_on_the_mortgage_crisis.pdf
Link Posted: 6/1/2009 9:17:43 AM EDT
[#43]



Quoted:


I don't know about the job market and economy in general, but here's a great slideshow on the housing market:  http://moremortgagemeltdown.com/download/pdf/T2_Partners_presentation_on_the_mortgage_crisis.pdf


For a Cliff's Notes of the slide show, Mish Shedlock did a commentary on this Sunday, May 31. It's still on the front page with the heading - Mortgage Meltdown More Pain to Come.







Basically what it comes down to is that without jobs, nothing is going to improve. And you can't collect taxes from people who aren't working. Show me anything that indicates employment is improving on a large scale and in a productive way, and I might be more positive.
Link Posted: 6/2/2009 6:02:28 PM EDT
[#44]
Our leadership will find a way to "paper over" the financial nightmare and people will soon forget about the falseness of our monetary system. Confidence will return, our phony economy will begin to expand again. Hard to rationalize but I believe this to be a fact.
Link Posted: 6/2/2009 6:37:05 PM EDT
[#45]
Truck tonnage dropped 13% in April (apologies if already posted)

Truck tonnage drops 13% in April....

Updated:  5/27/2009 12:00:00 PM  
April Truck Tonnage Plunges 13.2%

Drop Is Biggest in 13 Years; Reading Is Lowest Since 2001

Truck tonnage decreased 13.2% in April compared with a year ago, falling to the lowest level in seven-and-a-half years, American Trucking Associations said.

The decline in the for-hire seasonally adjusted truck tonnage index was the biggest in 13 years and left tonnage at a reading of 99.2, its lowest level since November 2001.

The index fell 2.2% from March, the second consecutive month-to-month decrease, ATA said late Tuesday.

Without accounting for seasonal adjustment, the index fell 2.9% from March, while March’s tonnage level had dropped 12.2% from a year earlier.

ATA Chief Economist Bob Costello said trucking is being hit by both the recession and businesses’ efforts to decrease inventory.

“While most key economic indictors are decreasing at a slower rate, the year-over-year contractions in truck tonnage accelerated because businesses are right-sizing their inventories, which means fewer truck shipments,” Costello said.

“Until this correction is complete, freight will be tough for motor carriers,” he said in a statement.

ATA calculates the tonnage each month based on reports by its member trucking companies.

By Transport Topics

See http://www.ttnews.com/articles/basetemplate.aspx?storyid=21997

ETA you should also see the Baltic Dry-Index

ETA Rail Traffic Hits Year's Low


Rail Traffic Hits Year's Low
John D. Boyd | May 21, 2009 7:52PM GMT
The Journal of Commerce Online - News Story


Worst week this year softened by mild lift for intermodal

Despite some lift from intermodal volume, major U.S. railroads by two important measures had their worst week so far this year.

Rail carloads, which include everything from bulk materials to finished motor vehicles and the in-between factory goods that can ride in large railcars, reached just 247,258 units in the week ending May 16, said the Association of American Railroads.

That is lower than any time since the end of December, when much of the industrial economy was shutting down to wait out the financial storm and ensuing collapse in demand.

Train hauls of intermodal trailers and containers reached 188,435 units, up by nearly 7,000 from a week earlier and the highest since the Feb. 14 week.

Still, total estimated ton-miles of combined carload and intermodal freight carried by large U.S. railroads, sank to the year’s low at 26.2 billion. That was down 24.3 percent from the same point in 2008.

A number of economists, and some rail executives, have suggested that the freight market’s decline is bottoming out. The traffic figures suggest the market could move along the bottom for a while.

One notable area of weakness this year is coal volume, which hits large carriers especially hard because that is the largest cargo railroads haul.

Last year they enjoyed a brisk business in export coal demand, especially the eastern carriers hauling coal to ports to fill Europe-bound ships, but that business has fallen sharply. Meanwhile, domestic coal demand is also lighter with fewer factories powered up to make goods.

But the carload numbers have weakened recently in some other areas as well. Chemical shipments – the second-largest cargo in railcar volume –– have cooled some this month, a possible indicator of a pause in the rebound of factory activity and perhaps in line with a new round of automobile factory cuts.

Other categories linked to auto or housing industries remain weak or have weakened a bit more during May, although a few cargoes of basic construction materials show some firming.

Intermodal numbers are probably continuing to benefit from a strengthened domestic business this year, industry officials say, while ocean container traffic remains very weak as shippers face the start of the summer peak season in which they normally import boxed goods for the autumn selling season.

Contact John D. Boyd at [email protected].

See   http://www.joc.com/node/411476

Link Posted: 6/2/2009 9:47:03 PM EDT
[#46]
Quoted:
Our leadership will find a way to "paper over" the financial nightmare and people will soon forget about the falseness of our monetary system. Confidence will return, our phony economy will begin to expand again. Hard to rationalize but I believe this to be a fact.


That is stupid.

It either works or not.
Link Posted: 6/2/2009 9:56:54 PM EDT
[#47]
Quoted:
One major difference between the US today and classic cases of hyperinflation (such as the Weimar, or Zimbabwe):

We have humongous quantities of material goods.  There is no shortage of luxury items, of necessities, or of anything.  Consumers have simply aquired them on credit, and are defaulting on their payments for them.

There is a glut of material goods.  People are trying to unload things to raise cash, or just get out from under payments.

This is a classic scenario for deflation.

The .gov will of course, in its infinite wisdom, cause inflation by printing more money and "buying" its own debt (classic shell game), and may succeed to a great degree.

But out of control hyperinflation occurs when there are people who need things, and there are very few things to go around.

We have more things than we need –– a lot more.


Agree 100%.  But this is just the first phase... the "sell off" or "forced liquidation" as unsustainable debts are (attempted to be) discharged.  Of course, production also stops.. and jobs go and, eventually, those things in need will become rare.  Perhaps that will occur around the time the (fiat) money supply has been expanded exponentially.   Deflation/inflation whipsaw.

Link Posted: 6/2/2009 10:23:45 PM EDT
[#48]
In 1990 I worked for $5 an hour and thought I was poor.

For 400 hours of labor I could buy an acre of land. For 4,000 hours of labor I could buy a home.


Today I make $20 an hour. It would take 12,500 hours of labor to buy a home. Plus another 12,500 hours of labor to pay the interest on the mortgage.

We are poorer today as a nation than in 1990 by far. We're all enslaved to nothing because of the credit bubble and I want to kill who ever is responsible for coming up with the credit bubble that enslaved me and my nation.

It's my duty and I'm mad as hell about it.
Link Posted: 6/2/2009 10:44:39 PM EDT
[#49]
Quoted:
Hell, even the Russkies see it coming.

American capitalism gone with a whimper
27.04.2009 Source: Pravda.Ru URL: http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/107459-american_capitalism-0
-snip-



All i can say is, wow
Link Posted: 6/3/2009 2:52:47 AM EDT
[#50]
What's coming is going to be the worst economic and political crash in our nation's history if only because the debt load (public and private) is worse and it's global, not just national. There's no bigger benevolent nation out there who can bail us out.... there ARE nations who are buying us up piece-meal, but once they've taken all the goodies, they'll dump us like a used......

so cut expenses, build up cash reserves, buy food, buy 'food acquisition tools', tools that help heat/cool the home, etc. as crazy as it is, buy some solar panels - if we go Zimbabwe poor, you won't be getting grid power at all and that generator is noisy (and runs on gasoline)....

Page / 3
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top