User Panel
Quoted:
The judge just issued a gag order Politico article View Quote |
|
Here's another interesting Politico article from today.
Russia investigators probe 2016 GOP platform fight Congressional investigators have interviewed ex-Donald Trump aides and advisers including J.D. Gordon, the national security policy representative at last year’s GOP convention, about the campaign’s push to remove proposed language from the 2016 Republican platform that called for giving weapons to Ukraine. ... Gordon, who has been a senior national security adviser or spokesman to four GOP presidential candidates since 2012, has largely escaped the harsh spotlight on some other Trump campaign officials. But while he has not been accused of wrongdoing, he has been questioned, in part, because of his role in the platform fight and his job overseeing two campaign volunteers, Carter Page and George Papadopoulos, who communicated with Russian officials or operatives last year. ... Gordon told POLITICO in a series of exchanges that he wasn’t involved in any wrongdoing and that he wasn’t aware of any suspect activities by Manafort or other campaign officials or advisers. He said investigators were probing other people involved in pushing the platform change that the Trump campaign opposed, though he would not identify them. "Investigators are rightly looking into whether or not crimes were committed by individuals connected to Ukraine, including possible FARA violations and other illegal activities,” Gordon wrote, referring to the Foreign Agents Registration Act. “I applaud them for conducting a thorough investigation as there are clearly two sides to the GOP Platform controversy." Could be a quo, maybe not. See what turns up. |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Fusion GPS co-owner met with Fusion GPS special occasion employee Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya before and after Trump Tower sit-down with DT Jr The co-founder of Fusion GPS, the firm behind the unverified Trump dossier, met with a Russian lawyer before and after a key meeting she had last year with Trump’s son, Fox News has learned. Congressional Republicans have since questioned whether that politically financed research contributed to the FBI’s investigation of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign – making Fusion’s 2016 contacts with Russian interests all the more relevant. Fox News had learned that bank records show Fusion GPS was paid by a law firm for work on behalf of a Kremlin-linked oligarch while paying a former British spy Christopher Steele to dig up dirt on Trump through his Russian contacts. Simpson’s presence with Veselnitskaya during this critical week in June -- together with revelations about Fusion’s simultaneous financial ties to the DNC, Clinton campaign and Russian interests -- raise new questions about the company’s role in the 2016 election. The DNC and Clinton campaign hired Fusion in April 2016 through lawyer Marc Elias, who was general counsel for the Clinton campaign. Fusion, in turn, paid Steele $168,000 for the dossier, memos from which were shared with the FBI in the summer of 2016. Fusion officials said last week Steele's money came from $1.02 million it received in fees and expenses from Elias' law firm Perkins Coie.?Prior to contracting with the DNC. Over the weekend, Fusion GPS sought a new restraining order after the House panel requested additional records that could reveal if Fusion was paying media companies or reporters for planting stories. |
|
Quoted:
The current spokespersons for the respective agencies share this view.Others who were previously agency heads,concur.That really carries more weight than a lay person with a biased agenda. View Quote I note that the "intelligence" community never produced a shred of evidence to support that |
|
|
I wonder what his screenname is...
|
|
Quoted:
I wonder what his screenname is...
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I wonder what his screenname is...
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Wasn't he the moron who had his staffer asking The_Donald for help drafting a Bill? . View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I wonder what his screenname is...
|
|
Quoted:
Wasn't he the moron who had his staffer asking The_Donald for help drafting a Bill? . View Quote Sad! |
|
Quoted:
You may be certain that I'm not affording your biased opinion any more weight than I give to the opinions of the other Obama/Clinton lackeys, regardless of where or when they serve your masters. I note that the "intelligence" community never produced a shred of evidence to support that View Quote If you have watched Congressional public hearings certain government agency witnesses , will often say that they cannot answer a specific question(s)in that public setting because of the sensitive/classified material the answer may require. It is clear,based on your response ,that you have never had a government agency security clearance. When heads of our intel agencies,or even former heads of such agencies,say it is clear that Russia interfered with our election,I believe them.Your opinion on the other hand is worthless and not needed by me.The fact that you haven't seen "a shred" of supporting evidence means nothing. |
|
You guys all on 2nd shift now? Did you all get demoted because of your poor performance?
|
|
Article about Mueller actually investigating Hillary and the rest of the crime syndicate. She must be reading these threads.
https://www.lizcrokin.com/author/admin/ |
|
Quoted:
Wasn't he the moron who had his staffer asking The_Donald for help drafting a Bill? . View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I wonder what his screenname is...
However, possible "gems" or a decent point can be found in many places, though the signal to noise ratio is usually fairly terrible. Whether that is some treatise on political, social or economic theory or a comment section on some website article. Even if every possible statement collected is complete and utter trash, working to refute, or at the least understand the sentiment behind the comments, is often a good exercise to hone one's thoughts. |
|
Quoted:
Article about Mueller actually investigating Hillary and the rest of the crime syndicate. She must be reading these threads. https://www.lizcrokin.com/author/admin/ View Quote The shills will soon discredit the article with links to The Daily Beast, Huffpo, and Snopes |
|
|
Quoted:
They skipped right over it for some reason. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
This may come as a suprise to you-most,if not all of our intelligence agencies deal with classified material.They can only share such information with persons,other agencies that are properly cleared and have a need to know. If you have watched Congressional public hearings certain government agency witnesses , will often say that they cannot answer a specific question(s)in that public setting because of the sensitive/classified material the answer may require. It is clear,based on your response ,that you have never had a government agency security clearance. When heads of our intel agencies,or even former heads of such agencies,say it is clear that Russia interfered with our election,I believe them.Your opinion on the other hand is worthless and not needed by me.The fact that you haven't seen "a shred" of supporting evidence means nothing. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You may be certain that I'm not affording your biased opinion any more weight than I give to the opinions of the other Obama/Clinton lackeys, regardless of where or when they serve your masters. I note that the "intelligence" community never produced a shred of evidence to support that If you have watched Congressional public hearings certain government agency witnesses , will often say that they cannot answer a specific question(s)in that public setting because of the sensitive/classified material the answer may require. It is clear,based on your response ,that you have never had a government agency security clearance. When heads of our intel agencies,or even former heads of such agencies,say it is clear that Russia interfered with our election,I believe them.Your opinion on the other hand is worthless and not needed by me.The fact that you haven't seen "a shred" of supporting evidence means nothing. |
|
Quoted:
When heads of our intel agencies,or even former heads of such agencies,say it is clear that Russia interfered with our election,I believe them.Your opinion on the other hand is worthless and not needed by me.The fact that you haven't seen "a shred" of supporting evidence means nothing. View Quote Yeah, I bet you actually do |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
The judge just issued a gag order Politico article View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Article about Mueller actually investigating Hillary and the rest of the crime syndicate. She must be reading these threads. https://www.lizcrokin.com/author/admin/ View Quote No D's or RINO's will be prosecuted, they'll all get another pass. |
|
Quoted:
This may come as a suprise to you-most,if not all of our intelligence agencies deal with classified material.They can only share such information with persons,other agencies that are properly cleared and have a need to know. If you have watched Congressional public hearings certain government agency witnesses , will often say that they cannot answer a specific question(s)in that public setting because of the sensitive/classified material the answer may require. It is clear,based on your response ,that you have never had a government agency security clearance. When heads of our intel agencies,or even former heads of such agencies,say it is clear that Russia interfered with our election,I believe them.Your opinion on the other hand is worthless and not needed by me.The fact that you haven't seen "a shred" of supporting evidence means nothing. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You may be certain that I'm not affording your biased opinion any more weight than I give to the opinions of the other Obama/Clinton lackeys, regardless of where or when they serve your masters. I note that the "intelligence" community never produced a shred of evidence to support that If you have watched Congressional public hearings certain government agency witnesses , will often say that they cannot answer a specific question(s)in that public setting because of the sensitive/classified material the answer may require. It is clear,based on your response ,that you have never had a government agency security clearance. When heads of our intel agencies,or even former heads of such agencies,say it is clear that Russia interfered with our election,I believe them.Your opinion on the other hand is worthless and not needed by me.The fact that you haven't seen "a shred" of supporting evidence means nothing. And all those leaks of classified material and not a single shred of factual hard evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia. We were getting leaks every day, sometimes multiple times per day....for over a year, and nothing at all. Even during the campaign, the dems and GOPe couldn't come up with a single damaging factual piece. LULZ. Have you held a clearance, of any sort? Any training in clearance? Hillary school of clearance, maybe? Anything at all? |
|
Quoted:
Riiiiiight.... And all those leaks of classified material and not a single shred of factual hard evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia. We were getting leaks every day, sometimes multiple times per day....for over a year, and nothing at all. Even during the campaign, the dems and GOPe couldn't come up with a single damaging factual piece. LULZ. Have you held a clearance, of any sort? Any training in clearance? Hillary school of clearance, maybe? Anything at all? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
What leaks of classified material are you referring to?Who leaked it?When? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Riiiiiight.... And all those leaks of classified material and not a single shred of factual hard evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia. We were getting leaks every day, sometimes multiple times per day....for over a year, and nothing at all. Even during the campaign, the dems and GOPe couldn't come up with a single damaging factual piece. LULZ. Have you held a clearance, of any sort? Any training in clearance? Hillary school of clearance, maybe? Anything at all? |
|
I can't believe folks are so stupid as to CONTINUOUSLY engage these Swamp Trolls' Nonsense...
|
|
Quoted:
Would be great if true, but Mueller & Rosenstein are part of the swamp - they'll protect it at all costs. No D's or RINO's will be prosecuted, they'll all get another pass. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Article about Mueller actually investigating Hillary and the rest of the crime syndicate. She must be reading these threads. https://www.lizcrokin.com/author/admin/ No D's or RINO's will be prosecuted, they'll all get another pass. |
|
Quoted:
I can't believe folks are so stupid as to CONTINUOUSLY engage these Swamp Trolls' Nonsense... View Quote His is a legend. His first 7 years here he only posted 36 times. Join date to 10/4/16. But in the last year, 11/8/16 to today 11/8/17, he has posted 4,389 times. It is clear to see that he has vastly stepped up his game!! Give him his due. Think of the restraint he showed during 7 years under OBAMA. Only posting 36 times. The character it took to accomplish that, under that administration, is remarkable! Imagine him biting his tongue, and only posting 37 times in all those years. Out of respect. After all he is a stated Conservative Concerned with Corruption. Thank GOD we have the likes of him here, once again. To help shine the light on the current administration. What could mere mortals do without members like him, to guide us? I shudder to think. |
|
Quoted:
Anything leaked that makes Trump look bad is "classified", apparently. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Riiiiiight.... And all those leaks of classified material and not a single shred of factual hard evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia. We were getting leaks every day, sometimes multiple times per day....for over a year, and nothing at all. Even during the campaign, the dems and GOPe couldn't come up with a single damaging factual piece. LULZ. Have you held a clearance, of any sort? Any training in clearance? Hillary school of clearance, maybe? Anything at all? |
|
|
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-strange-pleasure-of-seeing-carter-page-set-himself-on-fire
Legal scholars watching Page’s borderline insane interviews, reviewing his bizarre public statements and reading the wackadoodle transcripts of his testimony to congressional investigators have expressed various levels of shock. His testimony this week must have dismayed his friends in Trump world; a long, rambling, performance art piece before the House which confirmed key sections of the Steele Dossier and opened up entirely new venues for investigation.
The emerging paper trail of his forays into Russia has been amazing mosaic of comic-opera misunderstandings, grand and petty corruptions, grade-school category errors, and fundamental delusions about Putin’s kleptocracy. In short, Page is a perfect example of the ad-hoc weirdness of the Trump campaign, Trumpism’s deep, misplaced love of Putin’s Russia, and the power of magical thinking among the coterie of misfit toys Trump calls his advisors. Page is weird and wrong and in most campaigns he’d be the weirdest, wrongest dog in the pack. In Trump world, Carter Page in the middle quintile. A bizarre fascination with Russia as an ally shaped the view of many of Trump’s foreign policy advisors like Steve Bannon, Mike Flynn, Stephen Miller, Seb Gorka and the rest of the Foreign Policy Center for Kids Who Can’t Read Good and Want To Read Good. Yes, a meaningful fraction of it is informed by an alt-rightish belief that the U.S. and Russia are white Christian allies in the global war on Islam and brown people in general, but some of it is just their natural inclination toward nationalist authoritarianism. Page didn’t just talk the pro-Russian talk; he threw himself into the eager arms of SVR operatives. Like the rest of the Trump world, Page brought a kind of underpants Gnome theory to his bromance with Team Putin. Through some unknown alchemy, he expected to benefit Trump, and gain influence and profit from his Russia foray. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
This may come as a suprise to you-most,if not all of our intelligence agencies deal with classified material.They can only share such information with persons,other agencies that are properly cleared and have a need to know. If you have watched Congressional public hearings certain government agency witnesses , will often say that they cannot answer a specific question(s)in that public setting because of the sensitive/classified material the answer may require. It is clear,based on your response ,that you have never had a government agency security clearance. When heads of our intel agencies,or even former heads of such agencies, say anything I double check it five or six times because they are proven fucking liars, so twisted they have no idea of what truth even is anymore. View Quote Some of us will never forget nor will we forgive. |
|
Quoted:
EXPY37 Don't think you are giving b_Sponge the credit he deserves. His is a legend. His first 7 years here he only posted 36 times. Join date to 10/4/16. But in the last year, 11/8/16 to today 11/8/17, he has posted 4,389 times. It is clear to see that he has vastly stepped up his game!! Give him his due. Think of the restraint he showed during 7 years under OBAMA. Only posting 36 times. The character it took to accomplish that, under that administration, is remarkable! Imagine him biting his tongue, and only posting 37 times in all those years. Out of respect. After all he is a stated Conservative Concerned with Corruption. Thank GOD we have the likes of him here, once again. To help shine the light on the current administration. What could mere mortals do without members like him, to guide us? I shudder to think. View Quote I'll have to agree, his posting really raises one's eyebrows... Very, very, STRANGE... It's almost as if he has an agenda to influence folks against Trump! |
|
Quoted:
Wasn't he the moron who had his staffer asking The_Donald for help drafting a Bill? . View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I wonder what his screenname is...
I'm Just a Bill (Schoolhouse Rock!) |
|
Quoted:
This may come as a suprise to you-most,if not all of our intelligence agencies deal with classified material.They can only share such information with persons,other agencies that are properly cleared and have a need to know. If you have watched Congressional public hearings certain government agency witnesses , will often say that they cannot answer a specific question(s)in that public setting because of the sensitive/classified material the answer may require. It is clear,based on your response ,that you have never had a government agency security clearance. When heads of our intel agencies,or even former heads of such agencies,say it is clear that Russia interfered with our election,I believe them.Your opinion on the other hand is worthless and not needed by me.The fact that you haven't seen "a shred" of supporting evidence means nothing. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You may be certain that I'm not affording your biased opinion any more weight than I give to the opinions of the other Obama/Clinton lackeys, regardless of where or when they serve your masters. I note that the "intelligence" community never produced a shred of evidence to support that If you have watched Congressional public hearings certain government agency witnesses , will often say that they cannot answer a specific question(s)in that public setting because of the sensitive/classified material the answer may require. It is clear,based on your response ,that you have never had a government agency security clearance. When heads of our intel agencies,or even former heads of such agencies,say it is clear that Russia interfered with our election,I believe them.Your opinion on the other hand is worthless and not needed by me.The fact that you haven't seen "a shred" of supporting evidence means nothing. |
|
Quoted:
EXPY37 Don't think you are giving b_Sponge the credit he deserves. His is a legend. His first 7 years here he only posted 36 times. Join date to 10/4/16. But in the last year, 11/8/16 to today 11/8/17, he has posted 4,389 times. It is clear to see that he has vastly stepped up his game!! Give him his due. Think of the restraint he showed during 7 years under OBAMA. Only posting 36 times. The character it took to accomplish that, under that administration, is remarkable! Imagine him biting his tongue, and only posting 37 times in all those years. Out of respect. After all he is a stated Conservative Concerned with Corruption. Thank GOD we have the likes of him here, once again. To help shine the light on the current administration. What could mere mortals do without members like him, to guide us? I shudder to think. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I can't believe folks are so stupid as to CONTINUOUSLY engage these Swamp Trolls' Nonsense... His is a legend. His first 7 years here he only posted 36 times. Join date to 10/4/16. But in the last year, 11/8/16 to today 11/8/17, he has posted 4,389 times. It is clear to see that he has vastly stepped up his game!! Give him his due. Think of the restraint he showed during 7 years under OBAMA. Only posting 36 times. The character it took to accomplish that, under that administration, is remarkable! Imagine him biting his tongue, and only posting 37 times in all those years. Out of respect. After all he is a stated Conservative Concerned with Corruption. Thank GOD we have the likes of him here, once again. To help shine the light on the current administration. What could mere mortals do without members like him, to guide us? I shudder to think. There's a similar pattern with a couple accounts that were posting in the now retired Never Trump thread before the election. People joke about "CTR" Shills or Share blue but what was discovered by Wikileaks was that part of what they were doing was either taking over or buying old accounts on popular forums so as not to arouse suspicion when they started posting. It's my belief that's the situation here. I'm not going to accuse TS or BS of not being the same person now that created their accounts years ago. DKProf has made it clear that won't be tolerated, so I'm not going to do that. |
|
Quoted:
EXPY37 Don't think you are giving b_Sponge the credit he deserves. His is a legend. His first 7 years here he only posted 36 times. Join date to 10/4/16. But in the last year, 11/8/16 to today 11/8/17, he has posted 4,389 times. It is clear to see that he has vastly stepped up his game!! Give him his due. Think of the restraint he showed during 7 years under OBAMA. Only posting 36 times. The character it took to accomplish that, under that administration, is remarkable! Imagine him biting his tongue, and only posting 37 times in all those years. Out of respect. After all he is a stated Conservative Concerned with Corruption. Thank GOD we have the likes of him here, once again. To help shine the light on the current administration. What could mere mortals do without members like him, to guide us? I shudder to think. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I can't believe folks are so stupid as to CONTINUOUSLY engage these Swamp Trolls' Nonsense... His is a legend. His first 7 years here he only posted 36 times. Join date to 10/4/16. But in the last year, 11/8/16 to today 11/8/17, he has posted 4,389 times. It is clear to see that he has vastly stepped up his game!! Give him his due. Think of the restraint he showed during 7 years under OBAMA. Only posting 36 times. The character it took to accomplish that, under that administration, is remarkable! Imagine him biting his tongue, and only posting 37 times in all those years. Out of respect. After all he is a stated Conservative Concerned with Corruption. Thank GOD we have the likes of him here, once again. To help shine the light on the current administration. What could mere mortals do without members like him, to guide us? I shudder to think. |
|
|
Quoted:
@pikie1 There's a similar pattern with a couple accounts that were posting in the now retired Never Trump thread before the election. People joke about "CTR" Shills or Share blue but what was discovered by Wikileaks was that part of what they were doing was either taking over or buying old accounts on popular forums so as not to arouse suspicion. It's my belief that's the situation here. I'm not going to accuse TS or BS of not being the same person that created those accounts. DKProf has made it clear that won't be tolerated, so I'm not going to do that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I can't believe folks are so stupid as to CONTINUOUSLY engage these Swamp Trolls' Nonsense... His is a legend. His first 7 years here he only posted 36 times. Join date to 10/4/16. But in the last year, 11/8/16 to today 11/8/17, he has posted 4,389 times. It is clear to see that he has vastly stepped up his game!! Give him his due. Think of the restraint he showed during 7 years under OBAMA. Only posting 36 times. The character it took to accomplish that, under that administration, is remarkable! Imagine him biting his tongue, and only posting 37 times in all those years. Out of respect. After all he is a stated Conservative Concerned with Corruption. Thank GOD we have the likes of him here, once again. To help shine the light on the current administration. What could mere mortals do without members like him, to guide us? I shudder to think. There's a similar pattern with a couple accounts that were posting in the now retired Never Trump thread before the election. People joke about "CTR" Shills or Share blue but what was discovered by Wikileaks was that part of what they were doing was either taking over or buying old accounts on popular forums so as not to arouse suspicion. It's my belief that's the situation here. I'm not going to accuse TS or BS of not being the same person that created those accounts. DKProf has made it clear that won't be tolerated, so I'm not going to do that. |
|
View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Considering the leaks during the start of the Trump administration, why, pray tell, would one trust their assessment? Is it because they didn't even try to get the DNC server and trust a third parties analysis? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Mike-It is as you say an impossible argument to contradict or overcome with evidence for reasons you mentioned.I would hope you would agree that the agencies do have a basis for their opinions and positions. Is it because they didn't even try to get the DNC server and trust a third parties analysis? Many of them, even one here a couple of months back, was repeating the "All 87 Of Our Security Agencies agree!" BS talking point, never mind the fact that's demonstrably false, and that the agencies in question never even laid a hand on the Dim server because they wouldn't turn it over, instead they were fed information from a third party. |
|
|
Quoted:
"What could mere mortals do without members like him, to guide us?" That is obvious sarcasm. I'll have to agree, his posting really raises one's eyebrows... Very, very, STRANGE... It's almost as if he has an agenda to influence folks against Trump! View Quote On the anniversary of Trumps win. Thought I'd toss a jab at B_S. Couldn't help myself! One needs to stay within the COC. Where a "Protected" member is concerned! He has an agenda, no doubt. Very easy to spot. |
|
Quoted:
EXPY37 Don't think you are giving b_Sponge the credit he deserves. His is a legend. His first 7 years here he only posted 36 times. Join date to 10/4/16. But in the last year, 11/8/16 to today 11/8/17, he has posted 4,389 times. It is clear to see that he has vastly stepped up his game!! Give him his due. Think of the restraint he showed during 7 years under OBAMA. Only posting 36 times. The character it took to accomplish that, under that administration, is remarkable! Imagine him biting his tongue, and only posting 37 times in all those years. Out of respect. After all he is a stated Conservative Concerned with Corruption. Thank GOD we have the likes of him here, once again. To help shine the light on the current administration. What could mere mortals do without members like him, to guide us? I shudder to think. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
According to multiple sources close to the matter right? Yet Jr's own twitter is saying something completely different. Amazing there were no made up multiple sources close to either Flynn. We have to gaslight and make it look like Flynn might flip to save his son. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
https://amp.thedailybeast.com/trump-world-kids-are-putting-their-parents-at-risk |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.