User Panel
I have no belief that the cover up of the cover up won't be covered up.
|
|
So if the judge un-redacted it. They should leak by the end of the day I would think.
|
|
Quoted: Lol... 200 posts, only three weeks here... and alleging members you don't agree with are DU plants? you do seem familiar... probably won't last long.... https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/15577/retreadGIF-1707812-2658060.gif View Quote Dude might be a retread but I have no doubt that there are DU members here stirring shit on a regular basis. If not actual DU members they are the equivalent. |
|
|
- Order classified documents containing evidence of criminal behavior declassified.
- Take them with you to Florida. - Dangle them like bait. - Opposition takes the bait hook/line/sinker, colludes to try to seize documents, press charges. - Opposition tries to redact already-declassified documents, use as evidence. - Declassified documents now become evidence in trial, and as-such, public record. - Un-redact/unseal/distribute documents to the public. This was a brilliant trap. Obvious from the start for anyone with two brain-cells to rub together, but brilliant. |
|
|
Lie to .gov agents get prison time.
DOJ get instructions from White House and tells .gov agents the plan and DOJ lies about circus and they go all “nothing to see here, move along”. Totally not political, #believe.govtalkingpointstheywillsaveus. |
|
|
|
Quoted: You know they're not going to answer you. It's a waste of time. It will just be more personal attacks, more accusations that you're "trolling" or "thread sliding" simply because you ask for someone to explain it in their own words. AKA: Your 13 year old = "Best movie of all time. If it doesn't win an award, the system is rigged." Parent = "Can you explain why it's so good? In your own words?" 13 year old = "Just spend 10 minutes watching this youtube commentator talk about it." Parent = "How about you explain the movie in your own words? You seem to think this is a massively important movie, so in your own words, break it down why it's so significant." 13 year old = "Mom!! Stop being combative! So tired of you! Always hassling me! Just go away and leave me alone!! Everyone, ignore my mom!" View Quote Were'nt you outed as a Trump hating retread? Mr Bookmark my thread? |
|
Quoted: So the evidence in the indictment wasn’t true? Fake news? Jack Smith made it all up? Is that the breaking news? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: piles of evidence Apologize So the evidence in the indictment wasn’t true? Fake news? Jack Smith made it all up? Is that the breaking news? Some of it appears to have been fabricated, yes. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: So the evidence in the indictment wasn’t true? Fake news? Jack Smith made it all up? Is that the breaking news? Now you are catching on. Did you see an apology? I didn't see an apology. Attached File |
|
|
Quoted: Dude might be a retread but I have no doubt that there are DU members here stirring shit on a regular basis. If not actual DU members they are the equivalent. View Quote yeah, not disagreeing... there are people who join to stir shit up... on both sides. This one does not appear to even try to fly under the radar though. |
|
Quoted: I think it's more likely about the whole Russia collusion thing. That started with her but would mostly show deep state shenanigans. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: I think it's more likely about the whole Russia collusion thing. That started with her but would mostly show deep state shenanigans. Quoted: I think it's more likely about the whole Russia collusion thing. That started with her but would mostly show deep state shenanigans. Tell me again exactly why he would not share such papers with the world? |
|
Quoted: Some of it appears to have been fabricated, yes. View Quote The government understood that the handling of classified materials is such an esoteric subject that it was very easy to contrive a charge were none existed. This has been proven by the many threads on the subject where even those who have received training on the subject, have a neophyte level understanding of material. This is a perfect example of baffle them with bullshit |
|
You know, I don't even like trump and I can see they have (no Pun) Trumped up so much BS and treid to fabricate so much scandal, that even if dude did do, some dirt, I'd never believe the charges.
Everything I see from them on him I take as a farce and political warfare... |
|
Quoted: The government understood that the handling of classified materials is such an esoteric subject that it was very easy to contrive a charge were none existed. This has been proven by the many threads on the subject where even those who have received training on the subject, have a neophyte level understanding of material. This is a perfect example of baffle them with bullshit View Quote And again, he wasn't ever charged for mishandling classified information. |
|
Quoted: - Order classified documents containing evidence of criminal behavior declassified. - Take them with you to Florida. - Dangle them like bait. - Opposition takes the bait hook/line/sinker, colludes to try to seize documents, press charges. - Opposition tries to redact already-declassified documents, use as evidence. - Declassified documents now become evidence in trial, and as-such, public record. - Un-redact/unseal/distribute documents to the public. This was a brilliant trap. Obvious from the start for anyone with two brain-cells to rub together, but brilliant. View Quote Donald Trump is not that intelligent. This isn’t Blacklist on TV. |
|
Quoted: And again, he wasn't ever charged for mishandling classified information. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The government understood that the handling of classified materials is such an esoteric subject that it was very easy to contrive a charge were none existed. This has been proven by the many threads on the subject where even those who have received training on the subject, have a neophyte level understanding of material. This is a perfect example of baffle them with bullshit And again, he wasn't ever charged for mishandling classified information. At the heart of the issue were questions about classified materials, if it weren’t then the numerous threads on the subject would not be discussing classified materials |
|
Documents will probably get “ accidentally “ deleted before they would get unredacted and released , the punishment for accidentally deleting them far less than punishments for allowing them be possibly prosecuted via releasing them.
|
|
Quoted: Tell me again exactly why he would not share such papers with the world? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I think it's more likely about the whole Russia collusion thing. That started with her but would mostly show deep state shenanigans. Quoted: I think it's more likely about the whole Russia collusion thing. That started with her but would mostly show deep state shenanigans. Tell me again exactly why he would not share such papers with the world? He was going to put it on display at Mar a Lago or his presidential library. |
|
Quoted: The government understood that the handling of classified materials is such an esoteric subject that it was very easy to contrive a charge were none existed. This has been proven by the many threads on the subject where even those who have received training on the subject, have a neophyte level understanding of material. This is a perfect example of baffle them with bullshit View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Some of it appears to have been fabricated, yes. The government understood that the handling of classified materials is such an esoteric subject that it was very easy to contrive a charge were none existed. This has been proven by the many threads on the subject where even those who have received training on the subject, have a neophyte level understanding of material. This is a perfect example of baffle them with bullshit Very similar to ATFs attitude on what constitutes engaging in activities that require a FFL, and why they refuse to release an exact number per year of gun sales that makes you a gun dealer. You could sell 1000 and have no problems, or sell 1, and be labeled a gun dealer . |
|
Quoted: At the heart of the issue were questions about classified materials, if it weren’t then the numerous threads on the subject would not be discussing classified materials View Quote The heart of the issue isn't about classified material. It is that Trump kept stuff that wasn't his to keep, classified or not. And when he was asked to give it back, he didn't. And then when subpoenaed, he lied, hid, and otherwise blocked the government's attempts to take their property back. |
|
To clear up any confusion as to what Special Counsel Jack Smith sought to conceal in classified documents case, this is what Smith told Judge Cannon in Feb 2024 in response to Trump's motion to compel discovery from numerous govt agencies: 1) Defendants are not entitled to discovery of internal government correspondence and memoranda, or to documents that are otherwise privileged. 2) The Court Should Deny Defendants’ Requests for Evidence of 'Improper Coordination with NARA' and of 'Bias and Investigative Misconduct.' 3) The Court Should Deny Defendants’ Requests for Evidence Related to Trump’s Security Clearance With The Department of Energy. 4) The Court Should Deny Defendants’ Requests for Evidence Related to Secure Facilities at President Trump’s Residences. 5) The Court Should Deny Defendants’ Requests for Production of Materials Concerning the Search of Mar-a-Lago. AND FINALLY: 6) Defendants’ Request for Unredacted Discovery of Materials Should Be Denied. |
|
Quoted: You know, I don't even like trump and I can see they have (no Pun) Trumped up so much BS and treid to fabricate so much scandal, that even if dude did do, some dirt, I'd never believe the charges. Everything I see from them on him I take as a farce and political warfare... View Quote |
|
The circular spin logic has started. Another 30 pages of the equivalent of a 3 year old asking why to every answer.
|
|
|
Quoted: You know, I don't even like trump and I can see they have (no Pun) Trumped up so much BS and treid to fabricate so much scandal, that even if dude did do, some dirt, I'd never believe the charges. Everything I see from them on him I take as a farce and political warfare... View Quote Agreed. 99% of all media and most government agencies have been up trumps ass since the day after he started running for office for the 2016 election, simply endless bullshit, fraud, faked evidence to obtain wire taps into his campaign, and endless harassment. I have zero doubt if he had done something criminal or illegal he would have gone to prison long ago. Simply baffling to me how trump haters screech he’s a criminal, when he’s literally been investing 1000x harder, and longer than anyone in history, and even had people paid to claim he raped them and still couldn’t get a win. It’s also terrifying, as the lengths they are willing to get rid of trump, have exposed..to the point the corruption of government has become obvious to even average citizens, exposing… 1. Governments totally corrupt, far far more than anyone could have guessed, especially democrats, and Repubs don’t give a fuck. ( they corrupt too ) 2. Voter fraud exposed as very real and winning elections for democrats, and republicans don’t give a fuck. (Because they are not supposed to win ) 3. Media is fully in government’s pocket, might as well be directly funded via a department of education / propaganda. They cheer lead for approved government action and activities and demonize anything not approved. ( Biden is cheer leaded can do no wrong, while trump demonized and can do no right ) 4. Even using Covid to fully fund a way to undermine the 2020 election via mail in voting, AND make themselves wealthy, by investing in medical stocks, then require everyone to take those medical products, and offer immunity to lawsuits to protect everyone, undermine trust in medical community and media covered for them every step of the way. List goes on and on, but those are good highlights. |
|
Quoted:
To clear up any confusion as to what Special Counsel Jack Smith sought to conceal in classified documents case, this is what Smith told Judge Cannon in Feb 2024 in response to Trump's motion to compel discovery from numerous govt agencies: 1) Defendants are not entitled to discovery of internal government correspondence and memoranda, or to documents that are otherwise privileged. 2) The Court Should Deny Defendants’ Requests for Evidence of 'Improper Coordination with NARA' and of 'Bias and Investigative Misconduct.' 3) The Court Should Deny Defendants’ Requests for Evidence Related to Trump’s Security Clearance With The Department of Energy. 4) The Court Should Deny Defendants’ Requests for Evidence Related to Secure Facilities at President Trump’s Residences. 5) The Court Should Deny Defendants’ Requests for Production of Materials Concerning the Search of Mar-a-Lago. AND FINALLY: 6) Defendants’ Request for Unredacted Discovery of Materials Should Be Denied. View Quote Waiting on our resident underscores to say this is totally normal. |
|
Quoted: So the evidence in the indictment wasn’t true? Fake news? Jack Smith made it all up? Is that the breaking news? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: piles of evidence Apologize So the evidence in the indictment wasn’t true? Fake news? Jack Smith made it all up? Is that the breaking news? yes. that is, in fact, what is happening here more or less |
|
Quoted: It's been a couple hours--still waiting to hear what the big deal is...? You guys fall for this game every time, no matter how many times it fizzles and dies before launch. View Quote It's almost like the leftist intel folks at the 3 letter agencies ran a bunch of "this game" so that people would eventually ignore it when the real thing came out. |
|
|
|
Quoted: F'ing Bullet_sponge and Top_secret rolling up in every single Trump thread to shit it up. View Quote A few years ago, Bullet_Spooge posted another anti-Trump rant. I was bored so I tracked him down from his user name. Turns out he was working for a strongly anti-gun NJ congresswoman at the time (after running against her and losing). Found his FB, Twitter, campaign bio, etc.,. Tracked his rant verbatim back to his Twitter account, etc., and exposed him. One of the admins here sent me a nastygram stating "That's definitely not our bullet_sponge!" and I got an account warning. |
|
Quoted: He was going to put it on display at Mar a Lago or his presidential library. View Quote So he had documents and evidence that was going to blow the lid off the conspiracy between obama, clinton, the DNC, our intelligence agencies, and the media. But he kept it in boxes for a couple years in the bathroom at Mar A Lago, and didn't do anything with it. And then when the NARA started asking for stuff back, he did nothing with it. And then when he was subpoenaed, he still did nothing with it. All because he was waiting to put it in his library. Thats the theory? |
|
Quoted: This is where I am at. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/92687/IMG_6307_jpeg-3196658.JPG https://i.imgur.com/PU1Ph4g.gif View Quote Sad but true. God Bless America regardless... |
|
Quoted: So you seriously think this is just a coincidence??? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Donald Trump is not that intelligent. This isn’t Blacklist on TV. So you seriously think this is just a coincidence??? What part? Do I think he planned this whole thing the way it was wrote out in that post? Absolutely not. Trump is a fucking idiot. He’s not going to take down the deep state by baiting them into reading or entering documents into court and then going “gotcha mother fucker!” He has no power to do anything even if he had done that. He’s just a man now. |
|
Quoted: It's almost like the leftist intel folks at the 3 letter agencies ran a bunch of "this game" so that people would eventually ignore it when the real thing came out. View Quote This seems relevant to bring up again. https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/14/u-s-repeals-propaganda-ban-spreads-government-made-news-to-americans/ |
|
Quoted: So the evidence in the indictment wasn't true? Fake news? Jack Smith made it all up? Is that the breaking news? View Quote |
|
|
Quoted: So he had documents and evidence that was going to blow the lid off the conspiracy between obama, clinton, the DNC, our intelligence agencies, and the media. But he kept it in boxes for a couple years in the bathroom at Mar A Lago, and didn't do anything with it. And then when the NARA started asking for stuff back, he did nothing with it. And then when he was subpoenaed, he still did nothing with it. All because he was waiting to put it in his library. Thats the theory? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: He was going to put it on display at Mar a Lago or his presidential library. So he had documents and evidence that was going to blow the lid off the conspiracy between obama, clinton, the DNC, our intelligence agencies, and the media. But he kept it in boxes for a couple years in the bathroom at Mar A Lago, and didn't do anything with it. And then when the NARA started asking for stuff back, he did nothing with it. And then when he was subpoenaed, he still did nothing with it. All because he was waiting to put it in his library. Thats the theory? Sure, why not? Most of this evidence has already been known. The cover up police were just trying to be the sole owner of the documents so they can determine who gets to see it, which means nobody. |
|
Quoted: Trump is exposing our government to be more corrupt than we ever believed. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/CD5B1B69-9216-403B-9358-C05A3A07987F-482.gif View Quote Throw in the RINOs to this mix Now there's proof that news medias have weekly Friday night gatherings to go over what's to be discussed. All that repetition of word phrases comes from these meetings. |
|
Quoted: A few years ago, Bullet_Spooge posted another anti-Trump rant. I was bored so I tracked him down from his user name. Turns out he was working for a strongly anti-gun NJ congresswoman at the time (after running against her and losing). Found his FB, Twitter, campaign bio, etc.,. Tracked his rant verbatim back to his Twitter account, etc., and exposed him. One of the admins here sent me a nastygram stating "That's definitely not our bullet_sponge!" and I got an account warning. View Quote ARock is that you? |
|
Quoted: So he had documents and evidence that was going to blow the lid off the conspiracy between obama, clinton, the DNC, our intelligence agencies, and the media. But he kept it in boxes for a couple years in the bathroom at Mar A Lago, and didn't do anything with it. And then when the NARA started asking for stuff back, he did nothing with it. And then when he was subpoenaed, he still did nothing with it. All because he was waiting to put it in his library. Thats the theory? View Quote Him, JFK Jr and Q are springing a trap bro. Do your research bro. |
|
I am shocked, SHOCKED I SAY, that the same entities that falsified the Russian collusion hoax again abused their powers for political purposes. Thankfully I was sitting down when I read this BOMBSHELL and UNPRECEDENTED revelation.
And I see the Usual_Suspects are engaging in their usual obfuscation and outright gas lighting. |
|
Quoted: Waiting on our resident underscores to say this is totally normal. View Quote LOL, wait there's more another court case they lost...... this is about special council circumventing the law in order to get and hide presidential communications using an illegal subpoena to gain access.......A lot of information about presidential privilege.. Attached File https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/B8BAD4AB171DABF285258AA6005D0173/ |
|
Quoted: So the evidence in the indictment wasn’t true? Fake news? Jack Smith made it all up? Is that the breaking news? View Quote Well the entire Russian Collusion case was fabricated and the FISA court was lied to repeatedly and no one was held accountable but somehow you think this one is on the up and up. |
|
Quoted: Well the entire Russian Collusion case was fabricated and the FISA court was lied to repeatedly and no one was held accountable but somehow you think this one is on the up and up. View Quote Hey man, M4-AK decided this was BREAKING! All I see is people getting upset over a thread title, which really amounts to nothing more than the executive branch coordinating efforts with a criminal investigation. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.