User Panel
Quoted:
So the problem is that the President, who is the constitutional official in charge of foreign policy, made a statement that the CIA didn't like? I keep forgetting that the President reports to the intelligence community.! View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted: ~12 hours after the story broke and a few minutes after my thread. But who's counting... View Quote As to Urgent matter ODNI letter Attached File |
|
Quoted:
I'd go farther and say that some will ignore the evidence no matter what it is. We should ignore ignore those people. View Quote The press...every last fucking outlet that exists...has proven more than willing to publish complete and total falsehoods in the interest of promoting their preferred narratives and political outcome. All of them. Officials high in government have demonstrated that they will embrace complete and utter falsehoods in the interest of promoting their preferred narratives and favored political outcomes. So when it's abundantly clear that the press is a gaggle of liars and that people in high positions in the government...be they elected or civil servants...and this has been demonstrated repeatedly, it's pretty reasonable for those "some" people to believe that this is yet another instance of the same shit they've seen so shamelessly presented before. "But, but, we're not lying this time!" We've seen lots of extraordinary claims over the last three years. All without any of the required extraordinary evidence. Pushed primarily by people who are lying through their teeth in an effort to seize power. But, hey...anyone who distrusts what is being printed and promoted by that same cast of characters this time must be some sort of brain dead zealot. |
|
Quoted:
Hey Sponge, how much of your content is prepared before you start posting, and how much of it (if any) is written by someone other than you? Knowing the reactions it would get, I just skimmed the first couple of pages focusing mostly on your posts and when taken on their own, they read very much like a dissected article or prepared talking points. Just curious if that is entirely accidental and attributed to your writing style, or if you prep before making threads like this. I sometimes prep for threads that I think will generate a lot of Q&A, but most political ones are off the cuff. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
Sorry for writing good (sic). Everything I post is contemporaneous... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Hey Sponge, how much of your content is prepared before you start posting, and how much of it (if any) is written by someone other than you? Knowing the reactions it would get, I just skimmed the first couple of pages focusing mostly on your posts and when taken on their own, they read very much like a dissected article or prepared talking points. Just curious if that is entirely accidental and attributed to your writing style, or if you prep before making threads like this. I sometimes prep for threads that I think will generate a lot of Q&A, but most political ones are off the cuff. Everything I post is contemporaneous... |
|
|
Quoted:
Sorry for writing good (sic). Everything I post is contemporaneous... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Hey Sponge, how much of your content is prepared before you start posting, and how much of it (if any) is written by someone other than you? Knowing the reactions it would get, I just skimmed the first couple of pages focusing mostly on your posts and when taken on their own, they read very much like a dissected article or prepared talking points. Just curious if that is entirely accidental and attributed to your writing style, or if you prep before making threads like this. I sometimes prep for threads that I think will generate a lot of Q&A, but most political ones are off the cuff. Everything I post is contemporaneous... |
|
So, what's to stop some democrats from getting someone in the organization to file a false whistleblower allegation against PDJT? They seen to lie and make shit up about everything else and they are known to have stoolies in DOJ and FBI.
|
|
Quoted:
It doesn't apply to them. If you believe it does, you are living in fantasy land. Go ahead and make the case that it does so we can all have a good laugh. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That is a true statement and it's a good thing it exists. Unless if course you don't believe in the law applying to the powerful. Go ahead and make the case that it does so we can all have a good laugh. |
|
|
Quoted:
Or one person had a spine and put country first... We simply don't know yet. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So many people listen to his phone class but only one person was the "WhistleBlower"? Sounds like someone got their feelings_hurt. We simply don't know yet. I wonder why it's worth it to the mods and staff to do so much editing and warning and banning people just to keep you around. |
|
Quoted:
Cool. The rhetoricals don't sound very spontaneous, but if so you'd make a good debater or interview subject. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Hey Sponge, how much of your content is prepared before you start posting, and how much of it (if any) is written by someone other than you? Knowing the reactions it would get, I just skimmed the first couple of pages focusing mostly on your posts and when taken on their own, they read very much like a dissected article or prepared talking points. Just curious if that is entirely accidental and attributed to your writing style, or if you prep before making threads like this. I sometimes prep for threads that I think will generate a lot of Q&A, but most political ones are off the cuff. Everything I post is contemporaneous... At least I think they said "debater"... |
|
Quoted:
I got called a "Master Debater" once. At least I think they said "debater"... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Hey Sponge, how much of your content is prepared before you start posting, and how much of it (if any) is written by someone other than you? Knowing the reactions it would get, I just skimmed the first couple of pages focusing mostly on your posts and when taken on their own, they read very much like a dissected article or prepared talking points. Just curious if that is entirely accidental and attributed to your writing style, or if you prep before making threads like this. I sometimes prep for threads that I think will generate a lot of Q&A, but most political ones are off the cuff. Everything I post is contemporaneous... At least I think they said "debater"... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
The talking heads this morning indicated it was a "Senior Official" in the room who heard the comment and decided it needed investigating. lol wouldnt that be a hoot |
|
Quoted:
Quoted: I'd go farther and say that some will ignore the evidence no matter what it is. We should ignore ignore those people. You went with the subtle " English humor " which would apply if he had any introspection after how many time he has been shown wrong. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So many people listen to his phone class but only one person was the "WhistleBlower"? Sounds like someone got their feelings_hurt. We simply don't know yet. They reached out to the IC OIG. The IC OIG notified HPSCI about the complaint. You know that is some illicit conspiring deep state shit, right? Should they have simply sat down with the New York Times? EDIT: Spellin' Rachel has the scoop on this one! Right behind The WaPo! They're gonna take 'im down! |
|
I mean, guys, let's be real about this: It has to be true.
It's not like one of the major newspapers considered to be the gold standard of journalistic excellence just published some completely unfounded allegations claiming a Supreme Court justice sexually assaulted someone like last weekend or anything... |
|
I can’t wait for BS to be wrong as usual. It’s amusing as hell! . The poor guy never learns.
|
|
Quoted:
Naturally. Until we know the nature of the complaint it seems silly to jump to conclusions. At this point, anyone saying "This is a nothingburger" is just as much of a retard as someone saying "This will bring down Trump!!!!111" View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
A timeline of events from the WaPo that could be helpful: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/09/19/what-is-trump-whistleblower-complaint-about-heres-helpful-timeline/ Until we know the nature of the complaint it seems silly to jump to conclusions. At this point, anyone saying "This is a nothingburger" is just as much of a retard as someone saying "This will bring down Trump!!!!111" Nothingburger has happened multiple times. Bring down Trump hasn't. |
|
Quoted:
I'd go farther and say that some will ignore the evidence no matter what it is. We should ignore ignore those people. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Or one person had a spine and put country first... So it's going to take some truly extraordinary evidence to make anyone believe this time it's anything different than another Comey or McCabe doing deep state #resist shit. We should ignore ignore those people. |
|
Quoted:
Just an observation about which stories seem to immediately get a thread in GD, and which don't. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This is a leading story on the WaPo website, CNN, MSNBC, ABC and NBC. Nothing on Fox - which I guess explains why there was nothing here (That I could find) until I posted something. lol |
|
Quoted:
How about Ms. Gordon who got passed over for acting DNI, then got all butthurt & pissed off before resigning? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Well if nothing else the never_trumpers are worth a good laugh nice try OP maybe next time and there is always a next time with your crew.
I guess you never_trumpers can claim the same success as Wile E. Coyote it’s what you guys remind me of when come here and read about some more fake news about Trump. via Imgflip Meme Generator |
|
As children we are warned against 'crying wolf' and told exactly how the consequences of doing so will manifest themselves.
And yet here we are. |
|
Quoted:
I'd go farther and say that some will ignore the evidence no matter what it is. We should ignore ignore those people. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Or one person had a spine and put country first... So it's going to take some truly extraordinary evidence to make anyone believe this time it's anything different than another Comey or McCabe doing deep state #resist shit. We should ignore ignore those people. |
|
|
Quoted: Well there is a whistleblower. We just don't know (for sure) what the nature of the complaint is... View Quote We have no evidence other than the word of WaPo and Schiff that this whistleblower complaint was actually tagged by the IG as Urgent Concern. Neither the complaint or the alleged letter from the IG to IC have been made public. The only source of that info is Schiff. What we do know is the ODNI said in his letter to Schiff that A. It wasn't Urgent Concern as it had no direct impact on any intelligence operation that DNI had authority over B. it had no direct impact on any intelligence operation that DNI had authority over Attached File |
|
So what bad news or event for the Democrats either happened recently or is about to happen?
|
|
Pretty much everyone on my ignore list is in this thread. Who would have guessed that.
|
|
Quoted:
I mean, guys, let's be real about this: It has to be true. It's not like one of the major newspapers considered to be the gold standard of journalistic excellence just published some completely unfounded allegations claiming a Supreme Court justice sexually assaulted someone like last weekend or anything... View Quote The whistleblower exists, independent of whatever media reporting is out there. It's the nature of the complaint that's still up in the air. |
|
Quoted:
I know! Rachel has the scoop on this one! Right behind The WaPo! They're gonna take 'im down! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So many people listen to his phone class but only one person was the "WhistleBlower"? Sounds like someone got their feelings_hurt. We simply don't know yet. They reached out to the IC OIG. The IC OIG notified HPSCI about the complaint. You know that is some illicit conspiring deep state shit, right? Should they have simply sat down with the New York Times? EDIT: Spellin' Rachel has the scoop on this one! Right behind The WaPo! They're gonna take 'im down! |
|
Quoted: I guess it depends on what you mean by "this". The whistleblower exists, View Quote It just turns out that his accusation was completely unfounded. Which we only discovered a couple of days AFTER the headlines and calls for impeachment. I mean, one could conclude there was a pattern or something. |
|
Quoted:
I can’t wait for BS ago be wrong as usual. It’s amusing as hell! . The poor guy never learns. View Quote He is perfectly self aware and just rides the fine line. If he wasn't deliberately posting in the way he is, he wouldn't have replied in the manner he has to some of my replies to him. While its annoying as hell, he is good at it and I have a measure of respect for his work here. It is entertaining. |
|
B_S... I know how it feels man. I feel your pain. We fall for it every time. I get tricked every time a story comes out that deep state operatives lied to investigators, or when Dems get caught in a crime. I, also, ignorantly believe this is it, someone is finally going to jail now. Like Lucy with the football.
Except you get excited by any piece of drivel put out by socialists... but the feeling of severe disappointment is the same. Keep your head up because there is always the next story. |
|
Quoted:
I guess it depends on what you mean by "this". The whistleblower exists, independent of whatever media reporting is out there. It's the nature of the complaint that's still up in the air. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I mean, guys, let's be real about this: It has to be true. It's not like one of the major newspapers considered to be the gold standard of journalistic excellence just published some completely unfounded allegations claiming a Supreme Court justice sexually assaulted someone like last weekend or anything... The whistleblower exists, independent of whatever media reporting is out there. It's the nature of the complaint that's still up in the air. The leaks are real The news is fake |
|
Quoted:
Kavenaugh's accuser exists, too. It just turns out that his accusation was completely unfounded. Which we only discovered a couple of days AFTER the headlines and calls for impeachment. I mean, one could conclude there was a pattern or something. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I guess it depends on what you mean by "this". The whistleblower exists, It just turns out that his accusation was completely unfounded. Which we only discovered a couple of days AFTER the headlines and calls for impeachment. I mean, one could conclude there was a pattern or something. |
|
Quoted:
Kavenaugh's accuser exists, too. It just turns out that his accusation was completely unfounded. Which we only discovered a couple of days AFTER the headlines and calls for impeachment. I mean, one could conclude there was a pattern or something. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I guess it depends on what you mean by "this". The whistleblower exists, It just turns out that his accusation was completely unfounded. Which we only discovered a couple of days AFTER the headlines and calls for impeachment. I mean, one could conclude there was a pattern or something. |
|
Quoted:
B_S... I know how it feels man. I feel your pain. We fall for it every time. I get tricked every time a story comes out that deep state operatives lied to investigators, or when Dems get caught in a crime. I, also, ignorantly believe this is it, someone is finally going to jail now. Like Lucy with the football. View Quote What happens is that people like James Comey conclude before the investigation that "no prosecutor" would actually do anything about it. Whether that's Hillary's emails, Charlie Wrangle not paying his taxes, whoever that guy who had 90,000 bucks in his office freezer, Wasserman-schmuk aiding and abetting spies most likely working for the Chinese government, senate intelligence committee staffers leaking classified information to their girlfriends, FBI agents and federal prosecutors who engage in breathtaking misconduct in the effort to get a desired political result...all that shit happens, but the perps never really pay the price. The left has gotten damn good at protecting their asses while insisting that even the slightest misstep by a Republican must be cause for instantaneous removal from office. It is a strategy. Have no standards while accusing the other guy of being a hypocrite if he doesn't live up to a much higher standard. It's one of their go-to methods for acquiring and preserving power. |
|
|
Quoted:
Yeah, the weather forecast is wrong a lot which means it is never ever right, never! View Quote But our friends in the |
|
|
|
Quoted: The difference is that various democrats did get caught in crimes, but they just don't get prosecuted for them. Like Hillary. What happens is that people like James Comey conclude before the investigation that "no prosecutor" would actually do anything about it. Whether that's Hillary's emails, Charlie Wrangle not paying his taxes, whoever that guy who had 90,000 bucks in his office freezer, Wasserman-schmuk aiding and abetting spies most likely working for the Chinese government, senate intelligence committee staffers leaking classified information to their girlfriends, FBI agents and federal prosecutors who engage in breathtaking misconduct in the effort to get a desired political result...all that shit happens, but the perps never really pay the price. The left has gotten damn good at protecting their asses while insisting that even the slightest misstep by a Republican must be cause for instantaneous removal from office. It is a strategy. Have no standards while accusing the other guy of being a hypocrite if he doesn't live up to a much higher standard. It's one of their go-to methods for acquiring and preserving power. View Quote |
|
Twitter threads are kind of a pain - but this one does a good job of breaking down some of the legal issues of the dispute between ODNI and HSPCI...
In short, our whistleblower system isn't designed to deal with issues when the President may be the national security risk... |
|
Quoted:
So, there is something wrong with knowing history and bringing it up when the circumstances are somewhat similar? Only liberals do that? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So many people listen to his phone class but only one person was the "WhistleBlower"? Sounds like someone got their feelings_hurt. We simply don't know yet. They reached out to the IC OIG. The IC OIG notified HPSCI about the complaint. You know that is some illicit conspiring deep state shit, right? Should they have simply sat down with the New York Times? EDIT: Spellin' Rachel has the scoop on this one! Right behind The WaPo! They're gonna take 'im down! Good for them! He's goin' down! |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.