User Panel
|
Quoted:
When a lawyer puts stuff in bold, shit is about to get real. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted: Preliminary injunctions are heard quickly. What we file next is going to be epic. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Preliminary injunctions are heard quickly. What we file next is going to be epic. |
|
Good luck, we're all counting on you - Airplane |
|
|
Quoted:
Preliminary injunctions are heard quickly. What we file next is going to be epic. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Briefing scheduled issued. DOJ response 2/1. Our reply due 2/8. Thank you again for what you do. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Preliminary injunctions are heard quickly. What we file next is going to be epic. |
|
I must have been ripped off as a kid....govt. is claiming these are "automatic".
"Mr. Savage’s analogy between the use of a bump stock and the dribbling of a basketball ignores the role played by the constrained space in a bump stock. A bump stock is more akin to a paddle ball, see, e.g., Duncan Hi-Li Paddle Ball Toy, https://www.si.edu/object/nmah_1192020, wherein the ball is constrained in the distance it may travel from the paddle by an attached string, thereby facilitating the ability of the player to control the ball and find the rhythm appropriate for automatically performing the task." Do you think it should be pointed out that from the govt's own website example : "The paddle is attached to a red rubber ball by a thin rubber cord (not a string). The paddle reads “Duncan’s Official Hi-Li, Reg. U.S. Pat. Off., Champion No. 99.” Meaning since the govt example uses a form of spring (rubber cord) their "Hi-Lo Paddle Ball Toy" is analogous to Akins Accelerator not a bump stock... These things are defective! |
|
Does anyone have a link to contribute to Nolo to help defray costs?
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
We file tomorrow. Been working on a reply brief all week. Forgive my lack of posting about it. I’ve been busy writing stuff. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
I must have been ripped off as a kid....govt. is claiming these are "automatic". "Mr. Savage’s analogy between the use of a bump stock and the dribbling of a basketball ignores the role played by the constrained space in a bump stock. A bump stock is more akin to a paddle ball, see, e.g., Duncan Hi-Li Paddle Ball Toy, https://www.si.edu/object/nmah_1192020, wherein the ball is constrained in the distance it may travel from the paddle by an attached string, thereby facilitating the ability of the player to control the ball and find the rhythm appropriate for automatically performing the task." https://ids.si.edu/ids/deliveryService?id=NMAH-AHB2008q04235&max_w=360 Do you think it should be pointed out that from the govt's own website example : "The paddle is attached to a red rubber ball by a thin rubber cord (not a string). The paddle reads “Duncan’s Official Hi-Li, Reg. U.S. Pat. Off., Champion No. 99.” Meaning since the govt example uses a form of spring (rubber cord) their "Hi-Lo Paddle Ball Toy" is analogous to Akins Accelerator not a bump stock... These things are defective! View Quote |
|
We filed our reply today. Had some unexpected other things to take care of but will post up the brief here shortly.
Don’t know if we will have argument or not yet. Will advise when it gets ordered. |
|
And order entered:
MINUTE ORDER scheduling a hearing on the plaintiffs' [5] Motion for Preliminary Injunction at 3:00 p.m. on February 19, 2019. Consistent with the plaintiffs' "Statement Regarding Oral Argument" in their [18] Reply, the parties shall not present any argument on the claims regarding Acting Attorney General Whitaker's appointment. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on February 8, 2019. (lcdlf2) |
|
|
Quoted:
And order entered: MINUTE ORDER scheduling a hearing on the plaintiffs' [5] Motion for Preliminary Injunction at 3:00 p.m. on February 19, 2019. Consistent with the plaintiffs' "Statement Regarding Oral Argument" in their [18] Reply, the parties shall not present any argument on the claims regarding Acting Attorney General Whitaker's appointment. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on February 8, 2019. (lcdlf2) View Quote If i understand correctly, based off of nolos following link. That isnt the argument they are making anyway. Right? |
|
Quoted:
Forgive my ignorance, Whats the significance of this? Is that an order by the court? If i understand correctly, based off of nolos following link. That isnt the argument they are making anyway. Right? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
And order entered: MINUTE ORDER scheduling a hearing on the plaintiffs' [5] Motion for Preliminary Injunction at 3:00 p.m. on February 19, 2019. Consistent with the plaintiffs' "Statement Regarding Oral Argument" in their [18] Reply, the parties shall not present any argument on the claims regarding Acting Attorney General Whitaker's appointment. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on February 8, 2019. (lcdlf2) If i understand correctly, based off of nolos following link. That isnt the argument they are making anyway. Right? |
|
Quoted: I was the first to raise the AG angle. Another firm came in and briefed the stink out of it and the court "related" our cases. I have nothing more to add to to the AG argument and the court has already heard argument on it, so I basically told the court that I had nothing to add to it. So, she took me at my word that we are just there to argue the nuances of our bumpstock case with no further argument on the AG. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Ok got it. Thanks for the clarity. Keep kickin ass... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I was the first to raise the AG angle. Another firm came in and briefed the stink out of it and the court "related" our cases. I have nothing more to add to to the AG argument and the court has already heard argument on it, so I basically told the court that I had nothing to add to it. So, she took me at my word that we are just there to argue the nuances of our bumpstock case with no further argument on the AG. |
|
Quoted:
Some people don’t think I be like I do.... but I do. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I was the first to raise the AG angle. Another firm came in and briefed the stink out of it and the court "related" our cases. I have nothing more to add to to the AG argument and the court has already heard argument on it, so I basically told the court that I had nothing to add to it. So, she took me at my word that we are just there to argue the nuances of our bumpstock case with no further argument on the AG. |
|
Quoted:
Some people don’t think I be like I do.... but I do. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I was the first to raise the AG angle. Another firm came in and briefed the stink out of it and the court "related" our cases. I have nothing more to add to to the AG argument and the court has already heard argument on it, so I basically told the court that I had nothing to add to it. So, she took me at my word that we are just there to argue the nuances of our bumpstock case with no further argument on the AG. We’re grateful for what you do. |
|
View Quote Just letting you know. Thanks again Nolo. |
|
Quoted: I tried to read the filing but the (read here) wasn’t working. Or non existent. Just letting you know. Thanks again Nolo. View Quote Direct to .pdf |
|
Quoted:
I tried to read the filing but the (read here) wasn’t working. Or non existent. Just letting you know. Thanks again Nolo. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
I tried to read the filing but the (read here) wasn’t working. Or non existent. Just letting you know. Thanks again Nolo. |
|
How long does the government have to respond? Seems like they would just take their sweet time and reply in a few months.
I'm clearly not a lawyer. |
|
|
Quoted:
And order entered: MINUTE ORDER scheduling a hearing on the plaintiffs' [5] Motion for Preliminary Injunction at 3:00 p.m. on February 19, 2019. Consistent with the plaintiffs' "Statement Regarding Oral Argument" in their [18] Reply, the parties shall not present any argument on the claims regarding Acting Attorney General Whitaker's appointment. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on February 8, 2019. (lcdlf2) View Quote Illegitimate government officials are off limits? |
|
Quoted: I was the first to raise the AG angle. Another firm came in and briefed the stink out of it and the court “related” our cases. I have nothing more to add to to the AG argument and the court has already heard argument on it, so I basically told the court that I had nothing to add to it. So, she took me at my word that we are just there to argue the nuances of our bumpstock case with no further argument on the AG. View Quote A) You no longer intend to use the AG angle at all or B) You still consider it a valid reason to stop the rule change and are asking for it to be consider by the judge, but you don't have anything to add to the conversation because everything else has already been said. @NoloContendere |
|
Quoted:
For clarity, does this mean: A) You no longer intend to use the AG angle at all or B) You still consider it a valid reason to stop the rule change and are asking for it to be consider by the judge, but you don't have anything to add to the conversation because everything else has already been said. @NoloContendere View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I was the first to raise the AG angle. Another firm came in and briefed the stink out of it and the court “related” our cases. I have nothing more to add to to the AG argument and the court has already heard argument on it, so I basically told the court that I had nothing to add to it. So, she took me at my word that we are just there to argue the nuances of our bumpstock case with no further argument on the AG. A) You no longer intend to use the AG angle at all or B) You still consider it a valid reason to stop the rule change and are asking for it to be consider by the judge, but you don't have anything to add to the conversation because everything else has already been said. @NoloContendere |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I tried to read the filing but the (read here) wasn’t working. Or non existent. Just letting you know. Thanks again Nolo. I’ll wrangle the information somehow. I’m excited to see how the arguments go on the 19th. Good luck and God bless! |
|
Our next "deej" Is going to be that Kangaroo that's suffering from some sort of mental illness.
|
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I tried to read the filing but the (read here) wasn’t working. Or non existent. Just letting you know. Thanks again Nolo. Direct to .pdf |
|
Quoted: B View Quote https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/kisor-v-wilkie/ |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.