Something I hadn't considered before is that there is an immense industry build up around selling opioids, and Narcan. Other parts of that industry are police, courts, district attorney's, corrections, parole and probation, work release programs, hospital detox, and all the treatment programs out there. If we allowed all the junkies to simply die when they OD, then all the people employed in those industries would be kinda hard pressed to justify their employment.
I realize all the liberals would shout about how we have to save all those souls, but I wonder how loudly they would shout if paying into those industries was on THEIR dime, rather than on everyone's dime. If payments into all those industries and payments for all the narcan was voluntary, I wonder how many people would be coughing up the money to buy more and more narcan rather than just allowing Darwin's theory to run it's course?
If drug use was legal with the understanding that the government would not pay for narcan, I wonder if things would change. Drug addicts would be able to OD without anyone rescuing them from themselves. Why should society continue rescuing people who persist in making self destructive choices? Is it really society's responsibility to rescue people from themselves? And if so, how does society decide at which level of self destructive behavior it will intervene? Will they intervene with steroids, financial decisions, alcohol, driving too fast, being an idiot and doing stupid "hold my beer and watch this" stuff? For those who say only in case of life and death, does society intervene the moment someone heads toward what will eventually be self destructive, or do we wait until they stop breathing?