User Panel
How do you guys expect Biden to finally bring the country together with gun control, mask mandates, mandatory lockdowns, and higher taxes if you all keep bringing up his voter fraud?
|
|
Wow, if only Tucker had an inside track on one of the most significant political events in the last 100 years.
I think he kicked Sydney to the curb because he invented a narrative he was going to champion and her fraud case overshadows it. He wants us to believe Twitter and FaceBook influenced too many to vote for Biden, NOT that there was stolen and stuffed ballots. You stupid fuck! Left up to you Tucker, we would continue with history making electoral fraud while you wring your girl hands over Twitter!!! ?? I hope Tucker broils in his own juices of regret this holiday weekend. Giving thanks! |
|
Biblical. Georgia.
Yeah, I agree. These things are monumental tasks. Off to read the Michigan one now. |
|
Quoted: Wow, if only Tucker had an inside track on one of the most significant political events in the last 100 years. I think he kicked Sydney to the curb because he invented a narrative he was going to champion and her fraud case overshadows it. He wants us to believe Twitter and FaceBook influenced too many to vote for Biden, NOT that there was stolen and stuffed ballots. You stupid fuck! Left up to you Tucker, we would continue with history making electoral fraud while you wring your girl hands over Twitter!!! ?? I hope Tucker brooks in his own juices of regret this holiday weekend. Giving thanks! View Quote Tucker is a swamp fucktard. |
|
Quoted: I skimmed it. The only thing that seemed like it was kraken level was a supposed affidavit about china and iran manipulating results. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Have you read it? I’m halfway through and I don’t think you read it. I skimmed it. The only thing that seemed like it was kraken level was a supposed affidavit about china and iran manipulating results. Welp, I guess that settles it, then. Everyone go home, a world renowned expert skimmer named LuckyDucky from arfcom GD says it's a sham. Should've known better, idiots. |
|
Quoted: How do you guys expect Biden to finally bring the country together with gun control, mask mandates, mandatory lockdowns, and higher taxes if you all keep bringing up his voter fraud? View Quote SORRY! It happens so often it has become a habit. ?? Ain’t it glorious to have these first three filings out in the open? Love it. Waiting for the left to REEEEEEE like never before tomorrow. |
|
Quoted: Wow, if only Tucker had an inside track on one of the most significant political events in the last 100 years. I think he kicked Sydney to the curb because he invented a narrative he was going to champion and her fraud case overshadows it. He wants us to believe Twitter and FaceBook influenced too many to vote for Biden, NOT that there was stolen and stuffed ballots. You stupid fuck! Left up to you Tucker, we would continue with history making electoral fraud while you wring your girl hands over Twitter!!! ?? I hope Tucker brooks in his own juices of regret this holiday weekend. Giving thanks! View Quote I'm fine with tucker and cruz staying pretty hard on the twitter front. It's reasonable for anyone to question these court cases and the likelihood of their success. I don't really care if tucker and a lawyer got in a pissing match. Right now he's one of the biggest voices we have that the left might actually see. Once they take the red pill and go down the rabbit hole we usually get them. |
|
I'm a fuckin' pessimist. But I feel good this evening after days of disappointment. Fucking A. Glad my Trump flag is still flying.
|
|
I just got done reading the entire thing, every word, every page.
Obviously, I don't know what the 'exhibits' will consist of, so maybe there will be something big there. Otherwise, it's all just descriptions of witness statements regarding stuff we mostly have already heard about.... A stack of affidavits, in other words. Is it reasonable to believe that will be enough to make the courts set aside the result? For all the hype they've put on Powell's work, there sure aren't any amazing bombshells there. |
|
|
Quoted: I just got done reading the entire thing, every word, every page. Obviously, I don't know what the 'exhibits' will consist of, so maybe there will be something big there. Otherwise, it's all just descriptions of witness statements regarding stuff we mostly have already heard about.... A stack of affidavits, in other words. Is it reasonable to believe that will be enough to make the courts set aside the result? For all the hype they've put on Powell's work, there sure aren't any amazing bombshells there. View Quote Perhaps you should read it again and pay attention to what you are reading. They DIDN'T follow the law. That makes what they did UNLAWFUL. She is asking for the court to simply apply the law in those instances. |
|
Quoted: Welp, I guess that settles it, then. Everyone go home, a world renowned expert skimmer named LuckyDucky from arfcom GD says it's a sham. Should've known better, idiots. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Have you read it? I’m halfway through and I don’t think you read it. I skimmed it. The only thing that seemed like it was kraken level was a supposed affidavit about china and iran manipulating results. Welp, I guess that settles it, then. Everyone go home, a world renowned expert skimmer named LuckyDucky from arfcom GD says it's a sham. Should've known better, idiots. |
|
Quoted: I just got done reading the entire thing, every word, every page. Obviously, I don't know what the 'exhibits' will consist of, so maybe there will be something big there. Otherwise, it's all just descriptions of witness statements regarding stuff we mostly have already heard about.... A stack of affidavits, in other words. Is it reasonable to believe that will be enough to make the courts set aside the result? For all the hype they've put on Powell's work, there sure aren't any amazing bombshells there. View Quote The allegations are pretty substantial. If her exhibits provide evidence to the allegations, and don't forget, she has said many times that she doesn't make claims she can't prove, then it's pretty damning. Hell, if she makes half that stick, it'll put Georgia in the Trump column. I'd say that's pretty big. |
|
|
Quoted: They could probably use a better OCR code for sure but If it's a weird font or odd printer calibration to start and a crooked scan with less than optimal quality or the computer is just grumpy that day the OCR just doesn't work well. Probably if your blueprints were saved out as images if you never tried to edit them the text would stay legible but if you open them and edit it will scan for text and try to make it editable. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: We print our sets of drawings to pdf and several years ago the company I work for had to switch to other software because Adobe was turning large amounts of the text to gibberish. Mrs. BGB is a computer programmer and when I asked her about it, she said Adobe has known about those issues with pdfs for a long time and they refuse to do anything about it. I'm not saying that is what happened to SP's document just that it does happen. SHould they have checked it after it was printed yes, but if it was right in the actual document... They could probably use a better OCR code for sure but If it's a weird font or odd printer calibration to start and a crooked scan with less than optimal quality or the computer is just grumpy that day the OCR just doesn't work well. Probably if your blueprints were saved out as images if you never tried to edit them the text would stay legible but if you open them and edit it will scan for text and try to make it editable. No we would print directly from AutoCad to pdf. It used to be fine and then about three or four years ago huge swaths of the text would just be gibberish. And it was so weird. One or two pages printed might be fine today but tomorrow the same cad file printed to pdf was screwed up. And forget large print jobs. Jobs that had over a hundred pages, the text would be 40 or 50 percent gibberish. Some folks used Arial but most of us used fonts that looked handwritten. They changed to Bluebeam, I think that's what it's called, and all those problems went away. Fuck if I know why or how it happened. When mrs BGB tried to explain it to me my eyes glazed over and all I heard was some kind of speech that kinda resembled English that I couldn't understand. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: It’s gonna be used to judge though. Even if you’re completely impartial you’ve just cast doubt on the entire document. If you were someone in charge of hiring and an applicant couldn’t even spell their fucking name right on their resume would that inspire confidence? No, it’s not, but nice try. I’m sure judges don’t realize a document of this size and the short amount of time involved might have a spelling error or two. Seems like a great excuse to throw a suit out no matter what the content. |
|
Quoted: Appears to be a big fat nothingburger to me. The dominion evidence is mostly what we already know, and nothing about any actual compromise of the dominion system. Just that it could have been. View Quote Another fucking commie comes out of his hole. We shall see. This and everything else will go to the Supreme Court of The United States. Where pedophile buffoon Joe Biden and Justice Clarence Thomas have an interesting history. |
|
Quoted: I'd actually say its damn good, since everything we had on here was all hearsay and guesswork..whats filed shows there is enough there to withstand scrutiny in a court of law....good start..I bet some liberals and GOPe's are shitting bricks either tonite or in the morning...got that knot of fear in the pit of their stomach... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Yes, though it may not be completely surprising, depending on how closely you've been following. I'd actually say its damn good, since everything we had on here was all hearsay and guesswork..whats filed shows there is enough there to withstand scrutiny in a court of law....good start..I bet some liberals and GOPe's are shitting bricks either tonite or in the morning...got that knot of fear in the pit of their stomach... Right in time for the holiday. Would Trump do it any other way? |
|
|
Quoted: Oops https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/2893/Screen_Shot_2020-11-25_at_9_37_33_PM_png-1702075.JPG Maybe a rift in the space-time continuum? View Quote The grammatical and spelling errors in the filing are surprisingly frequent. |
|
Quoted: I just got done reading the entire thing, every word, every page. Obviously, I don't know what the 'exhibits' will consist of, so maybe there will be something big there. Otherwise, it's all just descriptions of witness statements regarding stuff we mostly have already heard about.... A stack of affidavits, in other words. Is it reasonable to believe that will be enough to make the courts set aside the result? For all the hype they've put on Powell's work, there sure aren't any amazing bombshells there. View Quote Should be enough for a hold, and to send in a bunch of auditors. Hopefully they can verify her claims. Getting a judge to decertify a whole state over affidavits that will be challenged, or because the SOS fucked up could be difficult. |
|
View Quote Why is this a 1995 website? |
|
Moar Kraken news here: https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat |
|
|
Quoted: Jesus, have you shills never read a filing, they always have misspellings and wrong names. It’s always the same motherfuckers in this thread and others trying to sow doubt and derision. Where is it where is it where is it? She’s never going to file. Well, it’s not as much as I built it up to be even though it never could have been because I’m a shill...but still Oh, a word is misspelled maybe, hahaha, Biden president now cause spelling bee rules not court of law. Fuck you. View Quote +1 |
|
Quoted: Maybe so people talk about it with their families over Thanksgiving, because the MSM sure as hell wont report on it. View Quote Ha Wikipedia disagrees "Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. (/'ba?d?n/ BY-d?n; born November 20, 1942) is an American politician and the president-elect of the United States. He defeated incumbent president Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election and will be inaugurated as the 46th president on January 20, 2021. " |
|
|
13. Immediate production of 36 hours of security camera recording ofall rooms used in the voting process at State Farm Arena in Fulton
County, GA from 12:00am to 3:00am until 6:00pm on November 3. How is the Judge expected to interpret "from 12:00am to 3:00am until 6:00pm on November 3."? Also, shouldn't it be November 4? |
|
|
Quoted: Nobody asked you to be here. Nobody gives a fuck about waking you up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Wake me up when this actually goes somewhere. This whole thing has been a clown show so far. Nobody asked you to be here. Nobody gives a fuck about waking you up. He’s right tho. |
|
Quoted: She is a bullshitter. View Quote No she is not. Everyone knows the truth. The democrats know they are dirty, that’s why you are not hearing from them. The Republicans know it but either are in on it or have too many skeletons in their closets to say anything. The news media knows it but are controlled by China and various communist/ globalist. They stoped the count for one reason. They realized that just like four years ago that they had not cheated enough and needed even more votes to trickfuck the election and even with massive fraud system wide to make things look right, they were coming up short. So they turned Wisconsin, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Arizona and probably Virginia by massive one way vote drops in the early morning hours. Experts know it and they know that it has been used before far and wide to make this country think things are close between the parties and they are not. Probably used to turn county elections around major metropolitan areas to allow democrats to control elections to be in place to trick fuck presidential and other national elections. Your right in a way it is bullshit but she ain’t bullshitting. |
|
The American people like to fuck but they are sick and tired of getting fucked.
|
|
I wonder, have those that continually bitch about how long this process is taking (I mean, its just a trivial thing to gather evidence and unravel such a huge amount of fraud right?) done anything to help? Donated to Sidney's legal fund at least? If not, why the fuck not?
|
|
Quoted: I wonder, have those that continually bitch about how long this process is taking (I mean, its just a trivial thing to gather evidence and unravel such a huge amount of fraud right?) done anything to help? Donated to Sidney's legal fund at least? If not, why the fuck not? View Quote I mean, there were Dillos... Defend The Republic Beverage Entry Tool |
|
I just skimmed the filing to see her evidence.
I was expecting to see that she had a compromised voting machine in her custody. Or at least source code reverse engineered from the software on the compromised machine. Nope, her "evidence" consisted largely of links to Tweets, YouTube videos, and wait for it - DuckDuckGo search results. |
|
Quoted: Did I make it in before all the Mitt Romney mobys run up on a political thread to shit all over it, and lecture us on how to submit our butt holes like good establishment repubs? View Quote If they’re depressed, I hope they gloss over the “reach out” thread in GD in their rush to shitpost here. |
|
Quoted: I just skimmed the filing to see her evidence. I was expecting to see that she had a compromised voting machine in her custody. Or at least source code reverse engineered from the software on the compromised machine. Nope, her "evidence" consisted largely of links to Tweets, YouTube videos, and wait for it - DuckDuckGo search results. View Quote This did not include the exhibits, so we have no idea what evidence she has. |
|
Quoted: Jesus, have you shills never read a filing, they always have misspellings and wrong names. It’s always the same motherfuckers in this thread and others trying to sow doubt and derision. Where is it where is it where is it? She’s never going to file. Well, it’s not as much as I built it up to be even though it never could have been because I’m a shill...but still Oh, a word is misspelled maybe, hahaha, Biden president now cause spelling bee rules not court of law. Fuck you. View Quote This needs to be repeated periodically as all of our legal-experts-in-their-own-minds chime in. |
|
Quoted: when you cut a tree down the branches fall too. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Done reading. I'm surprised they didn't go after the recount numbers, as the counties were told to report the original numbers instead of new numbers, even after inconsistencies were discovered. when you cut a tree down the branches fall too. LMAO. |
|
Quoted: This did not include the exhibits, so we have no idea what evidence she has. View Quote She would at least reference the evidence contained in the exhibits within the main filing, and she did not. I mean, there's like almost a hundred pages of excerpts from the affidavits we've already seen regarding things like poll watchers not being allowed to stand close enough, contained within her filing. |
|
Quoted: Why would this drop the evening before Thanksgiving? View Quote That it happened the night before Thanksgiving so people can talk about it today is just another gift from God. |
|
|
Well now!
This is what I've been waiting for, no more thread upon thread of BS speculation but enough under oath 1st hand accounts of irregularities (where the numbers really do make a difference) laid out and entered into the record for me to call into question the validity of the election without sounding like some wild-eyed sore loser. Will it work? It would be a miracle given the MSM/DOJ won't investigate what might be the biggest fraud ever foisted upon the American people. Slightly less BlueBalls87 standing by. |
|
Quoted: Should be enough for a hold, and to send in a bunch of auditors. Hopefully they can verify her claims. Getting a judge to decertify a whole state over affidavits that will be challenged, or because the SOS fucked up could be difficult. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I just got done reading the entire thing, every word, every page. Obviously, I don't know what the 'exhibits' will consist of, so maybe there will be something big there. Otherwise, it's all just descriptions of witness statements regarding stuff we mostly have already heard about.... A stack of affidavits, in other words. Is it reasonable to believe that will be enough to make the courts set aside the result? For all the hype they've put on Powell's work, there sure aren't any amazing bombshells there. Should be enough for a hold, and to send in a bunch of auditors. Hopefully they can verify her claims. Getting a judge to decertify a whole state over affidavits that will be challenged, or because the SOS fucked up could be difficult. Seems like if it gets that far and auditors get involved, it will be almost a done deal. But that is unlikely in my opinion. But before it even gets to that point, the documents need to exist and be produced by GA...federal law requires document retention by the state, if they cannot produce the records they are required by federal law to maintain, then that alone is sufficient to shut it all down. And send people to the slammer. Consider that to be the bad actor’s backstop...commit lots of fraud, fade back, allow the lack of records to overturn your fraud, allow the front line patsy crew to take the hit, avoid revealing the true fraud and the true guilty parties...as a bonus, have four more years of crying about how orangemanbad stole the election. |
|
Quoted: I just skimmed the filing to see her evidence. I was expecting to see that she had a compromised voting machine in her custody. Or at least source code reverse engineered from the software on the compromised machine. Nope, her "evidence" consisted largely of links to Tweets, YouTube videos, and wait for it - DuckDuckGo search results. View Quote Oh look. An usual suspect |
|
I see that our Leftist and Defeatist friends are now hanging on by their fingernails with "spelling errors" LOL On a scale of 1 to 10, how desperate would you have to be to pin your hopes on "spelling errors"? I'm gonna say about a 12. That's a mighty far fall from "NO EVIDENCE" |
|
Quoted: Do you base this on her track record of 100% not being a bullshitter. She is one of the most serious and respected lawyers in the country. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: She is a bullshitter. Do you base this on her track record of 100% not being a bullshitter. She is one of the most serious and respected lawyers in the country. And titled it "The Kraken". |
|
Quoted: Done reading. I'm surprised they didn't go after the recount numbers, as the counties were told to report the original numbers instead of new numbers, even after inconsistencies were discovered. View Quote Trying to respond to changing events would have derailed the filing. And I'll pile on: any moron that is fixated on spelling and typos has never read a legal filing. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.