User Panel
|
Quoted: What kind of yield could a uranium based weapon provide? Is this a Hiroshima potential yield or can it be scaled larger? I would guess that there is nothing more useless than one nuclear weapon. You need multiples, and reliable methods of delivering them to targets. Is the primary reason Iran is developing nuclear weapons to have the capability to use them tactically? If so, against whom can they use them and not get flash fried in response? Is the primary reason a fucked up version of national prestige? Is it a doomsday suicide vest that they can wrap around their own populace to maintain a hold on internal power? By any metric Iran's leadership is woefully incompetent. They appear to specialize in self-inflicted wounds. I feel sad for the people of Iran. The regular slobs, not the elite wackadoos. View Quote And our current administration is using fear mongering to put us back into the bribery deal they made with the Mullahs. |
|
Quoted: Have we ever gotten a drop of oil out of the Middle-East that we didn't have to pay for? View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted: I smell a new war on the horizon. View Quote The question is, what are you prepared to do about it? We are a nation by, of, and for We The People. Although we send others from our ranks to handle matters of Government in Washington, WE ARE THE GOVERNMENT. These motherfuckers are about to go to a foreign land and kill innocent people in your name, for you. The same illegitimately elected leaders that just permanently revoked your ability to choose who replaces them. What are you prepared to do to stop this? |
|
|
Quoted: Not there. Only in brushfire wars, with American troops being used as UN Peacekeepers. The Dems have to at least pay lip service to their far left antiwar nutcases. View Quote No they don’t. Now that the elections are fraudulent they don’t have to give a rats ass what their fringe want or what promises they made. |
|
|
|
Quoted: So Obama sending Iran pallets of our money paid off for their nuclear ambitions and Obama's VP now turned usurper is surprised? I guess the usurper forgot that you don't advertise the creation of an enemy them go to war with them if you want to keep what you have stolen! View Quote |
|
Valerie Jarret - who likely wrote the Iran nuclear deal for Obummer, is spouting off today - NOT about Iran.
Oh no. She’s opining on transgender issues and attacking republican senators: https://news.yahoo.com/valerie-jarrett-decries-sen-cornyn-194855013.html |
|
Quoted: What kind of yield could a uranium based weapon provide? Is this a Hiroshima potential yield or can it be scaled larger? I would guess that there is nothing more useless than one nuclear weapon. You need multiples, and reliable methods of delivering them to targets. Is the primary reason Iran is developing nuclear weapons to have the capability to use them tactically? If so, against whom can they use them and not get flash fried in response? Is the primary reason a fucked up version of national prestige? Is it a doomsday suicide vest that they can wrap around their own populace to maintain a hold on internal power? By any metric Iran's leadership is woefully incompetent. They appear to specialize in self-inflicted wounds. I feel sad for the people of Iran. The regular slobs, not the elite wackadoos. View Quote |
|
Quoted: As someone who is neither israeli nor Iranian, why should I give a shit? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: What I thought too. If they nuke Israel, Israel will nuke Iran more. As someone who is neither israeli nor Iranian, why should I give a shit? because, believe it or not you will be directly affected in a very negative way. |
|
Quoted: What kind of yield could a uranium based weapon provide? Is this a Hiroshima potential yield or can it be scaled larger? I would guess that there is nothing more useless than one nuclear weapon. You need multiples, and reliable methods of delivering them to targets. Is the primary reason Iran is developing nuclear weapons to have the capability to use them tactically? If so, against whom can they use them and not get flash fried in response? Is the primary reason a fucked up version of national prestige? Is it a doomsday suicide vest that they can wrap around their own populace to maintain a hold on internal power? By any metric Iran's leadership is woefully incompetent. They appear to specialize in self-inflicted wounds. I feel sad for the people of Iran. The regular slobs, not the elite wackadoos. View Quote There's only one reason, the same reason as every other nuclear power on the face of the planet: national sovereignty. Without nukes you're Libya or |
|
|
|
Quoted: The only proof that a clandestine nuclear program is a problem has been written in ash on Japanese soil. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: A clandestine nuclear program is a big deal, and problematic. You actually believe that? Why are you here? |
|
|
The international nuclear inspectors said there is nothing to see here. These aren't the drones you are looking for.
|
|
|
Quoted: And our current administration is using fear mongering to put us back into the bribery deal they made with the Mullahs. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: What kind of yield could a uranium based weapon provide? Is this a Hiroshima potential yield or can it be scaled larger? I would guess that there is nothing more useless than one nuclear weapon. You need multiples, and reliable methods of delivering them to targets. Is the primary reason Iran is developing nuclear weapons to have the capability to use them tactically? If so, against whom can they use them and not get flash fried in response? Is the primary reason a fucked up version of national prestige? Is it a doomsday suicide vest that they can wrap around their own populace to maintain a hold on internal power? By any metric Iran's leadership is woefully incompetent. They appear to specialize in self-inflicted wounds. I feel sad for the people of Iran. The regular slobs, not the elite wackadoos. And our current administration is using fear mongering to put us back into the bribery deal they made with the Mullahs. Yep |
|
Quoted: Yep. They need Hezbollah around to harass Israel. This is just them justifying re-entering the Iran deal. “We had to or they’d nuke us...” View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Hah. No. Biden admin is signaling another payoff to Iran. Yep. They need Hezbollah around to harass Israel. This is just them justifying re-entering the Iran deal. “We had to or they’d nuke us...” Iran is our most dangerous rival! |
|
|
same as the old military industrial complex but this time, it's worth dying for.
|
|
|
Quoted: I was answering the question. Out of context doesnt make sense. I am saying that WE had a clandestine nuclear program and that pretending we didnt is silly. The United States likes to use scary words View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You actually believe that? Why are you here? Are you comparing the US in WW2 involved in total world war and a psychotic Iranian regime bent on the destruction of the West and saying they are the same? |
|
Quoted: Are you comparing the US in WW2 involved in total world war and a psychotic Iranian regime bent on the destruction of the West and saying they are the same? View Quote |
|
Quoted: The only proof that a clandestine nuclear program is a problem has been written in ash on Japanese soil. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: A clandestine nuclear program is a big deal, and problematic. No posturing, no threats, no ultimatums, just a very quiet , clear and proven path to a viable, low cost weapons program. To assume that these weapons are being developed as a deterrence is a dangerous assumption. |
|
We should send Nobel peace prize nominee Stacey over there Attached File
|
|
Quoted: We should send Nobel peace prize nominee Stacey over there https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/459941/AFA275D7-4591-465D-980B-8340450CE5E0_jpe-1806395.JPG View Quote Should watch her interview with Colbert, very telling based on her reaction what went down |
|
Quoted: How old is this supposed to be? Biden has been President for only 12 days. Even if within those 12 days he eased up sanctions (and I’m not sure he did), it seems physically impossible that they can suddenly go from years away to weeks away. If Iran is closer to a nuke now than they were two or three years ago, that’s on the previous administration. But this is GD, so logic doesn’t apply. FJB and all. View Quote It's on Obama. |
|
|
|
Quoted: "Secret Nuclear Program" is stupid to begin with. OH FUCKING GEE a nation doing what it wants. Imagine that. Im willing to bet the US had a "Secret Nuclear Program" at one time. And those "Secret Nuclear Sites" WOW such a new concept when its a country we dont like . The rhetoric and propaganda is old news. Iran kicked us tge fuck out in 1979 because they didnt want US influence. Boomers in charge have been pissed since. View Quote Some nations shouldn't be allowed to do as they want. Some, like Iran, are evil actors. |
|
Quoted: It was stupid but I want to make sure you understand thst was Iranian money that had been seized. View Quote And the Iranians seized lots of US assets, stealing from the American owners. So it isn't the case that all that money rightfully belonged to Iran. And Obama sweetened the deal with additional cash. |
|
|
Quoted: I am saying we developed nuclear weapons in secret . And now it is a crime in the eyes of the international community to have a hidden program when the world tells you that you cant. How we always assume the moral high ground as a nation that does the exact same thing our enemies do is crazy. Every example you can ever give of the "bad" things Iran has "done" I can give you American examples in multiples. View Quote You are broken. |
|
Good for them. Let that guy sitting in the chair now, keep giving them our tax $$, just so they can be "our friends,wink, wink.."and see how "by the rules", they play. I'll just sit here, and await the red glow. F Iran and F xiden! Too old now to GAF! 10ring
|
|
Quoted: You are broken. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Pretty soon headlines will read: “Biden White House says Anerican gun owners are weeks from nuclear weapon” View Quote Don't laugh. During the Waco standoff, an interviewer from National Public Radio asked Bob Brown of Soldier of Fortune "if the Branch Davidians could have stolen nuclear weapons from the former Soviet Union". He deadpanned, "Yeah, I guess." It was radio, but you could hear his eyes roll. |
|
Quoted: They wont do shit. This is all about getting a reason to invade a country with oil. Its "pre crime" on a national scale and they are using Israel as a reason to invade a country to keep them in the 19th century View Quote If Iran is in the 19th century, they've jumped ahead a thousand years without anyone noticing. |
|
Hopefully Israel bombs the shit out of Iran's reactor and all associated stuff.
|
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.