User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 12:39:26 AM EDT
[#1]
Meh, given Russias track record in the middle east and that the IAF has HARM's, F35's, and the ability to fly over the SA-22's engagement ceiling this thing will be dead within 30 seconds of turning on its radar. It's a point defense ADA/SAM system. It'll give helicopters and low flying aircraft a hard time if it can detect them but unless it's used in conjunction with a broader IADS network with high altitude deterence capability it's a sitting duck if they ever try to use it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 12:43:23 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Does Gaza have an airport that could even receive something like this? EDIT: I’m an idiot; glossed over “hezbollah”  Lol. What a dummy. So did I. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 12:44:18 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Works for me Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Why are we surprised? We gave some "junk" weapons to Ukraine. Surely, they are returning the favor. Works for me Huh, another brand new pro-Putin account.  What Are The Odds of THAT? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 12:44:35 AM EDT
[#4]
Russia will surrender any day now.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 12:49:31 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Russia will surrender any day now. In Lebanon? To whom? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 12:53:32 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: While I know you are being stupid with this question... The second order effect of us arming the Ukranian forces who are killing thousands of Russians...is that the Russians now very much want thousands of dead Americans. They will arm and equip people who promise to hurt America and its allies. Way to go Uke Bro!!! Now we are all less safe. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Why would Russia aid a group that is backed by Iran and killed hundreds of American and French soldiers in Beirut? While I know you are being stupid with this question... The second order effect of us arming the Ukranian forces who are killing thousands of Russians...is that the Russians now very much want thousands of dead Americans. They will arm and equip people who promise to hurt America and its allies. Way to go Uke Bro!!! Now we are all less safe. Seriously? How old are you? Russia has been killing Americans since Korea and Vietnam. You’re being utterly delusional and dishonest. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 12:55:44 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Russians flew combat missions against USN and Airforce in Korea. Quoted: The soviet union included ukraine at the time  You seem a bit weak in Geography. Is the Kremlin in Moscow or Kiev ? Or do you somehow believe that mean old Kiev was bossing around poor little Moscow & forcing the peaceful & innocent Russians do ... bad things Bigger_Hammer  |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 12:56:26 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 12:57:00 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So Russia claims to invade Ukraine to remove Nazis but are cool with Arming people that actually want to genocide the Jews In the Slavic mind the connection between anti-Semitism and Nazism isn’t the thing that it is for us. The Russians believe that Nazism is simply hostility to Russia and other Slavs think Nazi symbols are what you wear when you kill Russians. Russia is only slightly behind the Nazis when it comes to violence against Jews. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 1:01:37 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. So…the only way the Russians have ever occupied a US fighting position is…the US left it willingly and the Russians scurried in? Sounds about right. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 7:46:36 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:20:07 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:23:29 AM EDT
[#13]
This is bullshit, Russia ran out of all its weapons and ammo over a year ago.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:34:47 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. Never heard of them. Neither relevant nor “ironic” (not sure you used that word properly) Nor is there any “propaganda” being cited or debunked in this discussion. It’s simply Russian information from Russia. There’s no need to cite ANYTHING to prove that the Russian site is a Russian site and is influenced by Russia. It’s undeniable. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:38:47 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Never heard of them. . There’s no need to cite ANYTHING to prove that the Russian site is a Russian site. It’s undeniable. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. Never heard of them. . There’s no need to cite ANYTHING to prove that the Russian site is a Russian site. It’s undeniable. Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:41:30 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. Never heard of them. . There’s no need to cite ANYTHING to prove that the Russian site is a Russian site. It’s undeniable. Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey Why would anyone care about that and want to go down that “rabbit hole”? That’s gross. A Russian source is a Russian source. Period. No one is debating propaganda, we’re just laughing at the clumsy use of Russian sources and subsequent denials. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:44:56 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey Whataboutism |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:45:23 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Why would anyone care about that? A Russian source is a Russian source. Period. No one is debating propaganda, we’re just laughing at the clumsy use of Russian sources and subsequent denials. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. Never heard of them. . There’s no need to cite ANYTHING to prove that the Russian site is a Russian site. It’s undeniable. Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey Why would anyone care about that? A Russian source is a Russian source. Period. No one is debating propaganda, we’re just laughing at the clumsy use of Russian sources and subsequent denials. Here is a hint useful for maintaining credibility don’t cite propaganda to debunk propaganda |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:47:25 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Here is a hint useful for maintaining credibility don’t cite propaganda to debunk propaganda Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. Never heard of them. . There’s no need to cite ANYTHING to prove that the Russian site is a Russian site. It’s undeniable. Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey Why would anyone care about that? A Russian source is a Russian source. Period. No one is debating propaganda, we’re just laughing at the clumsy use of Russian sources and subsequent denials. Here is a hint useful for maintaining credibility don’t cite propaganda to debunk propaganda Here’s a hint: read thread before posting no one is “debunking propaganda” |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:47:30 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey Whataboutism Whataboutism is term invented by people to deflect from either their hypocrisy or lack of knowledge Just about anyone who makes the statement knows they have no rebuttal, it’s the equivalent of calling someone racist, or today’s equivalent a “Russian agent” |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:48:00 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Here’s a hint: read before posting no one is “debunking propaganda” Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. Never heard of them. . There’s no need to cite ANYTHING to prove that the Russian site is a Russian site. It’s undeniable. Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey Why would anyone care about that? A Russian source is a Russian source. Period. No one is debating propaganda, we’re just laughing at the clumsy use of Russian sources and subsequent denials. Here is a hint useful for maintaining credibility don’t cite propaganda to debunk propaganda Here’s a hint: read before posting no one is “debunking propaganda” Here is a hint, you are citing propaganda. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:50:28 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Putin is anti-woke, hates gays and stands up for traditional family values. He's a true Saint and protector of Christendom. His values are totally in line with Western culture & civilization. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: But some GD peeps love Russia! Putin is anti-woke, hates gays and stands up for traditional family values. He's a true Saint and protector of Christendom. His values are totally in line with Western culture & civilization. Well, honestly, probably more then a significant amount of our own politicians and the president. And it pains me to say that, but it's an honest evaluation. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:51:19 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Here is a hint, you are citing propaganda. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. Never heard of them. . There’s no need to cite ANYTHING to prove that the Russian site is a Russian site. It’s undeniable. Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey Why would anyone care about that? A Russian source is a Russian source. Period. No one is debating propaganda, we’re just laughing at the clumsy use of Russian sources and subsequent denials. Here is a hint useful for maintaining credibility don’t cite propaganda to debunk propaganda Here’s a hint: read before posting no one is “debunking propaganda” Here is a hint, you are citing propaganda. Did I post anything that was untrue or even inaccurate? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:51:45 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Well, honestly, probably more then a significant amount of our own politicians and the president. And it pains me to say that, but it's an honest evaluation. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: But some GD peeps love Russia! Putin is anti-woke, hates gays and stands up for traditional family values. He's a true Saint and protector of Christendom. His values are totally in line with Western culture & civilization. Well, honestly, probably more then a significant amount of our own politicians and the president. And it pains me to say that, but it's an honest evaluation. Unfortunately that is true. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:52:45 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Did I post anything that was untrue or even inaccurate? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. Never heard of them. . There’s no need to cite ANYTHING to prove that the Russian site is a Russian site. It’s undeniable. Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey Why would anyone care about that? A Russian source is a Russian source. Period. No one is debating propaganda, we’re just laughing at the clumsy use of Russian sources and subsequent denials. Here is a hint useful for maintaining credibility don’t cite propaganda to debunk propaganda Here’s a hint: read before posting no one is “debunking propaganda” Here is a hint, you are citing propaganda. Did I post anything that was untrue or even inaccurate? you cite propaganda while making fun of making fun of someone citing propaganda That is strait up clown shoes. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:53:55 AM EDT
[#26]
Don't get me wrong, but I never have liked the Russians except for some of their finer ass women.
However, can't blame them for what their doing now. Would be surprised at this point if they set back on this one and did nothing. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:55:07 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: you cite propaganda while making fun of making fun of someone citing propaganda That is strait up clown shoes. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. Never heard of them. . There’s no need to cite ANYTHING to prove that the Russian site is a Russian site. It’s undeniable. Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey Why would anyone care about that? A Russian source is a Russian source. Period. No one is debating propaganda, we’re just laughing at the clumsy use of Russian sources and subsequent denials. Here is a hint useful for maintaining credibility don’t cite propaganda to debunk propaganda Here’s a hint: read before posting no one is “debunking propaganda” Here is a hint, you are citing propaganda. Did I post anything that was untrue or even inaccurate? you cite propaganda while making fun of making fun of someone citing propaganda That is strait up clown shoes. I’m not making fun of someone for posting propaganda. I’m making fun of someone for using Russian sources that are biased towards Russia. That’s not propaganda, that’s just bring straightforward. Again, did I cite anything that is false or inaccurate? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:56:30 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Whataboutism is term invented by people to deflect from either their hypocrisy or lack of knowledge Just about anyone who makes the statement knows they have no rebuttal, it’s the equivalent of calling someone racist, or today’s equivalent a “Russian agent” If you ever wonder why people accuse you of being a Russian agent, maybe consider that here you are carrying their vodka in a topic about Russia supporting Islamic terrorism. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 8:59:39 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I’m not making fun of someone for posting propaganda. I’m making fun of someone for using Russian sources. Again, did I cite anything that is false or inaccurate? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. Never heard of them. . There’s no need to cite ANYTHING to prove that the Russian site is a Russian site. It’s undeniable. Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey Why would anyone care about that? A Russian source is a Russian source. Period. No one is debating propaganda, we’re just laughing at the clumsy use of Russian sources and subsequent denials. Here is a hint useful for maintaining credibility don’t cite propaganda to debunk propaganda Here’s a hint: read before posting no one is “debunking propaganda” Here is a hint, you are citing propaganda. Did I post anything that was untrue or even inaccurate? you cite propaganda while making fun of making fun of someone citing propaganda That is strait up clown shoes. I’m not making fun of someone for posting propaganda. I’m making fun of someone for using Russian sources. Again, did I cite anything that is false or inaccurate? Your contention is if it is a Russian site, it is got be propaganda, and propaganda is false. And to prove it is a Russia site, you cite a Clinton associate run US propaganda site. While not apply the same rule, can you not see the lack of consistency? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 9:00:03 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If you ever wonder why people accuse you of being a Russian agent, maybe consider that here you are carrying their vodka in a topic about Russia supporting Islamic terrorism. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Whataboutism is term invented by people to deflect from either their hypocrisy or lack of knowledge Just about anyone who makes the statement knows they have no rebuttal, it’s the equivalent of calling someone racist, or today’s equivalent a “Russian agent” If you ever wonder why people accuse you of being a Russian agent, maybe consider that here you are carrying their vodka in a topic about Russia supporting Islamic terrorism. Anyone who accuses R0N of being a “Russian agent” is an idiot. However, it is ironic that he defends the guy pushing the Russian perspective that attempts to diminish that combat success of Marines in Syria. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 9:01:06 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If you ever wonder why people accuse you of being a Russian agent, maybe consider that here you are carrying their vodka in a topic about Russia supporting Islamic terrorism. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Whataboutism is term invented by people to deflect from either their hypocrisy or lack of knowledge Just about anyone who makes the statement knows they have no rebuttal, it’s the equivalent of calling someone racist, or today’s equivalent a “Russian agent” If you ever wonder why people accuse you of being a Russian agent, maybe consider that here you are carrying their vodka in a topic about Russia supporting Islamic terrorism. Because there are a lot stupid, illogical, people in the world. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 9:02:32 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Your contention is if it is a Russian site, it is got be propaganda, and propaganda is false. And to prove it is a Russia site, you cite a Clinton associate run US propaganda site. While not apply the same rule, can you not see the lack of consistency? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. Never heard of them. . There’s no need to cite ANYTHING to prove that the Russian site is a Russian site. It’s undeniable. Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey Why would anyone care about that? A Russian source is a Russian source. Period. No one is debating propaganda, we’re just laughing at the clumsy use of Russian sources and subsequent denials. Here is a hint useful for maintaining credibility don’t cite propaganda to debunk propaganda Here’s a hint: read before posting no one is “debunking propaganda” Here is a hint, you are citing propaganda. Did I post anything that was untrue or even inaccurate? you cite propaganda while making fun of making fun of someone citing propaganda That is strait up clown shoes. I’m not making fun of someone for posting propaganda. I’m making fun of someone for using Russian sources. Again, did I cite anything that is false or inaccurate? Your contention is if it is a Russian site, it is got be propaganda, and propaganda is false. And to prove it is a Russia site, you cite a Clinton associate run US propaganda site. While not apply the same rule, can you not see the lack of consistency? I made no such contention, whatsoever. That is a falsehood. My contention is that it was a Russian source found on a Russian search engine used by Russians to push a pro-Russian perspective -period. That’s not propaganda. I did not question whether it was true or false. I don’t care. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 9:03:02 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Anyone who accuses R0N of being a “Russian agent” is an idiot. However, it is ironic that he defends the guy pushing the Russian perspective that attempts to diminish that combat success of Marines in Syria. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Whataboutism is term invented by people to deflect from either their hypocrisy or lack of knowledge Just about anyone who makes the statement knows they have no rebuttal, it’s the equivalent of calling someone racist, or today’s equivalent a “Russian agent” If you ever wonder why people accuse you of being a Russian agent, maybe consider that here you are carrying their vodka in a topic about Russia supporting Islamic terrorism. Anyone who accuses R0N of being a “Russian agent” is an idiot. However, it is ironic that he defends the guy pushing the Russian perspective that attempts to diminish that combat success of Marines in Syria. It probably is Russian, but I would NEVER use anything from the Hamilton project. If they claimed DC as the U.S. capital, I would double check that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 9:04:44 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I made no such contention, whatsoever. That is a falsehood. My contention is that it was a Russian source found on a Russian search engine used by Russians to push a pro-Russian perspective -period. That’s not propaganda. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. Never heard of them. . There’s no need to cite ANYTHING to prove that the Russian site is a Russian site. It’s undeniable. Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey Why would anyone care about that? A Russian source is a Russian source. Period. No one is debating propaganda, we’re just laughing at the clumsy use of Russian sources and subsequent denials. Here is a hint useful for maintaining credibility don’t cite propaganda to debunk propaganda Here’s a hint: read before posting no one is “debunking propaganda” Here is a hint, you are citing propaganda. Did I post anything that was untrue or even inaccurate? you cite propaganda while making fun of making fun of someone citing propaganda That is strait up clown shoes. I’m not making fun of someone for posting propaganda. I’m making fun of someone for using Russian sources. Again, did I cite anything that is false or inaccurate? Your contention is if it is a Russian site, it is got be propaganda, and propaganda is false. And to prove it is a Russia site, you cite a Clinton associate run US propaganda site. While not apply the same rule, can you not see the lack of consistency? I made no such contention, whatsoever. That is a falsehood. My contention is that it was a Russian source found on a Russian search engine used by Russians to push a pro-Russian perspective -period. That’s not propaganda. You do that by citing the Hamilton project, which is a known U.S. disinformation site, that has been proven time and time again to see Russians behind ever bush. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 9:06:28 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You do that by citing the Hamilton project, which is a known U.S. disinformation site, that has been proven time and time again to see Russians behind ever bush. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. Never heard of them. . There’s no need to cite ANYTHING to prove that the Russian site is a Russian site. It’s undeniable. Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey Why would anyone care about that? A Russian source is a Russian source. Period. No one is debating propaganda, we’re just laughing at the clumsy use of Russian sources and subsequent denials. Here is a hint useful for maintaining credibility don’t cite propaganda to debunk propaganda Here’s a hint: read before posting no one is “debunking propaganda” Here is a hint, you are citing propaganda. Did I post anything that was untrue or even inaccurate? you cite propaganda while making fun of making fun of someone citing propaganda That is strait up clown shoes. I’m not making fun of someone for posting propaganda. I’m making fun of someone for using Russian sources. Again, did I cite anything that is false or inaccurate? Your contention is if it is a Russian site, it is got be propaganda, and propaganda is false. And to prove it is a Russia site, you cite a Clinton associate run US propaganda site. While not apply the same rule, can you not see the lack of consistency? I made no such contention, whatsoever. That is a falsehood. My contention is that it was a Russian source found on a Russian search engine used by Russians to push a pro-Russian perspective -period. That’s not propaganda. You do that by citing the Hamilton project, which is a known U.S. disinformation site, that has been proven time and time again to see Russians behind ever bush. R0N, there ARE Russians hiding behind Russian bushes in Russia. A Russian video found on a Russian website via a Russian search engine. This isn’t debatable. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 9:08:23 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: R0N, there ARE Russians hiding behind Russian bushes in Russia. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. Never heard of them. . There’s no need to cite ANYTHING to prove that the Russian site is a Russian site. It’s undeniable. Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey Why would anyone care about that? A Russian source is a Russian source. Period. No one is debating propaganda, we’re just laughing at the clumsy use of Russian sources and subsequent denials. Here is a hint useful for maintaining credibility don’t cite propaganda to debunk propaganda Here’s a hint: read before posting no one is “debunking propaganda” Here is a hint, you are citing propaganda. Did I post anything that was untrue or even inaccurate? you cite propaganda while making fun of making fun of someone citing propaganda That is strait up clown shoes. I’m not making fun of someone for posting propaganda. I’m making fun of someone for using Russian sources. Again, did I cite anything that is false or inaccurate? Your contention is if it is a Russian site, it is got be propaganda, and propaganda is false. And to prove it is a Russia site, you cite a Clinton associate run US propaganda site. While not apply the same rule, can you not see the lack of consistency? I made no such contention, whatsoever. That is a falsehood. My contention is that it was a Russian source found on a Russian search engine used by Russians to push a pro-Russian perspective -period. That’s not propaganda. You do that by citing the Hamilton project, which is a known U.S. disinformation site, that has been proven time and time again to see Russians behind ever bush. R0N, there ARE Russians hiding behind Russian bushes in Russia. If the Hamilton project said that, I would have to double check |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 9:11:33 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If the Hamilton project said that, I would have to double check Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. I asked how YOU found it. Now we know. ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? lol, you kept editing that post to make it more and more dramatic Again, yandex is a good place to find originals and primary sources when google just shows you the news link version. And this guy might show up to larp with you. It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ The irony of citing Hamilton 2.0 to debunk propaganda They are revamp of Hamilton 68. Which were the ones who pushed the Russian stealing the 2016 narrative, and also are trying to disbar attorneys supporting Trump. Never heard of them. . There’s no need to cite ANYTHING to prove that the Russian site is a Russian site. It’s undeniable. Just go down that rabbit hole and see they produce as much propaganda as the Russians and if I remember right is run by a Clinton lackey Why would anyone care about that? A Russian source is a Russian source. Period. No one is debating propaganda, we’re just laughing at the clumsy use of Russian sources and subsequent denials. Here is a hint useful for maintaining credibility don’t cite propaganda to debunk propaganda Here’s a hint: read before posting no one is “debunking propaganda” Here is a hint, you are citing propaganda. Did I post anything that was untrue or even inaccurate? you cite propaganda while making fun of making fun of someone citing propaganda That is strait up clown shoes. I’m not making fun of someone for posting propaganda. I’m making fun of someone for using Russian sources. Again, did I cite anything that is false or inaccurate? Your contention is if it is a Russian site, it is got be propaganda, and propaganda is false. And to prove it is a Russia site, you cite a Clinton associate run US propaganda site. While not apply the same rule, can you not see the lack of consistency? I made no such contention, whatsoever. That is a falsehood. My contention is that it was a Russian source found on a Russian search engine used by Russians to push a pro-Russian perspective -period. That’s not propaganda. You do that by citing the Hamilton project, which is a known U.S. disinformation site, that has been proven time and time again to see Russians behind ever bush. R0N, there ARE Russians hiding behind Russian bushes in Russia. If the Hamilton project said that, I would have to double check I’ve never heard of the Hamilton project, so I guess I wouldn’t be confused about whether a Russian company in Russia is Russia, just because they said it. I just googled the Russian company. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 9:21:31 AM EDT
[#38]
Hezbollass is a proxy terrorist group of Iranian mullahs. Iranian mullahs dictatorship is a proxy terrorist regime of the Russians.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 9:27:28 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Hezbollass is a proxy terrorist group of Iranian mullahs. Quote HistoryQuoted: Hezbollass is a proxy terrorist group of Iranian mullahs. Iranian mullahs dictatorship is a proxy terrorist regime of the Russians. Not really. They are mutually supportive. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 11:02:04 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Lol. I knew this shit would start happening after all the aid we supplied Ukraine. Did you hiberate between 1920 and 2022?? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 11:06:01 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: True Not really. They are mutually supportive. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Hezbollass is a proxy terrorist group of Iranian mullahs. Iranian mullahs dictatorship is a proxy terrorist regime of the Russians. Not really. They are mutually supportive. Yep and probably the actual string puller speaks with a much Asian voice. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 11:17:22 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ Well, you were asking where to find that russian gopro video from syria.Turns out its on a Russian site. Next you might discover that the weather channel has a shocking pro-weather bias. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 11:34:58 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Hezbollass Get them some subarus instead of toyota pickups, and they'd be lezbollah |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 11:45:21 AM EDT
[#44]
All the more reason for Israel to get shit done now.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 11:52:03 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yandex? You post a Russian search engine to show how easily one would come across your Russian link? Umm…  What American would EVER do that? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Post the link to the search YOU used to find the video YOU posted: https://my.mail.ru/mail/tatyna-a1/video/41793/63381.html C’mon, you can do it. That link came from somewhere. Can't tell if I am being epic trolled or if roman statues are hard headed! Answer is right there in the post. Third line. That link is the first result. Yandex? You post a Russian search engine to show how easily one would come across your Russian link? Umm… What American would EVER do that? I have suspected for a while that there're quite a few russian moles infecting GD. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 12:24:13 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Well, you were asking where to find that russian gopro video from syria.Turns out its on a Russian site. Next you might discover that the weather channel has a shocking pro-weather bias. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: It’s a Russian site Russians use to find Russian stuff. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/how-russias-leading-search-engine-spreads-kremlin-propaganda-on-ukraine-introducing-asds-yandex-dashboard/ Well, you were asking where to find that russian gopro video from syria.Turns out its on a Russian site. Next you might discover that the weather channel has a shocking pro-weather bias. No. I asked where did YOU find it. Not where could one find it. There’s no need to explain. It’s obvious and straightforward. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 12:31:06 PM EDT
[#47]
Wow this thread filled up fast with the usual people afraid of their own shadow
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 12:32:21 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Wow this thread filled up fast with the usual people afraid of their own shadow Shadows are globohomo. Be afraid. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 12:35:02 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Did you hiberate between 1920 and 2022?? Although Russia dominated the USSR I personally stick to post USSR antics like Moscow circumventing sanctions on Iran and North Korea pre 2022 for example. In my view Russia has not been #1 on our shit list compared to China but we’ve been at loggerheads with Moscow in one way or another since the 90s. Then Obama came along mocked Romney on Russia and isis as a JV team. Anyway I prefer to seperate the USSR from Russia |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 12:35:53 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No. I asked where did YOU find it. Not where could one find it. There’s no need to explain. It’s obvious and straightforward. You made an almost identical post on the last page. This is starting to sound like forced, generic dialogue out of a novel. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
