User Panel
|
|
|
|
Kind of want but will wait for a range report. I had a 16" Ruger SFAR that went back to the mother ship twice for accuracy issues. They wound up replacing the gun but I sold it instead of going down that rabbit hole again.
|
|
|
Quoted:....BCG has some weird silver coating, not sure what it is but it's definitely not hard chrome: View Quote Looks like hard chrome to me. Hard chrome has a dull finish. |
|
I would out a Magpul prs lite stock on there. Would be a perfect fit for that tube.
Now I want one. Guess I will wait and see what Black Friday brings. |
|
|
Quoted: Dude, I really don’t care what you think. It’s not your gun, so why are you so concerned about it? A short .308 is going to pack more of a punch than a BLK, all day every day and it’s not going to drop like a rock after 100 yards. I have one rifle chambered in .300AAC and a half dozen .308’s for a reason - the BLK sucks and with subs it’s even worse. View Quote Seriously lol. That guy wants so badly for someone to agree with him and justify his poor purchases. I almost got caught up in wanting a 300BLK because of how quiet it is, but after looking into it more...ballistics seem like they suck, especially with subs. Not worth the investment in a new caliber. Thanks for the thread, OP! These 13.7" Sabre 10s have really been staring at me lately And I'm not sure how much longer I can resist. |
|
I've been pleased with my 5.56 Sabre upper. Getting about 1.4 MOA with the AAC 75 gr match, and about 2.5 with PMC X-Tac.
Pretty decent for what it is, and only marginally less accurate than my DD. |
|
Quoted: Outstanding write-up! Mind if I plagiarize it when my PSA 16" mid-length rifle gets here today? https://palmettostatearmory.com/media/catalog/product/cache/0423dea8e9791990cba1722182d60508/5/1/5165493400_1_2.jpg View Quote Sure |
|
|
|
Quoted: Not really. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/478694/720320965_172250public_jpeg-3011912.JPG View Quote You're making me want a LPVO |
|
|
Quoted: Run it over a chronograph. You aren’t getting 2500fps out of a 150gr bullet out of a 13.7” barrel. Probably closer to 2300fps. View Quote IIRC, I get 2450 with FGMM 168 gr out of a 16" barrel. Also, this guy says something very similar... I'll bet it's well more than 2500. Another guy. |
|
That's a good looking rifle. When they make one in 6.5 I'll be sorely tempted.
|
|
For those of you who were wondering about the weight:
Attached File 9.4 lbs without the suppressor and magazine |
|
Quoted: This. I suspect the buffer is a standard length (and they opted for a longer RE) instead of a standard RE and the weird short buffers that DPMS used. View Quote I used a LMT AR-15 tube on my 12.5”, it works fine with Slash’s CAR-10 buffer but his .308 buffers are the same size as standard AR-15 carbine buffers A longer buffer might be a problem in a short tube, I dunno for sure cause I’ve never tried it |
|
9 positions is too many lol
I actually like the old Colt tubes that only had four positions with a big gap between positions 1 and 2 I’m either shooting it fully collapsed or fully extended depending on what I’m wearing |
|
|
Had a chance to shoot it today, here are some targets
This was at 25 yards, I was getting the windage dialed in here: Attached File Took it out to 50 yards to adjust the elevation: Attached File This was a 10-shot group at 100 yards: Attached File These were all with an Aimpoint, shooting AAC 168gr SMK’s using the VFG as a monopod on the side of my truck bed. Not bad at all, I’m confident it will do better with an optic off a bench. |
|
Nice gun.......interested to hear how it shoots as I may be in the market for one
|
|
It shoots great, I didn’t even have to adjust the gas block
It was 7 clicks out from fully closed from the factory and that was the perfect setting for suppressed use with 168gr |
|
Quoted: 9 positions is too many lol I actually like the old Colt tubes that only had four positions with a big gap between positions 1 and 2 I’m either shooting it fully collapsed or fully extended depending on what I’m wearing View Quote I wonder if a Vltor Emod would fully collapse? I have a couple of A5 setups and the Emod will fully collapse with them. Regular stocks will not and look just like yours. I normally shoot my rifles two positions out anyway, so no biggy. Good looking rifle with a lot of features! |
|
Quoted: Seriously lol. That guy wants so badly for someone to agree with him and justify his poor purchases. I almost got caught up in wanting a 300BLK because of how quiet it is, but after looking into it more...ballistics seem like they suck, especially with subs. Not worth the investment in a new caliber. Thanks for the thread, OP! These 13.7" Sabre 10s have really been staring at me lately And I'm not sure how much longer I can resist. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Dude, I really don’t care what you think. It’s not your gun, so why are you so concerned about it? A short .308 is going to pack more of a punch than a BLK, all day every day and it’s not going to drop like a rock after 100 yards. I have one rifle chambered in .300AAC and a half dozen .308’s for a reason - the BLK sucks and with subs it’s even worse. Seriously lol. That guy wants so badly for someone to agree with him and justify his poor purchases. I almost got caught up in wanting a 300BLK because of how quiet it is, but after looking into it more...ballistics seem like they suck, especially with subs. Not worth the investment in a new caliber. Thanks for the thread, OP! These 13.7" Sabre 10s have really been staring at me lately And I'm not sure how much longer I can resist. Not at all. I own two AR-10’s. One with an 18” barrel and one with a 16” barrel. The velocity difference between those two is substantial. Never mind comparing them to my 24” Vanguard. If the 13.7” barrel is what OP wants then more power (actually less..) to him. |
|
Get Slash's Heavy Buffer + a milspec extension if you want to collapse the stock.
Rig looks awesome. |
|
|
Quoted: Had a chance to shoot it today, here are some targets This was at 25 yards, I was getting the windage dialed in here: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/498043/IMG_9705_jpeg-3014606.JPG Took it out to 50 yards to adjust the elevation: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/498043/IMG_9704_jpeg-3014608.JPG This was a 10-shot group at 100 yards: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/498043/IMG_9706_jpeg-3014614.JPG These were all with an Aimpoint, shooting AAC 168gr SMK's using the VFG as a monopod on the side of my truck bed. Not bad at all, I'm confident it will do better with an optic off a bench. View Quote |
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: 9 positions is too many lol I actually like the old Colt tubes that only had four positions with a big gap between positions 1 and 2 I’m either shooting it fully collapsed or fully extended depending on what I’m wearing I’d agree that even 6 is excessive https://media.tenor.com/w_7Y38ld4r8AAAAC/ruby-rhod.gif Ya apparently |
|
lol at all the people offended by the OP’s rifle. Some of us like having options.
Nice stick OP! |
|
Quoted: That’s weird, it looks nothing like the chrome on my Young Mfg carriers. It almost feels like it’s powder coated. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: @797hp website states this..."Bolt Carrier Finish: Hard Chrome Finish" That’s weird, it looks nothing like the chrome on my Young Mfg carriers. It almost feels like it’s powder coated. weird, The rifle looks awesome! this post now has me wanting one pretty bad. |
|
Quoted: For those of you who were wondering about the weight: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/498043/IMG_9694_jpeg-3012477.JPG 9.4 lbs without the suppressor and magazine View Quote Ok, but you said a suppressor will be on it 100% of the time, and when will you not have at least a 10 round magazine in it during use? Your data is flawed. |
|
Quoted: Ok, but you said a suppressor will be on it 100% of the time, and when will you not have at least a 10 round magazine in it during use? Your data is flawed. View Quote Cool story, Karen. People asked for the weight of the gun, not the weight of the gun with the silencer. I don’t even own any 10-round mags, you can go look up magazine weights on your own fucking time. Don’t like it? You should cry about it on the internet. Oh, wait… |
|
Quoted: It shoots great, I didn't even have to adjust the gas block It was 7 clicks out from fully closed from the factory and that was the perfect setting for suppressed use with 168gr View Quote |
|
Quoted: Relatively new to suppressed shooting. So far only on bolt gun. Adjusting gas block - is that for function or muzzle velocity? Maybe stupid question but it's one way to learn. View Quote Suppressors can increase back pressure This can result in overgassing and increased bolt carrier speed My 12.5” does not have an adjustable gas block and the carrier was cycling so fast, I was getting stovepipes because the case didn’t have enough time to fully exit the ejection port before the bolt slammed back into battery On that gun I had to install a BRT gas tube to restrict the gas, after that it cycles perfectly An adjustable gas block does the same thing, if your gun is over gassed with the suppressor you can dial it down to control the amount of gas entering the gas tube |
|
Quoted: Outstanding write-up! Mind if I plagiarize it when my PSA 16" mid-length rifle gets here today? https://palmettostatearmory.com/media/catalog/product/cache/0423dea8e9791990cba1722182d60508/5/1/5165493400_1_2.jpg View Quote That is my favorite AR set up, got three of them. Light, handy, well balanced and superior gas length. |
|
Quoted: Ok, but you said a suppressor will be on it 100% of the time, and when will you not have at least a 10 round magazine in it during use? Your data is flawed. View Quote My turn to nitpick: The word "data" is plural for datum. Therefore, the correct sentences would be, "Your data are flawed," or "Your datum is flawed." |
|
Quoted: My turn to nitpick: The word "data" is plural for datum. Therefore, the correct syntax would be, "Your data are flawed." View Quote lol That guy is a troll, he talks shit in every thread he posts in When a gun manufacturer lists the weight of one of their rifles, do they include a magazine? Yeah I didn’t think so |
|
That is a fine looking rifle, OP.
Let us know how she performs. |
|
I posted a few targets on this page
I could only take it to 100 yards, when I get a chance I’ll stretch it out to some longer distances |
|
Quoted: Kind of want but will wait for a range report. I had a 16" Ruger SFAR that went back to the mother ship twice for accuracy issues. They wound up replacing the gun but I sold it instead of going down that rabbit hole again. View Quote what accuracy were you seeing that you sent it back? |
|
Nice rifle op! Might give one of these a try
Maybe next time do a poll to see what the snowflakes want you to buy |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.