Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 3
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 9/11/2012 2:11:02 PM EST
[#1]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:




As someone posted above, that stat is BS because is is limited to "income taxes". However, people who have an earned income also pay the Payroll Tax (that is OASDI & Medicare on your paystub).












The OASDI part ENDS when you hit 110,000 (give or take). Therefore, if your salary is 10,000 a year, you pay $420.00 in OASDI. If your salary is $100,000, your pay $4,200 in OASDI taxes. If your salary is $1,000,000 a year, you pay $4,620 in OASDI taxes.












The "rich" pay a smaller percentage of their income in OASDI taxes than people who make less than $110,000. Also, the payroll tax only applies to earned income, and not to dividends, interest, etc...













Even people who do not pay income taxes pay the payroll tax if they have an earned income.













Sounds like skin in the game to me.





It is not as much skin in the game and not equal.
Fair tax with no prebate would even the playing field for all.




 





That's called moving to goal posts.
When someone points out that the talking point of "50% of people pay nothing" and "have no skin in the game" is BS, you start talking about equality.
This is what liberals do when they talk about the 99%.
Congrats on being the same thing that you claim to hate.




 





Actually the insult and the talking points you made are what




the liberals and the 99%ers make.
Social Security and Fica taxes are actually insurance premiums and that




is a different game that is being discussed here.
The fact is that most do pay these taxes. But many get EITC and Child tax




credits of over $6k from the IRS that they never paid in. That far offsets




the SS and Fica taxes they pay. In addition these people get food stamps,




Wic, Section 8 electric supplements etc. Much of this is paid for with Federal




funds. Federal grants are given to States, counties and cities. The people




that do not pay income tax enjoy the benefits of the the services provided




by the agencies that receive these federal funds.
The rich people you seem to dislike also own businesses that pay additional




federal taxes and they have to pay 50% of their employee's SS costs. So




the rich are paying far more SS funds than you seem to realize.  





 
I stopped caring what you had to say with these the sentences.
Its clear you aren't talking to me, because I never once implied this.  




In this thread, or ever.
No, its clear you are marking shit up so you can bust out your talking points.
Thank you for proving my point: you are acting just like the liberals on this issue.  Facts be damned, you are going to get your talking points and sound bytes in regardless.
In the end, like a liberal, those who say "less than 50% of the people have a skin in the game" are lying.
And pointing out the fact that you are moving the goalposts isn't an insult, its reality.
It went from:




x% don't have a skin in the game




to "rich people" (whatever that is supposed to mean) are paying "more than you think" (as if, you have any clue as to what I think).
That's covered on the first day of moving the goalposts 101.




 





Clearly you are not literate and did do realize when you insult a person.
It is sad when you cannot see that you are a 99%er but yet you call me



one.  that is straight out of the communist manifesto. There are no goal


posts out there. You are caught up in liberal speak. I have not made anything up at all.





Do you disagree that a fair tax would be the most fair method of

taxing there is?
 
Link Posted: 9/11/2012 2:28:21 PM EST
[#2]







Quoted:
Quoted:




 
I stopped caring what you had to say with these the sentences.
Its clear you aren't talking to me, because I never once implied this.  



In this thread, or ever.
No, its clear you are marking shit up so you can bust out your talking points.
Thank
you for proving my point: you are acting just like the liberals on this
issue.  Facts be damned, you are going to get your talking points and
sound bytes in regardless.
In the end, like a liberal, those who say "less than 50% of the people have a skin in the game" are lying.
And pointing out the fact that you are moving the goalposts isn't an insult, its reality.
It went from:



x% don't have a skin in the game



to
"rich people" (whatever that is supposed to mean) are paying "more than
you think" (as if, you have any clue as to what I think).
That's covered on the first day of moving the goalposts 101.



 




Clearly you are not literate and did do realize when you insult a person.
It is sad when you cannot see that you are a 99%er but yet you call me



one.  that is straight out of the communist manifesto. There are no goal



posts out there. You are caught up in liberal speak. I have not made anything up at all.
Do you disagree that a fair tax would be the most fair method of



taxing there is?



 
You think I'm a 99%?  Who is the illiterate one?
No, the goal posts are "50% don't pay anything" which is a lie, and all who say it are ignorant or liars.
"Goal posts" isn't liberal speak...again...who is the illiterate one?
Sorry, you did make it up, because said that I:
1) Hate rich people.



2) am a 99%.
Both of these are not true.  Its not my fault that you made them up, but you did.
I have no problem with trying to make a fairer tax system.  Infact, I'm all for it.
What I am not for is moronically simplistic sound bytes by people who mirror the 99%ers.
"Haf da peepole don't hav no skin in da game" is just nonsense.
Saying "rich people pay more than you realize" (as if if you have any idea what I 'realize') doesn't make the previous statement any less foolish.
Aka, moving the goalposts.
 
Link Posted: 9/11/2012 2:43:04 PM EST
[#3]





Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:



 
I stopped caring what you had to say with these the sentences.





Its clear you aren't talking to me, because I never once implied this.  


In this thread, or ever.





No, its clear you are marking shit up so you can bust out your talking points.





Thank you for proving my point: you are acting just like the liberals on this issue.  Facts be damned, you are going to get your talking points and sound bytes in regardless.





In the end, like a liberal, those who say "less than 50% of the people have a skin in the game" are lying.





And pointing out the fact that you are moving the goalposts isn't an insult, its reality.





It went from:


x% don't have a skin in the game


to "rich people" (whatever that is supposed to mean) are paying "more than you think" (as if, you have any clue as to what I think).





That's covered on the first day of moving the goalposts 101.


 



Clearly you are not literate and did do realize when you insult a person.





It is sad when you cannot see that you are a 99%er but yet you call me


one.  that is straight out of the communist manifesto. There are no goal


posts out there. You are caught up in liberal speak. I have not made anything up at all.
Do you disagree that a fair tax would be the most fair method of


taxing there is?


 
You think I'm a 99%?  Who is the illiterate one?





No, the goal posts are "50% don't pay anything" which is a lie, and all who say it are ignorant or liars.





"Goal posts" isn't liberal speak...again...who is the illiterate one?





Sorry, you did make it up, because said that I:





1) Hate rich people.


2) am a 99%.





Both of these are not true.  Its not my fault that you made them up, but you did.





I have no problem with trying to make a fairer tax system.  Infact, I'm all for it.





What I am not for is moronically simplistic sound bytes by people who mirror the 99%ers.





"Haf da peepole don't hav no skin in da game" is just nonsense.





Saying "rich people pay more than you realize" (as if if you have any idea what I 'realize') doesn't make the previous statement any less foolish.





Aka, moving the goalposts.


 



I said you are quoting 99%ers and that means you must be one or at least agree


with them. You seem to be bashing rich people because they get to stop


paying in SS when they hit the limit. That appears to me that you have something


against them.





You have this fetish with goal posts and it is a stupid analogy. There are


no such things. There a convoluted system where the people get free stuff


and this is killing us.  





You are ignoring the fact that the 50% that pay income tax


are carrying the water for the 50% that does not pay income


tax. You seem to be making excuses about this and making


it seem like it is not a problem. You also seem to fail to see


the fact that the free shit crowd votes for people that will give


them for free shit.





Liberal speak is just what you are doing.





This is not having skin in the game, it is not having enough


skin in the game and that is what I said to begin with


when you insulted me.








 
Page / 3
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top