User Panel
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Still waiting for a link to a post from a NeverTrumper supporting an "ultra left" policy position. I'm sure it's out there somewhere.
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/463094/2F01E193-0768-4381-B8A9-96A35E6E0D14_jpeg-887748.JPG |
|
Quoted:
You will have written a novel by the end of this. All those words, typed out in a fury and full of anguish. And through it all... Donald Trump is still your President. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
@tango1978 So a safe space? Can you please link to the thread where the owner asked us not to make negative comments about Trump? Also, read my post above (about 10 posts up)...the long one. You'll noticed I'm fighting FROM a conservative position. Most of my biggest gripes towards Trump are over CONSERVATIVE issues. Maybe Trump would have actually created his promised "2nd Amendment Coalition" if pro-gun Conservatives actually held him accountable instead of actively trying to stifle any discontent. This forum will INSTANTLY turn on any long-standing conservative youtube commentators/gun manufacturers for ONE error. I see it here on GD weekly. One mistake and you guys have them thrown under the bus and instantly boycotting all products. Yet with Trump, he's constantly go back on his 2nd Amendment Coalition promise, gets friendly with Feinstein, help ban bumpstocks, openly talk about "taking the guns first, due process later," etc...etc.. So why aren't we seeing the same instant GD Conservative pushback towards Trump as we do with so many other figures in the gun world? Many of these companies/figures have been actively fighting pro-2A for decades. I bet you dollars to donuts that Hickock45 has done more positive as an ambassador for the gun community than Trump will ever hope to do. It's like you guys are willing to eat your own at a moment's notice but would never dare turn your back on Trump, regardless of his anti-gun bs. It's downright scary...that's why you see the word "cultish" tossed around so much. Donald Trump is still your President. |
|
Quoted:
That's adorable that you still pretend your constant negativity ends at Trump as if anyone still buys your schtick. If CNN made a list titled "alt right figures we hate" I could probably find a post for each one in which you trashed them. Correct me if I'm wrong...just off the top of my head... Tucker Hannity Milo Ben Shapiro Dan Bongino James Woods Sarah Sanders You even bash Ben Garrison the cartoonist. Then you turn around and dismiss things like Uranium1 as "right wing tin foil conspiracy" while pumping "muh Russia" daily. Speaking of "muh Russia"...you still haven't shown us what info you saw before Nov 2016 that convinced you Trump was a Russian stooge and sent you on your life mission to destroy the R candidate prior to the general. If you are a true conservative, I'm a unicorn. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I still find it odd that the true_conservatives in this thread (and the others) post the EXACT SAME thoughts, links, tweets, etc that my radical left, extreme liberal family members post. Is it because the political spectrum is a circle and not a line...extreme conservatism is the same as extreme liberalsism? This shouldn't be a difficult concept to grasp, and yet here we are. "Liberal's don't like Trump. NeverTrumpers don't like [checks notes] Trump. Ergo Liberals are NeverTrumpers" is some seriously childlike "logic". ETA: In before "Huuuuuuuuurrrrrr but it's true!" lol Correct me if I'm wrong...just off the top of my head... Tucker Hannity Milo Ben Shapiro Dan Bongino James Woods Sarah Sanders You even bash Ben Garrison the cartoonist. Then you turn around and dismiss things like Uranium1 as "right wing tin foil conspiracy" while pumping "muh Russia" daily. Speaking of "muh Russia"...you still haven't shown us what info you saw before Nov 2016 that convinced you Trump was a Russian stooge and sent you on your life mission to destroy the R candidate prior to the general. If you are a true conservative, I'm a unicorn. |
|
Quoted:
Are any of those people really conservatives? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I still find it odd that the true_conservatives in this thread (and the others) post the EXACT SAME thoughts, links, tweets, etc that my radical left, extreme liberal family members post. Is it because the political spectrum is a circle and not a line...extreme conservatism is the same as extreme liberalsism? This shouldn't be a difficult concept to grasp, and yet here we are. "Liberal's don't like Trump. NeverTrumpers don't like [checks notes] Trump. Ergo Liberals are NeverTrumpers" is some seriously childlike "logic". ETA: In before "Huuuuuuuuurrrrrr but it's true!" lol Correct me if I'm wrong...just off the top of my head... Tucker Hannity Milo Ben Shapiro Dan Bongino James Woods Sarah Sanders You even bash Ben Garrison the cartoonist. Then you turn around and dismiss things like Uranium1 as "right wing tin foil conspiracy" while pumping "muh Russia" daily. Speaking of "muh Russia"...you still haven't shown us what info you saw before Nov 2016 that convinced you Trump was a Russian stooge and sent you on your life mission to destroy the R candidate prior to the general. If you are a true conservative, I'm a unicorn. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/88145/225cv9_jpg-884204.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/88145/2trdp6_jpg-884205.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/88145/625FF1AA-D263-4344-937D-2234055A7D38-418141_JPG-884206.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/88145/hTScXJQ__2__jpg-884207.JPG |
|
Quoted:
And not one groveler has had coherent, or meaningful rebuttal. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
@tango1978 So a safe space? Can you please link to the thread where the owner asked us not to make negative comments about Trump? Also, read my post above (about 10 posts up)...the long one. You'll noticed I'm fighting FROM a conservative position. Most of my biggest gripes towards Trump are over CONSERVATIVE issues. Maybe Trump would have actually created his promised "2nd Amendment Coalition" if pro-gun Conservatives actually held him accountable instead of actively trying to stifle any discontent. This forum will INSTANTLY turn on any long-standing conservative youtube commentators/gun manufacturers for ONE error. I see it here on GD weekly. One mistake and you guys have them thrown under the bus and instantly boycotting all products. Yet with Trump, he's constantly go back on his 2nd Amendment Coalition promise, gets friendly with Feinstein, help ban bumpstocks, openly talk about "taking the guns first, due process later," etc...etc.. So why aren't we seeing the same instant GD Conservative pushback towards Trump as we do with so many other figures in the gun world? Many of these companies/figures have been actively fighting pro-2A for decades. I bet you dollars to donuts that Hickock45 has done more positive as an ambassador for the gun community than Trump will ever hope to do. It's like you guys are willing to eat your own at a moment's notice but would never dare turn your back on Trump, regardless of his anti-gun bs. It's downright scary...that's why you see the word "cultish" tossed around so much. Donald Trump is still your President. No wonder Trump is their hero. |
|
Quoted:
No shit, what the hell? This gets posted 2 hours before he locks the thread: And we are all getting warned? Who the hell is Jeff related to/friends with that he can get away with murder and the rest of us get fucked with for barely nudging the line? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This thread is being unlocked under the agreement that you guys will knock off the BS. Stop being petty and trying to bait people into CoC violations. That goes for both sides. Stop insulting, stop trying to bait people into raging, stop trying to goad people to cause problems. I will start warning and locking accounts from this point forward. If you can’t handle this then leave the thread and enjoy another one or another part of the site. Just curious, has there been anyone complaining/reporting? You’ve locked the last three and to me it’s been pretty tame for a few months. This gets posted 2 hours before he locks the thread: Quoted:
You sad fucks |
|
Quoted: Typos happen especially on a tablet. My statement still stands and your agenda does nothing positive for this forum, hence the need for you to create yet another thread when the previous ones got locked. You are doing nothing but harming the site. Even the owner of this site once made a thread asking members to not make negative posts in regards to Trump and he has also made it clear this is a conservative website. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Sylvan and Jeff is worth 10 of each of them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Everyone should go back and read this thread from the beginning up until about page 7. Even if you don't want to read it, just click each page and scroll quickly down each page. Notice how you'll see a lot of longer posts, good dialogue, people arguing back and forth in a mature manner, and actually having legitimate discussions? Yeah, there were a few memes thrown around but it was like 1-2 a page. That's how this thread SHOULD be. If anything, the whole thread should be nuked starting from around Page 7/8 It's always the same shitsposters that come in here with the same 1-2 sentence cheap shots, endless meme pictures, and other nonsense with the only intent to disrupt actual mature/constructive dialogue. At this point is just becomes more back and forth cheap shots and any actual debate gets quickly overwhelmed with hit-and-run shitposters. Honestly, go back and look at the transition from pages 1-6 and then from 7+...it's night and day. It's almost as if at page 7 there was a concentrated effort to shitpost, cause drama, and get these threads locked. It's such an obvious change in thread direction. Wish we had more effort to delete all of the crap posts instead of just constant thread locking. The evidence is overwhelming if you actually take the time to look back a few pages. Cry me a river. |
|
Quoted:
Can you name anyone that checks every single conservative box? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I still find it odd that the true_conservatives in this thread (and the others) post the EXACT SAME thoughts, links, tweets, etc that my radical left, extreme liberal family members post. Is it because the political spectrum is a circle and not a line...extreme conservatism is the same as extreme liberalsism? This shouldn't be a difficult concept to grasp, and yet here we are. "Liberal's don't like Trump. NeverTrumpers don't like [checks notes] Trump. Ergo Liberals are NeverTrumpers" is some seriously childlike "logic". ETA: In before "Huuuuuuuuurrrrrr but it's true!" lol Correct me if I'm wrong...just off the top of my head... Tucker Hannity Milo Ben Shapiro Dan Bongino James Woods Sarah Sanders You even bash Ben Garrison the cartoonist. Then you turn around and dismiss things like Uranium1 as "right wing tin foil conspiracy" while pumping "muh Russia" daily. Speaking of "muh Russia"...you still haven't shown us what info you saw before Nov 2016 that convinced you Trump was a Russian stooge and sent you on your life mission to destroy the R candidate prior to the general. If you are a true conservative, I'm a unicorn. |
|
Quoted: And not one groveler has had coherent, or meaningful rebuttal. View Quote “Donald Trump is still your president” is a phrase that’s both coherent AND meaningful. Unless you are Canadian, in which case there really isn’t a cure. Sorry. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Everyone should go back and read this thread from the beginning up until about page 7. Even if you don't want to read it, just click each page and scroll quickly down each page. Notice how you'll see a lot of longer posts, good dialogue, people arguing back and forth in a mature manner, and actually having legitimate discussions? Yeah, there were a few memes thrown around but it was like 1-2 a page. That's how this thread SHOULD be. If anything, the whole thread should be nuked starting from around Page 7/8 It's always the same shitsposters that come in here with the same 1-2 sentence cheap shots, endless meme pictures, and other nonsense with the only intent to disrupt actual mature/constructive dialogue. At this point is just becomes more back and forth cheap shots and any actual debate gets quickly overwhelmed with hit-and-run shitposters. Honestly, go back and look at the transition from pages 1-6 and then from 7+...it's night and day. It's almost as if at page 7 there was a concentrated effort to shitpost, cause drama, and get these threads locked. It's such an obvious change in thread direction. Wish we had more effort to delete all of the crap posts instead of just constant thread locking. The evidence is overwhelming if you actually take the time to look back a few pages. Cry me a river. |
|
Ahhhh, an Obama scandal Not on my list earlier.
Jim Jordan Makes Robert Mueller Nervous and TURN RED For Not Knowing Facts in Serious Investigation! |
|
|
|
Quoted:
I’m sorry your comprehension skills are so elementary. The educational system has failed our youth. “Donald Trump is still your president” is a phrase that’s both coherent AND meaningful. Unless you are Canadian, in which case there really isn’t a cure. Sorry. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: And not one groveler has had coherent, or meaningful rebuttal. “Donald Trump is still your president” is a phrase that’s both coherent AND meaningful. Unless you are Canadian, in which case there really isn’t a cure. Sorry. |
|
Quoted:
And there is the problem. Although all of those people are lightyears more conservative than Trump ever even thought of being. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I still find it odd that the true_conservatives in this thread (and the others) post the EXACT SAME thoughts, links, tweets, etc that my radical left, extreme liberal family members post. Is it because the political spectrum is a circle and not a line...extreme conservatism is the same as extreme liberalsism? This shouldn't be a difficult concept to grasp, and yet here we are. "Liberal's don't like Trump. NeverTrumpers don't like [checks notes] Trump. Ergo Liberals are NeverTrumpers" is some seriously childlike "logic". ETA: In before "Huuuuuuuuurrrrrr but it's true!" lol Correct me if I'm wrong...just off the top of my head... Tucker Hannity Milo Ben Shapiro Dan Bongino James Woods Sarah Sanders You even bash Ben Garrison the cartoonist. Then you turn around and dismiss things like Uranium1 as "right wing tin foil conspiracy" while pumping "muh Russia" daily. Speaking of "muh Russia"...you still haven't shown us what info you saw before Nov 2016 that convinced you Trump was a Russian stooge and sent you on your life mission to destroy the R candidate prior to the general. If you are a true conservative, I'm a unicorn. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Everyone should go back and read this thread from the beginning up until about page 7. Even if you don't want to read it, just click each page and scroll quickly down each page. Notice how you'll see a lot of longer posts, good dialogue, people arguing back and forth in a mature manner, and actually having legitimate discussions? Yeah, there were a few memes thrown around but it was like 1-2 a page. That's how this thread SHOULD be. If anything, the whole thread should be nuked starting from around Page 7/8 It's always the same shitsposters that come in here with the same 1-2 sentence cheap shots, endless meme pictures, and other nonsense with the only intent to disrupt actual mature/constructive dialogue. At this point is just becomes more back and forth cheap shots and any actual debate gets quickly overwhelmed with hit-and-run shitposters. Honestly, go back and look at the transition from pages 1-6 and then from 7+...it's night and day. It's almost as if at page 7 there was a concentrated effort to shitpost, cause drama, and get these threads locked. It's such an obvious change in thread direction. Wish we had more effort to delete all of the crap posts instead of just constant thread locking. The evidence is overwhelming if you actually take the time to look back a few pages. Cry me a river. |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Everyone should go back and read this thread from the beginning up until about page 7. Even if you don't want to read it, just click each page and scroll quickly down each page. Notice how you'll see a lot of longer posts, good dialogue, people arguing back and forth in a mature manner, and actually having legitimate discussions? Yeah, there were a few memes thrown around but it was like 1-2 a page. That's how this thread SHOULD be. If anything, the whole thread should be nuked starting from around Page 7/8 It's always the same shitsposters that come in here with the same 1-2 sentence cheap shots, endless meme pictures, and other nonsense with the only intent to disrupt actual mature/constructive dialogue. At this point is just becomes more back and forth cheap shots and any actual debate gets quickly overwhelmed with hit-and-run shitposters. Honestly, go back and look at the transition from pages 1-6 and then from 7+...it's night and day. It's almost as if at page 7 there was a concentrated effort to shitpost, cause drama, and get these threads locked. It's such an obvious change in thread direction. Wish we had more effort to delete all of the crap posts instead of just constant thread locking. The evidence is overwhelming if you actually take the time to look back a few pages. Cry me a river. |
|
|
Quoted:
Yes your bad grammar is a joke. You being anti gun could be construed as a joke as well. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Still waiting for a link to a post from a NeverTrumper supporting an "ultra left" policy position. I'm sure it's out there somewhere.
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/463094/2F01E193-0768-4381-B8A9-96A35E6E0D14_jpeg-887748.JPG Is the meme you constantly post directed at me? |
|
Quoted:
He's in the Jim Carey dumb and dumber "so you're saying there's a chance" mode. Is it denial or panic? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Are any of those people really conservatives? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I still find it odd that the true_conservatives in this thread (and the others) post the EXACT SAME thoughts, links, tweets, etc that my radical left, extreme liberal family members post. Is it because the political spectrum is a circle and not a line...extreme conservatism is the same as extreme liberalsism? This shouldn't be a difficult concept to grasp, and yet here we are. "Liberal's don't like Trump. NeverTrumpers don't like [checks notes] Trump. Ergo Liberals are NeverTrumpers" is some seriously childlike "logic". ETA: In before "Huuuuuuuuurrrrrr but it's true!" lol Correct me if I'm wrong...just off the top of my head... Tucker Hannity Milo Ben Shapiro Dan Bongino James Woods Sarah Sanders You even bash Ben Garrison the cartoonist. Then you turn around and dismiss things like Uranium1 as "right wing tin foil conspiracy" while pumping "muh Russia" daily. Speaking of "muh Russia"...you still haven't shown us what info you saw before Nov 2016 that convinced you Trump was a Russian stooge and sent you on your life mission to destroy the R candidate prior to the general. If you are a true conservative, I'm a unicorn. Most of them are just MAGA grifters selling a product to stupid people. Some aren't even really good at that - looking at you, Milo. I like the inclusion of two pederasts. That's a nice touch. |
|
Dammit I don't think I used pederast correctly.
Would definitely apply to Milo - since he was advocating having sex with an underage boy. But James Woods tried to pick up a 16-year old girl. So ephebophile would probably be the better word choice. Carry on, gentlemen. |
|
Quoted: These threads are FAR from policy discussions. The observation is that your hate for Trump is perfectly positively correlated with those that are 100% for open borders, gun confiscation, reparations, tax payer funded live birth ‘abortions’, etc. So if standing side by side at a NeverTrump rally, it would be impossible to distinguish between the progressive communist and true_conservative. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
So what you're saying is, anybody who shares common ground with Maxine_Waters can reasonably be assumed to subscribe to the same things she is passionate about? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: These threads are FAR from policy discussions. The observation is that your hate for Trump is perfectly positively correlated with those that are 100% for open borders, gun confiscation, reparations, tax payer funded live birth ‘abortions’, etc. So if standing side by side at a NeverTrump rally, it would be impossible to distinguish between the progressive communist and true_conservative. |
|
My personal opinions worth exactly what you paid for them.
Quoted:
Tucker - Pretty awesome Hannity - dim bulb pop "Conservative" Milo - self serving attention whore whose 15 minutes I'm glad are up Ben Shapiro - fucking awesome Dan Bongino - Pretty awesome James Woods - James Fucking Woods, what more needs said Attached File Sarah Sanders - she's okay You even bash Ben Garrison the cartoonist. - sometimes okay, sometimes pretty damn creepy View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Formal logic really needs to be taught in high school. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: These threads are FAR from policy discussions. The observation is that your hate for Trump is perfectly positively correlated with those that are 100% for open borders, gun confiscation, reparations, tax payer funded live birth ‘abortions’, etc. So if standing side by side at a NeverTrump rally, it would be impossible to distinguish between the progressive communist and true_conservative. Just Sayin. |
|
Kind of sad state of affairs that a conversation is going on about "important conservatives" and it's grifter clowns like Milo and not William F. Buckley, Thomas Sowell, F.A. Hayak, Milton Friedman, Adam Smith, Bestiat, von Humbolt, Locke, etc.
I'm convinced the political history of most hard-core Trump supporters started in 2008. |
|
Quoted:
Kind of sad state of affairs that a conversation is going on about "important conservatives" and it's grifter clowns like Milo and not William F. Buckley, Thomas Sowell, F.A. Hayak, Milton Friedman, Adam Smith, Bestiat, von Humbolt, Locke, etc. I'm convinced the political history of most hard-core Trump supporters started in 2008. View Quote Failed To Load Title But you do you. |
|
Quoted:
Kind of sad state of affairs that a conversation is going on about "important conservatives" and it's grifter clowns like Milo and not William F. Buckley, Thomas Sowell, F.A. Hayak, Milton Friedman, Adam Smith, Bestiat, von Humbolt, Locke, etc. I'm convinced the political history of most hard-core Trump supporters started in 2008. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
The real deal players are more concerned with guys like Victor Davis Hanson and Mark Lavin. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nezJKTc4bnA But you do you. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Kind of sad state of affairs that a conversation is going on about "important conservatives" and it's grifter clowns like Milo and not William F. Buckley, Thomas Sowell, F.A. Hayak, Milton Friedman, Adam Smith, Bestiat, von Humbolt, Locke, etc. I'm convinced the political history of most hard-core Trump supporters started in 2008. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nezJKTc4bnA But you do you. |
|
Quoted:
Actually the conversation was on people alive that you've trashed, not who the most conservative people of past and present are but feel free to move my goalposts so you can set yourself up for a jab at me. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Kind of sad state of affairs that a conversation is going on about "important conservatives" and it's grifter clowns like Milo and not William F. Buckley, Thomas Sowell, F.A. Hayak, Milton Friedman, Adam Smith, Bestiat, von Humbolt, Locke, etc. I'm convinced the political history of most hard-core Trump supporters started in 2008. If you'd like a reading list I could put something together for you. |
|
Quoted:
The real deal players are more concerned with guys like Victor Davis Hanson and Mark Lavin. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nezJKTc4bnA But you do you. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Kind of sad state of affairs that a conversation is going on about "important conservatives" and it's grifter clowns like Milo and not William F. Buckley, Thomas Sowell, F.A. Hayak, Milton Friedman, Adam Smith, Bestiat, von Humbolt, Locke, etc. I'm convinced the political history of most hard-core Trump supporters started in 2008. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nezJKTc4bnA But you do you. |
|
Quoted:
My personal opinions worth exactly what you paid for them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
My personal opinions worth exactly what you paid for them. Quoted:
Tucker - Pretty awesome Hannity - dim bulb pop "Conservative" Milo - self serving attention whore whose 15 minutes I'm glad are up Ben Shapiro - fucking awesome Dan Bongino - Pretty awesome James Woods - James Fucking Woods, what more needs said https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/102941/james_fucking_woods_JPG-887836.JPG Sarah Sanders - she's okay You even bash Ben Garrison the cartoonist. - sometimes okay, sometimes pretty damn creepy |
|
Quoted:
It's okay. If you'd like a reading list I could put something together for you. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Kind of sad state of affairs that a conversation is going on about "important conservatives" and it's grifter clowns like Milo and not William F. Buckley, Thomas Sowell, F.A. Hayak, Milton Friedman, Adam Smith, Bestiat, von Humbolt, Locke, etc. I'm convinced the political history of most hard-core Trump supporters started in 2008. If you'd like a reading list I could put something together for you. |
|
Quoted:
He can't even read a FISA book. Bestiat and Locke? el oh el. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Kind of sad state of affairs that a conversation is going on about "important conservatives" and it's grifter clowns like Milo and not William F. Buckley, Thomas Sowell, F.A. Hayak, Milton Friedman, Adam Smith, Bestiat, von Humbolt, Locke, etc. I'm convinced the political history of most hard-core Trump supporters started in 2008. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nezJKTc4bnA But you do you. The true pair would really suck and set a guy up for failure. |
|
Quoted:
No it's not okay. This is why I have zero respect for you. You are intellectually dishonest, you twist words, and outright lie. Having an "honest debate" with you is an exercise in futility. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Kind of sad state of affairs that a conversation is going on about "important conservatives" and it's grifter clowns like Milo and not William F. Buckley, Thomas Sowell, F.A. Hayak, Milton Friedman, Adam Smith, Bestiat, von Humbolt, Locke, etc. I'm convinced the political history of most hard-core Trump supporters started in 2008. If you'd like a reading list I could put something together for you. |
|
Quoted:
A busted ass FISA book is not as bad as a busted ass Logic book. The true pair would really suck and set a guy up for failure. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Kind of sad state of affairs that a conversation is going on about "important conservatives" and it's grifter clowns like Milo and not William F. Buckley, Thomas Sowell, F.A. Hayak, Milton Friedman, Adam Smith, Bestiat, von Humbolt, Locke, etc. I'm convinced the political history of most hard-core Trump supporters started in 2008. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nezJKTc4bnA But you do you. The true pair would really suck and set a guy up for failure. SAD! |
|
Quoted: Actually the conversation was on people alive that you've trashed, not who the most conservative people of past and present are but feel free to move my goalposts so you can set yourself up for a jab at me. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
That's cool. The whole "Classical Liberalism" thing probably would have been too confusing anyways... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Kind of sad state of affairs that a conversation is going on about "important conservatives" and it's grifter clowns like Milo and not William F. Buckley, Thomas Sowell, F.A. Hayak, Milton Friedman, Adam Smith, Bestiat, von Humbolt, Locke, etc. I'm convinced the political history of most hard-core Trump supporters started in 2008. If you'd like a reading list I could put something together for you. Go ahead and search my name +"classic liberalism." I've explained it multiple times on this forum. |
|
Quoted:
He has an extremely difficult time following conversations, even when it's right there for him to look at repeatedly. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Actually the conversation was on people alive that you've trashed, not who the most conservative people of past and present are but feel free to move my goalposts so you can set yourself up for a jab at me. |
|
Quoted:
your mistake is thinking that GD eating people is the behavior to encourage, rather than the treatment they give Trump that is actually appropriate View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So why aren't we seeing the same instant GD Conservative pushback towards Trump as we do with so many other figures in the gun world? Many of these companies/figures have been actively fighting for pro-2A for decades. It's like you guys are willing to eat your own at a moment's notice but would never dare turn your back on Trump, regardless of his anti-gun bs. I think GD's purity standards a bit too harsh sometimes. At times they have merit like in Team Wendy's case but other times they'll throw longstanding pro-2A companies/personalities under the bus for a minor comment. The pitchforks are out and minds are made up before even hearing a response back/explanation from the person. Looking back I can think of so many times recommending Hickock45 videos to wishy-washy (but not solid) anti-gun friends and having them come back seeing guns in a more positive light (and actually understanding what semi vs full means, the size of an AR bullet, how suppressors aren't just some "silent" assassin tool, etc..) Two of my neutral friends actually became pro-gun people BECAUSE of stuff put out by Hickock and others (also a fan of the Forgotten Weapons guy). So yeah, I'm only complaining about the rigid purity test that GD has towards long time pro-2A personalities/companies that do one screw-up...but then give guys like Trump, a multiple repeat offender, plenty of get-of-jail-free cards when it comes to criticism. Even worse, you're criticized for actually criticizing Trump on his anti-2A stuff. Wrap your head around that one. Look at the current Red Flag laws we have coming. Remember Trump's famous "Take the guns first, due process later." Words have consequences. |
|
Quoted:
Again trying to change my narrative to pretend you have a point. You really need to try harder. I'm surprised you didn't "quote" me purposefully misspelling words and putting (sic) at the end. That would really paint me as a retard. Go ahead and search my name +"classic liberalism." I've explained it multiple times on this forum. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Kind of sad state of affairs that a conversation is going on about "important conservatives" and it's grifter clowns like Milo and not William F. Buckley, Thomas Sowell, F.A. Hayak, Milton Friedman, Adam Smith, Bestiat, von Humbolt, Locke, etc. I'm convinced the political history of most hard-core Trump supporters started in 2008. If you'd like a reading list I could put something together for you. Go ahead and search my name +"classic liberalism." I've explained it multiple times on this forum. https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/-ARCHIVED-THREAD-Facebook-thinks-it-knows-whether-you-re-liberal-or-conservative-Here-s-how-to-find-out/5-2096071/?page=5?news=add&fvx=-1#i71620981 You said: "Classic liberalism isn't a thing anymore. The progressives hijacked the term "liberal." Classic liberalism is now libertarianism." That's a pretty simplistic understanding of the concept. It's not exactly wrong....just so simplistic to be kind of worthless. |
|
|
7DIans2ydJx2kTso |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.