User Panel
Posted: 10/29/2022 8:35:36 PM EDT
Did you know who it was? I hadn't heard his name until today. Strange that the Identify of the Dobbs VS Jackson Women's Health Decision is being withheld by the media yet it's been know since May.
Corporate media is protecting the identity of the prime suspect in the SCOTUS leak scandal by pretending they don't know his name. For six months corporate media has been gaslighting the American people about the identity of the individual who is suspected of leaking the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization draft decision. Hours after Politico published it the identity of the alleged leaker had spread like wildfire throughout Washington but corporate media universally decided not to report they had decided to protect the identity of the leaker. In fact, over the past six months, they have published story after story speculating about the identity of the leaker without ever mentioning the one name that they believe is the alleged leaker. View Quote Who is Amit Jain? Social Media 'Identifies' Clerk Behind Supreme Court Abortion Law Leak; Investigation On published May 4th Though the identity of the SCOTUS leaker was not released by the authorities, a section of social media users suggested that it a Supreme Court clerk named Amit Jain who was behind the historic leak. The speculation gained momentum after Matt Wolking, a Republican advisor and strategist, suggested Jain's name as the person responsible for the leak. "A person called Amit Jain clerks for Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. As a Yale student, Jain blasted Yale for supporting Brett Kavanaugh's nomination. Jain was quoted in a 2017 Politico piece by Josh Gerstein. Today, Gerstein published the draft SCOTUS opinion on Roe," read the tweet. View Quote |
|
Yeah hadn't even heard the person was identified - no real surprise there but man, can we stop with this Jan 2nd shit. I guess I will hear about that the rest of my life.
|
|
|
|
Maybe the Media wants to be SURE of what they are "claiming" BEFORE publication & broadcasting an "Allegation" naming a specific person ...
Something something something Defamation Lawsuit something something something... Besides - nothing going to change as the Leak is already Old News - what will matter is if the Supreme Court & Justice Department can confirm the "allegation" and then bring whatever charges are appropriate against that person(s). Bigger_Hammer |
|
Quoted: Maybe the Media wants to be SURE of what they are "claiming" BEFORE publication & broadcasting an "Allegation" naming a specific person ... Something something something Defamation Lawsuit something something something... Besides - nothing going to change as the Leak is already Old News - what will matter is if the Supreme Court & Justice Department can confirm the "allegation" and then bring whatever charges are appropriate against that person(s). Bigger_Hammer View Quote The same media that was balls deep in "Russian collision?" That media? Attached File |
|
Quoted: And Google makes no suggestions on the search. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/61099/Untitled_png-2581087.JPG View Quote WHen I did that it suggested.. amit jain us supreme court amit jain linkedin supreme court |
|
|
It seems Communists from India have been causing a lot of problems in this country lately.
|
|
Quoted: Maybe the Media wants to be SURE of what they are "claiming" BEFORE publication & broadcasting an "Allegation" naming a specific person ... Something something something Defamation Lawsuit something something something... Besides - nothing going to change as the Leak is already Old News - what will matter is if the Supreme Court & Justice Department can confirm the "allegation" and then bring whatever charges are appropriate against that person(s). Bigger_Hammer View Quote How did George Zimmerman’s lawsuit against NBC go, again? |
|
Quoted: Maybe the Media wants to be SURE of what they are "claiming" BEFORE publication & broadcasting an "Allegation" naming a specific person ... Something something something Defamation Lawsuit something something something... Besides - nothing going to change as the Leak is already Old News - what will matter is if the Supreme Court & Justice Department can confirm the "allegation" and then bring whatever charges are appropriate against that person(s). Bigger_Hammer View Quote Yes. That precedent has been set. Christmas Parade runner over guy Nick Sandman Kenosha Kid etc |
|
If this is real, why haven’t the SCOTUS judges that were threatened come forward?
|
|
|
|
View Quote Be a real shame |
|
Quoted: Maybe the Media wants to be SURE of what they are "claiming" BEFORE publication & broadcasting an "Allegation" naming a specific person ... Something something something Defamation Lawsuit something something something... Besides - nothing going to change as the Leak is already Old News - what will matter is if the Supreme Court & Justice Department can confirm the "allegation" and then bring whatever charges are appropriate against that person(s). Bigger_Hammer View Quote I mean maybe, but it would be literally the first time in the last 20 years. |
|
|
|
It just means the leak was intentional. Protecting the leak so he doesn't tell who gave him the task. It might be embarrassing for a protected class of judge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Well, by the name I'm guessing he was raised a member of the Jainist religion, which isn't Hindu. Jainism is very anti-abortion, which means he is a pretty terrible Jainist, assuming he even identifies as such. Jains aren't supposed to even kill insects. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: A Hindu? Well, by the name I'm guessing he was raised a member of the Jainist religion, which isn't Hindu. Jainism is very anti-abortion, which means he is a pretty terrible Jainist, assuming he even identifies as such. Jains aren't supposed to even kill insects. Thank you. I had to Google Jainism, and it confirmed my long-held belief that importing South Asians into the U.S. is-overall-a huge mistake. |
|
Quoted: Sure seems like they're (The lefty ones) pulling strings in a lot of places these days. Wish we could trade them for more D'Souza types. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It seems Communists from India have been causing a lot of problems in this country lately. Dinesh D’Souza is THE man. He seems to be the exception, however. |
|
Quoted: Notice how those Twitter fucks were Indians as well? Something is up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It seems Communists from India have been causing a lot of problems in this country lately. Notice how those Twitter fucks were Indians as well? Something is up. “Something is up”? What’s up is that many imports from South Asia hate traditional Americans, and There’s a racial and cultural component to their disdain. Hopefully we can import more. |
|
Quoted: Maybe the Media wants to be SURE of what they are "claiming" BEFORE publication & broadcasting an "Allegation" naming a specific person ... Something something something Defamation Lawsuit something something something... Besides - nothing going to change as the Leak is already Old News - what will matter is if the Supreme Court & Justice Department can confirm the "allegation" and then bring whatever charges are appropriate against that person(s). Bigger_Hammer View Quote |
|
Quoted: Maybe the Media wants to be SURE of what they are "claiming" BEFORE publication & broadcasting an "Allegation" naming a specific person ... Something something something Defamation Lawsuit something something something... Besides - nothing going to change as the Leak is already Old News - what will matter is if the Supreme Court & Justice Department can confirm the "allegation" and then bring whatever charges are appropriate against that person(s). Bigger_Hammer View Quote Tha fuck man... Delusional |
|
Quoted: Maybe the Media wants to be SURE of what they are "claiming" BEFORE publication & broadcasting an "Allegation" naming a specific person ... Something something something Defamation Lawsuit something something something... Besides - nothing going to change as the Leak is already Old News - what will matter is if the Supreme Court & Justice Department can confirm the "allegation" and then bring whatever charges are appropriate against that person(s). Bigger_Hammer View Quote You should be a consultant, they didn't get the memo about the minor child Kyle Rittenhouse |
|
I believe I heard that name shortly afterwards, but that it was merely speculation. Wake me up when the FBI arrests him. LOL.
|
|
Quoted: Maybe the Media wants to be SURE of what they are "claiming" BEFORE publication & broadcasting an "Allegation" naming a specific person ... Something something something Defamation Lawsuit something something something... Besides - nothing going to change as the Leak is already Old News - what will matter is if the Supreme Court & Justice Department can confirm the "allegation" and then bring whatever charges are appropriate against that person(s). Bigger_Hammer View Quote Are you fucking kidding? Another water carrier for the left. |
|
Quoted: Maybe the Media wants to be SURE of what they are "claiming" BEFORE publication & broadcasting an "Allegation" naming a specific person ... Something something something Defamation Lawsuit something something something... Besides - nothing going to change as the Leak is already Old News - what will matter is if the Supreme Court & Justice Department can confirm the "allegation" and then bring whatever charges are appropriate against that person(s). Bigger_Hammer View Quote This... The dumb among the dumbs is beyond dumb. |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: A Hindu? View Quote Probably a Jain or a descendent of Jains https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jainism But he has clothes and possessions… so probably not! |
|
Quoted: He’s not just a water carrier, he is one of them. View Quote LOL! Literal LOL!! Never Voted for ANY Democrat in 40 years - but You just keep right on making up that sort of bullshit! Obviously suggesting a reasonable & logical reason that in these litigious times for Libel & Defamation cases, any real broadcaster might want to be really really really sure of the facts or at the least have Officials make their statement naming any person charged in the case before 'naming a name' is clearly "a Vast Far Left Conspiracy". For Fucks Sake what an incredible stupidity level you have there. Clearly you don't understand Libel / Defamation - That's O.K. Let me explain it like I would to a 5 year or a Golden Retriever. It costs a LOT of Money in Lawsuits & Settlement money paid to the other party when Broadcasters or Publishers go off half cocked & without actual evidence. See: Richard Jewell Vs. NBC News, CNN, the New York Post, and Piedmont College. Former Atlanta Olympics Security Guard Richard Jewell was falsely accursed for being the Olympic Park Bombers himself. Richard Jewell sued NBC News for this statement made by Tom Brokaw, "The speculation is that the FBI is close to making the case. They probably have enough to arrest him right now, probably enough to prosecute him, but you always want to have enough to convict him as well. There are still some holes in this case." Even though NBC stood by its story, the network agreed to pay Jewell $500,000. Jay Leno also apologized during a Tonight Show episode on October 28, 1996. On July 23, 1997, Jewell sued the New York Post for $15 million in damages, contending that the paper portrayed him in articles, photographs, and an editorial cartoon as an "aberrant" person with a "bizarre employment history" who was probably guilty of the bombing. He eventually settled with the newspaper for an undisclosed amount. Jewell filed suit against his former employer Piedmont College, its president Raymond Cleere, and college spokesman Scott Rawles. Jewell's attorneys contended that Cleere called the FBI and spoke to the Atlanta newspapers, providing them with false information on Jewell and his employment there as a security guard. Jewell's lawsuit accused Cleere of describing Jewell as a "badge-wearing zealot" who "would write epic police reports for minor infractions." The college settled for an undisclosed amount. Or see Nick Sandman (the Maga Hat Kid) Vs. Washington Post, CNN, NBC. The Washington Post Sandmann's family retained lawyers who, in February 2019, filed a US$250 million defamation lawsuit on behalf of Sandmann against The Washington Post. The suit accuses the Post of publishing seven "false and defamatory articles". The complaint alleged that the Post wanted to lead a "mainstream and social media mob of bullies which attacked, vilified, and threatened" Sandmann, that the Post wrongfully targeted and bullied Sandmann "because he was the white, Catholic student wearing a red 'Make America Great Again' souvenir cap on a school field trip" and that the Post "knew and intended that its allegedly defamatory accusations would be republished by others." A spokeswoman for The Washington Post announced that the paper would defend itself against the lawsuit. On July 24, 2020, The Washington Post settled the lawsuit with Sandmann. The terms of the settlement have not been made public. CNN Sandmann's lawyers filed a second lawsuit on his behalf against CNN on March 12, 2019, seeking US$275 million in damages,[56] for allegedly "vicious" and "direct attacks" towards Sandmann. On January 7, 2020, the lawsuit was settled. The terms of the settlement have not been made public. NBCUniversal A third lawsuit was filed on May 1, 2019, seeking US$275 million defamation lawsuit on behalf of Sandmann against NBCUniversal. On November 22, 2019, a judge rejected NBC's attempt to dismiss the lawsuit against it. The lawsuit was settled on December 17, 2021, with Sandmann stating that the terms of the settlement were confidential. But let's not be the least bit Reasonable nor Responsible to actually see the investigation evidence or any actual charges before Raging Besides - as I pointed out - the Overturn of Roe Vs. Wade is old news by this point, as the Official SCOTUS Ruling came out well before the Mid Term. So whatever "fall out" it has in this election cycle was already out there in the air. In fact, it might turn out to have been beneficial for Conservatives. The longer after any "earthquake", the more time it has to sink in & has had time to fade the less most people care. We gun owners see this after every mass school shooting. Idiots rage that "Evil Assault Rifles must be banned" but as weeks and months pass, the urgency & outrage is eroded by other news & stories and the issue fades into the background noise. the Investigation has been underway since the leak occurred and the eventual results will be public knowledge when the investigation has reached the stage where there is ample evidence enough to support the acquisition made & appropriate Charges are filed. In the meanwhile - while lacking actual evidence or official charges, it seems a few of "The Usual Suspects" in good old G.D. just can't wait to go all '88' and rant & rail about "Indians". Bigger_Hammer |
|
Quoted: He’s not just a water carrier, he is one of them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Are you fucking kidding? Another water carrier for the left. He’s not just a water carrier, he is one of them. Attached File |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.