User Panel
A duel should be one shot. You get your shot at me, I get my shot at you, preferably, with my shot in the lead. Walther PDP Full-size 4.5bbl. This gun points on its own. I might look in that direction, but it already knows where to go. A very weird sensation. Be glad it’s only one shot. Subsequent shots with this pistol are the tightest of any handgun I’ve ever shot.
|
|
I would prefer to use bladed or blunt force weapons.
Three knock downs or first wound wins. The point was to see whom the fates or gods, or God favors. Not so much the killing of one of the combatants. |
|
Da .45 long slide mit laser sighting
You did say “modern handgun” which unfortunately leaves out The Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch…. Damn. A golden gun from pen, lighter, cigarette case & cuff link in 4.2mm vs Walther PPK, 7,62mm is classic, in some circles. |
|
I would use a heavy battle pistol like a Taurus PT-92 or Beretta.
|
|
Quoted: I would love to duel but only with sabres on both sides. But if it had to be handguns then desert eagles it is. However I believe dueling should legally make a comeback, there would certainly be alot less douchebags left around. View Quote I recommend you read the first chapter (or two?) of "Founding Brothers", @flamingdragon . It does a semi-forensic study of the Hamilton/Burr duel. By all accounts, Burr was the bigger Douchebag (the Al Gore of his day, if you will), and yet *because* he was the bigger douchebag, he lived. Most think that Hamilton fired to miss intentionally, and that Burr just decided to kill him. I actually recommend the whole book. It won a Pulitzer, and would have zero chance of doing so today. It's far too accurate re: the Founders (with all of their flaws were still remarkable), and thus would't even make the bestseller lis.t. |
|
Quoted: I'd go classic single shot in a hard hitting caliber and an optic. https://i.pinimg.com/474x/cf/31/0e/cf310e53b5bb6c7449a4d1e42e1b5dfa.jpg View Quote This in 300RUM. |
|
Quoted: I recommend you read the first chapter (or two?) of "Founding Brothers", @flamingdragon . It does a semi-forensic study of the Hamilton/Burr duel. By all accounts, Burr was the bigger Douchebag (the Al Gore of his day, if you will), and yet *because* he was the bigger douchebag, he lived. Most think that Hamilton fired to miss intentionally, and that Burr just decided to kill him. I actually recommend the whole book. It won a Pulitzer, and would have zero chance of doing so today. It's far too accurate re: the Founders (with all of their flaws were still remarkable), and thus would't even make the bestseller lis.t. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I would love to duel but only with sabres on both sides. But if it had to be handguns then desert eagles it is. However I believe dueling should legally make a comeback, there would certainly be alot less douchebags left around. I recommend you read the first chapter (or two?) of "Founding Brothers", @flamingdragon . It does a semi-forensic study of the Hamilton/Burr duel. By all accounts, Burr was the bigger Douchebag (the Al Gore of his day, if you will), and yet *because* he was the bigger douchebag, he lived. Most think that Hamilton fired to miss intentionally, and that Burr just decided to kill him. I actually recommend the whole book. It won a Pulitzer, and would have zero chance of doing so today. It's far too accurate re: the Founders (with all of their flaws were still remarkable), and thus would't even make the bestseller lis.t. There is a play... it has been kind of a big deal, that portrays the "Hamilton deliberately shot at the sky and missed" story. Of course, it also shows Burr's side of the story, that Hamilton wore his glasses and thus clearly intended to aim precisely. |
|
FNP 45, maybe the Tactical version.
15 rounds of .45 ACP is pretty reassuring. |
|
Quoted: I would prefer to use bladed or blunt force weapons. Three knock downs or first wound wins. The point was to see whom the fates or gods, or God favors. Not so much the killing of one of the combatants. View Quote The point of a duel SHOULD be "two men enter, one man leaves" If death isn't on the line, how is it a matter of honor? |
|
|
Everyone used to say "Deagle with beamz"
Now it's probably "Glock with da switch" |
|
Quoted: The point of a duel SHOULD be "two men enter, one man leaves" If death isn't on the line, how is it a matter of honor? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I would prefer to use bladed or blunt force weapons. Three knock downs or first wound wins. The point was to see whom the fates or gods, or God favors. Not so much the killing of one of the combatants. The point of a duel SHOULD be "two men enter, one man leaves" If death isn't on the line, how is it a matter of honor? So, thunderdome it is, then. Every town should have one. |
|
Quoted: There is a play... it has been kind of a big deal, that portrays the "Hamilton deliberately shot at the sky and missed" story. Of course, it also shows Burr's side of the story, that Hamilton wore his glasses and thus clearly intended to aim precisely. View Quote Yes, but that play was written by a fully and flagrantly Leftist (who is now being eaten by his own . . . good). Founding Brothers shows both sides, too, but without the stench of anti-American hatred (though Ellis did come to hate Trump, IIRC). |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Yes, but that play was written by a fully and flagrantly Leftist (who is now being eaten by his own . . . good). Founding Brothers shows both sides, too, but without the stench of anti-American hatred (though Ellis did come to hate Trump, IIRC). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: There is a play... it has been kind of a big deal, that portrays the "Hamilton deliberately shot at the sky and missed" story. Of course, it also shows Burr's side of the story, that Hamilton wore his glasses and thus clearly intended to aim precisely. Yes, but that play was written by a fully and flagrantly Leftist (who is now being eaten by his own . . . good). Founding Brothers shows both sides, too, but without the stench of anti-American hatred (though Ellis did come to hate Trump, IIRC). I'm tempted to ask you for an example of this stench of anti-American hatred, but I fear from your last bit it may resemble anything akin to not fully supporting Trump. |
|
|
Sig X-Five Legion with Romeo 1 Pro and Ranger +P. I’m B Class with it in Carry Optics USPSA / Steel Challenge ???????
|
|
|
The other guy gets to shoot the same thing at you...
I don't want it to be an easy gun to shoot well, and anyone that wants someone on the other side of a duel mag dumping a G18/Skorpion/etc at them is an idiot. They could be dead on their feet and you might catch a bullet. You don't want 2011s with optics that make a good shot great and a bad shot OK. You want something like a original LCP, or NAA mini-revolver that only with a great deal of practice and skill can you shoot accurately. |
|
Quoted: Yes, that is in the code duello. Who said dueling isn't legal? What difference does it make? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Traditional rules say the challenged party picks the weapon. I think. Yes, that is in the code duello. Who said dueling isn't legal? What difference does it make? It’s not legal in Texas. Some places we could step outside and beat on each other and the police would overlook it. Given certain circumstances. But shooting pistols at each other would not fly. |
|
|
Quoted: I would prefer to use bladed or blunt force weapons. Three knock downs or first wound wins. The point was to see whom the fates or gods, or God favors. Not so much the killing of one of the combatants. View Quote Back then they had different ideas of behavior. Now. We duel. My plan is to kill you. |
|
Quoted: The point of a duel SHOULD be "two men enter, one man leaves" If death isn't on the line, how is it a matter of honor? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I would prefer to use bladed or blunt force weapons. Three knock downs or first wound wins. The point was to see whom the fates or gods, or God favors. Not so much the killing of one of the combatants. The point of a duel SHOULD be "two men enter, one man leaves" If death isn't on the line, how is it a matter of honor? Exactly. You bet your life on your honor. |
|
|
|
Hollywood portrayed Old West gun fighting dueling. It was all bullshit. Never happened like the movies.
|
|
Quoted: It’s not legal in Texas. Some places we could step outside and beat on each other and the police would overlook it. Given certain circumstances. But shooting pistols at each other would not fly. View Quote The other day a buddy got into an altercation. Douchebag sucker punched buddy, buddy drew and pointed p320 at douchebags head. When cops arrived douchebag claimed mutual combat and walked away. |
|
Is the OP saying that he would have a Model 29 rechambered for .357 Magnum but replacing the cylinder and barrel, essentially creating a Model 27?
I feel like I am missing something here. May be a reference I missed. |
|
Matched set of Thompson center contenders in jacketed round nose .38 special.
Keep things survivable unless perfect accuracy is applied. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.