User Panel
Posted: 8/12/2021 8:55:15 AM EST
|
|
|
I'd take a saline jab if it would shut up the brainwashed idiots.
|
|
And that my friends is how you effectively rebel. Whether you approve of what she did or not is a totally different debate.
|
|
On this side of the world New York will help balance the scales.
"If you want to participate in society fully, you've got to get vaccinated." "you have the right to your body, of course; but you do not have the right to kill other people." -New York State Senator James Sanders, Jr. |
|
1. There's quite a lot of uncertainties in that article. "Get the vaccine again, maybe, because you may not have gotten it,
but we really aren't sure." 2. The last line in the article was completely unnecessary and out of place and is pure leftist propaganda. |
|
|
If I wanted the vaccine, and learned I got placebo instead, I'd be pissed on principle.
Give me what I chose to get. No more, no less. |
|
Fifth post nailed it. Don't have comorbidities, excellent genes and immune system. Fuck the state.
|
|
|
View Quote |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: On this side of the world New York will help balance the scales. "If you want to participate in society fully, you've got to get vaccinated." "you have the right to your body, of course; but you do not have the right to kill other people." -New York State Senator James Sanders, Jr. View Quote I presently am a subcontractor to a large (Fortune 50) defense contractor. Prior to being canceled by the thought police, I used to chat with other employees about various topics on their Slack channels. The majority of participants in the pandemic forum were authoritarian doomers. The single most telling moment was when we were discussing vaccination (early on, before widespread availability) and the arguments they were making were devoid of any understanding of freedom. I said, somewhat rhetorically (in quotes) the following: "You won't be forced to take the vaccine. You simply won't be able to participate in society if you don't." The response was immediately and overwhelmingly positive from these people, not realizing I was trying to say the quiet part out loud with regards to their line of thought. I was frightened. Now I see that not only do thousands (hundreds of thousands? millions?) of people believe this, that includes elected representatives. At some point we must acknowledge that there is no solution for coexistence with such people. |
|
|
Quoted: And that my friends is how you effectively rebel. Whether you approve of what she did or not is a totally different debate. View Quote By making medical choices for other people without asking or informing them? That's NOT her "rebelling" - that's her imposing and forcing her personal will on other people, when they are powerless to resist. You know, that tyranny thing we hate. In principle, what she did is no different that if an oncology nurse decided she didn't like or believe in a new cancer treatment (for whatever reason), and just decided on her own to give patients placebos instead of their cancer drugs. Would you also consider that rebellion? (Keep in mind that MANY cancer treatments are inherently experimental). The ethical choice for her would be to refuse to inject people with the vaccine, or quit her job. What she did was incredibly unethical. |
|
|
She confessed to doing 6 people because she dropped one vial on the floor and was afraid to report it.
The rest is all conjecture and no charges have been laid. The headline says they "fear thousands" got saline but the article says no such thing. And then the last two sentences tacked on, probably by the editor. "Germany has seen many anti-vaccination protests. Far-right groups are among those who reject the official data and conclusions about the spread of Covid." Another in a never-ending stream of bullshit and propaganda. Full spectrum programming. |
|
|
Quoted: By making medical choices for other people without asking or informing them? That's NOT her "rebelling" - that's her imposing and forcing her personal will on other people, when they are powerless to resist. You know, that tyranny thing we hate. In principle, what she did is no different that if an oncology nurse decided she didn't like or believe in a new cancer treatment (for whatever reason), and just decided on her own to give patients placebos instead of their cancer drugs. Would you also consider that rebellion? (Keep in mind that MANY cancer treatments are inherently experimental). The ethical choice for her would be to refuse to inject people with the vaccine, or quit her job. What she did was incredibly unethical. View Quote Why do you have to ruin things by putting this in the proper logical, legal and ethical perspective? Jeez... |
|
|
End of life care, Deutscher style…
ADAM AND THE ANTS - DEUTSCHER GIRLS (Jubliee Soundtrack Version) |
|
|
|
Quoted: On this side of the world New York will help balance the scales. "If you want to participate in society fully, you've got to get vaccinated." "you have the right to your body, of course; but you do not have the right to kill other people." -New York State Senator James Sanders, Jr. View Quote But abortion is ok. Got it. |
|
|
|
Quoted: If I wanted the vaccine, and learned I got placebo instead, I'd be pissed on principle. Give me what I chose to get. No more, no less. View Quote This. Regardless of covid and the vaccine, if someone wants to get jabbed and get something injected to them, it's shitty to give them something else without them knowing instead. If someone comes to a business/clinic to get a service they better get the damn service that's being offered. |
|
Quoted: By making medical choices for other people without asking or informing them? That's NOT her "rebelling" - that's her imposing and forcing her personal will on other people, when they are powerless to resist. You know, that tyranny thing we hate. In principle, what she did is no different that if an oncology nurse decided she didn't like or believe in a new cancer treatment (for whatever reason), and just decided on her own to give patients placebos instead of their cancer drugs. Would you also consider that rebellion? (Keep in mind that MANY cancer treatments are inherently experimental). The ethical choice for her would be to refuse to inject people with the vaccine, or quit her job. What she did was incredibly unethical. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: And that my friends is how you effectively rebel. Whether you approve of what she did or not is a totally different debate. By making medical choices for other people without asking or informing them? That's NOT her "rebelling" - that's her imposing and forcing her personal will on other people, when they are powerless to resist. You know, that tyranny thing we hate. In principle, what she did is no different that if an oncology nurse decided she didn't like or believe in a new cancer treatment (for whatever reason), and just decided on her own to give patients placebos instead of their cancer drugs. Would you also consider that rebellion? (Keep in mind that MANY cancer treatments are inherently experimental). The ethical choice for her would be to refuse to inject people with the vaccine, or quit her job. What she did was incredibly unethical. That's all true, but even more than that, it's a crime. Their consent to her injecting them with something was premised on that something being a vaccine. By injecting them with something else, she has negated that consent. |
|
Quoted: By making medical choices for other people without asking or informing them? That's NOT her "rebelling" - that's her imposing and forcing her personal will on other people, when they are powerless to resist. You know, that tyranny thing we hate. In principle, what she did is no different that if an oncology nurse decided she didn't like or believe in a new cancer treatment (for whatever reason), and just decided on her own to give patients placebos instead of their cancer drugs. Would you also consider that rebellion? (Keep in mind that MANY cancer treatments are inherently experimental). The ethical choice for her would be to refuse to inject people with the vaccine, or quit her job. What she did was incredibly unethical. View Quote That's certainly one way to look at it. Keeping the sheep from running off the mountain... |
|
|
|
Quoted: I presently am a subcontractor to a large (Fortune 50) defense contractor. Prior to being canceled by the thought police, I used to chat with other employees about various topics on their Slack channels. The majority of participants in the pandemic forum were authoritarian doomers. The single most telling moment was when we were discussing vaccination (early on, before widespread availability) and the arguments they were making were devoid of any understanding of freedom. I said, somewhat rhetorically (in quotes) the following: "You won't be forced to take the vaccine. You simply won't be able to participate in society if you don't." The response was immediately and overwhelmingly positive from these people, not realizing I was trying to say the quiet part out loud with regards to their line of thought. I was frightened. Now I see that not only do thousands (hundreds of thousands? millions?) of people believe this, that includes elected representatives. At some point we must acknowledge that there is no solution for coexistence with such people. View Quote We need to have like a four tier system: 1. People who had both covid and been vaccinated 2. People who have been fully vaccinated 3. People who have had covid and recovered 4. People have NOT been vaccinated NOR have not had covid yet The people in #4 could…,oh, I don’t know….wear a gold star or something like that pinned to their clothes. The other tiers could be identified with some sorta mark on their hands or maybe like on their face . |
|
At first I giggled, only because of personal beliefs of this ‘vaccine’, but realized it is messed up for her to chose not to administer what the patient wants.
Skimming the article, this sticks out Regional broadcaster NDR says 8,557 people have been asked to go back for repeat vaccinations, and so far about 3,600 new appointments have been confirmed. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.