User Panel
Posted: 7/22/2023 8:54:58 PM EDT
When rounds like the 6.5x55 and 30-06 (30-03) were interdicted they had extremely heavy for caliber bullets. 220gr for the 30-03 and 162 for the 6.5x55. They remained this way for a bit until they started to really pick up steam with hunters and lighter bullets were introduced.
Are the 77gr+ loadings for the 5.56 the same but in reverse? I’ll admit, I’ve been shooting 223 and ARs for more than a decade and never shot heavier than 64gr soft points. I still am working through my stocked up crap Russian 55gr 223 for range ammo. 55gr has almost been my only weight for the entire time. It’s fast, cheap, and good m193 is easy to both train with and keep loaded in my kit (though that’s mostly Federal 64gr soft points with the same POI as m193). I have ARs in 10.5”, multiple 16”, and an 18”. All are 1:7 or 1:8 twist. Am I crazy for not trying out 77gr ammo, especially to keep in my HD mags? I shoot my ARs a lot and always have felt a different POI would be a big bother between my practice ammo and HD ammo… |
|
77g TMKs will fuck everything up. From paper targets at 600 yards to elk/moose. All you need in my opinion. Fling 77g SMKs for practice or even the upper range ELDMs.
|
|
Depends on the purpose.
I jumped on the 75/77gr OTM/SMK/BTHP bandwagon right away (need to grab some PSA/AAC TMK's). I don't know if it is a different class, but it does extend the AR15's performance in some areas with very little negative impact. |
|
|
|
|
|
It is a SIGNIFICANT improvement, ballistically, over the 55 and 62 grain offerings. Heck, you tube has tons of "gel test" vidoes showing how mucb mkre effective the 70+ grain loadings are.
|
|
I shoot 75 ELD-M at our PRS club matches and do very well. 88 ELD-M work even better, but too heavy for tactical class. My barrels are chambered in 223 match as well as 223 wylde. The match is tighter than the wylde
Buddy of mine shoots BR also and is giving up the 223 to go to 22BR. He's always been pushing those 88s faster and last match got bit by his super hot load yeeting primers OTB. I always bring more ammo than I need so supplied him that day and he did just fine with my slower 75s ETA: this is all bolt gun stuff |
|
Quoted: 77g TMKs will fuck everything up. From paper targets at 600 yards to elk/moose. All you need in my opinion. Fling 77g SMKs for practice or even the upper range ELDMs. View Quote Yeah I like my heavies but half of why I like 77’s has more to do with the 77 TMK than 77’s in general. They’re such a great bullet. |
|
Just move to an intermediate cartridge for game application. Shooting a Elk or a moose is not a great idea.
|
|
How are 77 grain bullets on coyotes compared to 50-55 grain BT?
|
|
Depends on bbl length and range to target.
18-20” bbl and target inside 200 yd, 55g works great. Out of a 10.5” bbl or past 200, 77 g is way better. If 77g match bullets and 55g ball were same price, there would be no need for 55g. |
|
I see no reason to stray from 62 gr. Gold Dot, Fusion or TBBC for home defense.
|
|
I've heard several guys on podcast mention that when they shot people with 62 grain they kept going. 77grain dropped them fast.
|
|
|
Quoted: 77 is ok https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/433221/IMG_20230327_151755_2_jpg-2844972_jpeg-2895001.JPG View Quote |
|
|
|
I sent my son at 14 to a sniper class with a 16" Colt and 77 grain with a Vortex 1-6. He consistently hit steel at 950 yards.
|
|
My preferred loading is the 69grn SMK.
Accurate. Way better in the wind than lighter options. I loaded 77grn SMks for a while and just seem to like the 69s better. Have to test for yourself |
|
77 TMK will fragment out to nearly 300 yards in a 10.5 barrel. Regular SMK are only 125 IIRC.
|
|
|
has the 77gr tmk come back into stock recently? I gave up looking for them.
|
|
Quoted: Elk and moose. Seriously? View Quote here ya go 77gr knowledge |
|
A typical 55-grain bullet starting at M193 speeds, by the time it gets to 300 yards, has slowed down to the same speed - if not slower, sometimes - than a good 73-75-77 grain projectile that started much slower but had a better BC.
Of course, if you used the very best 55-grain projectiles, the velocity loss wouldn't be so bad - but at closer ranges, I'd MUCH rather have the slower, heavy bullet, as they tend to behave more predictably than lighter/faster stuff. In short, heavies are better-behaved at close range and have more power at longer ranges. Or, they're just better all around. |
|
|
Quoted: Elk and moose. Seriously? View Quote There's a giant thread on Rokslide (a western hunting forum where I lurk but don't post) where people have killed enough large game - deer, elk, and yes MOOSE - to fill up a football stadium. Some guy started taking his wife hunting and she ended up shooting a moose with a 77 TMK. |
|
|
View Quote Not even Wyoming allows it, for good reason. |
|
Quoted: Cant say for 77gr but the 69gr RMR bullets slap the shit out of coyotes, very good terminal performance. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: How are 77 grain bullets on coyotes compared to 50-55 grain BT? Cant say for 77gr but the 69gr RMR bullets slap the shit out of coyotes, very good terminal performance. I just did a side by side test at the range today with 69g SMK and 69g RMR. In my rifle the shift in POI was minimal for my loading. I was happy about that. I have a 16" gun that i load it's own ammo for, now I can stack cans of 69gr RMR without worrying about a zero with SMK. |
|
Quoted: How are 77 grain bullets on coyotes compared to 50-55 grain BT? View Quote Inside of maybe 250 yards nothing will ever beat a 55-grain (ehhh, anything from 40 to 60 grain) polymer-tipped varmint bullet, on varmints, especially if you want to save the pelts. But I can tell you that 75-77s will flatten coyotes. I've killed a few with 75-77 stuff with my HD rifle. Also, a 75 5.56 Tap T2 will absolutely smoke a crow. |
|
|
It is a big improvement over 55 and 62 gr offerings if your benchmarks are only m193 and m855. The race tightens up a lot when looking at terminal performance in game and people when you have access to various others.
What isnt really possible to beat with lighter bullets is the high BC of 77gr SMKs. You can go lighter and leave the muzzle much faster but you lose it faster too. Quoted: I didn’t see any noticeable difference between the 2. That’s only on about 10-12 kills though, all under 150 yards. View Quote It's a lot of round for pretty small animals comparatively. I've seen a few taken with lighter (68 gr and lighter) varmint, bonded jhp, and others like TMKs. They almost always leave a fist sized cavity or exit. |
|
Quoted: I've heard several guys on podcast mention that when they shot people with 62 grain they kept going. 77grain dropped them fast. View Quote Yeah, but a lot of those were because the 62 was M855/SS109 that doesn't expand or frag very well at all, not because it weighed 62 grains. That's why so many people prefer M193 to M855. It might be old tech and not terribly accurate but inside frag range, it works well. |
|
|
Quoted: Not even Wyoming allows it, for good reason. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Not even Wyoming allows it, for good reason. Did you even read the thread? More than enough picture proof of actual terminal destruction from TMKs and ELDMs. On par or better than .308 and magnums. |
|
|
Quoted: 77g TMKs will fuck everything up. From paper targets at 600 yards to elk/moose. All you need in my opinion. Fling 77g SMKs for practice or even the upper range ELDMs. View Quote The 77 gr. Sierra Matchking has 96" (that's 8 feet, gentlemen) of drop at 600 yds w/200 yd. zero, and retains a whopping 355 ft. lbs. of energy. By comparison, a lightweight 130 gr. bullet from a .357 magnum has 373 ft. lbs. at 100 yds. If you want to make the case that a 130 gr. .357 is an awesome elk round, please carry on. https://www.sierrabullets.com/223-remington-77-grain-matchking-trajectory-chart/ |
|
I'm not sure about class but I sure wouldn't want to be ventilated by one.
I keep this in my home defense rifle. https://www.hornady.com/ammunition/rifle/5-56-nato-75-gr-bthp-superformance-match#!/ |
|
|
|
Quoted: The 77 gr. Sierra Matchking has 96" (that's 8 feet, gentlemen) of drop at 600 yds w/200 yd. zero, and retains a whopping 355 ft. lbs. of energy. By comparison, a lightweight 130 gr. bullet from a .357 magnum has 373 ft. lbs. at 100 yds. If you want to make the case that a 130 gr. .357 is an awesome elk round, please carry on. https://www.sierrabullets.com/223-remington-77-grain-matchking-trajectory-chart/ View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: 77g TMKs will fuck everything up. From paper targets at 600 yards to elk/moose. All you need in my opinion. Fling 77g SMKs for practice or even the upper range ELDMs. The 77 gr. Sierra Matchking has 96" (that's 8 feet, gentlemen) of drop at 600 yds w/200 yd. zero, and retains a whopping 355 ft. lbs. of energy. By comparison, a lightweight 130 gr. bullet from a .357 magnum has 373 ft. lbs. at 100 yds. If you want to make the case that a 130 gr. .357 is an awesome elk round, please carry on. https://www.sierrabullets.com/223-remington-77-grain-matchking-trajectory-chart/ Read the rokslide thread above. It’s bullet selection and design not foot pounds. 77Gr TMK/ELDM fucks above its class. |
|
|
|
Quoted: The 77 gr. Sierra Matchking has 96" (that's 8 feet, gentlemen) of drop at 600 yds w/200 yd. zero, and retains a whopping 355 ft. lbs. of energy. By comparison, a lightweight 130 gr. bullet from a .357 magnum has 373 ft. lbs. at 100 yds. If you want to make the case that a 130 gr. .357 is an awesome elk round, please carry on. https://www.sierrabullets.com/223-remington-77-grain-matchking-trajectory-chart/ View Quote 6.8 SPC 200 yard zero 110gr BTHP 96 inch drop @ 600 yds 529 ft-lbs negligible increase in recoil, only 3 more grains of powder than a 223 load That was my solution. If I was going to pay more for better 223 bullets let's just go all the way better :) |
|
Quoted: Read the rokslide thread above. It’s bullet selection and design not foot pounds. 77Gr TMK/ELDM fucks above its class. View Quote I did. There are a bunch of disagreements on the 77 applicability for big game. It's a bad choice for big game. I gave you the physics of the situation. I know physics is hard, but take a look. 8 feet of drop at 600 yards, 355 ft. lbs. Yikes. No cartridge on the planet "fucks above its class." It is physically impossible. All cartridges perform exactly as they are expected to perform based on physics. Claims like that are precisely why we have ballistics tables. It separates the men from the boys, as they say. By comparison, the lowly .30-06 w/100 yard zero with a 165 gr. Rem. AccuTip drops 90", but retains 1075 ft. lbs. http://gundata.org/blog/post/30-06-ballistics-chart/ 355 ft. lbs. vs. 1075 ft. lbs. THREE TIMES THE ENERGY at 600 yds. Huh. If you'd like, we can discuss Ballistic Coefficient. But it involves more physics. |
|
Quoted: 6.8 SPC 200 yard zero 110gr BTHP 96 inch drop @ 600 yds 529 ft-lbs negligible increase in recoil, only 3 more grains of powder than a 223 load That was my solution. If I was going to pay more for better 223 bullets let's just go all the way better :) View Quote I've killed a truckload of deer with my 6.8. I recently wrestled with building another for my kids, and ended up going 5.56. I still like my 6.8 but at the end of the day for what my kids will do with it, I think 5.56 is going to work. As they get skilled enough to reach past 200 yards we'll move them up to a larger cartridge anyway. Lord willing, next week my oldest will be shooting my .280AI with reduced loads at 500 yards. It rained all week and we couldn't go this week. |
|
Quoted: has the 77gr tmk come back into stock recently? I gave up looking for them. View Quote https://www.midwayusa.com/product/1482156431?pid=156431 |
|
Quoted: 6.8 SPC 200 yard zero 110gr BTHP 96 inch drop @ 600 yds 529 ft-lbs negligible increase in recoil, only 3 more grains of powder than a 223 load That was my solution. If I was going to pay more for better 223 bullets let's just go all the way better :) View Quote It's a solution, but still a compromise. In fact, every cartridge is a compromise. Physics. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.